| 0 |
Subject: Pick-the-Pitchers -- FINAL - Friday
Posted by: smartone @work
- [10558714] Fri, Jul 09, 2004, 09:09
Friday, July 9, 2004
Texas (J. Benoit-1) 48 at Boston (B. Arroyo-2) 46, 7:05
Oakland (K. Saarloos-3) 46 at Cleveland (J. Westbrook-4) 40, 7:05
Tampa Bay (J. Halama-5) 42 at NY Yankees (J. Vazquez-6) 52, 7:05
Anaheim (B. Colon-7) 44 at Toronto (R. Halladay-8) 39, 7:05
Pittsburgh (S. Burnett-9) 38 at Montreal (S. Hill-10) 29, 7:05
Atlanta (J. Thomson-11) 43 at Philadelphia (E. Milton-12) 45, 7:05
Kansas City (D. May-13) 29 at Baltimore (E. Bedard-14) 36, 7:35
NY Mets (J. Seo-15) 43 at Florida (A. Burnett-16) 43, 7:35
Seattle (J. Pineiro-17) 32 at Chicago Sox (J. Garland-18) 43, 8:05
Cincinnati (A. Harang-19) 45 at Milwaukee (C. Capuano-20) 44, 8:05
Detroit (G. Knotts-21) 39 at Minnesota (C. Silva-22) 47, 8:10
Chicago Cubs (G. Maddux-23) 46 at St. Louis (J. Marquis-24) 52, 8:10
Colorado (S. Estes-25) 34 at San Diego (D. Wells-26) 46, 10:05
Houston (A. Pettitte-27) 43 at Los Angeles (J. Weaver-28) 46, 10:10
Arizona (R. Johnson-29) 31 at San Francisco (J. Williams-30) 46, 10:15
Courtesy ESPN.com |
| 1 | JeffG
Leader
ID: 1584348
Fri, Jul 09, 2004, 09:28
|
27 - Pettitte (PP)
04 - Westbrook
06 - Vazquez
16 - Burnett
26 - Wells
NP - 01 - Benoit
|
| 2 | clv
Sustainer
ID: 5911351713
Fri, Jul 09, 2004, 09:50
|
29 - RJ (PP)
6 - Vazquez
8 - Halladay
16 - Burnett
26 - Wells
27 - Pettitte
28 - Weaver (NP)
|
| 3 | smartone @work
ID: 10558714
Fri, Jul 09, 2004, 10:50
|
for Caper:
picks for Friday:
Johnson (Ari)
Halladay(Tor)
Wells (SD)
Pettite (Hou)
Vazquez (NYY)
NP-Arroyo (Bos)
|
| 4 | beastiemiked
Sustainer
ID: 3531815
Fri, Jul 09, 2004, 11:25
|
R. Johnson-29
J. Marquis-24
J. Vazquez-6
R. Halladay-8
E. Milton-12
NP
J. Halama-5
|
| 5 | bookie
ID: 394382410
Fri, Jul 09, 2004, 12:47
|
29 - RJ (PP)
6 - Vazquez
8 - Halladay
26 - Wells
27 - Pettite
|
| 6 | wolfer
ID: 58546215
Fri, Jul 09, 2004, 13:27
|
(J. Vazquez-6)
(D. Wells-26)
(R. Johnson-29)
(E. Milton-12)
(R. Halladay-8)
NP
(B. Colon-7)
|
| 7 | smallwhirled
ID: 58521513
Fri, Jul 09, 2004, 13:31
|
29
4
6
16
27
NP 1
|
| 8 | Eugene
ID: 57573013
Fri, Jul 09, 2004, 14:03
|
Thanks for shafting me
|
| 9 | Eugene
ID: 57573013
Fri, Jul 09, 2004, 14:10
|
also explain how my win total yesterday was 4
|
| 10 | Eugene
ID: 57573013
Fri, Jul 09, 2004, 14:22
|
also theres NO way my era was near 12 for thw day.......why dont you ripped me some more
|
| 11 | smartone @work
ID: 10558714
Fri, Jul 09, 2004, 14:22
|
Eugene, your only winner was Wilson who was offset by a Win to Ricado Rodriguez, your NP. Please let me know if I have another calculating error. and... come-on, please don't be so pissed off... what did I do wrong?
