| 0 |
Subject: 1/3 Thank you Pops - Action Thread
Posted by: deejay
- Sustainer [501182710] Sun, Jan 03, 2010, 18:06
Where is Duncan?
Where is Blair? |
| 1 | Pica
Sustainer
ID: 161141312
Sun, Jan 03, 2010, 18:11
|
from local chatroom: Bill Schoening on WOAI just said Tim Duncan will come off the bench - but is not injuried.
No mention of Blair yet, so perhaps a matchup thing.
|
| 2 | VP.
ID: 7335210
Sun, Jan 03, 2010, 18:23
|
Thanks Pica
|
| 3 | Pica
Sustainer
ID: 161141312
Sun, Jan 03, 2010, 18:32
|
They noted Duncan played 36 minutes last night as potential reason. Meanwhile, Blair is in. No Duncan yet.
|
| 4 | deejay
Sustainer
ID: 501182710
Sun, Jan 03, 2010, 18:32
|
Blair in, No Duncan yet...
|
| 5 | money4later
ID: 2111213116
Sun, Jan 03, 2010, 18:40
|
I can't find any news about a injury. Must be Pops screwing us. The past two weeks has been a nightmare.
|
| 6 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Sun, Jan 03, 2010, 18:44
|
Wow, he played 36 whole minutes last night. What an astonishing feat of endurance. We can now be assured he won't play 36 regulation minutes today. I'm losing faith in the report that he will play at all.
|
| 7 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Sun, Jan 03, 2010, 18:45
|
My loss of faith just got Duncan into the game.
|
| 8 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Sun, Jan 03, 2010, 18:59
|
Duncan now even has positive TSNP!
|
| 9 | money4later
ID: 2111213116
Sun, Jan 03, 2010, 19:00
|
Not bad enough that I have Wright, but now I have Blair to deal with. ugh
At least my Cowboys won today.
|
| 10 | reebbertxx
Dude
ID: 561124720
Sun, Jan 03, 2010, 19:11
|
Blair already has as many points off the bench today as he had starting yesterday.Okay .5 short but he's still holdable for awhile IMO.
|
| 11 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Sun, Jan 03, 2010, 19:15
|
Even having bought Blair on Tuesday I never figured out why he became such a big train. His price just happened to fit for me. Guess it did for a lot of people though by yesterday he wasn't a good buy. It's strange to wish I didn't make over 500K on a player so I wouldn't feel pressure to sell.
|
| 13 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Sun, Jan 03, 2010, 19:48
|
Timmy with 23 late in the 3rd. Not great by his normal standard, but much better than the Duncan donut I was fearing.
|
| 14 | Phatsow
Sustainer
ID: 2210292621
Sun, Jan 03, 2010, 21:32
|
13,
Yeah, if that's the Phantom DNP version 2010, I'll take it!
10,
Hey Rob, if you were so into decrying the 13 people who did Wade to Kobe on Friday, why aren't you castigating the 3 people who sold Wade yesterday WHEN HE PLAYED! ;)
|
| 15 | Dave R
SuperDude
ID: 3010361110
Sun, Jan 03, 2010, 22:13
|
Pau goes to the locker room with a " Strained Hammy ". Being evaluated, no word if he will return.
Not the same one that sidelined him earlier this year.
Per TV announcers
|
| 16 | money4later
ID: 2111213116
Sun, Jan 03, 2010, 22:32
|
15 - Wonder how many used their last trade on him tonight? Ouch
|
| 17 | Dave R
SuperDude
ID: 3010361110
Sun, Jan 03, 2010, 22:58
|
Halftime announcement is Pau will not return and will be re-evaluated tomorrow as far as his availability for the next game
|
| 18 | Phatsow
Sustainer
ID: 2210292621
Sun, Jan 03, 2010, 23:02
|
The Mavericks are being beaten by Vujacic and Mbenga! They did NOT come to play tonight.
|
| 19 | illmatic
ID: 308322
Sun, Jan 03, 2010, 23:08
|
why didnt dampier play is he injured or just coach decision... I have him on my best team =(
|
| 20 | money4later
ID: 2111213116
Sun, Jan 03, 2010, 23:32
|
Erick Dampier missed Sunday's game due to a left knee effusion, and Drew Gooden started in his place.
A left knee effusion means that there's fluid in his knee that shouldn't be there, and until we hear otherwise we're calling him questionable for the week. If he's able to play sooner it will be great news, but given his size and age we're looking at things conservatively.
Source: Dallas Morning News
|
| 21 | reebbertxx
Dude
ID: 561124720
Mon, Jan 04, 2010, 00:13
|
14, I honestly didn't even notice. Line them up so they can be punished!
|
| Rate this thread: | If you wish, you may rate this thread on scale of 1-5. Ratings should indicate how valuable or interesting you believe this thread would be to other users of this forum. A '5' means that this thread is a 'must read'. A '1' means that this is a complete waste of time. If you have previously rated this thread, rating it again will delete your previous rating. If you do not want to rate this thread, but want to see how others have rated it, then click the button without entering a rating, or else click here. |
|
|
|
Post a reply to this message:
|