RotoGuru Politics Forum

View the Forum Registry

XML Get RSS Feed for this thread


Self-edit this thread


0 Subject: Your Top Ten Blogs

Posted by: Baldwin
- [41944230] Sat, Oct 23, 2004, 09:25

Reading Polk's article at his blog just got me thinking I really need to get my blog-reading more organized. I need to weed thru and add to my favorites list of quality blogs.

Your candidates please?
Only the 50 most recent replies are currently shown. Click on this text to display hidden posts as well.
43Toral
      ID: 53422511
      Tue, Jul 26, 2005, 01:29
And, of course, Moore's "errors" in F911 were knowing and deliberate, intended to deceive and manipulate (as tends to be the case in a film, which takes a lot more time for production). We went through that all before.

I have to wonder...if I'm high on the ignoramus meter where are you? I would think you blew the top off.

Toral
44Pancho Villa
      Sustainer
      ID: 533817
      Tue, Jul 26, 2005, 01:53
I would think you blew the top off.

That would presume you were actually thinking.
45Perm Dude
      Dude
      ID: 030792616
      Tue, Jul 26, 2005, 09:27
Hey Toral, I'm sure the Holocaust was widely popular among the Germans as well. Doesn't mean it was right.

Those sneaky liberals, eh? Always making you feel bad about stuff. Damn them.
46Razor
      ID: 36241218
      Tue, Jul 26, 2005, 09:45
I think I know enuf about American liberals to generalize.

Laugh of the century. Just minutes after you say liberals are nothing but a bunch of swindling, unpatriotic cowards you proclaim your intimate knowledge of how liberals are. Nice.

The only things liberals are good for in a total war are finding ways to get out of combat, running black markets, and finding the best way to sneak out of the country.

Not to beat a dead horse but it was Bush and Cheney who weaseled their way out of combat and Kerry who found his way into harm's way, and yet it was Kerry who was mocked. This notion that you and Baldwin keep throwing out there that liberals are much more venomous than conservatives is just totally bunk. Cue Baldwin telling us that conservatives are justified in their nastiness because they are just keeping up with liberals.
47hoops boy
      ID: 226162110
      Tue, Jul 26, 2005, 10:51
wow, i didnt realize malkin was so controversial... i pegged her for a 2nd or 3rd level conservative voice, not even terribly important on the right, much less the left. The thing I liked about her blog is that she tends to blog regularly which keeps her blog topical.

On another note, anyone here have any favorite political podcasts? I subscribed to the RipNRead podcast (http://ripnread.blogspot.com/) which is a right leaning podcast... I haven't encountered any from a left leaning point of view, though i have looked much for political podcasts to be honest. Someone told me that some of the air america shows were being podcast, though I seem to remember not being able to get them for some reason.
48Perm Dude
      Dude
      ID: 030792616
      Tue, Jul 26, 2005, 10:53
hb: You're right, she's not important. In fact, it's more important to the Right that she was attacked for her writings than the actual content.
49Toral
      ID: 53422511
      Fri, Jul 29, 2005, 22:03
pd 48 is right. Conservatives defend their own. We have learned we have to do that.

Toral
50Toral
      ID: 53422511
      Thu, Aug 11, 2005, 15:34
Michelle Malkin hits #1 on favourite people list compiled from votes by conservative bloggers.

Must be all the pub she's getting.

Honorable Mentions: Peggy Noonan (4), Larry Elder (4), John McCain (4), Jeb Bush (4), Clarence Thomas (4), Antonin Scalia (4), Arnold Schwarzenegger (4), Zell Miller (5), Newt Gingrich (5), Laura Ingraham (5), Glenn Reynolds (5), David Horowitz (5), Bill Kristol (5)

