| 0 |
Subject: DPR's GMD (TP5)
Posted by: Comic Book Guy
- [20817160] Thu, Jan 29, 2009, 03:34
I don't know if it's a breech of etiquette for me to start this thread, but I wanted to talk about my team.
I want to go Lopez > Shaq tomorrow (at game time of course because it's Shaq). I have only a .07 window for this so it needs to be done tomorrow and would leave me with two trades.
I want to hold Granger today if his status remains nebulous or better, but if he's not in the lineup on Friday I won't be able to trade him for Camby (who I think will be a popular choice) because Granger is sure to lose more than 100K today. Therefore, I'm thinking I will give Granger all the way until Saturday to make it back, and if he's still out I would buy David Lee. Anyone with a better plan? Should I pass on Lopez > Shaq with trades so tight? Should I get Camby tomorrow? Should I enter an insane asylum?
Glad to see my main man Glenn back on the team. Perhaps he can add insight or at least humor to my plight. |
| 1 | twolves
Dude
ID: 811161317
Thu, Jan 29, 2009, 06:37
|
Lopez is healthy and playing so I would probably hold him. He will probably take a hit today from players interested in Shaq. Shaq will be a popular choice if playing and all indications are he will probably play since he has had some time off and has only one b to b just before all star break. Camby played and news today may be helpful to determine whether to buy him. I guess it comes down to whether you like Camby or Shaq better at this point if trades are tight. I would probably opt to trade Granger today unless you are pretty sure Granger will play both games of b to b. If tired of Lopez could go to Lee on Sat. I suspect Lopez drops less than Granger today
|
| 2 | Maineac
Donor
ID: 26110315
Thu, Jan 29, 2009, 07:02
|
CBG,
Those words of luv probably just saved my life. I was looking for a hose that will fit over my pickup's exhaust pipe. I've never been so depressed in my life. It's been 41 degrees below ZERO(!) here, we got up to another foot of new snow last night plus I recieved a virtual blizzard of those little red crosses(Ridnour-Blatche-Granger) on my team. I think Lopez will rebound. Let's keep Weykool in the cellar.
Glenn
|
| 3 | bd
Sustainer
ID: 102112811
Thu, Jan 29, 2009, 08:38
|
I haven't received the updated spreadsheet yet to post and am heading out on short trip so won't have access to the spreadsheet tomorrow. I just e-mailed Guru to see if he could post the sheet in our thread so hopefully we'll get that in a little while.
I haven't had a chance to look at my team to evaluate what I need to do with Granger. I went from Blatche to McGuire yesterday. I also am holding Eric Gordon and Thornton and it seems all the clippers players are deciding to return from injury, so I want to watch that situation closely. I've held Lee and Millsap and want to hold Granger but I know he's going to take some big hits the next couple of days.
|
| 5 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Thu, Jan 29, 2009, 20:31
|
1
I'm not very concerned about a money loss now that it's past mid-season, plus a one day cap hit doesn't mean much: I'm currently #54 in FV and if 160K is taken away from holding Granger I would be..........#54. I don't find today's reports on Granger meaningful: the fact that his injury has been lingering may just mean he needed a little rest or could mean there's a real problem. I'm willing to wait until game time and if he's out trade him for Jamison or Biedrins.
The only problem is that I think Shaq definitely needs to be bought today and my other trade option is healthy but Lopez has truly sucked since I've had him so I'm willing to let him go.
If anyone has Granger information tomorrow, can you post it on the TSN Board, not here? I can't access Rotoguru at work and Yahoo doesn't always have pre-game lineups.
Glenn, I guess your post counts as humor (of the very dark gallows variety).
|
| 6 | Maineac
Donor
ID: 26110315
Thu, Jan 29, 2009, 20:42
|
I really wanted to try to conserve a trade by waiting to see what happens to Granger but after careful consideration I decided to panic and traded Granger/Ridnour for Bynum/Foye. I like the longterm implications but hate trying to get by with 1 trade.
Glenn
|
| 7 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Fri, Jan 30, 2009, 02:25
|
Glenn, if you panicked after careful consideration, I'd hate to think what you'd do without careful consideration!
