Forum: base
Page 11342
Subject: Today's News & Views (9/13)


  Posted by: Perm Dude - Leader [28861216] Thu, Sep 13, 09:59

The other thread was getting way too long to load up!

pd
 
1JW
      Leader
      ID: 83441917
      Thu, Sep 13, 10:15
Thought it might be of interest to all of you to know that tomorrow (Friday) has been declared a national day of mourning here in Ireland.
All Government offices, banks, schools, colleges, stores, places of entertainment, bars & restaurants will be closed all day.
An ecumenical service attended by the President & Prime Minister will be televised nationwide and many ceremonies will take place especially at the American embassy, which has seen queues for the last few days to sign books of condolence.

You are not alone ...
 
2Perm Dude
      Leader
      ID: 28861216
      Thu, Sep 13, 10:37
Thanks, JW. The world's reaction to this, even among people who have not always seen eye to eye with us, has been heartening (not that the Irish haven't seen eye to eye with us--well, you know what I mean!).

To follow up a point on the earlier thread, I agree with patjams and ivan regarding the role of the Secret Service. If in their opinion (and their opinion alone) the President would be in harms way by taking an action, they have the authority to overide a Presidential order.

pd
 
3Gangman
      ID: 448401310
      Thu, Sep 13, 10:40
Thanks for that, JW.
 
4IRRIDUCIBILI LAZIO
      ID: 34433228
      Thu, Sep 13, 10:53
my soccer team s.s. Lazio will play with a black band on player's arm in sign of respect for all the victims. The fans will enter the stadium just 5 minutes after the game will begin, staying outside it praying for all the victims.
This is a little thing but it's all that a soccer team can do......
 
5KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Thu, Sep 13, 11:04
From biliruben in the previous thread: "My question: who exactly is in charge here? This makes it seem more than ever that dubya is being handled. He is taking, not giving orders. If he can't even command the secret service, how can we expect him to command our entire armed forces. The wrong president for the times is the only conclusion I can reach. This scares me. I hope I'm wrong."

The last time I checked, the President, even the great ones of the past, couldn't fly AF-1, therefore, the pilots, controlled by the Secret Service, are in charge of where the plane goes. Further, Bush's remarks about returning to Washington were made at a time when it is absolutely unclear as to whether or not it was safe to return to Washington. When will you people realize that the airplanes were not the only threat? It is blind to think that the airplanes were the only threat. The President may have thought so, but the FBI, CIA, or Secret Service may have had information to the contrary and would be in a better position to make that call. Bush is not taking orders. He is being forced to not take his own safety for granted, something which any President would be forced to do.

Personally, I do think you're wrong. I think, like steve houpt alluded to in the other thread that you are looking to find holes in Bush's armor and if you look hard enough at any President, you can find them. Why, for instance, didn't Clinton continue the attack against bin Laden after the '93 bombings until he was exterminated? Was he being handled? The fact is that a President is an icon. He does not make all the decisions, nor has he ever made all the decisions, nor will he ever make all the decisions. Get over your political differences and support America as a country. Bush is doing everything he can and is proving to be just as good of a leader during these tough times as any President I have been witness to. NOTE: No, I did not vote for Bush, nor did I want Bush in office. But I will, without a shread of doubt, support our President during times like this. Political differences be damned.

 
6jedman
      Sustainer
      ID: 27481118
      Thu, Sep 13, 11:05
Is anybody else as uncomfortable as I am about all the information we are getting about what the FBI, the CIA, etc are doing. To be quite honest, I don't want to know what they are planning, just that they are doing something. If I'm Bin Laden, I just tune to CNN. I don't want to know that we intercepted cell phone calls. I don't care why the President went to Nebraska. I guess I have confidence that our government is going to handle this the way it should be handled and I don't want us to tip our hand in anyway. It's not going to be solved in the next few days or even weeks. Let's have confidence in our leaders and let them do their jobs without second guessing every little thing that is said or done.
 
7Khahan
      ID: 12432113
      Thu, Sep 13, 11:06
With regards to Katiex comments from post 142 in the prior thread and the responses it generated:
I'd have to agree with Doug in 149.
Katiex and those that agree with her, I completely understand you have a very strong belief in God and feel his word and his way are the right way and just way. Since this was an act against Him and His way, that alone makes the act wrong.
I believe that too. But there is much more to it than that. What about aetheists? Those that believe neither in the Christian God nor Alah.
On these boards you are discussing, debating and defending sides against people from all walks of life.
Those may be your personal reasons and values and for you personally. But if that is your only defense, then you will be hard pressed to convince people who do not share the same religious beliefs as you that you are right.
If you look, for the most part, people on this board do agree with the need for and end result, even if they disagree with the method.
I've got to agree with Doug here. Saying what you said narrows what has happened to too fine of a line.
Yes, they committed the act in the name of their religion. Like Doug said, that makes them right and jsut in their eyes. Yet here we are condemning them and calling them cowards and terrorists.
How can you expect to use the same method of justification as them to prove yourself right?
You are entitled to your religious belief. If you, personally use that to fuel yourself that is great. But when dealing with others, it is not always enough. In fact its almost never enough.
 
8Khahan
      ID: 12432113
      Thu, Sep 13, 11:06
With regards to Katiex comments from post 142 in the prior thread and the responses it generated:
I'd have to agree with Doug in 149.
Katiex and those that agree with her, I completely understand you have a very strong belief in God and feel his word and his way are the right way and just way. Since this was an act against Him and His way, that alone makes the act wrong.
I believe that too. But there is much more to it than that. What about aetheists? Those that believe neither in the Christian God nor Alah.
On these boards you are discussing, debating and defending sides against people from all walks of life.
Those may be your personal reasons and values and for you personally. But if that is your only defense, then you will be hard pressed to convince people who do not share the same religious beliefs as you that you are right.
If you look, for the most part, people on this board do agree with the need for and end result, even if they disagree with the method.
I've got to agree with Doug here. Saying what you said narrows what has happened to too fine of a line.
Yes, they committed the act in the name of their religion. Like Doug said, that makes them right and jsut in their eyes. Yet here we are condemning them and calling them cowards and terrorists.
How can you expect to use the same method of justification as them to prove yourself right?
You are entitled to your religious belief. If you, personally use that to fuel yourself that is great. But when dealing with others, it is not always enough. In fact its almost never enough.
 
9Khahan
      ID: 12432113
      Thu, Sep 13, 11:07
WHY THE AMERICAN FLAG IS FOLDED 13 TIMES


Have you ever wondered why the Flag of the United
States of America is folded 13 times when it is
lowered or when it is folded and handed to the next
of kin at the burial of a veteran? Here is the meaning
of each of those folds and what it means:

The first fold of our Flag is a symbol of life.

The second fold is a symbol of our belief in eternal life.

The third fold is made in honor and remembrance of
the veterans departing our ranks who gave a portion of
their lives for the defense of our country to attain
peace throughout the world.

The fourth fold represents our weaker nature, for as
American citizens trusting, it is to Him we turn in
times of peace as well as in time of war for His
divine guidance.

The fifth fold is a tribute to our country, for in the
words of Stephen Decatur, "Our Country, in dealing
with other countries may she always be right; but it
is still our country, right or wrong."

The sixth fold is for where our hearts lie. It is with
our heart that we pledge allegiance to the Flag of
the United States of America, and to the Republic for
which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible,
with liberty and justice for all.

The seventh fold is a tribute to our Armed Forces,
for it is through the Armed Forces that we protect our
country and our flag against all her enemies, whether
they be found within or without the boundaries of our
Republic.

The eighth fold is a tribute to the one who entered
into the valley of the shadow of death, that we might
see the light of day, and to honor mother, for whom
it flies on Mother's Day.

The ninth fold is a tribute to womanhood; for it has
been through their faith, their love, loyalty and devotion
that the character of the men and women who have
made this country great has been molded.

The tenth fold is a tribute to the father, for he, too,
has given his sons and daughters for the defense
of our country since they were first born.

The eleventh fold, in the eyes of a Hebrew citizen
represents the lower portion of the seal of King David
and King Solomon, and glorifies in their eyes, the God
of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.

The twelfth fold, in the eyes of a Christian citizen,
represents an emblem of eternity and glorifies, in their
eyes, God the Father, the Son and Holy Spirit.

When the Flag is completely folded, the stars are
uppermost reminding us of our Nation's motto, "In God
We Trust."

After the Flag is completely folded and tucked in,
it takes on the appearance of a cocked hat, ever
reminding us of the soldiers who served under
General George Washington, and the Sailors and
Marines who served under Captain John Paul Jones,
who were followed by their comrades and shipmates in
the Armed Forces of the United States, preserving for us
the rights, privileges, and freedoms we enjoy today.

The next time you see a Flag ceremony honoring someone
that has served our country, either in the Armed Forces
or in our civilian services such as the Police Force or Fire
Department, keep in mind all the important reasons behind
each and every movement. They have paid the ultimate
sacrifice for all of us by honoring our Flag and our Country.


 
10steve houpt
      ID: 208461016
      Thu, Sep 13, 11:10
from other thread - also

- that they didn't just say that this is SOP, instead of seemingly making up a story about a direct
threat to AF1.

Why is it seemingly making up a story? What intelligence do you have access to prove this is a
made up story. First, I would not even answer the stupid questions from the press about why you
went where you did.

Do you know the code word used to identify AF1? In fact it probably changes. I don't. A threat made
against that code word was intercepted. The AG says they have credible evidence that AF1 was
threatened. And he said in response to questions he will not answer any questions about anything
about where they get their evidence or intelligence about anything.

This also from the NYT:

A threatening message received by the Secret Service was relayed to the agents with the president
that "Air Force One is next." According to the high official, American code words were used showing
a knowledge of procedures that made the threat credible.

Here is President's supposedly saltier comment. `I don't want some tinhorn terrorists keeping me out
of Washington.'
 
11Khahan
      ID: 12432113
      Thu, Sep 13, 11:11
Leonard Pitts, Jr.
Published Wednesday, September 12, 2001

It's my job to have something to say.  They pay me to provide words that
help make sense of that which troubles the American soul.  But in this
moment of airless shock when hot tears sting disbelieving eyes, the only
thing I can find to say, the only words that seem to fit, must be
addressed to the unknown author of this suffering.

You monster. You beast. You unspeakable bastard.  What lesson did you
hope to teach us by your coward's attack on our World Trade Center, our
Pentagon, us?  What was it you hoped we would learn? Whatever it was,
please know that you failed.

Did you want us to respect your cause?  You just damned your cause.

Did you want to make us fear?  You just steeled our resolve.

Did you want to tear us apart?  You just brought us together.

Let me tell you about my people.  We are a vast and quarrelsome family,
a family rent by racial, social, political and class division, but a
family nonetheless.  We're frivolous, yes, capable of expending
tremendous emotional energy on pop cultural minutiae -- a singer's
revealing dress, a ball team's misfortune, a cartoon mouse.  We're
wealthy, too, spoiled by the ready availability of trinkets and material
goods, and maybe because of that, we walk through life with a certain
sense of blithe entitlement.

We are fundamentally decent, though -- peace-loving and compassionate.
We struggle to know the right thing and to do it.  And we are, the
overwhelming majority of us, people of faith, believers in a just and
loving God.

Some people -- you, perhaps -- think that any or all of this makes us
weak.  You're mistaken. We are not weak.  Indeed, we are strong in ways
that cannot be measured by arsenals.

IN PAIN
Yes, we're in pain now.  We are in mourning and we are in shock.  We're
still grappling with the unreality of the awful thing you did, still
working to make ourselves understand that this isn't a special effect
from some Hollywood blockbuster, isn't the plot development from a Tom
Clancy novel.  Both in terms of the awful scope of their ambition and
the probable final death toll, your attacks are likely to go down as the
worst acts of terrorism in the history of the United States and,
probably, the history of the world.  You've bloodied us as we have never
been bloodied before.

But there's a gulf of difference between making us bloody and making us
fall.  This is the lesson Japan was taught to its bitter sorrow the last
time anyone hit us this hard, the last time anyone brought us such
abrupt and monumental pain.  When roused, we are righteous in our
outrage, terrible in our force. When provoked by this level of
barbarism, we will bear any suffering, pay any cost, go to any length,
in the pursuit of justice.

I tell you this without fear of contradiction.  I know my people, as
you, I think, do not.  What I know reassures me. It also causes me to
tremble with dread of the future.  In the days to come, there will be
recrimination and accusation, fingers pointing to determine whose
failure allowed this to happen and what can be done to prevent it from
happening again.  There will be heightened security, misguided talk of
revoking basic freedoms.  We'll go forward from this moment sobered,
chastened, sad. But determined, too.  Unimaginably determined.

THE STEEL IN US
You see, the steel in us is not always readily apparent.  That aspect of
our character is seldom understood by people who don't know us well.  On
this day, the family's bickering is put on hold.  As Americans we will
weep, as Americans we will mourn, and as Americans, we will rise in
defense of all that we cherish.

So I ask again:  What was it you hoped to teach us? It occurs to me that
maybe you just wanted us to know the depths of your hatred.  If that's
the case, consider the message received. And take this message in
exchange:
You don't know my people.  You don't know what we're capable of.  You
don't know what you have just started.

But you are about to learn.....
.
One last thing, I want to stress the last thing Jedman posted in #6:
Let's have confidence in our leaders and let them do their jobs without second guessing every little thing that is said or done.
That is one of the most important comments I've seen on these boards. The media, the political analysts, the airmchair bureaucrats..all need to shut up and leave Pres. Bush, VP Cheney, General Powell, the CIA, FBI and anybody else doing this alone to do their jobs. How can do they do what needs to be done if they are worried the press is going to misunderstand/misinterpret/misquote or just give too much info?
 
12steve houpt
      ID: 208461016
      Thu, Sep 13, 11:13
jedman - YES.

At least President told reproters that he will not answer questions about intelligence or tell the what, when, how, etc they are planning.

Ashcroft in an interview said same thing.

We could use a blackout of some coverage.


TWO FIREFIGHTERS pulled out and walking out of rubble.
 
13Harkonnon
      ID: 50230315
      Thu, Sep 13, 11:14
jedman

I can assure you that We all do not get all the information. I had studio duty on Tuesday and due the events there was a rush of pictures and info flooding in.

Not to mention that FBI et all would never get out any really significant infos intentionally it can happen in situations like these by accident.

Still then there is a Codex among Journalists to second guess and re-check anything before it goes on air. This is too serious an incident to be careless.
At least here in Germany we work like this, but I'm 99% sure this goes for all networks.

 
14KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Thu, Sep 13, 11:26
Harkonnon, that is pretty much the way it is here also. The mentioned on NBC News last night that they had information about the attacks that occured as retaliation for the '93 bombing of the WTC and they didn't disclose the information because it would put troops in harms way. I don't think any network would release any information that would put any member of our government or military in harms way.
 
