| 0 |
Subject: Battle Of the Ages - Week 7 Standings
Posted by: Promize
- Sustainer [19431422] Wed, Oct 23, 2002, 12:46
Youngins | Youngins | | -------------------------- | This Week | Total | | Peter N. | 1322 | 11144 | | TaRhEElKiD_16 | 1215 | 10301 | | The Second Stringers | 1267 | 10140 | | Chicago Serbs | 1066 | 10137 | | beebop | 1309 | 9689 | | leggestand_23 | 1035 | 9288 | | Kiwi2 | 1251 | 8895 | | Avi's Dolphins | 731 | 7395 | | Sheepac17 | 1110 | 5987 | | Total Youngins | | 82976 | | | | | Oldies | | | | -------------------------- | This Week | Total | | deepsnapper's pongers | 1538 | 11586 | | Old Possum's Practical Cats | 1542 | 11013 | | root88_oldman | 1703 | 10683 | | GoatLocker's Ancients | 1828 | 9692 | | C.C. SOLDIERS | 983 | 9408 | | Taxman Oldies | 1259 | 9281 | | RSF vs Rodan | 1366 | 9133 | | Old_Gold | 702 | 8906 | | PromizeBOA | 1371 | 8676 | | Total Oldies | | 88378 | | | | Oldies lead by: 5402
Highest Score This Week : Goatlocker's Ancients 1828
Lowest Score This Week : Old Gold 702
|
| 1 | RecycledSpinalFluid
ID: 211013916
Wed, Oct 23, 2002, 12:51
|
Too funny, but my "This Week" score beats all the snot nosed diaper wearing kiddies, but places 6th amoung the elder statesmen.
|
| 2 | WiddleAvi
ID: 208361511
Wed, Oct 23, 2002, 21:30
|
Wow did I have a bad week !! And to think that I used a few trades to get my "good" lineup.
|
| 3 | jd
ID: 23958248
Thu, Oct 24, 2002, 11:01
|
RSF,
Too bad your total score would only place you 7th in the Youngins.
|
| 4 | RecycledSpinalFluid
ID: 42121814
Thu, Oct 24, 2002, 11:51
|
Which, amazingly, is the same slot I am on with the oldies. Hey, consistancy counts for something!
|
| 5 | Promize
Sustainer
ID: 19431422
Thu, Oct 24, 2002, 12:01
|
I took a look at trades recently, looks like everyone is being honest in our league... Which is great news... Temptation is bad, so I hope people don't buy any.
I'm down to 0, so gotta make some important picks this week I guess..
|
| 6 | RecycledSpinalFluid
ID: 42121814
Thu, Oct 24, 2002, 12:04
|
Dang Promize, you're out of trades already? Wheres that Trade-O-Holics thread?
If someone buys trades for this game, then something is seriously wrong with them. This is about fun (and kicking the kiddies butts as usual!)
|
| 7 | Promize
Sustainer
ID: 19431422
Thu, Oct 24, 2002, 12:17
|
Yah, I had to burn some trades to get a bit more competitive... I was scoring worse then the youngins for awhile...
:-)
But searching through the league, im not the only one low on trades.
|
| 8 | root88
ID: 359101014
Thu, Oct 24, 2002, 13:59
|
We picked up 2000 points on the young-uns this week. That's gotta hurt. :P
|
| 9 | Purple Pimp at Work
ID: 45632311
Fri, Oct 25, 2002, 20:55
|
Jim Miller realyl screwed me no pts last week no hes not starting again so I have to sell him
|
| 10 | RecycledSpinalFluid
ID: 211013916
Mon, Oct 28, 2002, 02:45
|
Holy smokes! I just went through to see what kind of trade conservation is going on in this league and I gotta say it is pretty much none! Sheepac17 leads the way with 11, but I'm not sure that team is really active (you know how kids quit things so easily, nowadays) then myself and beebop have 9. The drop off after that is 5! 5! and I think there was only one of those.
Maybe I'm approaching this in the wrong way. Or then again, maybe not.
|
| 11 | pyrodave
ID: 50919289
Mon, Oct 28, 2002, 10:27
|
Oldies, Sorry about last weeks score, but at least I do have 5 trades left, and my week 8 score looks good and I still have McNabb tonite.
I really thought I would do better than I have this year. WHAT IS WITH THE YOUNGINS' ALL TALK AND NO SKILL.
Thanks for letting me play. Good luck and fun to everyone.
|
| 12 | C.C. SOLDIERS
ID: 467393122
Mon, Oct 28, 2002, 20:06
|
I'm sorry too guys. I was inactive this week. Things just got extremely hectic around my parts and fantasy sports slipped my mind. But I have not given up. I'm gonna finish the season.
|
| 13 | RecycledSpinalFluid
ID: 42121814
Mon, Oct 28, 2002, 20:18
|
Thats OK C.C. SOLDIERS, we'll just pass it off as a Senior Moment...
|
|
|
|
Post a reply to this message: (But first, how about checking out this sponsor?)
|