| 0 |
Subject: Gurupie Over/Under for 2005
Posted by: blue hen
- [331038201] Mon, Mar 21, 2005, 17:16
Please choose either over or under for each selection:
1. Randy Johnson: 19.5 wins
2. Pedro Martinez: 3.10 ERA
3. Johan Santana: 2.5 ranking in Cy Young voting
4. Oliver Perez: 199.5 strikeouts
5. Adam Dunn: 47.5 home runs
6. Mark Teixeira: .999 OPS
7. Ryan Wagner and Billy Wagner: 34.5 combined saves
8. Zambrano, Prior, Wood: 69.5 starts combined
9. Jim Thome: 149.5 strikeouts
10. Carl Crawford: 58.5 stolen bases |
| 1 | Toral
ID: 22731114
Mon, Mar 21, 2005, 17:19
|
1. Under
2. Over
3. What is a "2.5 ranking" In any case, I choose Under (less performance than expected)
4. Under
5. Under
6. Under
7. Over
8. Under
9. Under
10. Under
Pretty dumb props. You're lucky you're not a bookie, bh.
Toral
|
| 2 | TaRhEElKiD
ID: 0134510
Mon, Mar 21, 2005, 17:27
|
1. OVER
2. OVER
3. UNDER
4. OVER
5. UNDER
6. UNDER
7. OVER
8. UNDER
9. UNDER
10. UNDER
THK
|
| 3 | Bandos
Sustainer
ID: 279492419
Mon, Mar 21, 2005, 17:29
|
1. Over
2. Under
3. Under
4. Over
5. Under
6. Under, not by much
7. Over
8. Under
9. Over
10. Over
|
| 4 | darkside
Dude
ID: 3590317
Mon, Mar 21, 2005, 17:31
|
1. Over
2. Under
3. Under (worse than 2.5)
4. Over
5. Under
6. Under
7. Over
8. Over
9. Under
10.Under
|
| 5 | KrazyKoalaBears
Leader
ID: 517553018
Mon, Mar 21, 2005, 18:25
|
1. UNDER (has only done it 3 times in his career)
2. UNDER (home park advantage)
3. OVER
4. OVER
5. UNDER
6. UNDER (though he'll be closer than last year)
7. OVER (thanks in no part to Ryan)
8. OVER (Z: 30; Wood: 30; Prior: Enough)
9. OVER... WAY OVER
10. UNDER (barely)
|
| 6 | Filthy Rich
ID: 35119816
Mon, Mar 21, 2005, 18:44
|
1. over
2. under
3. under
4. under
5. under
6. over
7. over
8. over
9. under
10. over
|
| 7 | Trip
Sustainer
ID: 13961611
Mon, Mar 21, 2005, 19:12
|
1. O
2. U
3. U
4. U
5. U
6. U
7. O
8. U
9. U
10. U
|
| 8 | blue hen
ID: 331038201
Mon, Mar 21, 2005, 19:14
|
Incidentally, if you think Santana will be #1 or #2 in the voting, you choose under. Switch if you like.
|
| 9 | Toral
ID: 22731114
Mon, Mar 21, 2005, 19:17
|
3. Over. Way over.
|
| 10 | TB
Leader
ID: 031811922
Mon, Mar 21, 2005, 19:29
|
1. Over
2. Under
3. Over
4. Over
5. Under
6. Under
7. Over
8. Over
9. Under
10. Under
|
| 11 | Athletics Guy
ID: 562312118
Mon, Mar 21, 2005, 19:31
|
1. Over
2. Over
3. Over
4. Over
5. Under
6. Under
7. Over
8. Over
9. Under
10. Under
|
| 12 | smallwhirled
ID: 111182021
Mon, Mar 21, 2005, 19:37
|
1. over
2. over
3. under
4. over
5. under
6. under
7. over
8. under
9. under
10. under
|
| 13 | Twarpy
ID: 25255819
Mon, Mar 21, 2005, 21:49
|
1. UNDER
2. OVER
3. UNDER
4. UNDER
5. UNDER
6. UNDER
7. OVER
8. OVER
9. UNDER
10. UNDER
|
| 14 | JeffG
Leader
ID: 01584348
Mon, Mar 21, 2005, 22:41
|
1. U
2. U
3. O
4. O
5. U
6. U
7. O
8. U
9. O
10. U
|
| 15 | Twarpy
Leader
ID: 386242821
Tue, Mar 22, 2005, 00:18
|
Just read about #3, change it to Over please.
|
| 16 | blue hen
ID: 353412123
Tue, Mar 22, 2005, 00:34
|
1. under
2. under
3. over
4. over
5. over
6. under
7. over
8. over
9. over
10. under
|
| 17 | Chris
ID: 4708114
Tue, Mar 22, 2005, 04:03
|
sure, why not...
1. Under
2. Under
3. Under
4. Over
5. Under
6. Over(just to go against the grain, since he's got a pretty decent shot at it
7. Over
8. Over
9. Under
10. Under
|
| 18 | Razor
ID: 36241218
Tue, Mar 22, 2005, 09:22
|
1. Under
2. Over
3. Under
4. Over
5. Under
6. Under
7. Over
8. Under
9. Over
10. Over
|
| 19 | Peter N.
ID: 44253219
Tue, Mar 22, 2005, 09:37
|
1. Under
2. Over
3. Over
4. Over
5. Under
6. Over
7. Over
8. Over
9. Under
10. Over
|
| 20 | KTx
ID: 401482412
Tue, Mar 22, 2005, 10:38
|
1. under
2. over
3. under
4. over
5. under
6. under
7. over
8. under
9. over
10. under
|
| Rate this thread: | If you wish, you may rate this thread on scale of 1-5. Ratings should indicate how valuable or interesting you believe this thread would be to other users of this forum. A '5' means that this thread is a 'must read'. A '1' means that this is a complete waste of time. If you have previously rated this thread, rating it again will delete your previous rating. If you do not want to rate this thread, but want to see how others have rated it, then click the button without entering a rating, or else click here. |
|
|
|
Post a reply to this message: (But first, how about checking out this sponsor?)
|