18) Sean Hannity (6)
18) Rudy Giuliani (6)
18) Mona Charen (6)
18) Karl Rove (6)
18) Charles Johnson (6)
16) Dennis Prager (7)
16) Brit Hume (7)
15) Walter Williams (8)
12) Victor Davis Hanson (10)
12) William F. Buckley (10)
12) Charles Krauthammer (10)
11) Donald Rumsfeld (12)
10) Hugh Hewitt (13)
9) Rush Limbaugh (14)
7) Dick Cheney (16)
7) Ann Coulter (16)
6) Jonah Goldberg (17)
5) Thomas Sowell (18)
3) Mark Steyn (20)
3) Condoleeza Rice (20)
2) George W. Bush (23)
1) Michelle Malkin (24)

Their list of least favourite people on the right is here.
51Razor
      ID: 1477414
      Thu, Aug 11, 2005, 15:43
Ammusing lists. Disappointing to see Bush so high. I suspected that the Right only likes Bush because the Left hates him, but that doesn't appear to be the case. I was surprised to see Pat Buchanon at #1 for the Right, even though he is a jackass. Looks like the Right has a love/hate relationship with Coulter.
52Razor
      ID: 1477414
      Thu, Aug 11, 2005, 15:43
Er, one "m" in amusing.
53Boldwin
      ID: 49626249
      Thu, Aug 11, 2005, 17:20
Such a fun list. I would add variations just for fun.

  • Mark Steyn All the quality and clarity of Hanson combined with the hilarious no-holds-barred brutal honesty of Coulter.

  • Ann Coulter Why? Because she owns you.

  • Newt Gingrich Did more to save the world from totalitarianism than any man alive. If only he could master his sexual morality to match his political mastery. National tragedy, that.

  • William F. Buckley Megapoints points deducted for being a Bonesman who greased the skids for the neocon introduction to respectable republican society and for his similar role in excommunicating many conservatives. Megapoints added however for being so damn smart. The one man you would bring with you to a debate if you could bring only one.

  • Victor Davis Hanson Bulletproof powers of reasoning and clear writing. One point deducted for his connection to a publication that would fire Ann Coulter. No make that two points.

  • Rush Limbaugh Effective but needs to share the spotlight and worry less about his critics. Just a tad afraid to go out on a limb believe it or not.

  • Mark Levin If only he would quit the day job and become a fulltime pundit. Mind so sharp he cuts like a knife.

  • Peggy Noonan If you can't have Reagan giving speeches you can still hear his voice.

  • D'Nesh D'Souza So brilliant he can be rigorous and profound and yet always express the deepest wisdom with simple words. A much underappreciated art that. Only a true master can.

  • Thomas Sowell National treasure who will be fully appreciated when it is no longer tolerable to be racist against conservatives.

  • Walter Williams Ditto

  • David Horowitz Massive points added for having smuggled out the weak spots in the liberal death star. Massive points deducted for possibly still being a closet Trotskyite.

  • Thomas, Scalia, Renquist

  • John Kasich Could have been Ronald Reagan's successor if the bonesmen didn't run everything.

  • Tony Snow You'll be hearing more from him...big future.

  • Larry Elder Not sure he could write as well as he can do radio.

  • Sean Hannity Not in the same league mentally with the others on this list but he sure is getting a lot done with what he has.
Obviously I excluded a lot of people who would make other's lists. Neocons were excluded unless they had made extraordinary offsetting accomplishments. Bonesmen ditto. RINO's [republicans in name only] need not apply. Guys without the balls to leave the Dem party need not apply. Guys with questionable motives need not apply.

Wish I could remember who I am leaving off that list by mistake.
54Razor
      ID: 1477414
      Thu, Aug 11, 2005, 17:46
I think you forgot Clinton, Derrida and Moore.

If I were on the Right, I think Dole would be high on my list.
55Razor
      ID: 1477414
      Thu, Aug 11, 2005, 17:47
Although Derrida is now deceased, and this list only includes the living, I assume.
56Boldwin
      ID: 49626249
      Thu, Aug 11, 2005, 18:06
Derrida is high on my list of most damaging people. His apologists would like you to believe he was more reasonable than the uses to which his work was put but I would think that wouldn't have been beyond his power to correct had he the inclination.
57Razor
      ID: 5718511
      Thu, Aug 11, 2005, 18:39
Couldn't you accuse a lot of people of the same thing? Einstein and all the other scientists who laid the groundwork for the creation of the A-bomb.

