|
| Posted by: Puckprophet
- [1210541114] Fri, Feb 14, 2003, 18:32
time for a new one....
|
| | | 1 | smallwhirled
Donor
ID: 17152614
Sat, Feb 15, 2003, 00:26
|
Mario has his last chance tommorrow. I really would have liked to save a trade and hold for his 1 in 4 after tommorrow, but with no Kovalev....I'm not so sure.
Anyways, this game is extremely important, and we've been shutout two in a row. So, Mario will have at least two points tommorrow. That is a guarantee.
If it doesn't work out, Modano isn't the prime short term candidate. I may go back to my trusty guy Jason Blake and think of another way to make up some ground.
BTW, any lurkers should post and get astericked in the top 100 thread. We need more support, only 12 of us in there!
smallwhirled
|
|
| | | 2 | simbot
ID: 1597246
Sat, Feb 15, 2003, 02:20
|
I'm in, moved up 12 spots to 96!
|
|
| | | 3 | simbot
ID: 1597246
Sat, Feb 15, 2003, 02:42
|
On a side note, Kolzog is going to sit Saturday night. Link I'm probably going to move him to Lalime, Brodeur, or Roy. Anyone have any thoughts on who will rack up the most points out of the three?
|
|
| | | 4 | Rogue Nine
ID: 9110143
Sat, Feb 15, 2003, 03:15
|
! Your really at 96? Me too! Up 34 spots with my 456 TSNP night. Thanks go out to Knuble, Kariya, Thornton and Murray. Hackett gets the 'bleh' award of the night.
|
|
| | | 5 | Hockey Ljusa Sidan
ID: 52555310
Sat, Feb 15, 2003, 06:31
|
Maybe Kolzig->Belfour
|
|
| | | 6 | Irish Red
ID: 40020306
Sat, Feb 15, 2003, 08:40
|
I am the owner of Durham Irish Red, at 66 yesterday, up four spots to 62 this morning. Not leading my auto division, though; sill have some work to do on that front!
|
|
| | | 7 | Hockey Ljusa Sidan
ID: 52555310
Sat, Feb 15, 2003, 09:32
|
I'm @ 29, up 11 yesterday.
|
|
| | | 8 | Chestergreat
Sustainer
ID: 561321323
Sat, Feb 15, 2003, 11:49
|
28 Teams in action today (15th), and the other 2 (Dal & SJ) are the only 2 playing tomorrow.
Will be interesting to see what players gain or lose $$ today since they are almost all playing today. Dal & SJ players should gain some tomorrow.
|
|
| | | 9 | Little M
ID: 221251511
Sat, Feb 15, 2003, 12:37
|
What is the Top 100 thread?
I have 3 teams that are currently at 30, 70 and 89.
PS: I don't mind if Irish Red doesn't win his division. :)
|
|
| | | 10 | smallwhirled
Donor
ID: 17152614
Sat, Feb 15, 2003, 12:42
|
Yesterdays
Just go to the dropdown on the right to "hockey standings." Once you're in there you'll see it gets posted almost everyday alongside the gurupie standings and KKB's game standings.
It is an outstanding standings thread that has all the information that you could ever want on one page.
smallwhirled
|
|
| | | 11 | smallwhirled
Donor
ID: 17152614
Sun, Feb 16, 2003, 00:06
|
3HM guys with Mario....
I'm holding, I'm going to want him back anyways after the 1 in 4. IT's going to be a little inconsistant, but I think I'm along for the ride. His ownership is such an advantage right now. It's in the teens, IIRC, and it could be a huge advantage to have one of the most automatic guys in the game.