I'm one of very few serious players who kept Granger but I think it was worth the risk because I think there's a reasonable chance he's okay. Thank God for the apparent 160K cap on price movement. I actually moved up a spot in the FV rankings. More than 10 times as many people sold Granger as sold Lopez, but the money loss was only 160 to 50. Anyway, I'm glad Bynum's name was mentioned in this thread: he's where I'll go if Granger is out. Cheaper, much hotter and longer schedule than the other guys I was considering. Can't believe I forgot about him: I watch almost all of his games.
|
| 8 | Maineac
Donor
ID: 26110315
Fri, Jan 30, 2009, 02:51
|
You're very welcome. He's a big reason my D&T team is very hot. Speaking of hot, it's above zero here.
Glenn
|
| 10 | bd
ID: 43054307
Fri, Jan 30, 2009, 09:08
|
thanks guru for putting up the spreadsheet I hope to be able to do it tomorrow but so far my trip is behind schedule and we may have to stay an extra night.
Is there any concern that Bynum may be suspended for his foul on Gerald Wallace. It is being reviewed and with Wallace breaking a rib and collapsed lung I feel they may make him sit out a game or two. **disclaimer** - I have been out of touch and this is the first time I have had any chance to review... so it may have already been reviewed and ruled on.
|
| 11 | qwert
ID: 140401018
Fri, Jan 30, 2009, 10:27
|
It has bd...no suspension. Though it didn't sound like dirk would
suspended just after Christmas and he was so it's always
possible. This sounds like it's straight from the league though.
|
| 13 | Maineac
Donor
ID: 26110315
Sat, Jan 31, 2009, 22:45
|
Bynum! My 4th red cross this week.
Did Dr. Kervorkian get his license back? Never mind, I just ate a jar of peanut butter.
Glenn
|
| 14 | bd
ID: 389151123
Sat, Jan 31, 2009, 23:20
|
Trip went longer than expected and this is first time I have had a chance to look at my team. I held Granger, Lee and Millsap so took some $$ hits but all seem to be doing pretty well points wise. I'll look at things further tonight and see if anyone needs to be traded. I had been onsidering Bynum but didn't get a chance to pull the trigger... which now seems like a good thing.
|
| 16 | bd
Sustainer
ID: 102112811
Sun, Feb 01, 2009, 10:47
|
Looking at my roster:
G - Paul, Granger, Foye, E. Gordon
F - James, Millsap, Thornton, McGuire
C - Jefferson, Lee
Here are my initial thoughts...
Today --Granger/Millsap --> Bosh/A. Parker
2/5 James/Jefferson/Foye --> Granger/Murphy Dunleavy
2/8 Bosh/Parker --> James/Diaw
Would leave a roster of:
Paul, Granger, Dunleavy, Gordon
James, Diaw, Thornton, McGuire
Murphy, Lee
This should leave enough $ to go Lee --> Howard 2/11.
This does require holding cheapies Gordon (been doing well)and Thornton / McGuire (That haven't been good). It also has me buying A. Parker (another cheapie and only holding him a week)
Any thoughts???
|
| 17 | qwert
Sustainer
ID: 2910242819
Sun, Feb 01, 2009, 11:50
|
It might be a bit too heavy on pacers (I'm still not sold on Dunleavy) but you are picking up a lot of games which is always good.
|
| 18 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Sun, Feb 01, 2009, 14:43
|
bd,
It took me a lot of time to get a grip on your plan (mine usually don't get this complicated). I assume you've already done the first part, so I'll skip that. For the rest of your plan, Diaw and the James/Granger/Bosh triangle work (provided Granger stays semi-healthy you get two Granger games for one trade), but the rest of it is lateral at best in terms of points. 12 games of Jefferson figures to be about equal to 14 games of Murphy and based on season averages Foye should outpoint Dunleavy. Dunleavy has done very little other than that one big game (the one game I benched him in D & T BTW).
I know that Foye and Jefferson will be sold on Thursday but I'll never understand why people sell players with two game gaps followed by a 3 in 4. After the two days off, the T-Wolves have 3 straight spans of 4 games in 7 days (excluding the all-star break) and don't really have a major hole in their schedule until April (not saying I'll keep them that long).