I'd love to see a Baldwin Most Reviled List. Think you could keep it under 100?
58biliruben
      Leader
      ID: 589301110
      Thu, Aug 11, 2005, 18:55
Bill
Hillary
Bill
Marx
Hillary
FDR
Bill
Hillary

Rinse and repeat.
59Perm Dude
      Dude
      ID: 030792616
      Thu, Aug 11, 2005, 18:58
Ironically enough, smug and self-satisfied people seem to get under his skin.
60Boldwin
      ID: 49626249
      Thu, Aug 11, 2005, 19:22
Razor

No
61biliruben
      Leader
      ID: 589301110
      Tue, Oct 11, 2005, 15:58
Dan Drezner fails to make Tenure.

I shouldn't be doing this. I'll be going up for tenure soon."

It was with those words of self admonishment that an assistant professor of political science at the University of Chicago, Daniel Drezner, inaugurated his Web log in September 2002.
---

In a more subtle way, bloggers also risk drawing negative attention to their work by joining academic debates in such a casual and shallow manner, without the benefit of an editor and frequently without backing up their ideas as thoroughly as they would in a scholarly journal. Online academic disagreements could very well "translate into an evaluation of a scholar's abilities or talents," Mr. Volokh said.

The debate over academic blogging has raged in the pages of the Chronicle of Higher Education, sparked by an article in July by a humanities professor at a small liberal-arts college in the Midwest who, writing under the pseudonym Ivan Tribble, said he's seen job-seekers destroy their job chances by irritating people through a blog.

"The pertinent question for bloggers is simply, Why?" the scholar wrote. "What is the purpose of broadcasting one's unfiltered thoughts to the whole wired world? It's not hard to imagine legitimate, constructive applications for such a forum. But it's also not hard to find examples of the worst kinds of uses."

The article elicited an angry response from an assistant professor of political science and international affairs at George Washington University, Henry Farrell, who contributes to the blog Crooked Timber.

"To dismiss blogging as a bad idea altogether is to make an enormous mistake," he wrote. "For these academics, blogging isn't a hobby; it's an integral part of their scholarly identity. They may very well be the wave of the future."



62Boldwin
      ID: 49626249
      Tue, Oct 11, 2005, 17:27
Common sense and accountability to the real marketplace of ideas is a liability in the ivory tower. That's one way to keep it 'real'...real insular.
63Boldwin
      ID: 49626249
      Tue, Oct 11, 2005, 17:29
And Drezner wasn't just any blogger. He's made a bigger name for himself than he would have cloistered at UoC.
64Razor
      ID: 36241218
      Tue, Oct 11, 2005, 17:52
Did you ignore the part where the department chair and Drezner himself dismissed the idea that his blogging was responsible for his tenure denial?
65biliruben
      Leader
      ID: 589301110
      Tue, Oct 11, 2005, 18:01
It's hard to tell.

What's the chair going to say? "I couldn't stand his constant sniping and we were jealous of his fame that his blog garnered." No.

As for what Drezner thinks, check the second link:

[Wait a minute, you can�t leave it at that. What happened? What the hell happened? Why didn�t you get tenure? Was it your failure to anchor yourself within a clearly established theoretical paradigm? A lack of respect from peers in your IPE subfield? Too much output? A declining respect of your subfield by your tenured colleagues? The departmental turn away from mainstream political science scholarship? Your political orientation? Jealousy of your public intellectual status? WAS IT THE FRIGGIN� BLOG??!!--ed.] My answers in order: I dunno, perhaps, probably not, maybe, I guess so, a little, could be, I seriously doubt it, and who the hell knows? Any decent social scientist must allow for multiple causes, so it�s not necessarily an either/or question. At the moment, I simply lack the data to confirm or deny any explanation. I may garner more information in the days and weeks that follow, but the fact that I was genuinely surprised at the outcome suggests that my ex ante intelligence gathering was piss-poor.

