| 0 |
Subject: Hasselbeck or Rivers?
Posted by: gibby88
- [14059715] Wed, Sep 09, 2009, 17:18
We are at a stalemate on who to start. Rivers is clearly a better QB, but MH faces St Louis @ SEA and their porous defense.
Any insight would be appreciated.
Rivers is @ OAK.
Thanks. |
| 1 | Kyle
Sustainer
ID: 052753312
Wed, Sep 09, 2009, 18:49
|
Hasselbeck.
I think with the STL defense being abysmal, coincided with SEA's offense coming back and Hasselbeck having a good WR (Housh) will lead to a pretty good season.
|
| 2 | gibby88
ID: 43821918
Wed, Sep 09, 2009, 19:21
|
I have to agree so far. Any others want to weigh in????
|
| 3 | Electroman
ID: 565182111
Wed, Sep 09, 2009, 19:36
|
Jones and Spencer out.
So Hasselback will have have 2 starters out on his offensive line. For sure Spags will want his D to try to pressure the QB. Oaklands best passrusher hasn't reported yet, to the best of my knowledge. Me, I would start Rivers.
|
| 4 | Slizz
ID: 557152814
Sat, Sep 12, 2009, 11:02
|
Hasselbeck. Rivers hardly puts up big #'s vs. Oakland b/c of their porous run defense (avg. 154 yards against per game - WORST in the NFL). Therefore, expect San Diego to run run run. While you probably drafted Rivers early for big games, I just don't see it happening as his splits point to no better than 225 yards and 2 TDs. Rivers Split Stats - 2008
|
| Rate this thread: | If you wish, you may rate this thread on scale of 1-5. Ratings should indicate how valuable or interesting you believe this thread would be to other users of this forum. A '5' means that this thread is a 'must read'. A '1' means that this is a complete waste of time. If you have previously rated this thread, rating it again will delete your previous rating. If you do not want to rate this thread, but want to see how others have rated it, then click the button without entering a rating, or else click here. |
|
|
|
Post a reply to this message: (But first, how about checking out this sponsor?)
|