Hurting at goalie though...
smallwhirled
|
|
| | | 12 | Rogue Nine
ID: 3319162
Tue, Feb 18, 2003, 02:50
|
Went:
Lang -> Antropov
Hackett (Ugh!) -> Belfour
I've finally lost faith in Hackett... Too bad it took me longer than everyone else on these boards. I could've saved a trade and gotten about 50-75 more TSNP if I'd just held Storr.
|
|
| | | 13 | The Dienasty
ID: 25025130
Tue, Feb 18, 2003, 03:26
|
Went Storr --> Tugnutt
Storr doesn't play till Thursday and then has back to back back-to-back's. I had a decent little run with him but it's time to go with the cheap goalie on the best team in the league.
|
|
| | | 14 | KWizard
ID: 16141101
Tue, Feb 18, 2003, 04:11
|
Gonchar --> Tarnstrom
Storr --> Belfour
T White --> Jokinen
I was hoping to make Todd White a long term hold but he no longer plays on the top power play unit with Hossa and Alfredsson. Hopefully Olli can keep his point streak going for a while.
|
|
| | | 15 | Hockey Ljusa Sidan
ID: 52555310
Tue, Feb 18, 2003, 04:12
|
Murray->Mogilny
|
|
| | | 16 | KWizard
ID: 16141101
Tue, Feb 18, 2003, 07:20
|
If you didn't know already, Antropov is now playing with Renberg and Hoglund.
|
|
| | | 17 | Chestergreat
Sustainer
ID: 561321323
Tue, Feb 18, 2003, 08:25
|
Now Kovalev has a few Ranger games under his belt, Bure & Leetch are back, Lindros has been given a boot in the rearend by the coach . . . . will the potential on the Rangers ever come to fruition?
I think I'm going to take a chance on Bure. Unfortunately, I want to go Hackett->Belfour as well . . and to get the extra $$ to get Belfour I would need to go Jagr->Bure. Don't know if its worth it or not.
I'd like to wait until after the Rangers game with Minn. . . but don't want to lose the Belfour star vs Carolina.
|
|
| | | 18 | smallwhirled
Donor
ID: 17152614
Tue, Feb 18, 2003, 11:38
|
Jagr > Mogilny
Gonchar > Tarnstrom
Storr > Belfour
back on my roll again, watch out Chestergreat.
smallwhirled
|
|
| | | 19 | J
Leader
ID: 49346417
Tue, Feb 18, 2003, 11:41
|
Murray-->Samuelsson
Storr-->Belfour
|
|
| | | 20 | Chestergreat
Sustainer
ID: 137142214
Tue, Feb 18, 2003, 12:36
|
Spend your extra $10M wisely Smallworld. I am fading a bit . .. but not throwing in the towel yet!
|
|
| | | 21 | smallwhirled
Donor
ID: 17152614
Wed, Feb 19, 2003, 12:00
|
Seems like a chance for some real winger differentiaion. It's going to be tough not having Jagr and Hejduk tommorrow (probably), but it's not like Murray/Kariya/Mogilny have bad skeds. Just a lot to pick from right now. My roll continues, I wonder if 1700 SWP could be made up by the end of the year.
smallwhirled
|
|
| | | 22 | Rogue Nine
ID: 151551813
Wed, Feb 19, 2003, 12:51
|
I'm going with Jagr/Hejduk/Kariya/Tanguay.
|
|
| | | 23 | roy4hockey
ID: 451131913
Wed, Feb 19, 2003, 14:15
|
hejduk/jagr/sykora/tanguay for me
|
|
| | | 24 | Hockey Ljusa Sidan
ID: 52555310
Wed, Feb 19, 2003, 14:38
|
Will go Jagr/Hejduk/Mogilny/Sykora
|
|
| | | 25 | J
Leader
ID: 49346417
Wed, Feb 19, 2003, 15:05
|
I'm gonna give it a whirl with cheap W's and studs everywhere else
Jagr, Tanguay, Kip Miller (may move to Sykora if he doesn't produce), Samuelsson (playing with Mario and 500k).
along with 3HM at C, 3HM on D (even though their schedules aren't so great, and Gonchar has been terrible)
Belfour, Giguere at G.
Lets see if this can get me into the top 100...
|
|
| | | 26 | Chestergreat
Sustainer
ID: 561321323
Wed, Feb 19, 2003, 19:06
|
Being at only $63M I'm not going to stud D yet (Lidstrom/McInnis/Gonchar). Will stick with cheap to mid price range guys (Boyle/Ozolish/Tarnstrom) who have been doing just fine for me so far.
