| 0 |
Subject: 3/8 "Boozer Awol" Action Thread
Posted by: hills
- [250423113] Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 12:19
Boozer not listed in starting lineup--all other starters look normal |
| 1 | hills
ID: 250423113
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 12:26
|
Boozer has sore ankle per Yahoo
|
| 2 | deejay
Sustainer
ID: 501182710
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 12:47
|
Marbury starting it seems
No Rondo
|
| 3 | Senator Urine
ID: 011502111
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 12:49
|
Speaking of Marbury. Probably old news at this point, but that graphic kills me.
|
| 4 | Dave R
SuperDude
ID: 3010361110
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 13:07
|
Williams SUCKS
|
| 5 | Dean Martin
ID: 46031822
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 13:17
|
Noticed Deron got off to a very slow start on Friday vs. the Nuggets but finished strong in the second half. Hoping he does the same.
|
| 6 | Dave R
SuperDude
ID: 3010361110
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 13:32
|
Yahoo SUCKS
|
| 7 | money4later
ID: 2111213116
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 13:39
|
Can someone tell Brewer that it's ok to take more than one shot in a half?
|
| 8 | Dave R
SuperDude
ID: 3010361110
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 13:51
|
Hope the Celtics can keep it close, for Howard's sake
|
| 9 | CJ
Leader
ID: 499271021
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 15:27
|
Hope the Celtics get rid of the Plague they have on their team now.
#3
Oh man why have that guy on your team.
|
| 10 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 15:52
|
Maybe Boozer fell off the wagon.
Duncan already with more TSNP than last game!
|
| 11 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 16:59
|
Looking at Nate for a third team but he sounds somewhat iffy. Again, I ask if anyone knows for sure whether or not he's playing, please post.
|
| 12 | hills
ID: 250423113
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 17:20
|
#11 I'll watch the pre game at 5:30pm & give you an update if they give it
|
| 13 | hills
ID: 250423113
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 17:35
|
#11 According to announcer he is warming up & expected to play
|
| 14 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 17:43
|
Thanks, hills! Westbrook might be a safer choice, but he's more expensive and his schedule is shorter, so I will again roll the dice with Nate.
|
| 15 | Dean Martin
ID: 46031822
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 18:28
|
14 - CBG, had you considered Larry Hughes instead of or in addition to Nate?
|
| 16 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 18:31
|
16
I also have Hughes X 2. Nate in the game now. I think I need someone to worry about every day now that Granger is long gone.
|
| 17 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 18:43
|
Nate with 13.5 TSNP in 5.5 minutes. Think I do owe you now, hills, because I was inclined to chicken out today.
|
| 18 | hills
ID: 250423113
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 18:46
|
#17 Any time you need pre game info on Knicks or Nets let me know--I live in NJ & get both pre & post game shows for them
|
| 19 | deejay
Sustainer
ID: 501182710
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 19:36
|
Brooks SUCKS
|
| 20 | Dave R
SuperDude
ID: 3010361110
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 19:54
|
Allow me,
Brooks SUCKS
|
| 21 | deejay
Sustainer
ID: 501182710
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 19:59
|
Sure, mine don't work that is clear.
|
| 22 | Mike D
Leader
ID: 041831612
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 20:06
|
Post 16 is the greatest ever. Comic Book Guy referring to his own post.....as he writes it! Lol
|
| 23 | Dave R
SuperDude
ID: 3010361110
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 20:17
|
Yao with 39.5 in the first half, the same as Duncan earlier. Let's hope Yao has a more productive 2nd half than TD did
|
| 24 | Headless T Gunners
ID: 4173916
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 20:34
|
Andre Miller any time you want to pick up an assist it'll be OK
|
| 25 | deejay
Sustainer
ID: 501182710
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 20:46
|
Now if Memphis can keep it a bit close.
|
| 26 | Johnny Sue
ID: 31219410
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 20:46
|
22....lmao!
|
| 27 | CJ
Leader
ID: 499271021
Sun, Mar 08, 2009, 21:48
|
Is Gilbert ever going to come back this year I have been anticipating having him back after the new year and from what I read he is practicing full throttle and is game ready but no word when he will return or if he does return at all this year. UGH!
|
| Rate this thread: | If you wish, you may rate this thread on scale of 1-5. Ratings should indicate how valuable or interesting you believe this thread would be to other users of this forum. A '5' means that this thread is a 'must read'. A '1' means that this is a complete waste of time. If you have previously rated this thread, rating it again will delete your previous rating. If you do not want to rate this thread, but want to see how others have rated it, then click the button without entering a rating, or else click here. |
|
|
|
Post a reply to this message: (But first, how about checking out this sponsor?)
|