| 0 |
Subject: TSN Football Sortibles Suggestion
Posted by: JerryHenderson
- [2191656] Thu, Oct 05, 2006, 08:22
I noticed that you have "OPPOSING DEFENSE" as one of the options under Position.
Why not take this a step further and add
OPPOSING QUARTERBACKS
OPPOSING RUNNING BACKS
OPPOSING WIDE RECEIVERS
OPPOSING TIGHT ENDS
OPPOSING KICKERS
Seems like that would be useful information also. Just wondering how difficult that would be. Thanks. |
| 1 | Guru
ID: 330592710
Thu, Oct 05, 2006, 09:51
|
1. Difficult, but not impossible. I don't have my data organized that way, except for defenses.
2. There's no reason to reinvent that wheel, as it's already being provided. Here's the table for stats through week #4.
|
| 2 | JerryHenderson
ID: 4796611
Fri, Oct 06, 2006, 13:11
|
Yea, I saw that thread but like you said it had a denominator problem at the time I made this post.
For some reason TSN Fantasy Source is also coming up with different numbers on this.
Thanks Guru
|
| 3 | mjd
Sustainer
ID: 501381415
Fri, Oct 06, 2006, 14:56
|
Fantasy Source numbers were not reliable last year and last I heard the problem has not been fixed this year.
|
| 4 | Guru
ID: 1935512
Fri, Oct 06, 2006, 15:13
|
I think I may have figured out a way to do this efficiently as part of my regular routine. Let me work on it, and maybe I can take RSF off the hook.
Probably not until next week, though.
|
| 5 | RecycledSpinalFluid
ID: 56710281
Fri, Oct 06, 2006, 15:43
|
No sweat off my nose either way. I'm just parsing your data, as it is.
|
| 6 | Guru
ID: 1935512
Sat, Oct 07, 2006, 11:39
|
I've got a beta version of this posted already:
http://rotoguru1.com/cgi-bin/fstats6.cgi
It should work for any position or opposing position. I checked it against RSF's numbers, and it matches up very well. I noted a few differences in the WR list, which may be due to IPOs added since the start of the season, since I would have those player's stats included since day 1, rather than since they were made eligible. (I haven't confirmed that this is the source of the differences, but it seems plausible.)
Please test out this version and let me know if anything looks off, not only for the opposing stats, but also for regular reports as well.
If you drill down to look at game by game details you can see those for opposing positions, but I want to do some reformating of that page, probably consolidating all of the opposing position detail on one table.
|
| 7 | JerryHenderson
ID: 4796611
Sun, Oct 08, 2006, 00:55
|
Good stuff Guru.
Thank You.
|
| 8 | mjd
Sustainer
ID: 501381415
Sun, Oct 08, 2006, 13:02
|
I like all the info on one table (like RSF's), but I also really like the breakdown of individual weeks and home/away designations. Good stuff, Guru. Thanks
|
| 9 | Guru
ID: 1935512
Mon, Oct 09, 2006, 10:07
|
Seems to be working, so I released it to the regular URL.
|
| Rate this thread: | If you wish, you may rate this thread on scale of 1-5. Ratings should indicate how valuable or interesting you believe this thread would be to other users of this forum. A '5' means that this thread is a 'must read'. A '1' means that this is a complete waste of time. If you have previously rated this thread, rating it again will delete your previous rating. If you do not want to rate this thread, but want to see how others have rated it, then click the button without entering a rating, or else click here. |
|
|
|
Post a reply to this message: (But first, how about checking out this sponsor?)
|