Doing a little differential by going with Kovalev and St.Louis at wing (with Mogilny & Murray), but if St.Louis continues to struggle (no points in 5 games) tonight in Atlanta, Tanguay will take his place.
|
|
| | | 27 | DrAgOnS rAgE
ID: 2114217
Thu, Feb 20, 2003, 10:23
|
neone thinking of joel bouchard from pittsburgh... he is logging in a lot of ice time.. he's probably the second best defenseman in pitts behind tarnstrom.. a cheapie too!!!
|
|
| | | 28 | smallwhirled
Donor
ID: 17152614
Thu, Feb 20, 2003, 10:36
|
I'm not thinking of him, per say, becuause I'm pretty set defensively....but you are right on about Bouchard. He is playing point on the PP now, with a halfway decent shot and getting good ice time.
Heatley > Tanguay for me. Jagr and Hejdukless might hurt, but I gain nothing in terms of games if I trade into them.
|
|
| | | 29 | smallwhirled
Donor
ID: 17152614
Thu, Feb 20, 2003, 11:04
|
Screw it. Dan's got a hunch, and I'm going Murray > Naslund.
|
|
| | | 30 | rinkwide
ID: 541312012
Thu, Feb 20, 2003, 13:31
|
I cleared some cap room with "Beef" Jyrki Lumme $0.5 D TOR. Not the best player in the world, but for the price he seems to be getting lots of ice time on a hot team.
Aside from Big Al Mac (who's schedule I didn't like), I couldn't find decent projected D production. Nobody else seems to be looking at Lumme though. Am I missing something?
|
|
| | | 31 | simbot
ID: 1597246
Thu, Feb 20, 2003, 13:50
|
Lumme's a good cheapie dman right now... i'd probably move into him but i'm happy with my guys (Gonchar, Blake, Boyle) and I don't want to waste trades on dmen.
On another note, does anyone find it strange that a few managers in the top 100 have multiple teams with the exact same roster? What's the point of that- you only get one prize for being top 100, the best place you come in.
Or am I missing something...
|
|
| | | 32 | Rogue Nine
ID: 11145203
Thu, Feb 20, 2003, 13:55
|
I have 3 teams, all identical. My main reasoning behind this was to have a shot at 3 divisional prizes (although my team in the Eat, Sleep, Drink NHLv division with the other gurupies is a long shot) and maybe have an opportunity to differentiate near the end of the season if I'm in the running for a good top 100 prize. People with one team in the top 10 might have to choose between, say, Hejduk -> Jagr and Hejduk -> Naslund in the last week. With three identical teams, I could do both, and even try a 3rd option if I wanted.
|
|
| | | 33 | Die_Habs
ID: 47361010
Thu, Feb 20, 2003, 15:26
|
I only have one team. It solves all the problems!
|
|
| | | 34 | walk
Leader
ID: 214581016
Thu, Feb 20, 2003, 17:07
|
Moving right along. Issues for me that I have on my mind:
Thornton and the slumping bruins. A stud center who is not producing as of very late. I moved him on one team to Lemieux and held him on the other. If he does not have a good game against NJ tomorrow, then I see him taking another big hit money-wise, and so on. Not that Lemieux has easy opponents (Colorado tonight, St.L, then NJ), but they are all at home.
Then there's goaltending. With Turco out, most of us have Giguere and Belfour in goal. I am considering moving Belfour to Lalime on one team to differentiate. Ottowa starts a 6-game homestand tonight. I bet Pruszek starts tonight and then Lalime the next five. Ottowa is 21-4 at home. I like that. Still, no other goalie averages more TSN/G than Belfour, who routinely faces a lot of shots.
Food for thought.
- walk
|
|
| | | 36 | Richard
ID: 10112315
Thu, Feb 20, 2003, 17:52
|
Like, Walk, I've been mulling over what to do at Goalie and with my slumping Bruins.