If it was me, I'd be looking for a way out of Thornton, maybe for Stuckey on Saturday. Or maybe you can get Stuckey from McGuire.
|
| 19 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Sun, Feb 01, 2009, 14:49
|
After a little thought, I can see Jefferson > Murphy if you use the money you save for a really good upgrade somewhere else.
|
| 21 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Tue, Feb 03, 2009, 02:35
|
Assuming tomorrow's news on Paul remains vague, I think I will trade him for Bosh. That way, even if Paul turns out to be okay I will still get 4 games to 2 before trading back. Not the best use of two trades and it will probably leave me with only one emergency trade for the coming week, but my best guess is certainly that Paul will not play Wednesday. Groin injuries normally need time.
|
| 22 | Maineac
Donor
ID: 26110315
Tue, Feb 03, 2009, 06:32
|
CBG,
Not sure how many emergency trades is enuff. Paul is my 5th red cross this trade week. Probably will have to hold Lebron thru 3 off days. Hard to imagine they would let Paul play next game.
Glenn
|
| 24 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Wed, Feb 04, 2009, 01:13
|
Sometimes I just instinctively make the bad money choice---Bosh made 30K which is all he'll make while Kobe might make over 300K. I'm just hoping that Paul's absence is short, and I can trade back to him Sunday having gotten 4 Bosh games to 2 Kobes. Might be wishful thinking.
Do those of you without Odom have a plan for getting him? He should average high 30's for under 5 million and was better AFTER the Gasol trade last year. I'm getting him from Parker with the money I got from Paul > Bosh, then trading Millsap on Saturday for either Stuckey or Sessions so I have money to get Paul back. I know that Millsap is a more direct route but I don't want to encourage trading him because for now I'm holding!
|
| 26 | qwert
ID: 490561411
Wed, Feb 04, 2009, 09:14
|
24,
Just traded Millsap for Odom. Kind of wish I had gone for Nene last night in hindsight, but I prefer Odom going forward so hopefully he can get out of the 50 TSNP hole...longer schedule at least.
|
| 27 | dpr
ID: 13443116
Wed, Feb 04, 2009, 12:19
|
I also moved millsap to odom over Nene. Yesterday didnt help to make me confident in move but I hope it works out. I looked at Nene as having the longer schedule tho...
|
| 28 | twolves
ID: 199251719
Wed, Feb 04, 2009, 18:46
|
Since I am traveling very little time to run numbers and even did not trade Millsap yesterday but did today to Odom but Nene looks interesting. I could go Gasol so am still thinking on it.
|
| 30 | bd
ID: 299112113
Thu, Feb 05, 2009, 16:56
|
Paul and Bosh injuries have destroyed any plans I had.
I'll be getting Granger tonight and still determining how many guys I'll trade and who to trade into.
Looks like Jefferson, LeBron, Bosh will become Granger, Kobe and Dunleavy.
|
| 31 | qwert
ID: 490561411
Thu, Feb 05, 2009, 17:04
|
Might be a good idea to hold Lebron, no?
You would have to think you have to get him back and you would be cutting it a bit close on trades to move him and then go back.
Also not so sure I would move Jefferson if I were you, the way he's playing.
Also not a huge fan of Dunleavy.
|
| 32 | bd
ID: 299112113
Thu, Feb 05, 2009, 17:24
|
Holding both LeBron & Jefferson is an option. I am worried about the $$ hits. LeBron starts a 3 in 9 while Jefferson starts a 3 in 8. I think if I were to hold, it would be Jefferson since his 3 games are all before trade refresh, but even though Jefferson is playing well...will it outpoint 2 LeBron Games. It should, but not by much.
I had planned on going A. Parker back to LeBron after Toronto's B2B and I would be tradeless at that point if I carried out the other trades.
I expect LeBron, Jefferson, Foye & Bosh all to take pretty sizeable $$ hits tonight.
I like Dunleavy... his schedule is great and he has been given more playing time lately. I am also looking at Diaw or Felton, but had originally planned on going A. Parker to one of them in a few days. Now it looks like Parker may be my way back into LeBron.
I've got a little time to think it over and still have no clue what I'll decide.
A) Bosh --> Granger holding LeBron, Jefferson
B) Bosh/LeBron --> Granger/Dunleavy?
C) Bosh/LeBron/Jefferson --> Granger/Kobe/Dunleavy.
A. Parker would be my in back to LeBron as I'll have lots of $$ left.
|
| 33 | bd
ID: 389151123
Thu, Feb 05, 2009, 18:54
|
Worried about the $$ hits so decided on option D.