15The_Mentors
      ID: 9432248
      Thu, Sep 13, 11:28
Does anybody know why they are closing off 42nd st in Manhattan?
Bomb threat I would assume?
 
16El Tel
      ID: 54891210
      Thu, Sep 13, 11:30
TV here in the UK reports that Bin Laden is believed to be under house arrest.
El Tel
 
17wildyams/katietx
      ID: 247272010
      Thu, Sep 13, 11:32
Khahan...the one really beautiful thing about this country is exactly what is happening on these boards.

We are allowed to speak our minds, voice our opinons. I in no way meant to besmirch anyone religion or their lack thereof. I have great respect for those that believe in a higher power.

However, I do not in any way condone the killing of innocent people in the name of that religion...no matter which one it is. The fact that I am a Christian in no way belies the fact that terrible things have been done in the name of Christianity. It is the simple fact that bin Laden is hiding behind his religion in doing terroristic acts that makes him dispicable (and should for all of Islam). That is my opinion. Pure and simple.

Please do not think I'm attacking you or anyone else on these boards, nothing could be further from the truth. I can agree to disagree with you. As well as respect your right to voice your opinion.

 
18Perm Dude
      Leader
      ID: 28861216
      Thu, Sep 13, 11:38
Mentors, maybe something to do with the UN? It's on 42nd at the East River.

pd
 
19Perm Dude
      Leader
      ID: 28861216
      Thu, Sep 13, 11:44
Cold front coming into NYC, rain expected tomorrow sometime.

The 42nd street evacuation is because of a suspicious package in Grand Central. They've had several of these the last couple days.

pd
 
20The_Mentors
      ID: 9432248
      Thu, Sep 13, 11:56
I take the subway to 42nd st everyday. There was a Middle Eastern man sitting on the train with dufflebag. I got off at 34th st and walked. Everybody is on edge in the city.
 
21Perm Dude
      Leader
      ID: 28861216
      Thu, Sep 13, 11:59
Per Ashcroft briefing a minute ago, they believe there were 18 highjackers total (all ticketed passengers): 5 each on 2 planes and 4 each on 2 others.

pd
 
22Khahan
      ID: 12432113
      Thu, Sep 13, 11:59
Katie, I did not take it as a personal attack. Actually, I agree with you. Bin Laden feels he is going to be seated at the feet of Allah for what he did. I feel he is going to burn in hell and be squashed under the foot of satan for what he did.
However, I just wanted to point out (and I think Doug was, too) that even though you and I and many others think that way, there is another side to that story.
You and I believe in the Christian God. Bin Laden believes in Allah. What if Bin Laden's religion turns out to be right. Where will we be? What if neither side is right, but say Shintoism is right. Then where will we all be?
The point was that the religious argument is a double edged sword and just as likely to cut you on the backswing as it is to cut your enemy on the attack.
Be careful with it, use it, but don't rely solely on it.
 
23butt
      ID: 26801312
      Thu, Sep 13, 12:00
Is this a return to normalcy? According to a live local TV news report, Orlando (FL) International Airport is being evacuated ... police are onsite with machine guns and bomb-sniffing dogs.
:-(
 
24Perm Dude
      Leader
      ID: 28861216
      Thu, Sep 13, 12:09
Powell responding to a question about Iraq being the only country on the US' state-sponsored list not to respond to the attack: "I'm not surprised. Saddam Hussein is one of the world's leading terrorists. I don't believe that there is one drop of the milk of human kindness flowing through his veins. Next question."

Libya, North Korea, Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Cuba. All have offered condolences and help (!).

pd
 
25Khahan
      ID: 12432113
      Thu, Sep 13, 12:13
In my eyes, Cuba has no choice but to offer condolences and assistance.
Lets just say the very real scenario of a large scale war occurs. Cuba would be one of the first places we would take out if they were against us.
Why? Strategic geographical location for use by our enemies.
Cuba has no choice but offer assistance. Otherwise, they will be the first casualty if war breaks out.
 
26patjams
      ID: 22858138
      Thu, Sep 13, 12:14
I understand that the media has a job to do when reporting the news and I also know that there are members of the media present here on the boards, however, why do some members of the media feel it necessary to be presented with each and every detail of government action. I know it is no longer possible because we live in a world full of scrutiny, but let these people do their jobs. I also realize that government officals will not reveal anything that they don't wish to, but I get the feeling that some of these members of the media would ask if they could have the daye and time of the 1st attack if they thought they would get an answer. I don't have anything to do with the media, but even I wouldn't ask some of these dumb azz questions. Powell referred to a "candidate living in that region" (referring to Pakistan/Afghanistan) and somebody comes back with the question, "Are you speaking of Bin Ladin?". Uhhhhhhhhhhh, you think?
 
27Myboyjack
      Leader
      ID: 4443038
      Thu, Sep 13, 12:17
I'd like to see a whole lot more of Colin Powell while this crisis goes on ( danm I wish he'd run for Pres.. ) The more I see of him, the more comfortable I feel that US interests are in good hands
 
28The_Mentors
      ID: 9432248
      Thu, Sep 13, 12:24
I take the subway to 42nd st everyday. There was a Middle Eastern man sitting on the train with dufflebag. I got off at 34th st and walked. Everybody is on edge in the city.
 
29The_Mentors
      ID: 9432248
      Thu, Sep 13, 12:25
5 fireman reportedly saved.
 
30F Gump
      ID: 53837117
      Thu, Sep 13, 12:26
The more I see of Bush during this time, the more I am impressed. He is an emerging Leader, very single-minded when he sees a goal it appears. I am of the opinion that (maybe deliberately, maybe not) he has been incredibly underestimated.

Time will tell. But I think he has the cojones and the vision to take care of things that Clinton (and possibly his father also) either did not or would not confront. And the personal strength to surround himself with strong wise advisors rather than weak "yes" men.
 
31wildyams/katietx
      ID: 247272010
      Thu, Sep 13, 12:27
Just look in Powell's eyes...you will see the answer to all the questions right there!
 
32The_Mentors
      ID: 9432248
      Thu, Sep 13, 12:29
Bush says he is a loving man but this needs to be done. I wonder what he is planning on doing that is bringing him near tears?
 
33KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Thu, Sep 13, 12:36
The_Mentors, I imagine an all-out attack on Afghanistan, and possibly on terrorism around the world (Iraq, etc.) with the support of NATO countries and other allies. I can't imagine that they would be spending this much time gathering allies (which is what the news says is happening) without such a large scale attack being planned.

I heard it mentioned that Bush's eyes are completely red. I can't imagine that he is emotional over an small, concentrated attack on those responsible. Likely he is emotional over a large-scale attack that would mean many "innocent" deaths in the country/countries we attack.

 
34KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Thu, Sep 13, 12:46
Five firefighters pulled from the rubble and three WALKED AWAY! from the mess. Truly a miracle.

Word is that the three that walked away were in an SUV and stayed there until they were found. No word on the condition of the other two other than that they are alive.

 
35The_Mentors
      ID: 9432248
      Thu, Sep 13, 12:47
I really believe that there are still many many people alive under that rubble.
 
36KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Thu, Sep 13, 12:50
From Yahoo: "With hundreds of people confirmed dead and almost 5,000 missing, President Bush said on Thursday the United States and its allies were determined to 'do generations a favor by coming together and whipping terrorism.'"

Again, sounds like something large-scale is in the works.

 
37KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Thu, Sep 13, 12:52
5 NY Firefighters Alive in Rubble - Initial article.
 
38Perm Dude
      Leader
      ID: 38728300
      Thu, Sep 13, 12:55
I'm sure Bush has probably also had very little sleep since Tuesday.

F Gump, I agree with your assessment of Bush, but it's more than speculative to suggest that Clinton or even Bush Sr. would have acted differently. This is a test of all of us, the President included, and no one has ever faced anything like this. Bush is doing quite fine without the comparisons.

pd
 
39Sludge
      Donor
      ID: 1440310
      Thu, Sep 13, 12:58
Another tip from a friend, again from rotten.

chmod a+x /bin/laden
 
40The_Mentors
      ID: 9432248
      Thu, Sep 13, 13:05
NFL games cxled.
 
41KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Thu, Sep 13, 13:08
The_Mentors, there are a lot of postponements happening in a lot of sports. I'm keeping an update going in the When to start playing again? thread.
 
42KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Thu, Sep 13, 13:08
Sludge (39), well put!
 
43patjams
      ID: 22858138
      Thu, Sep 13, 13:10
2 of the firefighters were not from the original attack. They fell into a hole while looking for colleagues.
 
44KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Thu, Sep 13, 13:11
Pentagon Update: Pentagon Says About 190 People Dead

"Approximately 190 people perished in the terrorist attack on the Pentagon, and the Army suffered the heaviest blow with 74 people lost, the Pentagon announced Thursday."

 
45patjams
      ID: 22858138
      Thu, Sep 13, 13:15
It's amazing that had it not been for the WTC, the Pentagon attack would have been the largest terrorist attack in U.S. history. But since the WTC is so devastating the numbers from the Pentagon are going to pale by comparison.
 
46Sludge
      Donor
      ID: 1440310
      Thu, Sep 13, 13:16
My sister just informed me that reports of bin Laden being under house arrest are false.
 
47Perm Dude
      Leader
      ID: 38728300
      Thu, Sep 13, 13:17
Who's your sister, Sludge?

;)
 
48patjams
      ID: 22858138
      Thu, Sep 13, 13:19
Don't they sing 'We are Family'? ;o)
 
49Perm Dude
      Leader
      ID: 38728300
      Thu, Sep 13, 13:20
hahaha! Very funny, patjams!
 
50Sludge
      Donor
      ID: 1440310
      Thu, Sep 13, 13:21
From my thread on meeting Billy Wagner:


19 Aunt Jackie Sludge - Cool Story, but you are still a big ole dork!
ID: 20714817
Wed, Aug 08, 17:14


Her.
 
52Sludge
      Donor
      ID: 1440310
      Thu, Sep 13, 13:22
Oh geez... *sigh* Ha ha ha... very funny.
 
53F Gump
      ID: 53837117
      Thu, Sep 13, 13:27
Perm Dude

I was not speculating on what Clinton or Bush Sr would have done under THESE circumstances. I was instead commenting on their lack of having ALREADY done something to Bin Laden. He is not a new problem - our current president "inherited" him because of prior lack of dealing with the problem.

Read this list of prior things that Bin Laden has done previously towards the US, both successes and failures, about 4/5 of the way down this article in a drop-down list. My point is that this man has been WAGING WAR on the U.S. since at least 1993 (thus during almost all of Clinton's tenure) and maybe before. That is an incontrovertible fact. This is merely his MOST SUCCESSFUL ATTACK in that very same war. Til now, the US leaders have whined and then done basically nothing.
 
54Perm Dude
      Leader
      ID: 38728300
      Thu, Sep 13, 13:27
F Gump, you link doesn't work.

But your point is a good one that this is an inherited problem. Terrorism has been a force for some time now, and my readings indicate that experts point to its origins as a political force to the early 1970s in the Middle East.

There are many causes of the current crisis, many of them stemming from those who disagree with previous political stands that the US has made. Certainly, though, no one foresaw this particular action, wouldn't you agree? You seem to be saying (don't let me put words in your mouth) that the failure of Clinton or Bush Sr. to take out bin Laden has resulted in this problem.

pd
 
55Khahan
      ID: 12432113
      Thu, Sep 13, 13:31
I wouldn't say Bush Sr and Clinton's failure to deal with Bin Laden resulted in this problem.
Stating it that way seems to lessen the culpability Bin Laden has.
The basics of what Perm Dude and Gump are getting at is true though. Clinton and Bush Sr have had reason before to go after Bin Laden and have not followed through for whatever reason.
That is the past though, and hopefully Junior can learn from the mistakes of his predecessors and take this whack job out for good.
 
56Myboyjack
      Leader
      ID: 4443038
      Thu, Sep 13, 13:32
Am Ex building and 1 Liberty PLaza building appear ready to collapse. If they go, they'll take a lot with them and further exaserbate resue efforts.
 
57F Gump
      ID: 53837117
      Thu, Sep 13, 13:43
Perm Dude

(The link should be fixed now.)

My point is that Bin Laden specifically, not necessarily "terrorists in general", needed to be removed as a threat long ago. I base this on the linked list - it is is not hard to see that a failure to take action was going to eventually lead to something bad. And nothing was done. The CHOICE (yes, it was a choice) was to ignore the man and let him continue. He openly "declared war" on the US years ago - and took continued steps in attacking and fighting that war.

Something this bad, no one of course could have known. But a president is paid to either have foresight, or to surround himself with people wise enough to look ahead and then listen to them.

Had this happened after Bush had had to deal with it and done nothing, it would be on his head, also - and if he does NOT do something to win this WAR that has been going on for at least 8 years, future attacks will be his fault in that regard, yes. Previous leader or leaders failed in that test, yes: that is indeed my opinion.
 
58F Gump
      ID: 53837117
      Thu, Sep 13, 13:53
KHAHAN

I do not in any way intend to say that Bin Laden is not entirely culpable. But a failure to make any true attempt to eliminate that real threat to the US was a failure of prior leader(s). (I do not know when he started for sure: the first WTC attack, which was a Bin Laden op, was in '93).

It is as if you have someone repeatedly trying to burn down your house. Instead of taking action to make him stop, you ignore him and then attempt to put out the fires when he starts them before your family burns to death. It would be far better to arrest and jail him (or kill him) rather than to allow him to keep trying til he is successful.
 
59patjams
      ID: 22858138
      Thu, Sep 13, 13:57
IIRC, there was rumor of a failed assasination/kidnapping attempt of Bin Ladin some time after the '93 attack. He's never left Afghanistan in order for us to make an attempt to capture him. In order to get him, we would've bacially had to declare war on the Afghan's and we all know Clinton wasn't going to do that. Hindsight, in this case, is indeed 20/20.
 
606-9 With The Afro
      ID: 97969
      Thu, Sep 13, 14:01
First story I've seen on this matter:

BIL LADEN UNDER HOUSE ARREST
 
61patjams
      ID: 22858138
      Thu, Sep 13, 14:06
Sounds like damage control from the Taliban to me. Why place him under house arrest if he hasn't been charged? They are just posturing so that they don't get theirselves caught in the melee when the bombs start to drop. I would lend no creedence to anything the Taliban say and I'll bet neither does Bush/
 
62KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Thu, Sep 13, 14:08
As posted in the When to start playing again? thread:

MLB
From ESPN (speaking to Larry Bowa): Larry Bowa has been told to turn their team bus around by their GM and head back to PHI from their trip to CIN, whom they were to play this weekend.

Larry Bowa's understanding is that no games will be played this weekend. Games to resume on Monday.

 
63Perm Dude
      Leader
      ID: 38728300
      Thu, Sep 13, 14:11
Just read that bin Laden is in hiding at a second location, having moved within minutes of the first attack.