A few weeks ago it seemed clear that going with a three stud at center approach would be a good approach both from a point perspective and a trade conservation standpoint. However, Thornton's production has been dismal recently. Perhaps the three studs at center should be Modano, Lemeiux and Forsberg. Instead, I've got two studs and a dud at center.
At Goalie, I came very very close to grabbing Lalime as my replacement for Hackett. However, it looks like I went with the crowd and grabbed Belfour. Belfour is one of the top point producers in goal so far and I hope he continues.
My late season strategy currently is grabbing the best long-term producers I can afford and let other managers take the risks/rewards that go with differentiation picks. Of course, I'm hoping those managers get the risk rather than the reward from their differentiation moves;-)
Richard
|
|
| | | 37 | Teddybears
Donor
ID: 210492212
Thu, Feb 20, 2003, 17:56
|
Big Mac Innis will have a pretty bad schedule soon.
Anyone planning on moving out of him for a while?
Looks like Gonchar or Blake will be a good fit.
Is it worth trading for 3 extra games between 2/24 and 3/10???
It's down the stretch now, so it's time to be aggresive?.
|
|
| | | 38 | smallwhirled
Donor
ID: 17152614
Thu, Feb 20, 2003, 19:06
|
Well, I'm hoping that Thornton gets out of this dip in production...I like using all of my RV at this point and use it as an advantage. So I'll either commit to him, or commit to a cheapie and upgrade somewhere else immediately.
Choosing goalies is something I am not good at, so I plan on riding those 2 guys on the good schedules for now.
I know it seems tough paying 8 mil for Joe right now, but he's still at 45 TSNP/gm for the last 15...and that is certainly not pedestrian for 8 mil, IMO. He'll get it back...and all of the teams that had to go Thornton > Forsberg will miss out on Thornton. I'd also still take Thornton over Modano.
As for Mac, 3 extra games is probaly good enough for me at 30 TSNP/gm which is what I can get, at least.
Amazing fun and value in this game. By far TSN's best game.
smallwhirled
|
|
| | | 39 | Rogue Nine
ID: 11145203
Thu, Feb 20, 2003, 20:08
|
I too am going to stick with Thornton, at least until Sakic comes back. Then maybe, Forsberg/Sakic/Lemieux will be an option. In nets, I'm happy with the Belfour/Giguere combo for now. When the Leafs schedule dries up in two weeks I'll look it over. The Leafs have quietly been one of the top teams in the league as of late, no reason to dump the top producing TSNP goalie when he plays a ton. (If anything, Giguere -> Lalime would be the better move IMHO.)
Mac will stay on my team most likely. He really is the only guy who can score like a forward at D. Gonchar and Lidtrom maybe, but Lidstrom hasn't been too impressive this year and Gonchar is slumping. Plus, I still have Gonchar. ;)
I think the 'points differentiation' is down to the wingers we have. Lots of good options, only 4 slots. Gotta make sure we have the right ones...
|
|
| | | 40 | Chestergreat
Sustainer
ID: 561321323
Thu, Feb 20, 2003, 22:56
|
Sakic probably due back next week. Should be an automatic pick in the Free game . . for some reason he's only priced at $5.8M
Hope Hedjuk's not seriously injured. I have him on all 3 teams and not many trades left.
|
|
| | | 41 | rinkwide
ID: 52182022
Thu, Feb 20, 2003, 23:08
|
You Gonchar owners still sitting tight? The guy's tying up major cash with very little production.
|
|
| | | 42 | Pancho Villa
Donor
ID: 7129217
Fri, Feb 21, 2003, 08:41
|
Every one should remember that Boston does play 4 games a week for the next 3 weeks and their sked looks pretty easy. I have both Thornton and Murray and will hold on to them for a while yet, even if their production dips down. You can't expect Allstars to produce like Allstars every game.
|
|
| | | 43 | walk
Leader
ID: 214581016
Fri, Feb 21, 2003, 08:56
|
The deal with Boston and Thornton and Murray is that they are currently playing horribly. Even the Boston papers say so. I moved Thornton to Lemieux yesterday on one team only, but this paid no dividends. I will hold Joe on my other team. While I expect Joe and Boston to improve, the question is when, and how much time we can afford to wait. Given that Lemieux, Forsberg, Sakic, Sundin and Modano are pretty good themselves, it becomes difficult to hold onto a stud center who does not produce for 3+ games.