Went LeBron/Bosh/Jefferson--> Granger/Kobe/Gasol
Plan to go A. Parker to LeBron & have my fingers crossed hoping for no more injuries.
|
| 34 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Thu, Feb 05, 2009, 19:55
|
Bd,
I really think it's a mistake to make trades just to avoid single day money swings. You just don't want to hold a guy all week while he loses 500K that he'll never get back. Bosh > Granger is necessary, but other than that your two trades are getting you a single game of Kobe vs. Boston and a one game advantage of Gasol over Jefferson over a long period when Jefferson could easily outpoint him and a small amount of money. Assuming you could just get Kobe for Parker on Sunday I think that's what you should do. The trades I would suggest instead are Gordon > Stuckey and Thornton > Diaw on Sunday. Those would get you potential money trains, not just save you from one day losses. If it's still possible to undo your trades I would, but keep in mind that I don't know everything: I've done some pretty stupid things this week.
|
| 35 | twolves
Dude
ID: 811161317
Thu, Feb 05, 2009, 20:21
|
Bd,
Sorry I have been on vacation, just got back home and work was busy today. I hope you did #1 of the above and held Jefferson and Lebron.
If you did not have Gasol, I think Bosh to Gasol for long term would have made sense as I went Foye to Gasol on non-GMD team for a long term hold.
I think all may take hits but Bosh is probalby the most vulnerable for a big loss and no gain back. I am holding Lebron and Jefferson on teams that have them. Foye I am looking at but lean toward holding unless I can upgrade as I did on non-GMD team. The other one I would look at is Durant.
|
| 36 | bd
ID: 389151123
Thu, Feb 05, 2009, 22:22
|
I had to leave early and just now am getting to see the comments, of which I thank everyone for.
Unfortunately, I did the trades I mentioned (Gasol, Kobe & Granger) so all I can do now is hope for the best. Next time I'll start looking at things earlier so I have time to look at all the options presented.
|
| 37 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Fri, Feb 06, 2009, 01:55
|
bd,
Fortunately you got good games out of Kobe and Pau---maybe Gasol's rampage will continue and trading for him will be worth it. Let's all cross our fingers for no injuries---I don't have Kobe yet. I'm glad we can share our opinions here---this is a learning process for everybody.
|
| 38 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Fri, Feb 06, 2009, 02:05
|
I sure hope Paul comes back this week because Wade trades perfectly into him after the refresh, then Kobe triangles into Wade. Wish I'd noticed that before I passed on Kobe---I just assumed I'd want Paul back as soon as possible from whomever I traded him for so I took Bosh because his games were earlier. Luckily my rather reckless replacement for Bosh worked out tonight---Deron Williams (I just wanted someone with a back-to-back).
|
| 40 | dpr
ID: 13443116
Fri, Feb 06, 2009, 09:30
|
Is TSN really slow for anyone else?
|
| 41 | qwert
ID: 490561411
Fri, Feb 06, 2009, 10:02
|
I can't even get into it right now
|
| 42 | money4later
ID: 2111213116
Fri, Feb 06, 2009, 10:10
|
It was really slow last night at times.
|
| 43 | dpr
ID: 13443116
Fri, Feb 06, 2009, 11:45
|
jsut realized we jumped from 3rd to 1st yesterday. Good job guys.
I still cant navigate the site tho
|
| 44 | qwert
ID: 490561411
Fri, Feb 06, 2009, 11:50
|
now that's weird...we haven't won any of the TPs and yet we're in first. that's a testament to the parity of the GMD teams.
|
| 45 | dpr
ID: 13443116
Fri, Feb 06, 2009, 12:11
|
I am stuck on what to do with my guard spots. The top 2 are set for Kobe/paul/wade. For the others i would like to have stuckey and sessions but both prove pretty lateral from the guys i currently have on my team in gordon and foye. I will likely move gordon to sessions tomorrow. I had planned to move gordon to stuckey but sessions now seems better with ridnour out.
Do you agree that foye to stuckey is 2 lateral?
I also need to find a way into Villanueva it seems. But none of my forwards have to go really. A move from odom, shaq or Lee doesnt really gain any games and none of tem ahve to be moved for weeks. Troy murphy or Lebron would jsut be losing points and durant isnt going to be moved for 2 weeks.
