Forget the last 3 games. Just look at the last 3 outs of Game 4. That's choking. It's not like they weren't tired for 3 games, 8 innings and then suddenly became overworked and had their hitters go cold with their closer on the mound at the end of Game 4. No, Rivera choked and the rest was the culmination of that choke, becoming an overall team choke.

That's choking for any closer. Closers are supposed to come in, get 3 outs, and go home.

All seem to describe Rivera in Game 4. Games 5-7 were a direct result of Rivera's inability to perform. But what's your definition? And/or, how do you think Rivera didn't choke?

Human beings sometimes falter under pressure. Pilots crash and divers drown. Under the glare of competition, basketball players cannot find the basket and golfers cannot find the pin. When that happens, we say variously that people have "panicked" or, to use the sports colloquialism, "choked." But what do those words mean? Both are pejoratives. To choke or panic is considered to be as bad as to quit. But are all forms of failure equal? And what do the forms in which we fail say about who we are and how we think?We live in an age obsessed with success, with documenting the myriad ways by which talented people overcome challenges and obstacles. There is as much to be learned, though, from documenting the myriad ways in which talented people sometimes fail.

"Choking" sounds like a vague and all-encompassing term, yet it describes a very specific kind of failure.

==================

When Jana Novotna faltered at Wimbledon, it was because she began thinking about her shots again. She lost her fluidity, her touch. She double-faulted on her serves and mis-hit her overheads, the shots that demand the greatest sensitivity in force and timing. She seemed like a different person--playing with the slow, cautious deliberation of a beginner--because, in a sense, she was a beginner again: she was relying on a learning system that she hadn't used to hit serves and overhead forehands and volleys since she was first taught tennis, as a child. The same thing has happened to Chuck Knoblauch, the New York Yankees' second baseman, who inexplicably has had trouble throwing the ball to first base. Under the stress of playing in front of forty thousand fans at Yankee Stadium, Knoblauch finds himself reverting to explicit mode, throwing like a Little Leaguer again.

No matter what, the Cards never controlled their own destiny in this series; they never had a lead, of any sort, to protect. The Yankees did and they failed to get 3 key outs with the ball in their hands.

The way I see it, if a team is in complete control of its own destiny, like the Yankees having the ball in their hands to make only 3 outs to go to the World Series, and they fail, then I would consider that a choke. If a team is never in the series to begin with, I don't see where they've shown anything except futility. Could it have been a choke on the big stage? I suppose, but looking at the series, I personally think Boston was just a better team and showed it.