My guess is that "house arrest" now means that the house itself is in custody.

pd
 
64tomegun
      ID: 3589611
      Thu, Sep 13, 14:16
mlb will start monday. transportation is a problem right now.
 
65The_Mentors
      ID: 9432248
      Thu, Sep 13, 14:19
If the Talibad indeed has Bin Laden it is a VERY good sign. (Although I doubt it) We need to force these Govt to police there own people. If they dont take care of business we blow them up. Simple. They Aid and abide terrorists and we blow up there country. No mercy.
 
66KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Thu, Sep 13, 14:20
tomegun, transportation is not a problem. Most teams were already on their way to their games and were told to turn around. PHI was closer to CIN than they were to PHI when they were told to return home. MLB is just following the rest of the sports world. Tomorrow will start a weekend of rememberance, not just a day.
 
67The_Mentors
      ID: 9432248
      Thu, Sep 13, 14:20
Personally, I'd like to see three towers built in their place, with the middle one much taller than the other two. That way, it would look like a giant middle finger, directed straight at the fu$^ers who did this
 
68patjams
      ID: 22858138
      Thu, Sep 13, 14:22
Personally, I believe to hold games off that long is a mistake. It gives the people who perpetrated this attack more to celebrate. I know if transportation is tough and if they can't play in New York, they shouldn't play anywhere, but Americans need something to take their minds off of this tragedy if only for a few hours.
 
69Dec
      ID: 48541115
      Thu, Sep 13, 14:26
Nice idea Mentors and that's the american spirit I like.
 
70Mattinglyinthehall
      ID: 1832399
      Thu, Sep 13, 14:27
Surprised to see that Mentors, who works only a few blocks from me, has internet access. Verizon lost our T1 connection and with most power below 14th street down, we're told internet access is a low priority. Our MIS dept installed a dial up connection for me and a few other employees, but I still can't even receive outside emails to my Outlook program linked to our network.

Has Walk been posting?
 
716-9 With The Afro
      ID: 97969
      Thu, Sep 13, 14:27
#67 - Thanks - I needed that!
 
72Sludge
      Donor
      ID: 1440310
      Thu, Sep 13, 14:28
patjams -

Americans have plenty to take their mind off this tragedy. There are shopping malls, parks, the football/baseball and glove/soccer ball/basketball sitting at the bottom of your child's closet, barbeque pits, bottles of wine and friends to share it with, movie theaters, plays, symphonies, museums, that day trip you've been meaning to take, that book you've been meaning to read (no Clancy novels, please), Putt Putt, golf, and on and on and on...

As sports fans, maybe we get a little short-sighted and miss all the other things that are out there to do on a Saturday and Sunday.
 
73Khahan
      ID: 12432113
      Thu, Sep 13, 14:31
Taking my mind off, I can't wait until this weekend. I start out Friday night drinking myself silly with 200-300 other martial artists in Pottsville, Pa. I get to spend 8 hours Saturday fighting with them. Then I get to get drunk with them again. Then Sunday we get to fight again. Then we get to go home!
Drink, fight, drink, fight. What more could you ask for to release stress!
:)
It almost sounds like a family reunion. heheh
 
74Rogue's Strikers
      ID: 33732119
      Thu, Sep 13, 14:37
LOL @ 67

I'm writing that one down. ;)
 
75Sludge
      Donor
      ID: 1440310
      Thu, Sep 13, 14:39
F Gump and Perm Dude -

Not trying to stoke any embers here, but thought y'all might be interested in this:

Clinton rejected military strike on bin Laden

Sorry if it's old news here.
 
76Sludge
      Donor
      ID: 1440310
      Thu, Sep 13, 14:45
Hmmm... very interesting:

Debris found six miles from Pennsylvania crash

SHANKSVILLE, Pennsylvania (CNN) -- Investigators probing the crash of the hijacked United Airlines plane that went down in western Pennsylvania announced Thursday they found another field of debris six miles away from the main crash site.
 
77steve houpt
      ID: 208461016
      Thu, Sep 13, 14:50
patjams (post #26) - I have Ari Fleischer press conference on. You would not believe the questions.

Do you know were bin Laden is? Do you have proof yet that he was involved? (My response - I didn't talk to him before I came in, but the last time I talked to him he asked me to keep it a secret. Proof, sure. Copies of classified briefings and info are available in the back of the room. Just don't distribute them to any terrorists.)

Can the President do anything with out a declaration of war? (three times - different ways). (My response - are you kidding?)

Will the joint resolution be the same as the one his father got for the Gulf War? Is the President working with Congress on the language? (My response - Who cares what it's like. You know we don't talk to Congress. Next question.)

How can you declare war, but not against a country? (My response - You say, I declare war on terrorist's.)

I guess I'd never make it as anyones press secretary.
 
786-9 With The Afro
      ID: 97969
      Thu, Sep 13, 15:02
Agreed about the ridiculous questions that were asked. I like Fleischer. Everything he said had an implied ", Jackass" at the end of it! :)

Ex.: "We've already exhausted that topic and I find no reason to address this question again (, Jackass)."
 
79Perm Dude
      Leader
      ID: 38728300
      Thu, Sep 13, 15:06
I think the press has been pretty good except in these briefings, when they have been awful. For once I trust the government spokespeople to give me the information that they can give out but no more.

pd
 
80Myboyjack
      Leader
      ID: 4443038
      Thu, Sep 13, 15:07
Stock markets will re-open on Monday. Incredible given the devastation down there. An important step though
 
81patjams
      ID: 22858138
      Thu, Sep 13, 15:12
Don't know if these numbers are official, but Peter Jennings just indicated that there are 4,000+ (not more than 5,000) people still missing. That would put the number killed way below what was 1st thought. It's still an obscene amount, but not nearly as bad as it could have been.

Also, all 5 of the firefighters found today were trapped after the collapse.
 
82KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Thu, Sep 13, 15:13
steve houpt, Ann Curry, during the Today show yesterday, was interviewing a firefighter captain and asked something to the effect of, "What emotions are firefighters feeling right now with over 200 firefighters missing?"

My response: "Well, we're pretty damned excited about it. We're pretty sure that the 200 we lost were the bastards that kept us from getting our last pay raise and that's why we sent them in first. We were hoping all along that the building would collapse and what do you know, it happened. Yeah, we're pretty much overjoyed right now."

What idiots!

 
83Perm Dude
      Leader
      ID: 38728300
      Thu, Sep 13, 15:15
NYC officially put the missing at 4366 (as of this afternoon).

pd
 
84Myboyjack
      Leader
      ID: 4443038
      Thu, Sep 13, 15:16
patjams - that # only accounts for people known to be missing - mainly people missing from work, firefighters, police officers, etc. I don't think that # is a ceiling though - but a floor. For instance visitors to the building, (some 100,000 daily) probally aren't accounted for at all yet. Hopefully, the # stays lower than feared though.
 
86F Gump
      ID: 53837117
      Thu, Sep 13, 15:18
steve houpt

I saw the same press briefing, and I echo your sentiments in 77.

I will add one further item: I have failed (somewhat unintentionally) to watch any of the "talking head" shows this week that have picked at the president, played "woe is us", wailed that "no action will be taken and we are doomed again", etc. As a result, I have found that the truth is readily transparent in what is going on, once you stop listening to the paid idiots. The only accurate info being given on a consistent basis, strange as it seems, is from our leaders. This week, the media has taken upon itself to report rumors as facts, speculate on the future with no basis, ignore what is being said and done, and ask the most inane questions known to man.

And for those of you who have media based jobs, I am sorry, but that is the raw truth right now. Other than the bare facts of the story, and the visual images, the media has been a worthless pile of speculation and hearsay and blather the last few days - with a vast pile of it being just plain false but "reported" as fact.
 
88jedman
      Sustainer
      ID: 2702357
      Thu, Sep 13, 15:21
Ditto the above comments. I was listening in my car and shouting at the top of my lungs "Couldn't you ask something just a little more stupid?" My answers would be along the line of steve houpt's.
 
89KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Thu, Sep 13, 15:26
Report out now says that the report about 5 rescue workers being pulled from the rubble is not inaccurate. To what extent is not known. Apparently, the original report was from an "off-the-record" interview.
 
90patjams
      ID: 22858138
      Thu, Sep 13, 15:31
Duhhhhhhhhh, KKB do you think you could show me how to do research on the internet?

Note: I checked that exact page you referenced not 5 minutes before I posted the info and there was nothing, so you can go ahead and save your suggestions for further research. I'm pretty sure I can handle it.
 
92WiddleAvi
      ID: 9830119
      Thu, Sep 13, 15:48
Steve Houpt....My thinking all along. When the Press is asking how the FBI is finding out all their info I was thinking "Sure....Here is the names of spied we have working for us. We also have pictures of what they look like th help. Also we are using the this & this technology to listen in on all their conversations."

I am sorry but the media are all idiots !! Instaed of worrying about who will get the story first etc. let the Gov. do their job. How they get their info, When and how they will retaliate is really not important.

Kinda of reminds of the Olympic games then the terrorist group took hostage the Israeli atheletes. The German special forces were putting forces in place to storm the building. Meanwhile the TV crews are there showing exactly how they are setting up and where they are gonna storm from. The Terrorists were inside the rooms with the TV's on watching !! Kinda ruins the surprise attack don't you think ??
 
93David
      ID: 424281210
      Thu, Sep 13, 15:56
We let the intelligence community do their job and look at the results! Failure to secure our country will result in a much larger scruntiny of their process's and strategy. As well it should.
 
94Ender
      ID: 52438315
      Thu, Sep 13, 16:02
You have missed the point entirely. To ask the kinds of questions the media is asking and expecting answers is ridiculous. The answers they seek would jeopardize any operations and lead to a greater loss of life.

Plus, give our intelligence credit and do a little research and you'll find a lot of the terrorist atacks that were thwarted by the very agents you criticize.
 
95KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Thu, Sep 13, 16:03
David, there has long been talk that our nation's intelligence efforts need a lot more money. Maybe now Congress will listen. It's not a matter of them not doing their job, IMO. It's that they didn't have enough people to do all the jobs that were needed.
 
96slimer
      ID: 9150216
      Thu, Sep 13, 16:04
I heard there is a picture of the towers burning that looks like the face of the devil. I've searched, but can't find anything....anyone have a link? thanks
 
97Doug
      ID: 0737311
      Thu, Sep 13, 16:06
wildyams, kudos on post 17... again, sorry if it sounded like I was ripping into you before, I just thought the emotional tone of some posts was getting a little out of control, and we all need to respect each other and our different points of view... that is the American way, and for me at least, that is the Christian way (doesn't mean we shouldn't openly disagree, just that it should be respectful). "It is the simple fact that bin Laden is hiding behind his religion in doing terroristic acts that makes him dispicable (and should for all of Islam)." I think if you look deeply, you'll find reports of exactly this... 99% of Afghani's and Islamic people condemn the nature of these actions (and sincerely so). They may be anti-US, of couse, but that's not the issue. But many here seem to assume that all Afghani's support the Taliban and OMB, which is false, and of course the media shows us a clip of a few palestinian kids celebrating in front of the cameras and some assume that is representative. How sad.

azd, in the prior thread you state "If you are a 'patriotic American Christian' or a Christian of any kind - then you know that they are wrong, no ifs, and or butts." My point was to put a finer point on who exactly you mean by "they", it goes without saying that the actions were wrong. It seems like many of these posts were generating a "Muslims must die" sort of tone to them, and that's what sickened me. THAT is not a Christian attitude.

You also say: "It IS belief in the Bible, which you obviously don't have much of." *sigh* I see, I didn't realize you had the monopoly on blblical interpretation. Typical, silly me. I won't waste my time sharing my own beliefs, because you obviously have no interest in hearing anything that doesn't jive with your narrow view of the world. It seems as if you're just as ready and willing to negate the beliefs of a fellow, dissenting Christian as those of Muslim or anyone else who chooses to disagree with you. Fine. Personally, I don't think that's exactly a Christian attitude for you to have, but then hey, what do I know, right? I'm a Christian poser after all.
 
98silver-n-black
      ID: 297382911
      Thu, Sep 13, 16:20
Here is a link to the video showing what looks like an evil face/skull in it. Pause at 27 seconds and look in the smoke to the left. 2nd Attack on WTC
 
99slimer
      ID: 9150216
      Thu, Sep 13, 16:22
here is a still pic.... Devil face
 
100silver-n-black
      ID: 297382911
      Thu, Sep 13, 16:23
Purely coincidence I think, but creepy none the less.
 
101Skidazl
      Sustainer
      ID: 54855139
      Thu, Sep 13, 16:24
I am getting so sick of everybody blaming our intelligence groups...

Have you been on a plane lately and see the lack of concern MOST of these people working the metal detectors and such???? They are so lackluster, it is scary...

I have to beleive all this blame is coming from lack of somebody else to blame....
 
102slimer
      ID: 9150216
      Thu, Sep 13, 16:24
very creepy, s-n-b
 
103biliruben
      Sustainer
      ID: 3502218
      Thu, Sep 13, 16:25
Looks more like a x-files style alien to me. Extraterrestrial possession? ;)
 
104Doug
      ID: 0737311
      Thu, Sep 13, 16:32
It reminds me of the "face" on mars people talked about for years (until we got better quality pictures)... you look at just about random texture from a certain angle or with the right angle of the sun, etc. and it can look like something else.
 
105ChicagoTRS
      Sustainer
      ID: 4324316
      Thu, Sep 13, 16:44
I am also sick of the blame on the intelligence groups and even airport security.

People need to realize that this is a risk we take by living in a very free society. These highjackers were armed with razor blades and ceramic knives. These are not readily detected by metal detectors.

About our intelligence groups...do you realize how much data, threats, other information gets passed to these groups daily. They have to assess each risk and make a quick judgement and move on. The terrorists are not stupid and they do not make it easy...they know and learn how our intelligence agencies watch them...they learn how to avoid being caught...many times they will lay out a plan years in advance and then begin to execute it without further communication. Sometimes no matter how much money and how much intelligence you have it will be impossible to prevent some things like this.

I am also sick of hearing how sophisticated this plan was. How sophisticated was it??? Anyone can lookup airline schedules months in advance...basically anyone in america can learn the basics of flying a jumbo jet at least well enough to assume control when it is already in the air...anyone could have gotten a small knife or razor on a plane...that is about all it took. This simply was not that sophisticated and that is the scary part in my opinion. The problem is many of these new security procedures they are putting in airports still would not prevent what happenned but I guarantee you this if they do try this again not many people on these planes will sit quietly while they fly into a building.

Again these are some of the risks we take living in a society where people are allowed to move unchallenged throughout the country, people are allowed to learn whatever they want, for the most part our communications are secure, generally everything is very convienent, etc... Personally I prefer these freedoms to the alternative of living in a police state with no freedom.
 