That editor nonesense is just his device.
66Boldwin
      ID: 49626249
      Tue, Oct 11, 2005, 18:02
...both practicing an overabundance of caution and diplomacy. What I didn't miss and the tenure committee did is the world class mind.
67Razor
      ID: 9919418
      Tue, Oct 11, 2005, 19:12
And I'm sure you are better qualified to comment on his work than people who actually see his work.

It certainly would stink if Drezner was let go because he blogged, but there isn't enough evidence to jump to that conclusion.
68biliruben
      Leader
      ID: 589301110
      Tue, Oct 11, 2005, 19:28
I think he'll land on his feet and do just fine, though it definitely slows his advancement, not getting tenure. It will be interesting to see if he continues in academia, or whether he says the heck with it, and goes to government, industry or a think-tank.
69Boldwin
      ID: 49626249
      Tue, Oct 11, 2005, 20:55
I've seen some of the people they grant tenure to...

Ward Churchill, the tenured professors who defended him...

Have a look at how the sausage is made...
70biliruben
      ID: 531202411
      Sat, Nov 05, 2005, 18:55
Tufts give Dresner tenure. I was correct, however, that he pondering leaving academia over it.
71biliruben
      Leader
      ID: 589301110
      Mon, Nov 21, 2005, 21:09
Scott Adams has a blog, and his first entry was to explain why the cop is shooting a donut in this strip:



Luckily I have 16 years of corporate experience, and I know how to navigate my way around group decisions. What you need is a solution that could only appeal to a committee. I suggested a compromise...
72Mattinglyinthehall
      ID: 454491514
      Tue, Feb 26, 2008, 10:34
Sad day. Well, not that sad I guess, but disappointing news from Ed Morrissey at Captain's Quarters:
The Road Goes Ever On
Today brings exciting news and an end to a time in my life that has proven far more successful than I ever dreamed. Beginning on March 1, I will begin working for Michelle Malkin, a friend, mentor, and writer I have long admired. She has offered me a position as writer at Hot Air, and my blogging will appear exclusively there.

That means that I will close out Captain’s Quarters sometime in March. This saddens me, as it has become my ever-ready home and because of the terrific community it has generated. I hope that the CapQ community comes with me to Hot Air, and Hot Air will have open registration today for 12 hours in order to allow CapQ commenters to join me at my new digs.

Michelle and I have different voices, and sometimes different points of view. Rest assured that Michelle respects these differences and wants them as part of Hot Air. My writing and my viewpoints will continue, and find even more encouragement than before. In fact, we look forward to debating on some of these points between her personal blog and Hot Air, much as we have between her personal blog and CapQ – with respect, affection, and the absolute belief that we have it right!

In short, nothing really changes except location. I’ll still write as I have always done, perhaps with even more frequency, as I join Allahpundit at Hot Air. I’ll continue my daily show as a key piece in building the Hot Air brand and increasing our visibility. The show may take new directions before long, but we’ll talk more about that when the time comes.

At some point, we’ll redirect the CapQ domain to Hot Air. My archives will remain on line, though, and I intend to keep them available permanently at this link. Comments will close on all posts after March 1, even though I may cross-post for another few weeks to make for a smooth transition.

I want to thank everyone who has helped make Captain’s Quarters such a great success. I hope you will all join me on the next part of the great adventure.
As far as I'm concerned, Ed Morrissey is the gold standard for rational political commentary from the right. He's not a political insider and might not be among the right's shrewdest thinkers or highly accomplished writers but his genuine willingness to put aside his personal bias in approaching a topic is a rare treasure in the blogosphere.