MacInnis: that 2 in 8 starting on the 24th sure puts pressure on us owners to sell, and 3 extra games from someone like Gonchar or Blake or Lidstrom (if healthy) seem potentially key. I'll likely move Al on the 24h as well.
- walk
|
|
| | | 44 | J
Leader
ID: 49346417
Sun, Feb 23, 2003, 23:38
|
what are everyone's plans with MacInnis?
I dont really see any good alternative (I also have Gonchar & Blake)
|
|
| | | 45 | Rogue Nine
ID: 1157242
Mon, Feb 24, 2003, 05:00
|
Agreed. I was thinking of holding Big Mac, but here's his schedule:
3 days off - 2 in 3 - 1 in 4 - 2 in 2 - 1 in 5 - 2 in 3 - 1 in 4. Stl finally gets a good schedule again on the 20th of March, so I guess its drop him until then. There's just too many holes there to justify keeping him.
My options: (Have Gonchar and Boyle.)
Ozolinish: Back-to-Back against FLA/TB, ANA has been hot, and has a top schedule until the 9th of March.
Hamrlik: Good schedule until the 23rd of March (with a 1-in-4 in between) and arguably the best defense on my short list. (He's tied with Lidstrom in TSNP/G)
Morris or Blake: Also a good schedule (until March 16th, when Colorado starts a 1-in-5) and Colorado has been unstoppable lately.
I really have no clue who to go with here. I'll sleep on it and decide tomorrow morning around 11 I guess.
|
|
| | | 46 | KWizard
ID: 261131917
Mon, Feb 24, 2003, 07:21
|
I went MacInnis -> Blake
Blake has a good schedule and he should put up better numbers with Sakic back this week. I also think the Avs will soon make a trade to acquire a top winger like Satan to play with Sakic. I'm also considering trading Belfour after his next game for a cheap goalie like Vokoun, Storr, or Snow and then upgrading Tanguay to Bertuzzi or Palffy (Naslund, Mogilny, and Hejduk are my other 3 wingers). Even though Tanguay will continue to play with Forsberg and Hejduk, Sakic will replace him on the top power play unit.
One thing I've noticed about the cheaper wingers that play on top lines like Tanguay, Kip Miller, Sykora, and Roberts is that they usually are the ones kept off the ice in 4-on-4 situations.
|
|
| | | 47 | smallwhirled
Donor
ID: 17152614
Mon, Feb 24, 2003, 10:55
|
I'm considering Tarnstrom/Mac > Hamirlik/Blake. Watching the last few Tarnstrom games concerns me about his production. The style is different, they're not getting power plays...so there's no need to let a slot be a lame duck this late in the year. Going to Blake allows me to get Hamirlik too, and that looks pretty good on paper.
My entire team looks good on paper, but can it hit the averages? That is the question.
smallwhirled
|
|
| | | 48 | bookie
ID: 448382418
Mon, Feb 24, 2003, 11:33
|
The only move I made today is Big Al, to Rob Blake, I considered Morris, Boyle, Shneider,(already have Hamrlik) but opted for Blake.
Other things I considered and passed on....
Thornton -> Mario or Modano.. Joey and the B's will break out soon (I hope)
Belfour -> Roy or Lalime... Roy and Lalime are two of the hottest Goalies in the league right now and Toronto has a revved up Detroit offense looming. I just have a feeling the Eddie will stand on his head in the Joe, so I'm going to take the risk for the hope of the reward. I'm certain I'll lose some cash over the next few days, but if my gut holds true, I'll make it back after the Detroit game.
|
|
| | | 49 | vlad24
ID: 141127212
Mon, Feb 24, 2003, 11:49
|
I thought Joe and the B's looked pretty good yesterday, even though Joe himself went -3. They hustled, had many chances, PP looked good. Rolston is heating up, which should take pressure off the top line.
