|
| Posted by: ¤ Mario LeMoose ¤
- [101125422] Sat, Dec 04, 2004, 23:25
Guru: This is completely a "frill," but have you considered adding the RotoGuru logo as an icon to your site's URL? (Probably only the light bulb "R" would fit, as the icon should be created from a square graphic.)
Discussion of the process here: Dynamic Drive Forums
Numerous major sites now feature a logo icon in their URL (Boston.com, Sports Illustrated, The New York Times, and CNN, to name just a few).
As mentioned in the Dynamic Drive Forum thread, the icon appears automatically in Netscape, but apparently only on pages accessed via a "favorite" in IE. |
| | | 1 | Guru
ID: 330592710
Sun, Dec 05, 2004, 21:50
|
I always wondered how that was done.
I couldn't make the light bulb recognizable as a 16x16 icon. I did try a simple R, using the same font as the RotoGuru logo. If you open the blurb page, you can see the result.
If anyone with graphical talent wants to build a better icon (limit - 16x16 pixels), I'll consider it.
I'll also set it up to work for forum pages, but I haven't done so yet.
|
|
| | | 2 | Mike D
Sustainer
ID: 041831612
Sun, Dec 05, 2004, 21:53
|
Your "R" is pretty cool Guru. Because the letter is so wide, and dark colored, it stands out well.
|
|
| | | 3 | Mike D
Sustainer
ID: 041831612
Sun, Dec 05, 2004, 21:54
|
Maybe a yellow background instead of white would give the lightbulb effect and add a little to it.
|
|
| | | 4 | Guru
ID: 330592710
Sun, Dec 05, 2004, 22:27
|
Good idea. Yellow background added.
|
|
| | | 5 | Mike D
Sustainer
ID: 041831612
Sun, Dec 05, 2004, 23:41
|
Yeah, that looks great.
|
|
| | | 6 | JeffG
ID: 31151522
Sun, Dec 05, 2004, 23:51
|
I was playing with the icon builder site refered to in the link Moose provided. Looks good, am emailing to guru.
|
|
| | | 7 | Addicted
Dude
ID: 4611592518
Mon, Dec 06, 2004, 04:18
|
Just noticed it. Looks great.
--Addicted--
|
|
| | | 8 | Guru
ID: 330592710
Mon, Dec 06, 2004, 10:05
|
For comparison, I put JeffG's light bulb icon on this page.
I think I like the simple R better (still on the blurb page), as it's easier to identify - although not as distinctive, I'll admit. What do others think?
|
|
| | | 9 | Mike D
Sustainer
ID: 041831612
Mon, Dec 06, 2004, 10:15
|
Agreed Guru. Again, with it being so small, the ease in identifying is key, IMHO.
|
|
|
|