| 0 |
Subject: Branch to Seattle
Posted by: blue hen
- Leader [710321114] Mon, Sep 11, 2006, 13:24
Makes him a pro bowler, right? |
| 1 | Guru
ID: 10841817
Mon, Sep 11, 2006, 15:12
|
You mean like Earl Anthony and Nelson Burton?
|
| 2 | blue hen
Leader
ID: 710321114
Mon, Sep 11, 2006, 15:41
|
I remember Earl Anthony. Man, that guy was good. So much better than Walter Ray.
I'm thinking Branch is going to play in the big game in Hawaii.
|
| 3 | holt
ID: 22726517
Mon, Sep 11, 2006, 17:30
|
lol
my dad plays competitive horseshoes (yes there is such a thing) and knows walter ray williams. he actually switched to pitching horseshoes left-handed a year or two ago and still manages to place 2nd at the world tournament (whether to show off, or to protect his bowling arm, we don't know).
|
| 4 | The Beezer
Leader
ID: 191202817
Mon, Sep 11, 2006, 18:45
|
Just out of curiousity, I had to see if PBA.com had a fantasy league. They do not. I guess best ball would be a bit too easy, eh?
Regarding Branch, I don't think this will make him a Pro Bowl guy, but I think both teams made a great trade here. Being able to roll out DJax, Branch, Burleson, and Engram as a 4-WR set is pretty scary, especially with Alexander in the backfield.
|
| 5 | Texas Flood
ID: 8762917
Wed, Sep 13, 2006, 14:35
|
This should be posted on the poly boards "Things that make you go...WTF?"
Branch gets 39 mil for 6 yrears, WTF!
|
| 6 | Motley Crue
Dude
ID: 439372011
Wed, Sep 13, 2006, 14:37
|
He'll re-do that in two years, and if not, he'll be cut.
I am surprised that Seattle has collected so many name brand WR's. What are they going to do with all of those guys? It's like the Yankees' rotation.
|
| 7 | Ref
Donor
ID: 539581218
Wed, Sep 13, 2006, 14:54
|
Perhaps but he gets $23 mil over the firest 3 years I think.
|
| 8 | rooter
ID: 298341315
Wed, Sep 13, 2006, 16:34
|
Just out of curiousity, I had to see if PBA.com had a fantasy league. They do not.
The used to. ESPN had some uber-fantasy challenge that would add up your scores from every type of league that they ran. I had a fantasy fishing team at one point.
|
| 9 | boikin
ID: 59831214
Wed, Sep 13, 2006, 16:37
|
What are they going to do with all of those guys? It's like the Yankees' rotation. score 9 pionts.
i think my d. jax draft pick is going to suck now.
|
| 10 | TB
Sherpa
ID: 031811922
Wed, Sep 13, 2006, 20:21
|
I am surprised that Seattle has collected so many name brand WR's. What are they going to do with all of those guys? It's like the Yankees' rotation.
It is a headache for a fantasy manager. I was thinking about dumping Engram, who is bench depth as my 5th WR, for someone with more upside. The only problem was that the three WR available who looked like decent grabs (Colston, Northcutt, and Cotchery) were all claimed. I suppose I could stow him on the bench for a couple weeks and see how it shakes out.
|
| 11 | rooter
ID: 488201411
Thu, Sep 14, 2006, 12:20
|
I am surprised that Seattle has collected so many name brand WRs. What are they going to do with all of those guys?
I can not believe they gave up a 1st round pick for Branch. He has never had over 1000 yards or more than 5tds in a season.
|
| 12 | Ender
ID: 5963859
Thu, Sep 14, 2006, 17:08
|
That's what I was thinking. I won't say Branch is without skill, but I will say what has this guy ever really done? I don't think he's worth a 1st round pick.
|
| 13 | sarge33rd
ID: 257222410
Thu, Sep 14, 2006, 17:38
|
I had a fantasy fishing team at one point.
ROFLMAO...Now THAT belongs on the poli board WTF thread!
|
| Rate this thread: | If you wish, you may rate this thread on scale of 1-5. Ratings should indicate how valuable or interesting you believe this thread would be to other users of this forum. A '5' means that this thread is a 'must read'. A '1' means that this is a complete waste of time. If you have previously rated this thread, rating it again will delete your previous rating. If you do not want to rate this thread, but want to see how others have rated it, then click the button without entering a rating, or else click here. |
|
|
|
Post a reply to this message: (But first, how about checking out this sponsor?)
|