0 |
Subject: Fantasy Football Week 1 Roster Question
Posted by: Baller222
- [27282722] Fri, Sep 05, 2008, 02:01
On one am I teams I am trying to decide who to start as my #3 WR for week 1. Nate Burleson or Deshawn Jackson. Also I am trying to decide for my #2 rb between Matt Forte and Justin Fargas. What do you think?
|
1 | TB
ID: 395122110 Fri, Sep 05, 2008, 04:14
|
I would start Fargas at home against the Broncos week one. Look what the Raiders did to the Broncos rushing the ball last season. I do expect the Broncos to be focused on stopping the run to try and force Russell to have to throw the ball, but I also expect to see the Raiders focus on running with Fargas still getting the bulk of the carries.
My choice would be Nate Burleson for the WR. He should have a huge week.
|
2 | Vee
ID: 44644109 Fri, Sep 05, 2008, 17:25
|
Fargas and Jackson.
I know what Burleson can do...absolutely nothing. At least you don't know anything about DeSean Jackson. With Reggie Brown being OUT for Sunday's game, you gotta go with the devil you DON'T know this time.
|
3 | judy Leader
ID: 7771722 Fri, Sep 05, 2008, 18:12
|
Jackson will also be a return man...
|
4 | Vee
ID: 8750149 Wed, Sep 10, 2008, 20:34
|
Hey Baller22, where's the thank you?
|
5 | Baller222
ID: 27282722 Wed, Sep 10, 2008, 21:19
|
Thank you very much! -)
|
6 | Vee
ID: 8750149 Thu, Sep 11, 2008, 20:33
|
Excellent. I was hoping you weren't gonna listen to TB. Not this time. He's usually right though.
|
7 | TB
ID: 395122110 Thu, Sep 11, 2008, 21:29
|
Burleson had a good week as well (like 60+ yards and a TD), not sure what you are talking about. Forte would have been a better play than Fargas, from both of us, but in reality all his options were pretty good.
|
8 | TB
ID: 395122110 Thu, Sep 11, 2008, 21:35
|
RIFC scoring: Jackson D, - 20.30 (2nd ranked WR) Burleson N, - 17.40 (5th ranked WR)
I'm guessing he would have been off starting both of them over whomever else he had on his roster unless it was Eddie Royal or Hines Ward.
RB 7) Forte - 20.10 points 21) Fargas - 10.90 points
|
9 | TB
ID: 395122110 Thu, Sep 11, 2008, 21:41
|
In RG24 scoring: 12) Burleson - 12 16) Jackson, DeSean - 10.6
Looks like no points for return yards, which is actually fairly standard in most traditional leagues, so Burleson was a better play.
|
10 | Vee
ID: 44644109 Fri, Sep 12, 2008, 15:13
|
I didn't see Burleson's TD. My fault.
Like I said before, TB is always right.
|
| Rate this thread: | If you wish, you may rate this thread on scale of 1-5. Ratings should indicate how valuable or interesting you believe this thread would be to other users of this forum. A '5' means that this thread is a 'must read'. A '1' means that this is a complete waste of time. If you have previously rated this thread, rating it again will delete your previous rating. If you do not want to rate this thread, but want to see how others have rated it, then click the button without entering a rating, or else click here. |
|
|
Post a reply to this message: (But first, how about checking out this sponsor?)
|