| 0 |
Subject: trade help
Posted by: smiles
- [5745283] Fri, Sep 15, 2006, 15:46
tiki and holt for LJ
or
tiki and s. smith for LJ
I would be getting LJ, is this a bad trade? |
| 1 | leggestand
Leader
ID: 451036518
Fri, Sep 15, 2006, 15:49
|
Bad trade. Don't do it. Tiki should end up a top 6 or so back this year and Holt and Smith will likely both end up top 10 WR's. I'd stay away from LJ if the cost is two studs.
|
| 2 | Perm Dude
ID: 16858158
Fri, Sep 15, 2006, 15:52
|
I agree. Unless Smith is riding your bench because you have too many studs already at that position, you are moving 2-for-1.
|
| 3 | smiles
ID: 5745283
Fri, Sep 15, 2006, 15:54
|
Donovan McNabb QB
Tiki Barber RB
Thomas Jones RB
Dominic Rhodes RB
Steve Smith WR
Torry Holt WR
Dallas Clark TE
Nate Kaeding K
Cincinnati Bengals Def/ST
----- Bench -----
Brett Favre QB
Musa Smith RB
Cedric Cobbs RB
Ron Dayne RB
Kevan Barlow RB
Mike Anderson RB
Ladell Betts RB
Keyshawn Johnson WR
Matt Jones WR
Bubba Franks TE
It's a 12 team league, drafted 4th this year... no PPR, TE get 1 point for every 7.5 yards, everyone else 1 pt for every 10
I'm weak at TE and RB..
Any suggestions?
|
| 4 | smiles
ID: 5745283
Fri, Sep 15, 2006, 15:55
|
we play 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 QB, 1 TE, 1 K , 1 DEF, 1 FLEX (TE/WR/RB)
|
| 5 | smiles
ID: 5745283
Fri, Sep 15, 2006, 15:56
|
i drafted alot of scrub RBs incase one of my starters goes down or lose their jobs..
|
| 6 | leggestand
Leader
ID: 451036518
Fri, Sep 15, 2006, 16:04
|
You're not really weak at RB, and trading Tiki for LJ doesn't make you much stronger there. If anything, I'd say you are weak at WR (depth-wise), as the drop from Smith/Holt to M. Jones/Johnson is pretty severe, while your RB's trend downwards pretty evenly. I'd hold off on trading and maybe wait until Barlow gets the 20+ carry game, which will come, and try to send him off with Clark for a 2nd tier TE, like Watson/Gonzo/Crumpler.
|
| 7 | smiles
ID: 5745283
Fri, Sep 15, 2006, 16:09
|
wow sound advice, thanks!
|
| 8 | smiles
ID: 5745283
Fri, Sep 15, 2006, 16:10
|
i'm still waiting for matt jones to break out this year..
|
| 9 | Motley Crue
Dude
ID: 439372011
Fri, Sep 15, 2006, 16:11
|
Gosh, Gonzo is second tier now? That sucks for him!
|
| 10 | smiles
ID: 5745283
Fri, Sep 15, 2006, 16:13
|
gonzo was 2nd tier last year :(
|
| 11 | sarge33rd
ID: 257222410
Fri, Sep 15, 2006, 16:14
|
With Huard at QB, and no Willy Roaf to pass block... he's 3rd tier.
|
| 12 | leggestand
Leader
ID: 451036518
Fri, Sep 15, 2006, 16:18
|
MC, seeing where he was drafted this year, I imagine Gonzo is now 2nd tier. In one of my drafts he was the 7th TE off the board, behind Gates, Heap, Shockey, Witten, Cooley, and Crumpler (and I like to think that the league is relatively savvy league!). Gonzo basically did nothing last week until garbage time as well, but he had quite the garbage time!
He was 3rd off the board in RIFC, but that was the highest I saw him go in my drafts.
|
| 13 | smiles
ID: 5745283
Fri, Sep 15, 2006, 16:55
|
man drafting steve smith in 2nd round at the 4 spot was a huge mistake... should of went for gore..
any word on steve smith?
|
| 14 | sarge33rd
ID: 257222410
Fri, Sep 15, 2006, 16:57
|
Steve Smith, WR CAR
News: Steve Smith, the league's top receiver last season, missed practice again Friday with the Carolina Panthers because of a hamstring injury and is questionable for this weekend's game at Minnesota.
Analysis: Smith has been out since straining his right hamstring in practice Sept. 5. Without Smith, the Panthers failed to score a touchdown in their 20-6 season-opening loss to Atlanta. Drew Carter most likely would replace Smith against the Vikings if he can't go. It's likely that Smith will be a gametime decision if he is not ruled out earlier, but don't expect to have him since coaches normally sit players who don't practice on Friday
|
| 15 | sarge33rd
ID: 257222410
Fri, Sep 15, 2006, 16:57
|
FROM CBSSPSORTSLINE
|
| 16 | smiles
ID: 5745283
Fri, Sep 15, 2006, 17:04
|
just confirms that i was an idiot to take him in the 2nd rd :(
|
| 17 | sarge33rd
ID: 257222410
Fri, Sep 15, 2006, 17:17
|
nah...just worked out that way. Gore at 2.4 would have been a stretch at the time.
|
| 18 | smiles
ID: 5745283
Fri, Sep 15, 2006, 22:46
|
St. Louis Rams DEF/ST vs @SFO
or
Cincinnati Bengals DEF/ST vs CLE
|
| 19 | Kyle
ID: 52753312
Sat, Sep 16, 2006, 03:55
|
Bungles VS. Clev.
San Fran seems to be getting it's pieces together and I think Alex Smith will be a solid QB in the future. That being said Cincy's dismantling of KC was a Masterpiece (pardon the pun) and I think this D is for real.
|
| Rate this thread: | If you wish, you may rate this thread on scale of 1-5. Ratings should indicate how valuable or interesting you believe this thread would be to other users of this forum. A '5' means that this thread is a 'must read'. A '1' means that this is a complete waste of time. If you have previously rated this thread, rating it again will delete your previous rating. If you do not want to rate this thread, but want to see how others have rated it, then click the button without entering a rating, or else click here. |
|
|
|
Post a reply to this message: (But first, how about checking out this sponsor?)
|