It seems my options into villanueva are from odom shaq or lee but those moves dont really gain points jsut free up money. Another alternatve would be to move from foye but again not gaining points and I player who doesnt need to be moved.
|
| 46 | qwert
ID: 490561411
Fri, Feb 06, 2009, 12:16
|
I agree that Foye to Stuckey is lateral...and I wouldn't go crazy chasing Charlie V.
I'm going to see how he does in his two games this week and maybe I'll get in around or after the break.
|
| 47 | dpr
ID: 13443116
Fri, Feb 06, 2009, 12:21
|
It seems with most teams coming out the allstar break with good schedules all of a sudden there are like 15 players that I want. Guess o reason to mvoe out the guys that i already have who ahve been performing jsut as well tho
|
| 48 | bd
ID: 299112113
Fri, Feb 06, 2009, 14:30
|
I agree that Foye to Stuckey seems lateral. However if Foye puts up another 13 point night I'm sure many will jump ship.
Other options that may be considered from Foye are Felton and Diaw (although a F), but these are pretty lateral as well.
|
| 49 | deejay
Sustainer
ID: 501182710
Fri, Feb 06, 2009, 14:40
|
intruder...
40->43
I don't have any problem surfing through TSN...
but we dropped to 3rd, so maybe that's the reason ;)
|
| 50 | Maineac
Donor
ID: 26110315
Fri, Feb 06, 2009, 16:21
|
The TSN site has been driving me crazy for two days. And nobody was mentioning it, which was worse.
My team went all to hell with 5 injuries in a week. Decided to roll the dice with Paul, by passing on Kobe, to see if I could save a couple trades on him and that made things worse. Dropped almost 100 places in 2 days. The team did well without me and that sucks too. As they say, have a nice day.
Glenn
|
| 51 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Sat, Feb 07, 2009, 01:45
|
Foye > Stuckey would be worth doing only if you can do something REALLY good with the money you're saving.
You just know Charlie V will turn into a pumpkin as soon as people buy him. Don't must of us have enough money that there's no need to own three cheapies and isn't too late in the season to go out of your way to chase potential trains?
dpr, I think you should be glad you don't have players who need to go right now the way players are going down.
Is there a consensus that Sessions is a better buy than Stuckey? Sessions could be held for 14 games, after which he would possibly be traded for Stuckey, who has 14 games in the same span and no major schedule holes the rest of the season. Is Sessions 4-5 TSNP per game better than Stuckey, making him worth an extra trade?
|
| 52 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Sat, Feb 07, 2009, 01:57
|
Wow, we really are in 1st place(!) in spite of my being drafted too high. It's amazingly close among the Top 3---shows what a great community this is.
|
| 53 | bd
Donor
ID: 034735159
Sat, Feb 07, 2009, 13:20
|
I will not be able to post our site for the next couple of days. Could someone contct Guru and do it for me? Thanks!
|
| 54 | bd
ID: 58141717
Sat, Feb 07, 2009, 18:41
|
My computer that has the spreadsheet is down. The only internet access I have is via blackberry so I can't do the spreadsheet. I probably won't gain access to the spreadsheet until at least mid next week. Plan is to go parker to lebron with my last trade this week.
|
| 55 | dpr
ID: 13443116
Sun, Feb 08, 2009, 22:09
|
Foye to stuckey or villanueva is looking less lateral now.
|
| 56 | bd
ID: 299112113
Mon, Feb 09, 2009, 07:51
|
Here's the latest on our daily spreadsheet. The router at my house went down and Verizon is supposed to send another one out which I should get by Wednesday.
I am unable to run the spreadsheet from work as I always get a "run time error" on it.
|
| 57 | qwert
ID: 490561411
Mon, Feb 09, 2009, 10:13
|
thanks bd...I'm sure we can manage without the stats for a while.
|
| 58 | twolves
ID: 161542014
Mon, Feb 09, 2009, 11:49
|
WE have climbed back to the top as a team. I see we have 2 Al Jefferson's. CBG and I have them and have trades fortunately. I am most likely to trade him today rather than waiting for news after seeing the game on TV.