106Doug
      ID: 0737311
      Thu, Sep 13, 16:45
Ditto ski... we're a nation full of second-guessers. We keep cutting CIA funding and limiting their tactics, and we complain when they don't know in advance about every ill-intentioned action in the world. Oh, and we don't bother making much hubbub when they succeed, (a) because we usually don't know about it, and (b) that's their job anyway. We also want airport security to catch every possible weapon, etc. but we don't want to be overly hassled ourselves or have to show up 2 hours in advance. And we only want to kill the bad guys (OMB and crew, maybe Taliban, but not the Afghani people), but we don't want to use tactics such as assassination, and we don't want to put any of our own troops at too much risk to get the job done. And finally, we can criticize previous presidents for not going after this guy via means that the American public would have previously deemed unacceptable. Of couse, if they had, and especially if there had bee any "collateral damage", we would have have criticized them then too, because OMB wasn't THAT big of a threat...
 
107 Mark L
      Leader
      ID: 4444938
      Thu, Sep 13, 16:54
cnn.com says Capitol being evacuated and the NY airports are being shut down, "details later."

What the ????
 
108patjams
      ID: 22858138
      Thu, Sep 13, 16:59
The people who are at fault are the ones who hatched and carried out the attack. That is where the blame lies. the fact is that we live in a free society and as sad as it is to say, because of that, we are susceptible to this type of attack. Again, when a man is willing to give his life for his cause there is virtually nothing that can be done. These people are zealots and they can be very quiet (obviously) about their plans. We will almost certainly lose some of our freedoms because of this attack and that is sad considering so many people have died in order to instill and uphold that freedom. I truly believe that the simple act of having Sky Marshals on every flight would have prevented this attack. But what's done is done and we must try to move forward and not place blame in the wrong place. Sure, the intelligence community could have done more to try and prevent this, but the fact remains that they didn't have the resources. (Much of that is due to the fact that our former President reduced those resources substantially.) However, it is not his fault either. This is the way of the world today, cowards who do not have the courage to meet their so called enemies face to face will continue to disrupt the world peace until we eradicate them entirely. We could go on forever with this debate, but the facts will never change. Many beautiful people have died in this horrible attack and before it is over many more will die as well.
 
109KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Thu, Sep 13, 16:59
Mark L, apparently they are "looking at a package."

CNN's footer says the buildings were evacuated for "FBI purposes". Probably another of about a thousand false bomb threats that have been reported across the nation today.

 
110Perm Dude
      Leader
      ID: 28861216
      Thu, Sep 13, 17:00
I agree; we really don't know the threats that the intelligence community have prevented from being carried out because they did their jobs.

Not to say that there was some problem here; a big job probably had to have some prior evidence. But The intelligence community can only do so much and leave it to the hands of domestic experts (airline security, for example) to do their jobs. The intelligence community doesn't stop every threat (and can't), only all those ones we don't hear about.

pd
 
111 Mark L
      Leader
      ID: 4444938
      Thu, Sep 13, 17:01
ABC reports that FBI prevented four people from boarding a United flight at Kennedy, then arrested them. Both airports then were closed.

Also confirming the evacuation of the Capitol, no reason given.
 
112biliruben
      Sustainer
      ID: 3502218
      Thu, Sep 13, 17:03
5:47 p.m.--Both the Senate and House sides of the Capitol were evacuated because of an apparent bomb scare.
 
113KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Thu, Sep 13, 17:05
ChicagoTRS, the fact that these guys enrolled in flight school shows that they weren't playing around. Sure someone could have done it as unsophisticated as you outline, but that's not what was done according to the evidence that is surfacing. To say that their plan was unsophisticated is to dismiss these terrorists as intelligent and that's the sort of thinking that causes the relaxation in securities that was prevelant before this attack. Why can't airport security be what it is right now? NBC showed the security in England today and called it "normal" saying that those residents were "used to it", including the sight of many armed guards. Yet we look at that sort of thing as "Hightened Alert Security". Such a shame that our airport security is so trivial during "normal" times.
 
114KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Thu, Sep 13, 17:06
CNN reports that a "Bomb Dog" did a positive "sniff" (possibility of being a bomb) on a package at the Capitol. No further word.
 
115KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Thu, Sep 13, 17:07
Sorry, 113 should read, "To say that their plan was unsophisticated is to dismiss these terrorists as unintelligent"
 
116KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Thu, Sep 13, 17:12
CNN Reports: Osama bin Laden is now reported as "Suspect #1", but the reason he has not been confirmed is that they are investigating the possibility of multiple terrorist groups.
 
117patjams
      ID: 22858138
      Thu, Sep 13, 17:19
This is from a friend of mine. I thought I would share it here:

I thank God for the bravery, resiliency and compassion He provided to the men and women who worked tirelessly and without compromise - even risking imminent death - to seek and search, rescue and save multitudes of attack victims - before they, themselves were trapped in the fiery rubble and debris and not known to have survived.

Some men lay unconscious, others lay still... perhaps the long arm of death had gripped hope from them, leaving them in empty solitude and with feelings of uncertain fate. Many a brave soul went in to lend their expertise - to
abandon the practice rounds for the precise training for which they'd prepared their entire careers. Their acts of courage under fire demonstrates the resolve America has when tested to its limits. Multitudes of these skilled men were lost - as were the common men and women who began their day as all others - to earn a living... to gain respect... to return home
after a long day and put their minds to rest... to turn on CNN and learn about the events of the world... to turn to their hiding places and break momentarily from the existance of things real.

Yes, many of our friends and neighbors, our colleagues and rivals were dismissed from this earth along with the courageous men and women who pursued with great ferver the chance to bring these people home.

Some brave men have now been found, and their patience and willful determination to remain alive - to see their own children again... to hug their wives... to mourn with their trusted friends the loss of those who were so dear - is the exact representation of our country's promise to be whole and to be strong when our brothers and sisters have fallen.

I thank God for His grace given to men to work diligently and extraordinarily under times of uncertainty. These men marched into the gravest of circumstances and did not waver, though the grim face of death looked right into their hearts and souls. Having already witnessed the sudden end of hopes and dreams of scores who'd leaped to their earlier deaths from the burdened and blackened skies above, these men followed their command to give unselfishly in a time when many were desperate and the hour at hand spelled trouble.

I hope and trust these men will tell their stories of courage and hope; pain and desparation; grief and uncertainty. Theirs are the stories of America, whose foundational truths are built on the bravery of so many before us.

They are the epitomy of the American dream: to have the pursuit of happiness and prosperity. We are happy the lives of some were spared - rescued from a war-torn icon of the heart of America... the Big Apple. Their rescue is the beginning of hope for a nation questioning the possibility of life resuming as it once was. These brave men - wo were crushed under the terrible weight of building materials, office equipment and the debris of the earth around in valiant efforts to maintain a sense of control in a desparate time - have been found alive to unify our hopes, our dreams and our intention to rebuild and to reconvene.

Today, when you feel at your weakest - when the day wears on you and that extra step to be nice seems like a giant leap the wrong direction, please say hello to a stranger... good evening to a homeless person... please call your parents and tell them you care for them. Through the efforts of some, many will join, and that multitude will grow into a congregation of peoples seeking to touch the lives of all they can. Tomorrow, Thursday, be thankful for one thing you have and tell someone how happy you are to have it.

Then give it away to someone who doesn't.


 
118ChicagoTRS
      Sustainer
      ID: 4324316
      Thu, Sep 13, 17:21
KKB...I am not saying they weren't intelligent...what I am saying is that sometimes the best plan is a very simple unsophisticated plan. Yes they did go to flight school but you know what 1000s of people go to these small mom and pop flight schools every day. The high school I went to has flying classes that would teach you enough to fly a jet like that already in the air. You probably can order a flight manual from the internet for jumbo jets and learn just from that. This simply was not that difficult a plan to execute...probably the hard part is finding a dozen people willing to commit suicide...but other than that this simply was not that sophisticated and unfortunately that was the brilliance of the plan.

I have traveled throughout europe and england many times and yes there are armed 'stormtroopers' throughout the airport but how would have they prevented something like this from happenning? Other than that their airport security is not all that different than ours...going through the metal detectors is nearly the same...yes their passport people ask a few more questions but it is all basically routine.

I do agree air marshals would probably solve this along with a more aggressive american population. I am not saying there is nothing we can do about it but something this simple will be difficult to combat.
 
119Doug
      ID: 0737311
      Thu, Sep 13, 17:42
All clear at the Capitol... they are letting people back in.

At Kennedy airport, there were 2 Saudi nationals who identified themselves as airline pilots and who had originally had tickets for flights on Sept. 11. They aren't yet suspected of anything, and probably wouldn't have been so stupid as to get on board a flight today, but because of the obvious coincidences they took them into custody to question them and make sure they in fact weren't involved. No word yet on that.

A bit more suspicious is 3 men of arab descent who arrived at LaGuardia with baggage marked "crew", even though they did not check out as actual crew members. They to are now being questioned, no word on their status.
 
120KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Thu, Sep 13, 17:52
ChicagoTRS, I think we're saying the same thing, just using the words in slighty different ways. In short, their plan had a lot of brain behind it, yet it was extremely simple in execution. The best plans are usually the most simple ones.

However, Embry-Riddle isn't exactly a "mom and pop" flight school, so they did know what they were doing in that aspect also. They went to a good flight school and probably got a lot more than the quickie lesson found in the schools you're talking about.

Lastly, I don't think "storm troopers" by themselves would have done much to stop these events, but heightened security all the way around might have at least deterred it or made it a lot more difficult. I'm tired of hearing that tightening airport security is "too difficult" or whatever else. The FAA needs to just do it and say, "Follow these guidelines or you don't handle flights anymore." Period. End of discussion. Why do we heighten security after the fact? Why do we only do it during times of crisis? We tightened security during the Gulf War, then we said, "Well, no more bad guys, time to relax again." and look where it got us. And why are knives under 4 inches allowed on board? A 4 inch blade can do some serious damage in the right hands (which I think it was in this time). Again, after the fact, the FAA says, "No more knives of any kind." Ok, that's fine, but they need to be that firm on security all the way around. But unless the FAA tightens security and demands it through new guidelines, then something like this, or some other hijacking resulting in the loss of innocent lives. We can't prevent hijackings forever, but we can do everything possible to make it as difficult as possible to pull off. Then let the passengers have at 'em!!!

 
121biliruben
      Sustainer
      ID: 3502218
      Thu, Sep 13, 18:05
I've had a pocket knife and a leatherman in my carry-on bag the last 4 flights I have gone on, because I have been heading fishing or camping. Frankly I was a bit surprised the x-ray guy didn't say anything.

The thing to remember is that the tighter security is, the higher the chances we'll catch someone with ill intent. The risk of hijacking will NEVER be reduced to zero, however. So we increase security. After discussions with a bud who used to try to sneak bombs and such through security for the FAA, my guess is that the latest security guidelines will increase our changes of catching someone from something like 40% to 55%.

We have to balance the costs, both monetary and costs to our civil liberties, with the benefits. Are they worth it? At what point do you stop? Is the money and time and loss to civil liberties better "spent" in other ways?

No easy answers. But until we start to address the root of the problem - that the world we live in, and the way we interact in the world, creates much hatred for the US, I will never feel safe or secure.
 
122F Gump
      ID: 53837117
      Thu, Sep 13, 18:15
biliruben

You said: "But until we start to address the root of the problem - that the world we live in, and the way we interact in the world, creates much hatred for the US, I will never feel safe or secure."

You are correct in that it is the "root" that is the problem. But your root as stated above is far from the real problem, sad to say. The problem is that of human nature: greed, selfishness, individual agendas, hatred for others, and the willingness to at times do whatever we feel like to get what we want.

Until you can CONTROL the thoughts and attitudes of the whole world, the root problem will always be there. And that goal is impossible. So, the only solution is to punish the ones who go over the line, and make the punishment severe, hoping that such will deter the selfish from choosing to act out their bad desires.
 
123azdbacker
      Donor
      ID: 51392423
      Thu, Sep 13, 18:16
Doug: Post 97, I agree 100% with your first point addressed to me.

Your last paragraph baffles me, however. "It seems as if you're just as ready and willing to negate the beliefs of a fellow, dissenting Christian as those of Muslim or anyone else who chooses to disagree with you."

The reason I responded to your hypocritical post in response to wildyams/katietx in the prior thread was due to YOUR "willingness to negate the beliefs of a fellow, dissenting Christian" as you did when you said "I'm a patriotic American Christian, but I feel the need to state that I find the attitude expressed in the brief post #142 hypocritical, narrowminded, and offensive... it literally sickens my stomach, as it assumes the same sort of religious/moral righteousness and superiority as that espoused by the perpetrators of this act of war." Once YOU 'negated the belief of a fellow, dissenting Christian' I had no choice but to assume that you yourself were not a Christian - based on your typed words alone.

You, as a Christian, know that those who perpetrated those acts will not be sitting at the foot of Allah, as katietx stated. In fact, as a Christian, you know that there is no Allah as Muslims believe God to be. So why be hypocritical and chastise wildyams/katietx for saying what you KNOW to be true? And if you don't know it to be true, then by definition you are NOT a Christian. Simple logic. All I can go by is your own words. Don't fault me when your words don't jive.
 
124ChicagoTRS
      Sustainer
      ID: 117541522
      Thu, Sep 13, 18:23
KKB...I agree we are saying basically the same thing. I do agree we need to take a more aggressive approach to security and make it more and more difficult for lunatics to succeed in these sort of attempts. Yes it will be more inconvienent for us regular law abiding people but I think it is well worth it if it provides a higher level of safety. We now know that an airplane is equivalent to a very powerful missle or bomb we need to treat the security surrounding airplanes with that in mind. And I do agree the big thing is to make these security changes permanent.

It is just very frustrating to fight these terrorists...I wish it was a country we could point to and anihilate. I think in the end it will be nearly impossible to completely stop them but I hope we really take a far more aggressive approach and go on the offensive before they strike again and then remain on offense forever. We certainly know where they train where they headquarter etc...it is time take care of those things before they strike. It is also very important to strike the countries that provide refuge for these people.

My biggest fear is I know when they strike again they will use some entirely new deadly strategy.
 
125Roo
      ID: 665497
      Thu, Sep 13, 18:27
azdbacker:

I may not have understood this very well, but I thought that one of Christianity's main teachings was tolerance.
 
126biliruben
      Sustainer
      ID: 3502218
      Thu, Sep 13, 18:31
F Gump - You got the stick, I got the carrot. My glass is half full, yours is half empty.

I am not naive enough to think the world will ever be completely safe. That doesn't mean it can't be a heck of alot safer, and no - not through missile defense.

My solution would actually be to work towards the exact opposite of what you suggest - to allow people the freedom to express their plethora of thoughts attitudes safely and without fear of retribution, so long as they don't significantly impinge upon my freedom to do the same.

The world should (and I think can) be a place of compromise and harmony, with noone taking more than their fair share or imposing their will upon others. Currently the US takes much more than their fair share and we impose our will with impunity. That way creates hatred. As we move away from that path, that hatred, and hence our danger, decreases.