I remain skeptical on Mario being able to get back to his early season pace, now that Kovalev is gone and they play more defensive style. I expect the recent pattern of 2 point nights alternating with being shut out to continue for him. Should still be good for 40 TSNP/G average (his actual average since Kovalev trade: 35 TSNP/G in 7 games), but not worth 9MM, IMHO.
|
|
| | | 50 | ookpik
ID: 2510542310
Tue, Feb 25, 2003, 09:52
|
Here's something to mull over:
Steve Yzerman will participate in tonight's pre-game skate and will then decide if he will play against the Kings, reports TSN.
He has been steadily recovering from a right knee osteotomy, a realignment procedure, and could play this evening. If in fact Yzerman does play tonight, it will be just over 6 months since he had the surgery (August 2nd), and he will provide a huge boost to the slightly disappointing Red Wings. Get ready to activate Stevie Y.
http://www.rotoworld.com/display1.asp?sport=NHL&page=news
|
|
| | | 51 | B-TRAIN
ID: 46139617
Tue, Feb 25, 2003, 11:02
|
At 3.08 M in the Ultimate game, not a bad deal. I didn't see last nights game, but I would guess he would center the Red Wings second line between Hull and Zetterburg. Probably mucho powerplay time as well. The Wings schedule gets hot Thurs. the 27th.
|
|
| | | 52 | bookie
ID: 448382418
Tue, Feb 25, 2003, 11:05
|
Thrusday the 27th?? They have two days off after that game vs Toronto.. I'd say the schedule picks up on March 2nd when they have 6 games over 9 days......
|
|
| | | 53 | vlad24
ID: 141127212
Tue, Feb 25, 2003, 11:36
|
I hear Stevie Y will only play a handful of games the rest of the way and may get limited ice-time as he rounds into form. Besides, Red Wings players never seem to be good fantasy-wise, their scoring is too balanced. Better value may be Jokinen, only 1MM more and already hot and have been producing all year.
|
|
| | | 54 | StLCards
Sustainer
ID: 4431816
Tue, Feb 25, 2003, 11:50
|
I'm not sure how widely held Tkachuk is, but he is likely to be suspended for a pretty nasty crosscheck to the throat of Wes Walz.
link
|
|
| | | 55 | StLCards
Sustainer
ID: 4431816
Tue, Feb 25, 2003, 15:09
|
Rototimes shows that Tkachuk got suspended for 4 games. link
|
|
| | | 56 | DrAgOnS rAgE
ID: 2114217
Wed, Feb 26, 2003, 11:59
|
So for the people who has tkachuk?? who are you going to get now??
Also any cheapie defenseman that's playing good as of late??
|
|
| | | 57 | vlad24
ID: 141127212
Wed, Feb 26, 2003, 13:55
|
As for cheapie D, look at Sopel - averaging 33 TSNP/G over last 30 days for the hot Canucks, he's 1.18MM.
|
|
| | | 58 | Hockey Ljusa Sidan
ID: 52555310
Thu, Feb 27, 2003, 03:16
|
What's everyone doing with Jagr now?
|
|
| | | 59 | smallwhirled
Donor
ID: 17152614
Thu, Mar 06, 2003, 23:27
|
After much deliberation, I think it's time to gamble and go for broke.
Morrison > Datsyuk
Jagr > Tanguay
Ozilinsh > Lidstrom
Vokoun > Checkmanek
Gigure > Lalime following Gigure's game
That's my plan, uses some trades but I can maximize all of my RV with studs or cheapies who are wannabe studs.
smallwhirled
|
|
| | | 60 | Chestergreat
Sustainer
ID: 13239618
Thu, Mar 06, 2003, 23:47
|
Looks like some good moves SW. Det has good sched, Lalime gets the ice cold Pens. Tanguay . . no brainer.
I'm making a couple differential moves with my wingers.
Mogilny->Shanahan
Naslund->Iginla
Surovy->Heatley
Also went Belfour->Joseph.
