| Posted by: Blooki
- [119492312] Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 19:34
Not too much of TSN fantasy significance in the actual games scheduled for tonight.
The more interesting storyline will be what will happen TSND-wise with Nate Robinson, Wilson Chandler, Spencer Hawes and Dwyane Wade. I anticipate a lot of Chicken Little's dominating the price movement tonight much to the consternation of the remaining managers. |
| 1 | deejay Sustainer
ID: 501182710 Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 19:39
|
keeping them all...
|
|
| 2 | RecycledSpinalFluid Dude
ID: 204401122 Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 19:50
|
Selling them all...then buying them back. Three times. Wait...I don't play TSN...nm.
|
|
| 3 | allhair allstars Sustainer
ID: 50902421 Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 19:58
|
Blooki,
You anticipate Hawes being sold right before his 5 in 7 because of one off night? Did something happen that I missed out on? Last I heard Moore was going to miss his last two, suggesting the possibility for more minutes for Hawes...
|
|
| 4 | qwert Donor
ID: 2910242819 Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 19:58
|
holding too
|
|
| 5 | dpr
ID: 13443116 Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 20:00
|
who is going to make money tonight? I want to move robinson on my money team but I dont see any places to go. Already ahve mason brew and cj miles and need a guard. Rose looks to have most potential to make money but that is a pretty short hold. maybe ill jsut go invalid...
|
|
| 6 | allhair allstars Sustainer
ID: 50902421 Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 20:00
|
Ah... I get what you're saying... I had to think back and remember the whole Chicken Little thing... LOL
|
|
| 7 | G Donor
ID: 5810561615 Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 20:40
|
dpr,
I agree. While there may be a little RV to be gained all the options are...well...there aren't any. I beleive the winners will be the holders to use those trades later. Invalid is prob the safest bet.
|
|
| 8 | dpr
ID: 13443116 Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 20:49
|
i decided on rose. i think he can make good money in the short term and I am not that trade strapped so I hope it doesnt hurt me. Didnt want to go invalid because would still like to win the division if possible. I have the top FV guy my league tho so he likely knows what he is doing and will be hard to beat without an allout points effort
|
|
| 9 | I Support Bill Ayers
ID: 291043125 Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 21:48
|
Where's McGrady tonight?
|
|
| 10 | Guru
ID: 330592710 Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 22:18
|
McGrady left Monday's game in the third quarter with a right knee injury, according to the Associated Press.
|
|
| 11 | reebbertxx
ID: 010581721 Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 23:11
|
Price movers seem weird this year. Daniels gets 22 sells and loses 70k while Chandler gets 18 sells and loses 80k. Assuming that their ownership info is right I don't see how those changes make sense.
|
|
| 12 | CJ Leader
ID: 499271021 Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 23:12
|
I agree and to add I do not understand all of the daniels sells...short fuse because if you can ride the schedule for another few days you have as many games as any team for 2 weeks. I am holding
|
|
| 13 | reebbertxx
ID: 010581721 Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 23:18
|
CJ, the Daniels losses were expected for his 1in5. I fully expect him to start gaining again soon, maybe as soon as tomorrow.
|
|
| 14 | dpr
ID: 13443116 Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 23:22
|
11 on the boards wen the same issue was brought up a few weeks ago it was explained as there was a delay before the ownership data was collected slightly after the official price movers data so wasnt 100% accurate. you can read tsn reasoning in the issues thread at the top
|
|
| 15 | CJ Leader
ID: 499271021 Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 23:42
|
13 Thanks You have confirmed I have a messed up schedule. I think I got it from Kafenatid.net and noticed these "x2" in some of the cells. I am not a top player so I will survive....Any word on T-Mac missing time?
|
|
| 16 | Blooki
ID: 119492312 Tue, Nov 18, 2008, 00:21
|
re: 11
Also, the price formula might not be directly proportional to the net change in ownership. I can imagine a situation where Marquis gets sold by x managers and bought by x-22 managers possibly leading to a price loss of greater than 70K mitigated by a less muted price gain for the buys.
I could be entirely wrong about this thinking, but just offering an alternative explanation.
|
|
| 17 | CJ Leader
ID: 499271021 Tue, Nov 18, 2008, 00:28
|
Or even though sells are more by one player over another one....but each player has a different amount of holders out there????
Spurs--------Who need Parker and Gino they got Timmy "D"!
|
|
|