What can you say, I am an eternal optimist.
 
128azdbacker
      Donor
      ID: 51392423
      Thu, Sep 13, 18:35
Roo: Tolerance for those who kill us? Think about the logic of what you just said. Sure, there are levels of tolerance in the bible - but nowhere is it written that we are expected to be tolerant of those who purport to kill us. In fact the exact opposite is true.
 
129costanza
      ID: 10161222
      Thu, Sep 13, 18:45
Nobody else commented on it... does that mean I'm the only one a bit "concerned" by the thoughts expressed in posts #20/28:

"There was a Middle Eastern man sitting on the train with dufflebag. I got off at 34th st and walked"

First of all, is it not possible that this "Middle Eastern man" was actually American? Even if he wasn't, though, do all people of Arabic descent really deserve to be treated with suspicion?

Sorry, but as a fourth-generation Japanese-Canadian, this sort of thing hits a bit close to home. (So do comments about the US acting like it did after Pearl Harbour... there was a rather ugly side to the post-attack response which I'd rather not see happening again now to a different group)
 
130Roo
      ID: 665497
      Thu, Sep 13, 18:49
"those who kill us?"

Who are they exactly? Bin Laden is strongly suspected, but I haven't yet heard anyone state their belief that all Muslims are behind this attack.

"In fact, as a Christian, you know that there is no Allah as Muslims believe God to be."

Can you explain how defining right and wrong, or apportioning blame, on the basis of religion like this is not racist?

I thought good Christians were against that too.
 
131Perm Dude
      Leader
      ID: 28861216
      Thu, Sep 13, 18:54
Actually, adz, there is more than a little bit of contradiction in the Bible about that very point. Jesus was very clear: Love your enemies. Are these terrorists our enemies? You bet.

Am I saying we need to forgive these guys? The Bible is clear that the sinner must make the first step, by being truly repentent for their sins. And that hasn't happened.

Again, from a religious point of view there is little clarity here, and a numver of different, and valid viewpoints. Just giving you mine.

pd
 
132James K Polk
      ID: 4455731
      Thu, Sep 13, 19:09
Thanks, PD, for at least a little support for the press. Sorry you all don't like the questions being asked at the White House press conference. Sure, they sound stupid. But they're shots in the dark that no journalist expects to be truthfully answered anyway. You get the information that the Fleischer wants to give you, then you take a few shots in the hopes that whatever he does say gives you a hint at something to follow up.

The news-gathering process isn't pretty. Not much fun to watch either. I don't blame anyone for thinking those sounded like stupid questions. But questions asked do not equal finished product. So please withhold judgment until you read the finished stories.

As for printing things that might compromise national security or or future plans, don't worry. News agencies asked to withhold a story for reasons such as these will do it. Without question.

One more word of advice for those who might equate the "talking head" TV shows with real journalism -- Gump, don't do it. Those people get paid to sit around and discuss. That's exactly the reason their audience watches them, because it comes with the opinion and speculation. If you're looking for NEWS, read a ficking newspaper. And before you shoot off your mouth about speculation and false reports, get a clue. Where have all the links posted in these threads come from? Where has all the background information about bin Laden come from? Where have you been able to get a sense of not only the enormity of this event, but also a sense of how very much this is affecting individuals in this country? Where have you been able to find out what you can do to help out? Why are people on this board and others even able to discuss these things in detail?

From people like me, who have hardly had time to understand, process and grieve because we've been working our asses off so you could. So shut the hell up with your asinine accusations. Your own posts about information regarding this tragedy belie them.

If I sound edgy, it's because I am.
 
133curly
      ID: 347231613
      Thu, Sep 13, 19:13
azdbacker I pretty much agree with you in your responses and views. however trying to explain world events as fundamental believers to middle of the road Christians and non-believers without the complete picture is near impossible.

for instance I believe that since the beginning of time there has been a state of spiritual warfare ongoing. the light and the darkness,the righteous and non. I believe Satan to be the master of lies always using religion as a tool to mislead humanity to doom. even using the Christian Church to this end.
Also
when christianty gained an ever increesing foothold in the world the muslims were born to counter act.

This may seem harsh,I'm sorry it's reality to a Bible believing Christian.

I'm just wondering do any others believe that.
 
134Madman
      ID: 68361122
      Thu, Sep 13, 19:19
Regarding the Clinton and Bin Laden issues:

Clinton Declared a "War on Terrorism" in 1998. This was resulted in the destruction of an aspirin factory in Sudan (who had supported him) and one base in Afghanistan. That sort of empty rhetoric is one main reason why our military isn't feared.

One other thing that I hope Bush starts to do is define what a new "War" will entail. Personally, I hope he is delaying this new definition while he tries to shore up whatever support we can muster from moderate Muslims who, like us, abhor this sort of violence. The only way we can win a war against terrorism is if moderate Muslims wake up and reject the teachings that have misled Bin Laden and others.

Basically, we have to try a strategy of peace and reconciliation with moderate Muslims while simultaneously ostracizing and destroying the radicals. Not going to be an easy road to hoe. . .
 
135KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Thu, Sep 13, 19:27
ChicagoTRS (124): "My biggest fear is I know when they strike again they will use some entirely new deadly strategy." No doubt. They've shown it time and time again.

With regard to the others discussion about tolerance, the Bible does indeed teach that you should love your enemies. With regard to PD (131): "Am I saying we need to forgive these guys? The Bible is clear that the sinner must make the first step, by being truly repentent for their sins. And that hasn't happened." Forgiveness in that sense is not for us to decide. If the sinner makes the first step, it doesn't matter if it's to us or not, it needs to be to God.

 
136James K Polk
      ID: 4455731
      Thu, Sep 13, 19:41
steve houpt, et al. -- Here's one example of why, although a question may sound stupid, it actually turns out to be part of a significant story. This one is related to several of the questions you dismissed in #77.

Dallas Morning News intends to file a story tonight, a summary of which is:

When President Bush and other government leaders loudly proclaimed Tuesday that the country is at ``war,'' many legal experts gasped.

Was he using the word literally or metaphorically? The question may seem to be an esoteric exercise but lawyers and judges say the answer could change America forever. If Bush sees us at war the same way President Reagan waged a war against drugs, then life goes on. No rights or civil liberties are lost. However, many civil libertarians and legal experts fear the government will use these events to infringe on some basic civil liberties.
 
137James K Polk
      ID: 4455731
      Thu, Sep 13, 19:45
Not to mention that asking whether the president is working with Congress on the resolution's language might only serve to further illustrate that partisan politics is being left behind as our leaders decide how to respond to this attack.
 
138Perm Dude
      Leader
      ID: 28861216
      Thu, Sep 13, 19:52
Madman, good post, though I think you mangled a metaphor. "Row to hoe" or "Road to ???"

We can demonstrate our solidarity with moderate Arab nations by strongly clamping down on anti-Arab violence and rhetoric here in the States. Let's get some Arabs up on the podiums with the white guys.

KKB, I almost posted that exact tag onto my point but cut it, since for me, that's the real kick in the pants. My own religion states that the truly repentent is forgiven by God and sits at his right hand in heaven upon death. It's automatic. Heck, Hitler could be there for all I know, if he was, indeed, repetent before his death.

But that's just one guy's view.

pd
 
139curly
      ID: 347231613
      Thu, Sep 13, 19:56
Just wondering what would happen if Ben Ladin offered his self up to the world as the guilty one here.
giving up himself for trail,wow would that be a big turn of events. It would more or less be the biggest action he could take. Think about it.
 
140puckprophet
      ID: 52712723
      Thu, Sep 13, 20:04
...and give up those nights camping out in a tent or mud hut?? please ...;)
 
141BoSoxFan9
      ID: 33518295
      Thu, Sep 13, 20:14
pd--regarding post #138
Although I'm not a religious expert, I can say that my religion believes in pre-destination. Those chosen would of course be repetent, but if you were chosen you would have a feeling about it, and not commit those acts that Hitler committed. So, I doubt seriously that Hitler is behind those gates. Again, I'm not an expert, but that is what I believe.
 
142James K Polk
      ID: 4455731
      Thu, Sep 13, 20:19
Bin Laden doesn't have to camp in any huts. There is a complex of mountain caves in the region, built with U.S. money and expertise during Afghanistan's CIA-backed war against the Soviets.

So not only did we help train him, we gave him some nice hideouts for a time just like this. Oh, and we may have let him have a few stingers and other high-tech U.S. weapons too.
 
143KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Thu, Sep 13, 20:33
PD, he very well could, but he would have had to do a lot of repenting and would have had to be absolutely serious about it. We all know that you can't fake it to God. And if Hitler, or any other person has repented for their sins, and God has forgiven them, then what right do we have not to accept that? If we believe in God's teachings, then we must accept it.

This is why you hear the stories like Sister Helen Prejean and her fight to get Death Row convicts to repent and beg forgiveness for their sins. Again, they're not asking us.

It's tough for us to accept because our mind, our heart, and everything else says that those who have done wrong need to pay for that, but if we follow God's teachings to the strictest letter, then we are not the ones who are to worry about, nor deliver, the punishment to those people. God will deliver their final judgement and that's the one they most need to worry about.

 
144Perm Dude
      Leader
      ID: 28861216
      Thu, Sep 13, 21:01
Yep, KKB. It's a real kick in the pants all right. It's out of our hands.

BoSoxFan9, that's cool. But my religion believes a bit differently, of course! Good works and good behavior, coupled with repentence when we stray is basically our recipe. Indeed, we are put on earth to do good works. Otherwise, we'd have little purpose to be here if it was already decided for us.

Not knocking your view at all. Just trying to explain my own a bit further.

pd
 
145winmiller
      Sustainer
      ID: 107452613
      Thu, Sep 13, 21:03
The vast majority of Muslims would say that the work of these terrorists is against Islamic law:

Suicide is against Islamic Law. Murder is against Islamic Law. Therefore, the suicidal murder of defenseless civilians is against Islamic Law.

The concept of Jihad does not override these facts. Unfortunately, a tiny minority of powerful leaders has convinced a zealous band of followers that any act in what they have declared to be a Holy War will be rewarded by Allah.

It pains me to hear people blaming all Muslims for the work of a few extremists. It pains me even more to hear that people in the US have responded with violent acts against Muslims who are unrelated to the criminal terrorists. These acts only punish innocent people while providing further justification for the terrorists to continue their evil.

This is a time for all of us to seek an understanding of our fellow human beings - even those with vastly different religious faith. It is also a time to root out these terrorists who have corrupted their own religion in order to support their own warped political agenda. We will need the cooperation of Muslims throughout the world to help us squelch these criminals.
 
146James K Polk
      ID: 4455731
      Thu, Sep 13, 21:06
BTW, just to show that I of course don't think all stupid-sounding press questions end up being important, here's my own recent favorite.

Reporter, to airport police official on the day of the attacks: "Have you ever seen anything like this before?"
 
147KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Thu, Sep 13, 21:28
Pres, my response: "Oh yeah, we get this kind of stuff all the time. I really don't know what the fuss is all about. I mean we just covered up...er, um, completed an investigation of one of these crashes just last week. Yep, they're starting to get kind of cliche, if you know what I mean."
 
148Ender
      ID: 13443221
      Thu, Sep 13, 21:29
Re: 141

BoSoxFan9, that logic is flawed. I understand that the weight and magnitude of Hitler's actions make it tough, but clearly based on Paul's actions (Acts 8:1-3) prior to his repentance ( Acts 9:1-18) and subsequent ministry, even those chosen by God can commit evil acts (as opposed to what we (not God) consider to be run of the mill sin) prior to repenting and acknowledging Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior.

Re: 144
"Good works and good behavior, coupled with repentence when we stray is basically our recipe."
I just want to point out that it is Grace through Faith that brings Salvation. Good works and behavior come as fruits of this Faith and our Salvation is not based upon good works or behavior.
 
149 Special K
      ID: 218331321
      Thu, Sep 13, 21:36
Unconfirmed but I heard from a friend:
XINOEHPOEL HAS BEEN ARRESTED.

My friend hasn't confirmed it, nor does he have a link to any sites that show it, but I heard they arrested him. So, I thought i'd share it with you all.

Peace.
 
150James K Polk
      ID: 4455731
      Thu, Sep 13, 21:48
On the subject of religion, I think it's been heartening to see many religious leaders really seeking to unite the country and help it heal. But unfortunately, there are those who can't resist an opportunity to reinforce the world view that Christians are intolerant and insensitive.

Jerry Falwell today said that the ACLU, abortion providers, gay rights proponents and court decisions on abortion and school prayer had left the U.S. so spiritually weak that we were open to the terrorist attacks.

He did say he wasn't blaming God for the attacks, and didn't want to take responsibility away from the terrorists, but that God had permitted things to happen.

He said, ``the ACLU's got to take a lot of blame for this,'' and said he said he would point the finger at secular influences and say, ``You
helped this happen.''

A quote from his 700 Club transcript: ``I sincerely believe that the collective efforts of many secularists during the past generation, resulting in the expulsion from our schools and from the public square, has left us vulnerable. God has protected America from her inception. It is only recently that many have decided God is unnecessary.''

----------------------

If that's what he believes, fine. But now is not the time to be divisive like that. And his statements sure aren't going to convince anyone on the fence that Jesus is the way to salvation.
 
151Ender
      ID: 13443221
      Thu, Sep 13, 22:08
Please, just as we know these murderers do not represent all Muslims, understand that these people do not represent the views of all Christians.
 
152Doug
      ID: 0737311
      Thu, Sep 13, 22:08
azd, I don't feel I negated wildyams... yes, I expressed myself strongly, but I feel there's a difference between saying "what you said really bothered me and here's why I think it sucks", and "what you said is invalid, you are not what you claim you are". I mean, you were practically telling me what my own Christian beliefs should be, and I find that troubling. There is not one and only one interpretation of the bible and it's teachings. Perhaps there is only one truth, but neither you, nor I, nor anyone can definitively know what it is. If we did, faith could not exist, for faith is belief without proof. My point telling a muslim that there is no Allah is counterproductive and disrespectful... as it would be if they told you (or me) that there was no Jehovah.
 
153 Mark L
      Leader
      ID: 534679
      Thu, Sep 13, 22:22
JKP, we need to get Rev. Falwell in touch with that poor fool Colin Powell immediately and tell him to stop looking in Afghanistan for bin Laden. Turns out we need to be going door-to-door on Castro Street hunting down the gays and lesbians that caused this.

Just when I think that I have seen it all, there is a new nadir.
 
154puckprophet
      ID: 52712723
      Thu, Sep 13, 22:49
jerry falwell??????????
???????????
??????????????????
just ignore that as$hole.
he's gonna be one of the first to fry.
 
155James K Polk
      ID: 4455731
      Thu, Sep 13, 22:52
Ender -- in case I didn't really make it clear in the Falwell post, I'm not saying that I think his comments represent all, or even a significant portion, of Christians. Quite the contrary. I'm just sick that such a high-profile leader would say such a stupid thing at such a critical time. I believe non-Christians see things like this, and it only reinforces their assumptions about religion in general.
 