I had considered holding him through the break with his recent production, so am now looking for a forward or center since have no flex and no additional cash after getting Gasol yesterday from Bargnani.
|
| 59 | bd
ID: 299112113
Mon, Feb 09, 2009, 15:16
|
When looking at my team page... it shows "Last" scores which normally are from last night showing the scores the players received on 2/4. It has LeBron with 91.5.
|
| 60 | qwert
ID: 490561411
Mon, Feb 09, 2009, 15:26
|
It seems to have all of the scores from that night.
|
| 61 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Mon, Feb 09, 2009, 19:46
|
I do have a trade to get out of Al Jeff: unfortunately, it means I'm still stuck with some impostor wearing Paul Millsap's uniform. My trade is easy to make because I didn't have Gasol. twolves, I'm wondering if you should go to Charlie V because he's such an incredible value, then figure out what to do with your cash surplus. The other options that come to mind are Yao and Dirk, who have strong long-term schedules but aren't terribly appetizing. Losing Al really sucks: he was playing so well and I was planning to keep him through March. This is going to cost me more than one trade.
dpr, yes, it does seem that if it's your way into Villanueva that Foye should go. I'm looking at that move Wednesday, but I absolutely hate dropping Foye because it would be because of poor performance: his schedule flaws are minor. Anyone know if anything is wrong with Foye? We figure that Millsap is playing poorly because he's not 100%.
|
| 62 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Mon, Feb 09, 2009, 19:48
|
In fact, Minnesota's schedule is good enough that I'm considering getting Kevin Love when I FINALLY get rid of Paul Millsap's carcass.
|
| 63 | twolves
Dude
ID: 811161317
Mon, Feb 09, 2009, 20:10
|
Foye is streaky and when he is having a good game can be unstoppable. I do not think he is hurt at present, but not playing with the same confidence as before. He is having more trouble with the 3 pointers lately.
With Jefferson out, he will be called on to do more and should respond and hopefully not press too much.
I think the Love idea is very good as he should get more minutes now in the rotation and it will be interesting to see if they start Love at center tomorrow and whether he will be the inside out focal point that Jeffrson has been.
Since I have a trade, and now can upgrade Foye after trading Jefferson, I may do that.
|
| 64 | twolves
Dude
ID: 811161317
Mon, Feb 09, 2009, 20:18
|
CBG, I do think Gasol is a definitely a "must have" trade. I did go to Charlie V tonight but did give Diaw serious consideration since he has a 10 to 8 game advantage on Charlie V over the near term here.
|
| 65 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Mon, Feb 09, 2009, 20:57
|
Thanks for the perspective on Foye: I forgot we had a T-Wolves fan on board. It does make sense that his production should go up with Al gone, but it's hard to pass up Charlie based on his recent production.
My options:
Foye > Villanueva Wednesday, Millsap > Love after the break.
Millsap > Villanueva Wednesday, keep Foye, skip Love.
Millsap > Love after the break, keep Foye, skip Charlie.
I definitely think Love will average in the 30's. Feedback appreciated.
|
| 66 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Tue, Feb 10, 2009, 21:34
|
Foye having a big game, making me reconsider. I could just trade Millsap for CV tomorrow, so it boils down to this: is it worth a trade to have Millsap play one more game for me, then have Love long-term instead of Foye?
What are people doing with Wade? Holding for now and hoping Paul is back after the break? What if Paul is not back next Tuesday? Will you guys just hold Wade in that case?
|
| 67 | qwert
Sustainer
ID: 2910242819
Tue, Feb 10, 2009, 21:36
|
Re: Wade...yes that's my plan.
Holding Foye will cost you but if you already have Sessions and CV in your plans Foye will probably be as good as anyone else for a longterm hold.
|
| 68 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Tue, Feb 10, 2009, 22:30
|
Superstar Randy Foye and his 47.5 TSNP definitely stay. He'll even make money next Tuesday. Funny how one game changes one's perspective. Millsap for CV at 8:01, Love can be worked in when I need to free up cash.
|
| 69 | deraynman
ID: 22121310
Tue, Feb 10, 2009, 23:28
|
stuckey hurt fouling ben gordon on a 4 point play.