So starting in March, if I want to continue to read Captain Ed, I'll have to log on to Hot Air, home of that succubus and her harpy minions. Oh well. Be prepared for a lot more complaining from yours truly about the right wing blogosphere.
73Madman
      ID: 230542010
      Tue, Feb 26, 2008, 11:12
MITH 72 -- that event is one reason I prompted for input on right-wing blogs in a new thread ...
74Baldwin
      ID: 201045320
      Wed, Nov 05, 2008, 15:38
One thing this election taught me was how badly I had underestimated Michelle Malkin. She has really got a lot on the ball. I'm not ready to put her above Coulter on my list but she's headed in that general direction.
75Baldwin
      ID: 201045320
      Wed, Nov 05, 2008, 15:44
Also I take back my comments regarding Mark Levin. He was better as a call-in in small doses. Some holes exposed in his game under the pressure of 3 hours daily.
76Seattle Zen
      ID: 49112418
      Tue, Nov 18, 2008, 18:28
One more of your comments caught my eye, Baldwin:

Tony Snow You'll be hearing more from him...big future.

We certainly did hear more from him, unfortunately it was about his health. Did anyone start a thread about him a while back... sorry, PD, it was too easy :)
77Boldwin
      ID: 4010491810
      Tue, Nov 18, 2008, 19:15
Yeah, we've discussed Snow during his last days.
78Perm Dude
      ID: 154552311
      Wed, Jul 15, 2009, 12:07
Hilzoy retiring
79Mith
      ID: 2894309
      Mon, Jul 20, 2009, 09:08
What terrible news to return to from a vacation!

With her retirement, the medium loses one of it's most valuable treasures.

For anyone unfamiliar, here's one of her final posts at Obsidian Wings and a fine sample of that loss.
80Boldwin
      ID: 467910
      Mon, Jul 20, 2009, 13:03
You notice that she doesn't mention that setting health insurers up in competition with an entity that doesn't need to make a profit and can print money, might as well be the same thing operatively.
81Mith
      ID: 2894309
      Mon, Jul 20, 2009, 13:14
That's correct, B.

She didn't bother including any off-topic rightist talking points in a post focused on the rather consistant failure of top right-leaning bloggers to do the the most basic and minimum of research possble that only the most partisan dolt wouldn't demand from a political pundit before he/she espouses such disingenuous claims.
82Perm Dude
      ID: 154552311
      Mon, Jul 20, 2009, 13:14
Health insurance companies, however, are much more flexible than the government, and can offer services the government can't.

The fact that the government is in the mail delivery field hasn't stopped Fed-Ex and UPS (and many local companies) from package delivery.
83DWetzel at work
      ID: 49962710
      Mon, Jul 20, 2009, 14:45
Here's what I don't get:

If government-run health care is supposed to be so terrible in comparison to private insurance, and the free market is supposed to be so great, why is there a fear that businesses will abandon private care (which isn't going to be abolished) for government care? Why would all these businesses (who presumably want to have good health care available to their employees for both altruistic reasons and to attract better employees) flock to the government plan?

It seems like a rejection of the belief in the free market to assume that that's going to happen, doesn't it?
84biliruben
      ID: 461142511
      Mon, Jul 20, 2009, 15:17
There is no free market in health care, there never was, and imho, there cannot be.
85Boldwin
      ID: 376192015
      Mon, Jul 20, 2009, 16:19
why is there a fear that businesses will abandon private care (which isn't going to be abolished) for government care? - Dwetz

Why would any employer spend money for their employees when the government is willing to foot the bill? It would put them at a competitive disadvantage other than the issue that it might be better coverage and attract/retain better employees [assuming they haven't gone half-quack aflac].

If your employee costs are 4-5K less per year than your competitors...
86Boldwin
      ID: 376192015
      Mon, Jul 20, 2009, 16:21
There is no free market in health care, there never was, and imho, there cannot be. - bili

There is no care in government.
87DWetzel at work
      ID: 49962710
      Mon, Jul 20, 2009, 16:40
"Why would any employer spend money for their employees when the government is willing to foot the bill? It would put them at a competitive disadvantage other than the issue that it might be better coverage and attract/retain better employees [assuming they haven't gone half-quack aflac]."