156 azdbacker
      Donor
      ID: 51392423
      Thu, Sep 13, 22:55
Fine, Doug, you telling a Muslim that there is no Allah may be counterproductive, but you bashing someone for saying what you believe is wrong.

curly, I share your beliefs, rare as they are in this world, and invite you to contact me if you wish.

KKb "but if we follow God's teachings to the strictest letter, then we are not the ones who are to worry about, nor deliver, the punishment to those people. God will deliver their final judgement and that's the one they most need to worry about. "

That is not true, and I challenge you to support it form the Word of God. We do not judge one's right to mortality or immortality, that is God's job. But on Earth, it is our right and our duty to deliver punishment as set forth by God for those who seek to harm God's children. If that person we punish reconciles himself with God before we kill him, that's great, he will be brought up with the believers when Christ returns. But we kill him nonetheless, for his deeds on Earth. God handles his final judgement.
 
157Ender
      ID: 13443221
      Thu, Sep 13, 22:59
JKP, I understood completely what you were saying. I just know there are people out there who let the actions and words of these men color and affect their attitudes to any person who calls themself a Christian. These men may well be Christians, but they do not speak for all of them. And it is important to remember that they like all Chirstian carry the same baggage and tendencies as the rest of humanity. We are all frail and sinners by nature and are far from perfect.
 
158puckprophet
      ID: 52712723
      Thu, Sep 13, 23:07
am i missing something?? most of you seem to be refering to muslims , when it appears to be islamic fundamentalists responsible for this heinous act...
 
159KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Thu, Sep 13, 23:10
azdbacker, I give you Genesis 4:3-15

3 At harvesttime Cain brought to the LORD a gift of his farm produce, 4 while Abel brought several choice lambs from the best of his flock. The LORD accepted Abel and his offering, 5 but he did not accept Cain and his offering. This made Cain very angry and dejected.

6 "Why are you so angry?" the LORD asked him. "Why do you look so dejected? 7 You will be accepted if you respond in the right way. But if you refuse to respond correctly, then watch out! Sin is waiting to attack and destroy you, and you must subdue it."

8 Later Cain suggested to his brother, Abel, "Let's go out into the fields." F13 And while they were there, Cain attacked and killed his brother.

9 Afterward the LORD asked Cain, "Where is your brother? Where is Abel?""I don't know!" Cain retorted. "Am I supposed to keep track of him wherever he goes?" 10 But the LORD said, "What have you done? Listen – your brother's blood cries out to me from the ground! 11 You are hereby banished from the ground you have defiled with your brother's blood. 12 No longer will it yield abundant crops for you, no matter how hard you work! From now on you will be a homeless fugitive on the earth, constantly wandering from place to place."

13 Cain replied to the LORD, "My punishment F14 is too great for me to bear! 14 You have banished me from my land and from your presence; you have made me a wandering fugitive. All who see me will try to kill me!" 15 The LORD replied, "They will not kill you, for I will give seven times your punishment to anyone who does." Then the LORD put a mark on Cain to warn anyone who might try to kill him.

So the breakdown (layman's terms) is: Cain killed Abel, God banished him, Cain knew that others would kill him in retaliation for killing Abel, and God basically said, "That is not for them to do." Sounds pretty cut and dry to me. God says that he's the one with the final judgement about death.

 
160winmiller
      Sustainer
      ID: 107452613
      Thu, Sep 13, 23:15
puckprophet,

A Muslim is someone who adheres to the Islamic faith. We are talking about the same thing.
 
161azdbacker
      Donor
      ID: 51392423
      Thu, Sep 13, 23:19
KKB, if you wish for me to respond with biblical passages I will do so tomorrow, from the New Testament, that portion of the bible addressed to the people living after Jesus fulfilled the law. However, unless you know that the New Testament is directed at us, while the Old Testament is meant for our learning, you will always be confused.

Ender, right on in #151.
 
162Ender
      ID: 13443221
      Thu, Sep 13, 23:20
KKB, Romans Chapter 13 is extremely relevant to our situation. Please give it a look in its entirety for full context, but pay particular attention to verses 1 and 4.
 
163rockafellerskank
      Donor
      ID: 4911539
      Thu, Sep 13, 23:21
anyone that things aren't going to change is mistaken.

here is an example of wht types of behavior is being spawned

I beleive that the terrorists have won. Our way of life IS changed. Retaliation cannot undo what has been done.

rfs
 
164azdbacker
      Donor
      ID: 51392423
      Thu, Sep 13, 23:33
Ender, again, right on.
 
165puckprophet
      ID: 52712723
      Thu, Sep 13, 23:40
winmiller , thanks ...perhaps i should have read this
 
166Madman
      ID: 218371323
      Fri, Sep 14, 00:01
PD -- nope, no mixed metaphor. A "Road to Hoe" is a common term used to describe a difficult path. I bet it dates back (in America) to the frontier days when they had to clear trees and roots and things from roadways. Pure guess, however. To prove I have company in this idiocy:

Hoya article

The arbiter of the Enlish language, Sports Illustrated (check out the caption)

;)
 
167Sandlot
      Donor
      ID: 59832108
      Fri, Sep 14, 00:03
Ender, azd - couldn't agree more with your recent posts.

On the subject of judging, which I as a believer in Christ constantly struggle with, I remember the words of Jesus himself. "How can you say to your brother, `Brother, let me take the speck out of your eye,' when you yourself fail to see the plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye." (Luke 6:41-43) Personally, I sometimes 'judge' the 'sins' of others to feel better about myself, forgetting about the sin I harbor in my own life. It is important for me to always remember that I've got plenty of sin to overcome in my life before I go around pointing out the faults of others.

Were Falwall's comments offensive, inappropriate and ill-timed. Perhaps so. Many people see some Christians as extreme and intolerant. They delight in pointing out the faults in their lives and call them hypocrites. Well yes, if my life is examined next to the model of Jesus Christ, then I am indeed a hypocrite. I fall well short of the example He left. But I can't hope to ever come close to living as He did. I still sin in many of the same ways a non-believer does. In fact, I constantly struggle with sinful actions and thoughts. What's the difference? I've accepted God's forgiveness: His grace, freely given, my sin-debt fully paid on the cross by His Son Jesus Christ. Forgiven, but not perfect - not even close.

Another perspective on judging comes from Matthew 7:1 - "Do not judge, or you too will be judged," Jesus said. However, scrutinizing the actions of others doesn't absolve them from paying a price for their misdeeds. I remember counseling at a junior high Christian camp several years back. Our guest speaker was Jerry Huson, the baseball coach at Biola University (Christian college in SoCal). The one phrase that was burned into my mind from that week was this - you can choose your sin, but you can't choose your consequences. I can choose to murder someone, I can choose to steal, or whatever. I can repent of those actions and be forgiven for them. That doesn't mean I won't still be held accountable for those actions by the world.

In the same way, these terrorists have IMO sinned against man and against God. They will not be honored by Allah for their atrocities. As has been pointed out, even the Islamic faith doesn't condone murder or suicide. We have the right to punish them for their actions, but the ultimate judging belongs to One alone.

Man, I could go on and on regarding so many of the subjects brought up tonight, but it would be too much reading and I might ramble too much!

Regardless of the difference of beliefs and opinins among us, it has been informative and healing reading and posting with all of you. Thank you all for sharing with each other. Thank you very much.
 
168azdbacker
      Donor
      ID: 51392423
      Fri, Sep 14, 00:27
Sandlot, I am pleased to see that there are more believers who truly understand the Bible than I thought. Judging from here, it appears to be almost 5 percent. With God's guidance, we will someday see a majority of knowledgeable believers, who truly know the power and peace of mind that comes with actual understanding of God's Word. God bless you and protect you - as we know he does.
 
169Doug
      ID: 0737311
      Fri, Sep 14, 02:39
To our 11th President - I 100% concur, things like what Falwell said have such a visceral effect, espeically coming from someone so high-profile who in no way represents the majority of Christians in this country. For me, the same goes for so-called-Christian fundamentalists, yet they are notoriously the most quoted and visible element, which is partially the fault of the media, and partially that of the more moderate masses. They don't typically make as much of a concerted effort to draw attention to themselves as fundamentalists do, and because they aren't as confrontational, it doesn't make for good entertainment... errr... news.

"I believe non-Christians see things like this, and it only reinforces their assumptions about religion in general." Exactly... in fact, many of my friends feel precisely this way, and sometimes tease me about the fact that I am a Christian. I always have to explain that I reject fundamentalism... be it Christian, Islamic, or any other religion. They're different religions, but often the same basic small-mindedness and intolerance of free thought pervades... and often the world and the complicated issues within it are simplified to a matter of black v. white, us v. them, good v. evil, etc. My friends are usually suprised the first time I explain to them that fundamentalism is not the same as Christianity for many people, as their perceptions are that ALL Christians think that way. I can see why they would think that. And then when they realize I'm reasonable about my faith, they have a hard time poking fun anymore. A couple have even started to more fully explore their own spirituality (good for them!), which I like to think is at least in small part thanks to our relationship.

But you know, I'm getting off the topic of this off-topic post, so I think I'll let it go now.
 
170Doug
      ID: 0737311
      Fri, Sep 14, 02:41
To our 11th President - I 100% concur, things like what Falwell said have such a visceral effect, espeically coming from someone so high-profile who in no way represents the majority of Christians in this country. For me, the same goes for so-called-Christian fundamentalists, yet they are notoriously the most quoted and visible element, which is partially the fault of the media, and partially that of the more moderate masses. They don't typically make as much of a concerted effort to draw attention to themselves as fundamentalists do, and because they aren't as confrontational, it doesn't make for good entertainment... errr... news.

"I believe non-Christians see things like this, and it only reinforces their assumptions about religion in general." Exactly... in fact, many of my friends feel precisely this way, and sometimes tease me about the fact that I am a Christian. I always have to explain that I reject fundamentalism... be it Christian, Islamic, or any other religion. They're different religions, but often the same basic small-mindedness and intolerance of free thought pervades... and often the world and the complicated issues within it are simplified to a matter of black v. white, us v. them, good v. evil, etc. My friends are usually suprised the first time I explain to them that fundamentalism is not the same as Christianity for many people, as their perceptions are that ALL Christians think that way. I can see why they would think that. And then when they realize I'm reasonable about my faith, they have a hard time poking fun anymore. A couple have even started to more fully explore their own spirituality (good for them!), which I like to think is at least in small part thanks to our relationship.

But you know, I'm getting off the topic of this off-topic post, so I think I'll let it go now.
 
171F Gump
      ID: 53837117
      Fri, Sep 14, 05:37
JAMES K POLK (post 152)

Re the talking head shows, I did not equate those with "news" but they are indeed "news media" types. However, as I stated, I have NOT been watching them anyway.

If you want to blast me for taking the NEWS media to task for spreading rumor as fact and speculation as hype this week, then take me to task for observing the following reported "facts" on the major networks this week (ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX). These are some that I recall; they were on the major networks; they were reported as FACT; and they were all bs:

a car bomb blew up outside the State Dept on Tuesday

a highjacked plane crashed into Camp David Tuesday

two planes crashed into the Pentagon Tuesday

Bin Laden is under "house arrest" in Afghanistan

the Old Exec Office Building had to be evacuated (this one was breathlessly being reported on one major channel 30 minutes AFTER Ari Fleischer had specifically stated in a press briefing that it did not happen)


There were quite a few more that I saw: these are the ones I can recall off the top of my head.

Some of these were even inserted into the scrolling list of "facts" at the bottom of the screens, to keep viewers up-to-date with the latest "news".

As I said, the news people have gotten the BASIC story out. But it has been accompanied this week by a pile of incorrect "facts". It has APPEARED to be "throw anything out there that MIGHT be true, and we will erase it if it turns out to be false." If that offends you, don't get mad at me - instead, get mad at the news people that are doing it.
 
172sarge33rd
      ID: 25818711
      Fri, Sep 14, 06:37
ref post 136: THAT is exactly what I have been saying from the onset. Politicians choose words very carefully and deliberately. With the Pres, Colin Powell, W Bennett et al, stressing 'WAR'... trust me, there will be little or no juris-prudence involved here. This is not and will not be treated as a crime. Rather, it will be treated as a declaration of war and the response will befit such a declaration. Hence the invoking of Chapt 5 of the Washington Treaty by NATO.

(had to reply since someone finally woke-up and realized that Washington is saying the same thing I've been calling for, over the past 3 days.)
 
173David
      ID: 424281210
      Fri, Sep 14, 06:54
Ender,

You missed my point entirely. I specifically did not state who should do this but it should be done. And I speak from experience as my Father was in the NSA, and I had numerous interactions with the intelligence community while in the military. Intelligence agencies IMO often hide behind their cloak of secrecy. This is fine as long as they achieve results. Fialure to do so will result in others in the government getting involved in how they run their organizations. Checks and balnces exist in the government for a reason.
 
174KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Fri, Sep 14, 06:58
Ender & azdbacker, I will never claim to know everything, nor even a majority and barely "a little bit" about the Bible, so please indulge me a bit. Most of what I know is from Sunday sermons, etc. and those haven't been long enough in my life for me to have the extent of knowledge that others have on the subject. Again, I ask that you just bear with me as I just try to learn.

Ender, I read the passage you pointed to and it does seem to put the Goverments in charge of judgement and punishment, but it says nothing with regard to us "common folk". Forgive me as I use the "New Translation" for it's a bit easier for me to read and understand (obviously):

1 Obey the government, for God is the one who put it there. All governments have been placed in power by God. 2 So those who refuse to obey the laws of the land are refusing to obey God, and punishment will follow. 3 For the authorities do not frighten people who are doing right, but they frighten those who do wrong. So do what they say, and you will get along well. 4 The authorities are sent by God to help you. But if you are doing something wrong, of course you should be afraid, for you will be punished. The authorities are established by God for that very purpose, to punish those who do wrong.

So this obviously leaves us following our leaders in condemning the terrorists and, presumably, going after them. It's just such a gray area to me where God says (just verses later) "9 For the commandments against adultery and murder and stealing and coveting – and any other commandment – are all summed up in this one commandment: "Love your neighbor as yourself." F81 10 Love does no wrong to anyone, so love satisfies all of God's requirements." and yet we can still follow our leaders (God's workers) and be able to kill others.

Don't get me wrong. I still have a very strong feeling that those who did this need to pay for what they did. I just don't know where we, as people, come into play and when it becomes "ok". I imagine the breakdown is something like this: It's not ok for you, as a soul individual, to be judge and executioner, however if that is what your government, people whom God has put in place to do his deeds, has determined needs your help, then you are to provide it.

Partially on the right track?

 
175F Gump
      ID: 53837117
      Fri, Sep 14, 08:19
KKB

You did not address me, but I have studied the Bible in depth (and apparently have much the same frame-of-view as azdbacker and others in regards to what it says, it seems.)