|
| 12 | smartone @work
ID: 10558714
Fri, Jul 09, 2004, 14:31
|
4 - Loaiza (PP) ER: 8x2=16, IP: 5.3x2 = 10.6
6 - Curt ER: 3 IP: 5.3
15 - Wilson ER: 3 IP: 6.7
14 - Milwood ER: 3 IP: 5.3
20 - Eaton ER: 5 IP: 6
NP: 1 - Rodriguez: ER: 0 IP: 9*(-)=-9
Total ER: 30
Total IP: 26
and here you get the double-digit ERA
Your biggest mistake was picking RR as your NP... that's life... my picks weren't great either, and believe me, the sun will shine tomorrow and the day-after regardless of our picks
ITS ONLY A GAME
|
| 13 | blue hen
ID: 372102211
Fri, Jul 09, 2004, 14:34
|
Actually, I put some code in their to raise Eugene's team ERA every day.
|
| 14 | Eugene
ID: 57573013
Fri, Jul 09, 2004, 14:35
|
are the pitching innings right
|
| 15 | Eugene
ID: 57573013
Fri, Jul 09, 2004, 14:36
|
Plus rodriquez gave up no runs how do i get a 11 96 era These new rules could not have been in till new game
|
| 16 | smartone @work
ID: 10558714
Fri, Jul 09, 2004, 14:56
|
Eugene, what do you mean by "These new rules could not have been in till new game "?
In order to win this long game, you have to adopt the new rules like everyone else does. You are not forced to play -- though I am happy that you play since in the early rounds you showed that you are among the best.
In any case, this is the first time that this kind of game is being played, and any positive or negative inputs for the future games will be highly appreciated.
Rodriguez: You picked him as a NEGATIVE PITCHER... which means, you thought that he would play BAD: few innings, many ER, BB and Hits, but, he screwed you (and CLE) and had a great outing.
|
| 17 | smartone @work
ID: 10558714
Fri, Jul 09, 2004, 15:03
|
29 - RJ (PP)
9 - Burnett
14 - Bedard
26 - Wells
17 - Pineiro
NP: 5 - Halama
|
| 18 | Piccolos
ID: 55649714
Fri, Jul 09, 2004, 15:58
|
29
27
12
6
23
NP : 21
|
| 19 | smartone @work
ID: 10558714
Fri, Jul 09, 2004, 16:19
|
clv, you picked 6 SP (and a NP), so I'll just take the first 5 unless I hear from you otherwise
|
| 20 | philliephanjr
ID: 28617915
Fri, Jul 09, 2004, 16:20
|
29-RJ
12
8
6
26
NP-22 Silva
|
| 21 | smartone @work
ID: 10558714
Fri, Jul 09, 2004, 16:32
|
I'll start Pettitte (27) instead of Pineiro (17)
|
| 22 | clv
Sustainer
ID: 5911351713
Fri, Jul 09, 2004, 17:26
|
Sorry smartone...It did feel like I was digging awfully deep when I posted those earlier...
29 - RJ (PP)
8 - Vazquez
16 - Burnett
26 - Wells
27 - Pettitte
28 - Weaver (NP)
|
| 23 | Slackjawed Yokel
Leader
ID: 52347519
Fri, Jul 09, 2004, 18:02
|
29 - RJ
6 - Vazquez
8 - Halladay
9 - S Burnett
27 - Pettitte
21 - Knotts (pp)
no way, effin don knotts...
|
| 24 | smartone @work
ID: 10558714
Wed, Jul 14, 2004, 10:27
|
I am posting now Friday's results -- please review and correct me if necessary ... 2 more days to go in the FINALS!
|
| 25 | bookie
ID: 394382410
Wed, Jul 14, 2004, 13:21
|
smartone, check my post in the standings thread...
|
| 26 | smartone @work
ID: 10558714
Wed, Jul 14, 2004, 13:53
|
thanks bookie -- corrected (I didn't paste the correct table)
|
| Rate this thread: | If you wish, you may rate this thread on scale of 1-5. Ratings should indicate how valuable or interesting you believe this thread would be to other users of this forum. A '5' means that this thread is a 'must read'. A '1' means that this is a complete waste of time. If you have previously rated this thread, rating it again will delete your previous rating. If you do not want to rate this thread, but want to see how others have rated it, then click the button without entering a rating, or else click here. |
|
|
|
Post a reply to this message: (But first, how about checking out this sponsor?)
|