|
| 71 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Thu, Feb 12, 2009, 02:50
|
I may be fed up enough with Shaq to trade him just for a 5 game to 4 advantage of Troy Murphy. Based on their recent numbers it would get me 80+ points. Murphy could then go with Granger for Duncan and Love on the 24th. I would be left with two trades I have no plans for in the next 9 days (excluding the break) with my other plan being the Wade > Paul, Kobe > Wade triangle. Does anyone think Shaq > Murphy is a bad idea?
|
| 73 | bd
ID: 299112113
Thu, Feb 12, 2009, 13:58
|
Work got in the way yesterday as I spent all day dealing with problems and didn't get a chance to make the McGuire --> sessions trade I wanted to make. Looks like the net change was $190K and about 40 points:(
|
| 74 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Thu, Feb 12, 2009, 20:33
|
Ouch! What work could you have that's more important than trading McGuire for Sessions? Where are your priorities?
|
| 75 | bd
Sustainer
ID: 102112811
Fri, Feb 13, 2009, 09:41
|
If you are unsure what the column header means, hover over it with your mouse.
A pop up will display a longer definition of the header.
GURUPATRON BONUS MATERIAL
The following columns are sartible and reverse sartible.
Click on the column header once for the default sort order.
Click a second time for the reverse sort order.
| Rank | GurupieName | LSWP0 | LSWP | LSWP5 | WWR | FV | Cash | RV | FVC | Trades | | 1 | qwert-215 | 14408 | 111.5 | 3514 | 1 | 75.30 | 2.97 | 72.33 | 0.06 | 3 | | 2 | twolves-128 | 14224.5 | 38.5 | 3318 | 15 | 73.68 | 3.51 | 70.17 | -0.03 | 5 | | 3 | dpr-315 | 13574.5 | 38.5 | 3293.5 | 53 | 71.02 | 3.30 | 67.72 | -0.11 | 6 | | 4 | Rude Boy-1353 | 13567 | 80 | 3275.5 | 52 | 64.31 | 0.79 | 63.52 | -0.03 | 3 | | 5 | Coach Bird-983 | 13561 | 0 | 3215 | 67 | 70.94 | 1.84 | 69.10 | -0.10 | 3 | | 6 | Comic Book Guy-1245 | 13537.5 | 38.5 | 3235 | 30 | 70.20 | 2.69 | 67.51 | -0.01 | 3 | | 7 | bd-967 | 13216.5 | 0 | 3041 | 218 | 63.11 | 1.65 | 61.46 | -0.14 | 2 | | 8 | Maineac-277 | 12890 | 38.5 | 2749.5 | 337 | 62.94 | 1.36 | 61.58 | 0.06 | 1 | | 9 | Soetal1-121 | 12312.5 | 0 | 2876.5 | 588 | 61.40 | 9.13 | 52.27 | -0.17 | 3 |
|
| 76 | twolves
Dude
ID: 811161317
Fri, Feb 13, 2009, 11:34
|
Congratulations to Qwert who is still #1 at the break. Nice call on Rondo. Let's try to keep him there the rest of the way.
|
| 77 | Gescom
Leader
ID: 520461315
Fri, Feb 13, 2009, 11:38
|
Intruder
It's going to be a SU - qwert match up for the title. I don't see anyone else competing for the holly graal this year.
|
| 78 | twolves
Dude
ID: 811161317
Fri, Feb 13, 2009, 11:59
|
Gescom,
I would not count yourself out yet or a number of others in the top 25-30. It is hard to deny that qwert and the senator are the ones to watch.
|
| 79 | Gescom
Leader
ID: 520461315
Fri, Feb 13, 2009, 12:37
|
May be Blooki can break out his teams and go with high risk high reward strategy on some of them. Anyone has his address to send him a brand new Monopoly game ?
|
| 80 | qwert
ID: 541191311
Fri, Feb 13, 2009, 16:38
|
thanks guys...twolves is right though there's lots of game left to play.
|
| Rate this thread: | If you wish, you may rate this thread on scale of 1-5. Ratings should indicate how valuable or interesting you believe this thread would be to other users of this forum. A '5' means that this thread is a 'must read'. A '1' means that this is a complete waste of time. If you have previously rated this thread, rating it again will delete your previous rating. If you do not want to rate this thread, but want to see how others have rated it, then click the button without entering a rating, or else click here. |
|
|
|
Post a reply to this message: (But first, how about checking out this sponsor?)
|