Yes, you have it correct. Governments are indeed one of God's chosen means of dispensing judgment and justice - even though they are composed of humans. The rule of law is a provision of God, though it is imperfect at times because humans and their flaws are part of it.

Additionally, as INDIVIDUALS we are commanded (!) to love others, even our enemies. Not only are we told "not to hate" but we are told to love those who do evil toward us. (Yes, an "impossible" standard, but indeed that is the God-like standard: God loved and gave his only Son as a brutal sacrifice to pay for the sins of a world that hates God - including the sins committed in slaying Jesus himself. That is impossible love.) They are still to be held to account for their actions, but that is the role of governments to even the humanly scales as much as is possible.

In regards to the passage you earlier cited in Genesis, understand that this was early early early in human history, and God was the only overriding authority at that point. There were no nations, no governments to determine and dispense justice in any form. God has the ability to dispense the PERFECT amount of justice that is tempered with LOVE and includes forgiveness. He KNEW without any possibility of deception what was in Cain's heart - human governments are only capable of determining justice based on WHAT THE GUILTY PERSON DID.
 
176Ender
      ID: 52438315
      Fri, Sep 14, 08:22
KKB, let me start by saying that I hold no degree in theology. I have never attended seminary. AND do not read the Bible as much as I should. I know what I know from much the same sources as you. I do attend church on a regular basis and have even begun attending every week this summer (prior to that I attended regularly, but didn't go every single week). I have participated in Bible studies during college and sincerely wish to be part of them again.

Because of all the above, I attempt to have the utmost patience with those who read the Bible occasionally, and are often motivated to do so at times like these. Bearing all that in mind, I confess that as I read through Chapter 14 last night I struggled with it as well.

I do know that our government is placed in power by God. I do know that if I am Faithful to God, I will follow not only His Will, but the laws of my country. He has given the authority to punish and even kill (the word (forgive me for not knowing whether it is the original Greek or Hebrew text) which is translated to "sword" in the NIV translation literally meant the sword of decapitation, which shows that Paul was referring to Capitol Punishment).

I do not mean to imply that governments operate on a different set of laws than we do as individuals. However the truth of the matter is when we are talking about nations and principalities, there are larger issues. When another country, or in this case, entity attacks and takes innocent lives, there is no choice but to fight back lest more innocent lives be lost. I don't claim to know everything about Old Testament warfare, but God did authorize the use of force.

I firmly believe that I am to love my neighbor as myself. I am to turn the other cheek. I am to do unto others as I would have them to unto me. This is all at the individual level. It is not up to me to decide whether another man should live or die. God has not authorized me to do so, but according to Romans 13, he has authorized governments to punish evildoers. I think the persons responsible for this attack certainly fit that description.

Let me qualify all this by saying I am human. I base my Faith on my relationship with Jesus Christ as my Lord and Savior. I still have flaws. I still make mistakes (even big ones). My beliefs and understanding of the Bible are open to error. If their is a Biblical scholar who has a better grasp of these things, I will defer to their expertise. I can only speak from my own perspective, but I do base that perspective on the Bible and on the things God has shown me.
 
177KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Fri, Sep 14, 08:23
F Gump, thanks, that helps me understand it a bit better.
 
178Ender
      ID: 52438315
      Fri, Sep 14, 08:47
F Gump, that was well stated.
 
179F Gump
      ID: 53837117
      Fri, Sep 14, 09:02
KKB

Thanks, I am more than glad to help. I rarely wade into the Biblical or theological discussions on these boards, but I have been blessed with much opportunity in the past to study and learn the Bible in depth. I am glad for the opportunity to share.

ENDER

Thanks for the kind words.

The New Testament was written in Greek. The original word used there is "machairan" (that is as close as I can transliterate, root word is "machaira"). Though the context does indeed seem to support the idea of the sword being used as a tool of justice in this context, and thus capital punishment, it is not a "technical term" for a "decapitating sword" that is used here but rather the general word for a sword that is used frequently throughout the New Testament - at least 28 other times by my count. (I am not sure if there even IS a technical term for such a sword, frankly.) The Bible quite clearly supports such a "right" for governments, though, no question about it, and the contextual reading of the term as used in the passage here could easily be a reference to that legitimate right/responsibility.
 
180Ender
      ID: 52438315
      Fri, Sep 14, 09:14
F Gump, thanks for the clarification. You are just the type of scholar I was deferring to in my post. I thought the NT was Greek as it was the language of the Gentiles that Paul was writing to. I heard a pastor on Moody radio yesterday describe the sword as such and thought I would share.
 
181Judge Mental
      ID: 5688147
      Fri, Sep 14, 09:20
Wow, I'm suprised to see that this thread has also evolved (no pun intended) into a discussion of religion and I am impressed with the knowledge of religion displyed here. I think we all know so much more about each other than ever before.

Whether it's baseball or politics, the opinions put forth here are (for the most part) intelligent, compassionate and insightful, and I am thankful for the perspectives of all the gurupies.

As with the world, this message board has been changed forever.
 
182F Gump
      ID: 53837117
      Fri, Sep 14, 09:23
ENDER

Thanks for sharing. There is much for all of us to learn, and I certainly don't know it all or even most of it: I am blessed to have been given great opportunity in my life. God desires his words to man to be understood, and the more we study and are open to the truth the more we are "rewarded" with that understanding. Re Moody radio, I am a preacher's kid (yeah, one of them! *LOL*) and my parents are both grads of Moody - Moody is a great disseminator of Biblical study to many.
 
183Sandlot
      Donor
      ID: 59832108
      Fri, Sep 14, 10:05
F Gump - I think before I begin writing last night I was wanting to explain things the way you did. Very good job - coherent and easy to follow. Thanks
 
1846-9 With The Afro
      ID: 97969
      Fri, Sep 14, 10:14
Interesting follow-up on Leo Pheonix, LOTS of people reported him:

Xinoehpoel follow-up
 
1856-9 With The Afro
      ID: 97969
      Fri, Sep 14, 10:17
PS: Just sharing a tidbit I've found and thought might be of interest. Please consider the source of the follow up before taking this as hard proof or before attacking me - thanks!
 
186Ender
      ID: 52438315
      Fri, Sep 14, 10:21
I have a hard time trusting anything I read from a website titled "Bootysmack.com"
 
187biliruben
      Sustainer
      ID: 3502218
      Fri, Sep 14, 10:22
This is what I call unamerican:

In Denton, Tex., the police are investigating a firebomb attack that damaged the Islamic Society of Denton's mosque early yesterday. In suburban Cleveland, Sukhwant Singh, a Sikh priest who lives at the Guru Gobind Sikh temple, awakened early Wednesday to find bottles filled with gasoline hurled in the temple's windows and flames pouring out. No arrests have been made.

In Louisiana, schools in Jefferson Parish were closed on Wednesday after officials reported that students of Middle Eastern origin were being taunted and harassed.

On Long Island, a market in Smithtown owned by a native of Pakistan was the target of what the police considered a probable arson attack Wednesday morning. In Ronkonkoma, a man was arrested on suspicion of waving a pellet gun and shouting obscenities at a South Asian gas station worker. And in South Huntington on Wednesday night, a man was arrested after the police said he tried to run down a Pakistani woman. The police said he screamed that he was "doing this for my country."

Early Wednesday in Manhattan, a Sikh man said he was pounced on by three white men yelling "terrorist" at Broadway and 52nd Street. Later in the morning, three Sikh men waiting at Grand Central Terminal for a Connecticut-bound train were stopped and had their bags searched by the police.

On Wednesday night, more than 100 people, including many teenagers, held a march near a mosque in Bridgeview, Ill., near Chicago. Some waved American flags and shouted, "U.S.A.!"

Shame.

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/14/national/14ISLA.html
 
188F Gump
      ID: 53837117
      Fri, Sep 14, 10:22
SANDLOT

The subject of "justice" and how it should be administered, from a Biblical perspective, is not an easy one. I don't know all the answers either - we are all just sharing the bits of understanding we have been fortunate enough to learn so far in our best way possible. I have found that the best "answers" come from personally going back and examining what the Bible itself actually says, though.

Thank you for the kind words. Do not downplay your own words on how we should act on a person-to-person basis (in 167), however; they contained much much wisdom and were very insightful.
 
1896-9 With The Afro
      ID: 97969
      Fri, Sep 14, 10:43
bili-

Sadly a disaster like this leaves people wanting to react and a situation like this where terrorists live amongst us in cells makes it hard to rule out anybody. I've heard these cells become so ingrained in a comunnity that they're even on PTA boards. That's sick. A friend of mine says there's a family that lives near him that has a framed picture of Bin Laden hanging on their wall. That may be their right, but I can't say I'd blame anyone who fire bombed them. People are scared and sadly profiling people like this is the only thing most people have to go on. It is indeed sad but also understandable in this time of fear.
 
190Doug
      ID: 19850280
      Fri, Sep 14, 14:19
You can't say you'd blame them? I certainly can blame people for such ignorant acts. Taking violent action because of displaced anger is inexcusable. Yes, I can understand how those feelings might exist amongst someone who doesn't want to take the time to fully understand the complexities of what's going on, or that OMB might represent something other than a terrorist to some people. Furthermore, have they checked if these people continue to display his photo? And asked what it means to them? I had a friend in college who had a photo of Hussein on his wall, not because he supported him, but because the photo made him laugh (it reminded him of the custodian at his High School). Anyway, to feel hatred is understandable if that's your trip, but to act on those ungrounded feelings is entirely unpermissable. Period.
 
191Mattinglyinthehall
      ID: 1832399
      Fri, Sep 14, 14:28
6-9, Doug said all that is needed, but I would add that by your reasoning, you "can't blame" and should "understand" and the hijackers/suicide bombers.

There is no excuse for attacking the innocent, be it following religious orders or enacting revenge.
 
192azdbacker
      Donor
      ID: 51392423
      Fri, Sep 14, 15:08
Great comments by Ender and F Gump. Also KKB for giving me a little perspective. When these threads started Tuesday, I was called a voice of reason for a moment. Unfortunately, I sometimes get a little out of control with the expression of my deep beliefs, and I have been a somewhat guilty of that in the last couple days. I have learned a lot that has helped me tremendously in my life, and am eager to pass that on. Sadly, I often don't have the patience necessary to speak God's Word with LOVE, instead I sometimes become confrontational - but I'm working on it.

God Bless.
 
193James K Polk
      ID: 19351290
      Fri, Sep 14, 19:59
F Gump 171 -- not angry at you for your opinion, just happen to think it's an ill-informed one. You seem to not be able to see the forest for the trees.

As an experiment, wander over to washingtonpost.com, MSNBC.com, abcnews.com, chicagotribune.com, bostonglobe.com, etc. etc., and take a look at the coverage they've provided. Then tell me which stories are merely blather and speculation, and which stories are important, compelling, fascinating, groundbreaking and so on. You know, the kind of stories that many people, yourself included, have been linking to in these threads.

I have not only been watching dozens of hours of television coverage during and after this event, but I've been working 12-hour days (starting less than an hour after the first crash) and reading literally hundreds of stories. I can honestly say that the coverage of this event -- in all its depth and breadth -- has been unprecedented. I'm proud to have been a part of it, because I believe it's important, and a noble way to help the American people understand and be able to not only grieve for what happened, but also get through it.

So of course I'm disturbed when someone chooses to focus on the minute fraction of the coverage that has been in error. Some of those things aren't that hard to understand, frankly -- they came out of initial chaos, like the State Dept. car bomb report, then were immediately corrected. If it's a matter of having the attacks reported instantly and running the risk that you correct a small part of the report, I think most people will gladly take it. In fact, if the media hadn't been on the air so fast, based on the stories I've read of people escaping the WTC and the apparent heroes that tried to retake the flight near Pittsburgh, there may have been even more casualties.

Another widely reported story that was later retracted involved the apparent rescue of five firefighters from the WTC rubble. This one was a source problem -- NYC officials gave this exact story to the press, and one reporter was even standing next to a firefighter as he was relating details of the rescue over a cell phone.

So those two stories were widely reported, and then quickly corrected. Absolutely no lasting damage, and perfectly understandble. So be it.

The other reports you criticize were NOT widely reported, and a couple were likely simple human error or misspoken words -- the report of two planes hitting the Pentagon rather than the WTC, and the plane hitting Camp David rather than Camp David being a possible target. Like I said, I've been immersed in this from the beginning, and I've seen neither of these reports. So I know they weren't out there widely at all.

As for bin Laden's house arrest, something tells me you need to pay more attention to the way things are reported. First of all, very few Western media outlets even mentioned this. I happened to be handling all the bin Laden coverage for my paper last night, and not one of the stories filed, and I read dozens of then, reported it as fact. Several specifically refuted the rumor, in fact. The reason the rumor was out there in the first place was because an online Arabic newspaper reported it -- and that source has been cited in every instance of the "house arrest" story I've seen.

All that said, the news people have gotten FAR more than the basic story out. The media has reported on, in random order and off the top of my head: how people can help, through blood donations, donating to Red Cross or local fund-raisers; local Muslim community reaction; measures taken to protect Arab-American communities; background on Osama bin Laden, including links to CIA; information on his training camps in Afghanistan; information on specific terrorists in his network, as well as the historic spread of the network; background on bin Laden's previous attacks, and those that were foiled; U.S. relations with Mideast states; security upgrades at airports nationwide; how a National Guard call-up would affect specific communities; what the National Guardsmen would be doing; individual stories of survival from the WTC and the Pentagon; stories of relatives looking for the missing at the same buildings; reaction of world leaders after the attacks; reaction of religious leaders; specifics on the structural strengths and weaknesses of the WTC and Pentagon; the reaction of workers who still work in skyscrapers; the stories of rescue efforts; street scenes in lower Manhattan; increased fear of flying among Americans; the renewed consideration of trading freedoms for safety in the U.S.; security measures taken by other countries to fight terrorism; the economic impact of the attacks, on the airlines, on NYC and on the nation; details on companies with WTC offices trying to find employees; breakdowns of how many countries had victims involved; detail on the investigation process and how officials tracked down suspects; detail on the effort to identify bodies at WTC and Pentagon; the effects of the attacks on American sports and entertainment industries ...

I'm going to quit now, not because I can't think of more, but because I'm tired of typing them in. And remember, for each of these subjects, there were many stories by many outlets. No, I think it's safe to say the media has done far better than cover just the basics.

Like I said before, I'm not upset. And for the record, I don't simply disagree with whatever you say -- in fact I have great respect for all your other posts in this thread, and in other threads as well.

But I will always take you to task for inane, generalizing statements about the news media. And in that vein, I actually feel sorry for you, because it appears your opinion of the media has blinded you to the incredible effort that is going into the coverage of this event. If you choose to focus on the rare, quickly corrected errors that in most cases weren't even widespread in the first place, there's nothing I can do about it. If you choose to believe that a handful of human errors somehow outweighs, or even compromises more than a tiny bit, the enormous ongoing media effort, again, nothing I can do.

