| 0 |
Subject: NFL Reallignment
Posted by: Kings Fan
- [10283113] Wed, Feb 06, 2002, 13:41
Anyone know where I could find the new division reallignments for the NFL? |
| 1 | steve houpt
ID: 16045288
Wed, Feb 06, 2002, 13:58
|
No link. But had a standings sheet and had put new conferences in column. If I copied correctly when I read realignment, these are new divisions.
AFC-E
NEW ENGLAND
MIAMI
NY JETS
BUFFALO
AFC-N
PITTSBURGH
BALTIMORE
CLEVELAND
CINCINNATI
AFC-S
TENNESSEE
JACKSONVILLE
INDIANAPOLIS
[HOUSTON]
AFC-W
OAKLAND
DENVER
KANSAS CITY
SAN DIEGO
NFC-E
PHILADELPHIA
WASHINGTON
NY GIANTS
DALLAS
NFC-N
CHICAGO
GREEN BAY
MINNESOTA
DETROIT
NFC-S
TAMPA BAY
ATLANTA
NEW ORLEANS
CAROLINA
NFC-W
SAINT LOUIS
SAN FRANCISCO
SEATTLE
ARIZONA
|
| 2 | Mark L
Leader
ID: 4444938
Wed, Feb 06, 2002, 14:59
|
"NFC North." Yuck. At least it fits well with the concept of frozen tundra.
Apropos of nothing, anyone remember the "four C" NFL division names in, I believe, the late 60s?
|
| 3 | Toral
Sustainer
ID: 2111201313
Wed, Feb 06, 2002, 16:22
|
Central-Capital-Coastal-Century
(Had to Cheat to get Century)
Toral
|
| 4 | Mark L
Leader
ID: 4444938
Wed, Feb 06, 2002, 16:59
|
Toral - You are, of course, correct. (I remembered them from football cards, which I guess is a form of cheating.)
|
| 5 | Mike D
Donor
ID: 50072914
Wed, Feb 06, 2002, 23:12
|
I copied this from this thread:
Subject: 2002 Schedules
Posted by: biliruben - Sustainer [3502218] Tue, Jan 08, 2002, 16:18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ESPN lists the 2002 schedules for each team.
8, 4-team divisions, with only 2 games dependent upon the prior season's performance. Given that I am a Bill's fan and was looking forward to a cake sked, I am a bit disappointed. That said, I think this is the right way to go. With the level of parity in the league these days, a team can turn itself around in 1 or 2 years, making it less necessary for schedules to be heavily biased, and sometimes difficult to successfully implement in any case, given that it isn't clear who the quality teams really are.
1 Mike D.
ID: 39027310
Tue, Jan 08, 2002, 19:29 Wow, the Eagles schedule is tough---assuming the NFC East is better than this year, which it should be. Eagles have the home and home with their division (Dallas/Wash/NY Giants), then the 2 divisions they play are the NFC West and the AFC South, both of which look very tough next year (NFC West = Rams/49ers/Seattle/Arizona and the AFC South = Tennessee/Jacksonville/Indy/Houston).
Then......the 2 "throw ins" are Chicago and Tampa Bay..........wow! I guess that makes sense though given their record this year and the weighted system. With free agency, who really knows anyway.
|
| 6 | TimmyBogar
ID: 61161213
Tue, Feb 12, 2002, 14:19
|
How much do the Bucs love this new reallignment, replacing Chicago, Green Bay, & Minnesota with Atlanta, Carolina & New Orleans. If they ever get a coach, they look to have some easy wins.
|
| 7 | Irish All Stars
ID: 48931413
Thu, Feb 14, 2002, 10:18
|
Mike D
It was good to see another Bills fan in here. We will be alright this year. Take care
|
| 8 | Mike D
Donor
ID: 4215277
Thu, Feb 14, 2002, 23:43
|
Eagle fan here, Irish. Sorry. ;)
|
| Rate this thread: | If you wish, you may rate this thread on scale of 1-5. Ratings should indicate how valuable or interesting you believe this thread would be to other users of this forum. A '5' means that this thread is a 'must read'. A '1' means that this is a complete waste of time. If you have previously rated this thread, rating it again will delete your previous rating. If you do not want to rate this thread, but want to see how others have rated it, then click the button without entering a rating, or else click here. |
|
|
|
Post a reply to this message: (But first, how about checking out this sponsor?)
|
|