Yeah, I got suckered in to Surovy after his quick start on Mario's line and he has got me absolutely nothing in 5 games. Once again I have only 2 trades left . . and its only Friday!
|
|
| | | 61 | KWizard
ID: 53226119
Fri, Mar 07, 2003, 01:26
|
Naslund -> Shanahan
Skudra -> Tugnutt
|
|
| | | 62 | walk
Leader
ID: 4112711
Fri, Mar 07, 2003, 08:51
|
One Team:
Kolzig --> Cechmanek
Mogilny --> Hull
Another Team:
Lemieux --> Sakic
Kolzig --> Cechmanek
- walk
|
|
| | | 63 | Die_Habs
ID: 47361010
Fri, Mar 07, 2003, 09:12
|
Cechmanek has been on fire, but I still don't really like his match ups. Goalies are hit or miss for me though, so when I see NYR, COL and WAS I stay away.
|
|
| | | 64 | smallwhirled
Donor
ID: 17152614
Fri, Mar 07, 2003, 09:17
|
I see NYR and I'm blinded by Col right now. If I find some confirmation that he's gonna go against the Rangers, I think I'm gonna take it, and hope he sits vs. Colorado.
I'm also considering Cujo in that slot as well, I may even flip a coin in the end. Best out of 3 for sure, though. ;)
|
|
| | | 65 | Toral
Sustainer
ID: 2111201313
Fri, Mar 07, 2003, 09:19
|
Jagr --> Hull
Naslund --> Shanahan
|
|
| | | 66 | Die_Habs
ID: 47361010
Fri, Mar 07, 2003, 09:54
|
Anyone holding Naslund? I think I may just do that. Looking at the schedule I would lose 1 game and $ but also save a trade on someone I would have gone right back into. I have the players that people are trading into, so I think I am sticking it with him. Toronto has be struggling. Hmm?
|
|
| | | 67 | Dan
Sustainer
ID: 0229323
Fri, Mar 07, 2003, 10:13
|
Depending who you go to, you should pick up two games from Naslund...I've traded him on one team, debating what to do on the other, likely to make the same move, with both Hull, Hejduk, and Tanguay allowing you to pick up 2 games from Naslund.
|
|
| | | 68 | bookie
ID: 1859247
Fri, Mar 07, 2003, 10:15
|
I'm debating the Nasland hold myself... My wings are:
Nasland
Hejduk
Mogilney
Palffy
I'm thinking of dropping both Nasland and Mogilney for Alfie and Heatly... Then after Col 3 in 4 going back to Nasland from Hejduk... That would leave me a little cash and I would upgrade trade Hamrlik -> Macinnis even though he has 3 days off coming up....
|
|
| | | 69 | Hockey Ljusa Sidan
ID: 52555310
Fri, Mar 07, 2003, 10:19
|
Went Mogilny->Heatley
Going Poti->Redden tomorrow.
|
|
| | | 70 | Die_Habs
ID: 47361010
Fri, Mar 07, 2003, 10:30
|
03/07 - 03/18 COL and VAN has an even schedule so you wouldn't gain anything :) Its all in the way you look at it and right now if you want to conserve trades, you should determine if you want to trade out of COL's up coming 1 in 4 or the VAN's that occurs right now. Or both.
|
|
| | | 71 | Dan
Sustainer
ID: 0229323
Fri, Mar 07, 2003, 10:38
|
Most of my team's have around 20 trades or more, so I guess I'm in a different position than most, and am able to try and make the most by trading in and out of studs such as Naslund, Hejduk, etc...so I think I've decided I'm going to try and make a run and use some trades finally, just hope they all turn out! Naslund is gone from all of my teams, holding Jagr though.
|
|
| | | 72 | C.SuperFreaks
ID: 29011148
Fri, Mar 07, 2003, 11:11
|
3 trades:
Blake--Datysuk, because it's makes sense to move to a player that has 3 games compared to 1
Naslund--Alfredsson, because Ottawa plays Pittsburgh twice
Skudra--Cechmanek, because it's makes sense to move to a player that may start 3 games compared to 1.
|
|
| | | 73 | smallwhirled
Donor
ID: 17152614
Fri, Mar 07, 2003, 11:15
|
I am holding Naslund, but trading Jagr. I am not ready to use two trades to go in and out there when I want him right back.