But your simple statement that, other than reporting the bare facts, the media has been a worthless pile of blather and speculation, is simply untrue. Demonstrably untrue, in fact. And absurd and offensive to anyone who has been working his or her butt off to make sure you and everyone else gets not only those basic facts, but all the stories I mentioned before, and more.

If you miss the forest for the trees, don't blame the news media, blame yourself.
 
194Roo
      ID: 665497
      Fri, Sep 14, 20:15
Competition: How many examples of ignorance can you find in the New York Times article mentioned by biliruben?

Despite W's inspirational "We should not hold one who is a Muslim responsible for an act of terror", there have been numerous "reports of arson (and) personal attacks".

"In Denton, Tex., the police are investigating a firebomb attack that damaged the Islamic Society of Denton's mosque early yesterday."

"In Louisiana, schools in Jefferson Parish were closed on Wednesday after officials reported that students of Middle Eastern origin were being taunted and harassed."

"On Long Island, a market in Smithtown owned by a native of Pakistan was the target of what the police considered a probable arson attack Wednesday morning. And in South Huntington on Wednesday night, a man was arrested after the police said he tried to run down a Pakistani woman. The police said he screamed that he was "doing this for my country.""

"On Wednesday night, more than 100 people, including many teenagers, held a march near a mosque in Bridgeview, Ill., near Chicago. Some waved American flags and shouted, "U.S.A.!"

Non-Muslims have also been subject to harrassment.

"In suburban Cleveland, Sukhwant Singh, a Sikh priest who lives at the Guru Gobind Sikh temple"

"Early Wednesday in Manhattan, a Sikh man said he was pounced on by three white men yelling "terrorist" at Broadway and 52nd Street. Later in the morning, three Sikh men waiting at Grand Central Terminal for a Connecticut-bound train were stopped and had their bags searched by the police."

"When an Amtrak train from Boston was stopped in Providence, R.I., on Wednesday, about 10 people were removed, held by the police and questioned for an hour and 40 minutes while the train idled in the station, the police and passengers said"

"Sher J. B. Singh, a telecommunications consultant, was one of three Sikh men escorted from the train at gunpoint, handcuffed and questioned about whether he had anything to do with the terrorism."

"Col. Richard T. Sullivan, chief of police in Providence, said his department had received a call from police and federal officials in Boston to search for men meeting a specific description. He said those detained included a Hispanic and an African- American. "They broadcast four Arabic males, so four Arabic males is what we are looking for," Colonel Sullivan said. "It's not ethnic on our part(?)"."

Singh = Sikh,
Sikh priest = Sikh,
Guru Gobind Sikh Temple = Sikh

Sikhism is a totally different religion to Islam, but to many "patriotic" Americans, including New York and Providence Police, a Sikh wearing a turban is Middle Eastern / Arabic / Islamic / terrorist suspect.

Mr. Singh was arrested for "possession of a concealed weapon." "He wore under his shirt a three-inch-long sheathed knife called a kirpan, which is traditionally carried by devout Sikh men."

As he said "I didn't anticipate that as a country we would become blind and just look at somebody suspiciously who looks or dresses in a certain way. I thought that if that would be the case, it wouldn't be the authorities, it would be the people, and the authorities would be there to support you."

And, probably not finally:

"Hours after the two airliners slammed into the World Trade Center, the phone at the mission (of Afghanistan to the United Nations) began ringing with death threats."

"Mr. Amin said many Americans do not understand that his mission does not represent the Taliban government in Kabul, but the embattled Islamic State of Afghanistan."
 
195BoSoxFan9
      ID: 33518295
      Fri, Sep 14, 21:27
Now that religion has come up, does anyone know of a reference book which compares the protestant faiths?
Also, isn't strange that just a couple of weeks ago the major focus was on a 14-year-old playing baseball against 12-year-olds? It was trivial then and completely forgotten about now.
 
196Sandlot
      Donor
      ID: 5343219
      Fri, Sep 14, 21:52
there was a 14-year-old playing against 12-year-olds??? Here??

Sorry, bad attempt at ill-timed humor
 
197KrazyKoalaBears
      ID: 266182910
      Fri, Sep 14, 22:21
My fiancee made the comment earlier tonight, "Do you think Gary Condit is happy about the terrorist attacks?"

Doubtful he's happy about it, but you get the idea.

 
198F Gump
      ID: 53837117
      Fri, Sep 14, 23:48
JAMES K POLK

You choose to see the media's role as "getting most of it right" when they report so-called facts, with the task of cleaning it up later when the facts turn out to be untrue. As long as they have a good percentage, you don't mind.

I just happen to disagree. I think that when they have "unconfirmed reports" or "unsubstantiated rumor", they should say so. Some do, but some don't, and in so doing assert "facts" that never were. I think that is wrong.

All the items I cited were indeed false reports of facts. NONE were "misstatements" (such as a confusion of "Pentagon" for "WTC") as you try to explain away - they were just flat out wrong. But reported as "fact." And though you say you did not notice any of these errors, they were all reported on one or more of the major TV networks: FOX, CBS, ABC, or NBC. Because of their widespread reach, I would consider any of those to fit the definition of "widely reported": maybe you do not.

You said "As for bin Laden's house arrest, something tells me you need to pay more attention to the way things are reported. First of all, very few Western media outlets even mentioned this." JKP, I am paying attention: this was a scrolling "fact" on EVERY major TV network all morning. Don't take ME to task for that, and don't accuse me of somehow being confused or inattentive!!!

So I am forced, then, if I want "news", to take every report of fact and regard it as possibly error-filled, until EVENTUALLY the junk is sifted and removed. From the standpoint of a recipient of such "fcts", however, if what is reported as fact keeps being unreliable, then it leads me to be forced to mistrust it all.

Another example of crappy reporting, that I have seen and that further makes me leery: this report, which is typical of this story being disseminated, from CNN.com ...

PHOENIX, Arizona (AP) -- Three Northwest Airlines employees intentionally breached a security checkpoint at Sky Harbor International Airport in Phoenix as flights resumed Thursday.

Two ground crew employees cleared the checkpoint with a pocketknife and a corkscrew while a pilot passed without proper identification, airport spokeswoman Suzanne Luber said.

"Once they did that, they turned around and said, 'Hey, look what we did,"' she said. Their point: to show that security gaps still exist days after terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, she said.


However, the report that they did this intentionally is blatantly false. My basis: I saw an interview with one of the 3 with Diane Sawyer this morning. In it, he said it was unintentional, it just happened, they noticed and went back. She tried to make it sound as if he and the other 2 had cooked up a scheme to "test" security, and he said "no it was an accidental thing" several times. But it is very widely reported that they somehow made a determination to "test" the security.

Having seen that interview, as well as an interview with the airport spokewoman cited by CNN, I can see where someone could LEAP to that idea. But obviously they did not check it out, and it was and continues to be false.

Is that a minor distinction? Maybe. But at this point, it is actually a lie: it just is not true, yet it is being reported as such. If I had not seen the interview myself, I would be led to believe that airline employees don't trust the security and are attempting to prove it is flawed: in this case, that is far from the truth.

Now, how can ANY news outlet say the words "intentional"? You can't even leap to that if you don't know, unless you are willing to "make it up" to get a good flavor to your story. Only a "minor" lie? Maybe. But why not just tell it as it is. Or say "we don't know if it was intentional or not"?

Anyhow, you seem to think that I should be willing to accept the concept that "most of it, when we say 'these are facts', will eventually turn out to be true". I don't, cause then I am left wondering which is the false part that has crept in. I have no way of knowing.
 
199James K Polk
      ID: 19351290
      Sat, Sep 15, 01:12
Problem: the report isn't necessarily blatantly false. There is a source discrepancy, because I saw this story last night with information on this being a planned security breach. Either this guy has changed his story from what he said at first, or this guy is a different member of the three and is saying something different, or ... well, I don't know. But anyhow, one guy talking to Diane Sawyer doesn't necessarily instantly refute all the other reporting that's been done. Messy, I know.
 
200F Gump
      ID: 53837117
      Sat, Sep 15, 01:49
JAMES K POLK

I agree that it was (and is) REPORTED as intentional. I trust that the "source" is that airport security lady cited in CNN.com, who actually is NOT saying it was intentional, though her quoted words can be twisted or misconstrued to say as much. Do you have a different source that has EVER been cited? Or are you just making the asumption that there is a "source" who says it was intentional? If you want me to believe that this is not sloppy and/or false news reporting, convince me.

You say "one guy talking to Diane Sawyer doesn't necessarily instantly refute all the other reporting that's been done." WHAT OTHER REPORTING? You are a media insider: convince me with facts that you know there is ANY true "reporting" that was done in using the word "intentional." I see NOTHING-NADA-ZERO-ZIP-ZILCH to support your view.
 
201James K Polk
      ID: 19351290
      Sat, Sep 15, 02:06
I have spent quite a little time going back through the wire here, but unfortunately we've been cycling through about 1,000 stories a day right now and the stuff that I was reading last night just isn't there anymore. I've given it my best effort, but I cannot provide a link to a source.

All I can do is say that I was not making any assumptions -- I read last night a story that clearly laid out that this was a planned thing. You can choose whether or not you believe me; it doesn't matter to me. Just remember that you have cited more than a few TV reports that you couldn't provide any links to either. That's just the way it goes sometimes.

Now, the story I read last night might of course be changing. It's entirely possible that these guys were simply in a tither over what they'd just done, and talked it up to the reporter. Or that the security people misunderstood whether these three intentionally did what they did.

However, it is also entirely possible that this guy told Diane Sawyer that it was accidental because he's at risk of losing his job if he really did intentionally try to break security. That wouldn't surprise me at all.

And of course, there's no way to really know.
 
202James K Polk
      ID: 19351290
      Sat, Sep 15, 02:54
As for your first point in 198 --

No, I don't see the media's role as "getting most of it right," and mistakes being OK as long as we're right a high percentage of the time.

Of course we strive to be 100% accurate. What I'm trying to say is that I can understand that in covering such a chaotic, devastating, unprecedented event, perfection isn't going to happen. Especially in the intial hours, when speed actually was of the essence.

As for bin Laden's house arrest, I just don't buy that this was a "scrolling item" on every major network all morning. The rumors were already being denied Thursday night, I watched three networks Friday morning and never saw it. But if you saw it at all, and it did not include the word "reportedly" or some other note like that, of course that would be wrong.

I agree with you that when media outlets have unconfirmed reports, they should say so. And what I'm telling you is that, in the vast amount of coverage I've taken in during the past few days, I have seen great pains taken to do just that. Over and over. Is it possible that some reports have failed to do this? Of course it is. You seem to have seen some, and it's not like I've never it seen it myself.

Which brings me to this: I do not expect anyone, you included, to simply overlook media errors; they make me cringe as much as anyone. And I am not trying to say that in this event, or in any event for that matter, media coverage is perfect. That will never happen. We are human.

But what I have been trying to point out is that posts like 86 are just absurd generalizations. You are talking about an ocean of facts that have been reported. You are talking about an incredible depth of coverage, including the themes I listed in a previous post, and more. You are talking about the round-the-clock efforts that have given you every bit of information you know about this incident.

You have cited a handful of items that have been incorrectly reported. All of them, of course, for only a small amount of time -- ranging from a couple minutes to a couple hours -- until they were corrected. But still, you say that other than the bare facts, the media has been a worthless pile of speculation, and that the vast pile of it has just been plain false.

I can't stress this enough -- you are talking about such a minute fraction of the facts involved in the coverage of this event. And if you somehow feel that this means you must question everything, then you are ignoring the overwhelming amount of fantastic work that the media has done. The vital work that, in no hyperbole at all, has saved people's lives and helped the country come together.

So spend as much time being as skeptical as you want. But be careful about making such sweeping generalizations about the media, because your own extensive knowledge about this whole event belies your offensive, ill-informed opinion about the messengers.

-----------------------------

I have no idea what you do for a living, if you face high-pressure deadlines, if you have people who know little about what you do yet sit in judgment of everything you do. I have no idea if you consider what you do to be important, if you're proud of what you do, or if you know beyond doubt that people need what you provide. I have no idea if you believe your job is important enough that you'd work at it past midnight, every night, if that's when it had to be done, or if you'd take far less pay than you could make elsewhere. If any of these things are true about your job, however, I'm sure you'd get a little defensive about it too.
 
203F Gump
      ID: 53837117
      Sat, Sep 15, 03:34
JAMES K POLK

Your points are accepted and well-taken.

Only two minor points:

(1) I am certain that I saw the Bin Laden "house arrest" as a continuous scroll this morning, and not last night. The reason: I turned off the TV early last night (before 5) and did not turn it on again til about 7 this morning. It was indeed a scroll item at the bottom (where they update you on current "facts"), it was on at least 2 and maybe more of the major networks, and it lasted AT LEAST past the Ari Fleischer press conference (at whatever time that was).

(2) Regarding the airport security incident, the reports still are claiming it was "intentional." I see no corrections thus far. So, if there is a claim that it was "intentional", the source of such a "fact" should still be available for those who have access, I would think. The only first-hand source I have EVER seen says it is "hooey", though.

One further note about that, by the way: I watched the interview. It was not hard-hitting, or anything like that, just a friendly chat. The guy recited his story of what happened: we walked through, realized they missed what they should have caught, and went back to point it out. Sawyer was TRYING to make a point about how ingenious/insightful or somesuch the 3 were to PLAN something like that, and the guy was like "hey, it just happened". (That is the boiled down version, of course.) Very offhanded, actually "deflecting" what was an attempt to praise. If you had seen it, you would know exactly what I mean. I saw no defensiveness, only Sawyer trying to get him to make a point that was contrary to what happened - and then I see that the cnn.com site is calling it "intentional." That sort of combo is what makes me leery.
 
204sarge33rd
      ID: 25818711
      Sat, Sep 15, 07:46
Guys, if I might? The press has a job that is almost as difficult as that of an Intel Analyst. I've been trying to come up with an analogy that would accurately ( for the most part anyway) reflect just how tough it is. Best I can do is this....assume I take a dz or so, 5000 piece jigsaw puzzles which you've never seen. Then I dump all 60,000 pieces into a big bag, shake it up real good, and then let you pull out 500 pieces. Then, you have to tell me what all 12 completed puzzles look like. The press has to do this daily, Intel Analysts have to do this in order to make informed 'guesses' as to who plans on doing what, where and when.

If we want the press to report, facts...and only absolutely verified facts..fine. We can then read all about this event, in 2003 or so. In the meantime, lets allow them to do their jobs.
 
205Voodoo Child
      ID: 57842922
      Mon, Sep 17, 18:06
Re: Mentors/Post 67
This was forwarded to me by a friend today and I immediately thought of this thread..
 
206tomegun
      ID: 3589611
      Mon, Sep 17, 18:14
we have that picture posted at work. cool