| 0 |
Subject: Best Draft after 30 Days
Posted by: Gman15
- Leader [44961510] Thu, Nov 29, 2001, 16:12
Maximizing points for the first 30 days, the best roster to have drafted would be:
Team Player Price SWP/G SWP G PC
G Sea Payton, Gary 10,110 42.5 723 17 300
G LAL Bryant, Kobe 10,250 48.3 676 14 100
F LAC Brand, Elton 8,600 42.8 642 15 280
G Ind Tinsley, Jamaal 2,250 35.7 643 18 1,470
G Sea Barry, Brent 4,490 34.6 588 17 910
F Uta Marshall, Donyell 6,530 34.9 524 15 120
C NJN MacCulloch, Todd 2,750 28.3 425 15 270
C Ind Foster, Jeff 2,540 21.4 385 18 450
F Cle Jones, Jumaine 1,640 21.9 329 15 120
F Uta Kirilenko, Andrei 500 20.6 309 15 550
49,660 331.0 5,242 159 4,570
|
| 1 | Blooki
ID: 359321514
Thu, Nov 29, 2001, 16:25
|
Interesting... had 6 of 10 of them...
Had Payton, Tinsley, Barry, T-MacII, Foster, and Kirilenko.
Excluding T-MacII. I wish I had held onto all of them for trade conservation... Made the mistake of moving Tinsley, Barry, and Foster.
|
| 2 | Craig H
ID: 5810442911
Thu, Nov 29, 2001, 16:38
|
Good enough for 40th place and still having 20 trades in the bank...
|
| 3 | Ref
ID: 1442849
Thu, Nov 29, 2001, 16:43
|
Thanks Craig H--just put my 41 WWR to shame :(
I drafted 5 of the 10.
|
| 4 | Ender
ID: 52438315
Thu, Nov 29, 2001, 16:46
|
Oh the humanity... That makes all my trades look incredibly inefficient.
|
| 5 | Craig H
ID: 5810442911
Thu, Nov 29, 2001, 16:53
|
I only had 3 of the 10. Got rid of Jumaine Jones early. Still have Tinsley and AK47 from opening day, everybody else has changed.
I've got 920k more but 80 points less. Oh and I've used 19 trades!
|
| 6 | DR Stars
ID: 162592010
Thu, Nov 29, 2001, 16:53
|
Wow 40th, only money would be a problem, but imagine the $ you could make with 20 trades sitting in the bank...
|
| 7 | lionprideguy
Donor
ID: 289471616
Thu, Nov 29, 2001, 16:54
|
Yeah, I feel pretty shamed now too. After starting with 5 of those guys I've managed my way _down_ a few hundred spots in the rankings then!
|
| 8 | Ender
ID: 52438315
Thu, Nov 29, 2001, 16:57
|
Sure you would have lost 340K, but I think this re-enforces to an extent how money may not matter as much this year.
Maybe it helps determin the value of a trade in $$$. Most teams have made $5 to $6 mill by now with their 20 trades. Perhaps you're doing ok if you have a similar rank and you have 250K to 300K per trade?
|
| 9 | Gman15
Leader
ID: 44961510
Thu, Nov 29, 2001, 16:59
|
Some of the names that show up are very interesting. I doubt if many had Kobe opening day and I don't think I have seen Donyell Marshall mentioned at all. Thanks for looking at where this team would rank - I didn't have a chance to check in my haste to post this.
I only had Tinsley and Barry opening day, but, fortunately, I still have them.
|
| 10 | Craig H
ID: 5810442911
Thu, Nov 29, 2001, 17:09
|
Umm Ender, the way I read it that team would have made 4.57 Million.
|
| 11 | Blooki
ID: 359321514
Thu, Nov 29, 2001, 17:15
|
Yup, you're right Craig. Man... this thread is so depressing...
|
| 12 | Ender
ID: 52438315
Thu, Nov 29, 2001, 17:16
|
Hmmm, I didn't bother to add up the current salaries. I just assumed the 49,660 was what they added up to right now. I see that those are the original prices now. Oh well. Now my trades aren't even worth money either :(
|
| 14 | smallwhirled
Donor
ID: 119491116
Thu, Nov 29, 2001, 17:38
|
The -1 is pretty bad, but I think two more gravity players, approx. 1.8 million, loss is evern worse.
? ;)
|
| 18 | KobeWannabe
ID: 4210482811
Thu, Nov 29, 2001, 17:58
|
I pretty much stink when it comes to this information. Hovering at 2,000 world ranking. Only up $2,000. I seem to hit the trades a day late. I had only one at the beginning and have since worked up to 5 with plans for 7 but am quite shamed at how stupid I have been. 2 trades left. One waiting on Webber the other for Kobes to GP.
I feel like riding with a good schedule team and banking some trades?
|
| Rate this thread: | If you wish, you may rate this thread on scale of 1-5. Ratings should indicate how valuable or interesting you believe this thread would be to other users of this forum. A '5' means that this thread is a 'must read'. A '1' means that this is a complete waste of time. If you have previously rated this thread, rating it again will delete your previous rating. If you do not want to rate this thread, but want to see how others have rated it, then click the button without entering a rating, or else click here. |
|
|
Post a reply to this message: (But first, how about checking out this sponsor?)
|
|