Because the government "footing the bill" will result in higher taxes? (There, I said it. Someone has to pay for the insurance one way or another.)

Businesses making the choice to have the government option insurance are determining one of two things:

1. The government option is a better option for them and their employees in terms of cost/benefit ratio, or

2. They think that they can pay a lower bill because their tax liability for the insurance costs will be significantly cheaper than the current option (in other words, because the government option is cheaper for them!).

Is there an element of "socailized medicine" in this? Um, yes. Of course, isn't that what insurance is in the first place?
88Tree
      ID: 41371322
      Mon, Aug 17, 2009, 15:15
I love Mark Cuban's blog...

The Most Patriotic Thing You Can Do

Aug 13th 2009 1:51PM

Bust your ass and get rich.

Make a boatload of money. Pay your taxes. Lots of taxes. Hire people. Train people. Pay people. Spend money on rent, equipment, services. Pay more taxes.

When you make a shitload of money. Do something positive with it. If you are smart enough to make it, you will be smart enough to know where to put it to work.

I don’t care what anyone says. Being rich is a good thing. Not just in the obvious sense of benefiting you and your family, but in the broader sense. Profits are not a zero sum game. The more you make the more of a financial impact you can have.

I’m not against government involvement in times of need. I am for recognizing that big public companies will continue to cut jobs in an effort to prop up stock prices, which in turn stimulates the need for more government involvement. Every cut job by the big companies extracts a cost on the American people in one way or another...

Entrepreneurs are needed to create and grow companies to absorb those people in new jobs. If entrepreneurs dont create those jobs, the government ends up having to spend more money to help them one way or another.

So be Patriotic. Go out there and get rich. Get so obnoxiously rich that when that tax bill comes , your first thought will be to choke on how big a check you have to write. Your 2nd thought will be “what a great problem to have”, and your 3rd should be a recognition that in paying your taxes you are helping to support millions of Americans that are not as fortunate as you.

In these times of “The Great Recession” we shouldn’t be trying to shift the benefits of wealth behind some curtain. We should be celebrating and encouraging people to make as much money as they can. Profits equal tax money. While some people might find it distasteful to pay taxes. I don’t. I find it Patriotic.

I’m not saying that the government’s use of tax money is the most efficient use of our hard earned capital. It obviously is not. In a perfect world, there would be a better option. We don’t live in a perfect world. We don’t live in a perfect time. We live in a time where the government plays a big role in an effort to help lead us out this Great Recession. That’s reality.

So I will repeat my point. Get out there and make a boatload of money. Enjoy the shit out your money. Pay your taxes.

Its the most Patriotic thing you can do.
89sarge33rd
      ID: 17681812
      Mon, Aug 17, 2009, 15:19
Here here!!
90Seattle Zen
      ID: 257501716
      Mon, Aug 17, 2009, 17:50
If you are smart enough to make it, you will be smart enough to know where to put it to work.

I'm sorry, Mark, but you are certainly not speaking from experience here.
92Perm Dude
      ID: 5510572522
      Thu, Apr 21, 2011, 15:37
butt (to get rid of spam)
93biliruben
      ID: 59551120
      Fri, Dec 23, 2011, 10:06
This one's for Baldwin (and anyone else who wants to live the good life), so that he can take control of his own financial destiny.

Mister Money Mustache.
 If you believe a recent post violates the policy on Civility and Respect,
you may report the abuse via email to moderators@rotoguru1.com 
RotoGuru Politics Forum

View the Forum Registry

XML Get RSS Feed for this thread


Self-edit this thread




Post a reply to this message: Your Top Ten Blogs

Name:
Email:
Message:
Click here to create and insert a link
Click here to insert a block of hidden (spoiler) text
Ignore line feeds? no (typical)   yes (for HTML table input)


Viewing statistics for this thread
Period# Views# Users
Last hour11
Last 24 hours11
Last 7 days64
Last 30 days2817
Since Mar 1, 200739391161