| 0 |
Subject: "Anti Gravity"
Posted by: Gmoney16
- [5810561615] Thu, Jan 01, 2004, 23:39
Interested in what people think about this concept.
What about the idea of what I have termed "Anti-Gravity":
With "Gravity" A player decreases in prices if not held by approx. 2% of owners.
So if a player would hit what I call Anti Gravity (Let's say 60%), a player could increase by 30K every day until they reached a price level that would take them closer to others producing at their level.
Let's face it, anyone in this thing has Randolph. However, if ZR continued to rise to say about 6-7 million, you would see players like K-mart, Walker, Kirilenko, etc. creating additional options for maangers at the same price range.
This may cause owners to move out of him and into other players creating more variables amongst the rosters. Without "Anti-Gravity" everyone has Randolph until he hits poor schedules stretches.
Guys like Randolph happen every year. It was Stoudemire last year and I think J. Oneal the year before. It can be tough to price out every player before the season starts for what they are worth, so this would allow them to grow into a more realistic price.
Thoughts? |
| 1 | Mike D
ID: 23715270
Thu, Jan 01, 2004, 23:42
|
This thread discussed a lot of similar ideas, IIRC.
|
| 2 | CJ
Donor
ID: 499271021
Thu, Jan 01, 2004, 23:44
|
But still what about the players that are in gravity and are producing may above their price? You get a 30k kick in the rear for having him even though he is putting up great points.
By the way I want to post a MP3 anyone know how to do it?
|
| 3 | Gmoney16
ID: 5810561615
Thu, Jan 01, 2004, 23:56
|
Thanks Mike D,
I read that post several weeks ago but got out of it once Deadeyes and some others starting going off on other topics. I see the end talks about the same concept.
Good enough.
|
| Rate this thread: | If you wish, you may rate this thread on scale of 1-5. Ratings should indicate how valuable or interesting you believe this thread would be to other users of this forum. A '5' means that this thread is a 'must read'. A '1' means that this is a complete waste of time. If you have previously rated this thread, rating it again will delete your previous rating. If you do not want to rate this thread, but want to see how others have rated it, then click the button without entering a rating, or else click here. |
|
|
|
Post a reply to this message: (But first, how about checking out this sponsor?)
|