I am passing on Alfreddson and Hossa becasue they're screwed me too many times this year.
|
|
| | | 74 | C.SuperFreaks
ID: 29011148
Fri, Mar 07, 2003, 11:24
|
I thought about moving Jagr but seeing that naslund plays 1 in 4 and jagr 2 in 4 i figured more production from Jags. Then upon further review I figured keep Jagr sell Nas and then switch them up after the 10th because Jags sked goes in the tank and Vans picks up.
Canucks play TO in TO with Nolan in the line up. Could get interesting now that Toronto has lost 3. I don't like Van's chances.
|
|
| | | 75 | smallwhirled
Donor
ID: 17152614
Fri, Mar 07, 2003, 11:29
|
True,
Maslund > Tanguay and Jagr > Naslund later gains 1 game and costs one extra trade, I may go for that idea. Naslund is so good right now that I don't wanna miss his games, almost like I went up until Mario's last 2 without missing even one of his games all year.
|
|
| | | 76 | J
Leader
ID: 49346417
Fri, Mar 07, 2003, 11:39
|
Morrison-->Datsyuk
Lilja (dont ask) ---> Lidstrom
Before today, I've had ONE Red Wing this year - Zetteberg!
|
|
| | | 77 | J
Leader
ID: 49346417
Fri, Mar 07, 2003, 11:41
|
tomorrow
Giguere-->Lalime
|
|
| | | 78 | smallwhirled
Donor
ID: 17152614
Fri, Mar 07, 2003, 11:54
|
Made up my mind.
Naslund > Tanguay, Jagr > Naslund 4 days
Voukon > Chechmanek
Ozilinsh > Lidstrom
Morrison > Datzyuk
Gigure > Lalime tommorrow
Too aggressive, maybe but I'll try it.
|
|
| | | 79 | bookie
ID: 1859247
Fri, Mar 07, 2003, 12:19
|
I ended up holding onto Nasland... and only went
Mogilney -> Heatley... I love Atlanta's schedule and hope last night was the beginning of a hot streak for both him and the team....
Tommorrow
Giguere -> Lalime..
4 days.. What to do about Kolzig (maybe 2 days), Forsberg and Hejduk.....???
|
|
| | | 80 | Die_Habs
ID: 47361010
Fri, Mar 07, 2003, 12:40
|
I ended up holding Jagr for one more game then will re-evaluate. Went Naslund > Tanguay to match the player right behind me in my division. I can do this because I have more trades then him :)
I'm watching you very close though DAN, your 24 trades are scary!
|
|
| | | 81 | smallwhirled
Donor
ID: 17152614
Fri, Mar 07, 2003, 12:42
|
LMAO, I've been trying to get Dan to use the damn trades for a while now. I think he's ready for his run now.
|
|
| | | 82 | Die_Habs
ID: 9128516
Fri, Mar 07, 2003, 19:29
|
Ouch. So Glad I didn't pick up checkmanek. I think you can guarentee he won't start against COL now. 3 goals against in the first 9 mins of the game.
|
|
| | | 83 | Silentz
ID: 110412217
Fri, Mar 07, 2003, 19:49
|
I don't know, he'll be well rested.....
|
|
| | | 84 | Die_Habs
ID: 9128516
Sat, Mar 08, 2003, 09:27
|
Lalime or Khabibulin? TB has been on fire but I don't want it to turn into another cechmanek. Giguere > ?
Holding Vokoun
|
|
| | | 85 | smallwhirled
Donor
ID: 17152614
Sat, Mar 08, 2003, 09:56
|
I went for Lalime.
I've been trying hard to catch you, but your team has been hotter than mine. Great job, Die_Habs.
|
|
| | | 86 | Die_Habs
ID: 9128516
Sat, Mar 08, 2003, 10:12
|
Thanks. I'm just trying to win my division, it wasn't till a few weeks ago that I saw I was one of the top groupies. I don't consider myself to be one. I am just waiting for you guys to catch me :)
|
|
|
|