| 0 |
Subject: Week 2 Games
Posted by: Ref
- Donor [539581218] Sun, Sep 17, 2006, 13:26
I don't think Carr will do much this week if the first two drives are any indication. Thus far every pass play has resulted in a sack and two fumbles with one lost. 14-0 Colts so Carr is going to have to pass a lot. |
| 1 | smallwhirled
ID: 408271610
Sun, Sep 17, 2006, 14:00
|
Atlanta looks very good again. Maybe this is the year for Vick. Unstoppable on the ground.
|
| 2 | Electroman
ID: 44651412
Sun, Sep 17, 2006, 14:05
|
How 'bout them Iggles?
|
| 3 | sarge33rd
ID: 76442923
Sun, Sep 17, 2006, 14:12
|
TB's D secretly and quietly go to hell over the offseason????? They've barely stopped a bloody nose so far.
|
| 4 | Gary
ID: 55492216
Sun, Sep 17, 2006, 14:49
|
A couple of things I learned so far from watching the games the first couple of weeks.
1. the Packers are not as bad as they looked in week 1
2. The Lions are not as good as they looked in week 1
3. The Bears defense is the real deal. They looked very good all be it against two teams that were picked to not be to good this year.
|
| 5 | smallwhirled
ID: 408271610
Sun, Sep 17, 2006, 14:56
|
Atlanta's running game cannot be stopped.
|
| 6 | Pancho Villa
ID: 366352418
Sun, Sep 17, 2006, 16:08
|
Ryan Longwell throws a TD pass for Minny. He's on my RIFC team, wonder if AOL has the capacity to award him those points.
Anyone have a clue as to how that works?
|
| 7 | Punk42AE
Donor
ID: 036635522
Sun, Sep 17, 2006, 16:20
|
This NYG-PHL game is amazing.
|
| 8 | Mike D
Leader
ID: 041831612
Sun, Sep 17, 2006, 16:22
|
Eagles have been pathetic in the 4th (and late 3rd) and deserve to be tied.
|
| 9 | sarge33rd
ID: 76442923
Sun, Sep 17, 2006, 16:35
|
Minn in OT!!!!! 2-0 WOOT!!!!!!
|
| 10 | sarge33rd
ID: 76442923
Sun, Sep 17, 2006, 16:37
|
Phi had this game won, and then they started taking it for granted it looked like.
|
| 11 | sarge33rd
ID: 76442923
Sun, Sep 17, 2006, 16:54
|
Unless they fumble, or Feely chokes...NYG are gonna win this thing.
|
| 12 | sarge33rd
ID: 76442923
Sun, Sep 17, 2006, 16:57
|
lol, or the Gts could commit enough penalties to take themselves out of FG range.
|
| 13 | sarge33rd
ID: 76442923
Sun, Sep 17, 2006, 16:57
|
unbelieveable.
|
| 14 | sarge33rd
ID: 76442923
Sun, Sep 17, 2006, 16:59
|
whens the last time a QB raan for more yds than he passed for?
lol Vick w/97 PaYds and 127 Ru Yds.
|
| 15 | Mike D
Leader
ID: 041831612
Sun, Sep 17, 2006, 17:00
|
These fast DBs.....why are they always falling over on lob passes? Doesn't matter what the size difference is if the DB is falling down and never jumps. Pathetic.
|
| 16 | sarge33rd
ID: 76442923
Sun, Sep 17, 2006, 17:06
|
As far as a starting D goes, its looking like any D playoing OAK, MIA or TEN is a good bet.
|
| 17 | barilko6
ID: 13821022
Sun, Sep 17, 2006, 17:10
|
This is two weeks in a row that the Vikings have screwed me over...
|
| 18 | sarge33rd
ID: 76442923
Sun, Sep 17, 2006, 17:13
|
gee, I've felt that way, pretty much for the past 34 years. roflmao Get used to it, they're pretty good at it. :)
|
| 19 | Ref
Donor
ID: 539581218
Sun, Sep 17, 2006, 18:42
|
Jets' Coles is pretty impressive.
|
| 20 | GoatLocker
Sustainer
ID: 060151121
Sun, Sep 17, 2006, 18:46
|
Do ya think we can convince the NFL to change the sched and let the Chargers only play the Raiders and Titans this year LOL
Cliff
|
| 21 | sarge33rd
ID: 76442923
Sun, Sep 17, 2006, 18:57
|
is SF for real?????????
|
| 22 | Kyle
ID: 52753312
Sun, Sep 17, 2006, 19:56
|
I am glad I stayed away from Denver's RBBC. The Bell's alternated drives and Tatum finished with slightly more carries and yards because Shanahan trusted him with the touches late in the game. I don't see a 1000 yard back here unless one of them goes down.
|
| 23 | sarge33rd
ID: 76442923
Mon, Sep 18, 2006, 20:38
|
Big Ben is starting, with a body temp of 104. Wonder how long before he dehydrates?
|
| 24 | sarge33rd
ID: 76442923
Tue, Sep 19, 2006, 08:20
|
NO vs Atl next MOnday night. Both at 2-0. Lets add NO being 2-0, to the list of unforeseen happenings in the nFL YTD.
|
| Rate this thread: | If you wish, you may rate this thread on scale of 1-5. Ratings should indicate how valuable or interesting you believe this thread would be to other users of this forum. A '5' means that this thread is a 'must read'. A '1' means that this is a complete waste of time. If you have previously rated this thread, rating it again will delete your previous rating. If you do not want to rate this thread, but want to see how others have rated it, then click the button without entering a rating, or else click here. |
|
|
|
Post a reply to this message: (But first, how about checking out this sponsor?)
|