|
| Posted by: damoose7474
- Leader [181042723] Mon, Feb 22, 2010, 14:04
updated |
| | | 2 | Senator Urine
ID: 348262116
Mon, Feb 22, 2010, 17:33
|
I have to stick with Evans, right? He won't continue playing this bad and Westbrook won't continue being this amazing. Or am I just being stubborn?
|
|
| | | 3 | Senator Urine
ID: 348262116
Mon, Feb 22, 2010, 20:27
|
Ok, Deron's out. This is pretty much worst case scenario as it completely invalidates my selling of Rondo in the first place since I would have just been able to grab Smith from him tonight instead. This has been the single worst sequence I've encountered I think.
So now I'm ironically faced with the choice: Rondo or Westbrook? This SUCKS.
|
|
| | | 4 | money4later
ID: 2111213116
Mon, Feb 22, 2010, 20:30
|
SU - I feel your pain. Was planning on Willy to Rondo on 3/2, now I might have to grab Westy now. Ugh
|
|
| | | 5 | Senator Urine
ID: 348262116
Mon, Feb 22, 2010, 20:33
|
If I get Westbrook, I'm locked out of guard slots for Rondo unless something happens...
If I get Rondo, then I'm passing on Westbrook...
I think I just have to go into "screw it" mode. Really can't believe how every little thing went wrong in such a perfectly bad way this time. Not sure if "screw it" mode is buying Rondo or Westbrook yet...
|
|
| | | 6 | money4later
ID: 2111213116
Mon, Feb 22, 2010, 20:39
|
Hey, now you can have Tyreke AND Westy. LOL
|
|
| | | 7 | matic
ID: 11402219
Mon, Feb 22, 2010, 20:40
|
SU
on the team I lost nash on i picked up westy with the same dilemma you are saying now with the inablity to get rondo
Looking at your team though couldn't you just do one of the following
A. Hold Bogut for his whole 4in5 then trade him into Rondo using your flex with Zach and Durant
B. Just trade Zach into Rondo at 3/2. Its not like Zach is performing great if he throws up another 2 or 3 35s I will probably trade him out early end of next week too.
|
|
| | | 8 | Senator Urine
ID: 348262116
Mon, Feb 22, 2010, 21:02
|
Yeah, those are options I guess, maybe I'm being too stubborn with my original rotation. Westbrook still makes me nervous, there was a reason I didn't buy him originally. I'm setting a thirty minute time limit on this one and then I'm going to bed. Any spot I finish in higher than 8th at the end is a bonus, it's time to relax.
|
|
| | | 9 | money4later
ID: 2111213116
Mon, Feb 22, 2010, 21:04
|
D Will's locked now. Hope you sent him packing if that was your plan.
|
|
| | | 10 | Senator Urine
ID: 348262116
Mon, Feb 22, 2010, 21:09
|
Yeah I got out, just an issue of to whom now. Going to just do an impulse decision at the last second. All of that planning multiple rosters through 3/17 feels like a tremendous waste of time now.
|
|
| | | 11 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Tue, Feb 23, 2010, 01:51
|
*****INTRUDER*****
My holding Rondo is now validated with triangling back from Deron going from a plan I didn't like for my team to impossible. Trust me, SU, it doesn't feel much better to have held Rondo: anyway you miss out on those Westbrook games sucks.
|
|
| | | 12 | matic
ID: 18118231
Tue, Feb 23, 2010, 02:18
|
I'm trying to craft what would be the most optimal team from next week out
My Centers would be Howard/Blanche
Forwards are J Smith/ Z Randolph/ D Lee /LBJ
I ran into a problem in terms of guards.
with Deron Out/ Nash Out/ Kidd is poised to start sucking/ Evans doin bad and starting to lose RV/ Curry with a Blip in schedule / Rondo is going to lose big after tommorrow
I don't see how any team can have 4 good guards.
1. Collison (100% ownership!)
2. Westbrook
3. Durant ( G/F)
4 ?
who should the fourth guard be? as for me I'm deciding on putting either Evans/Curry/Kidd not thats considered optimal atm
|
|
| | | 13 | matic
ID: 40121231
Tue, Feb 23, 2010, 02:21
|
forgot to say that I have Kidd now but I think I will move him to westbrook tommorrow to free up cash to be able to go Rondo > Howard and Bogut > D Lee next week.
That leaves me with decision of keep evans or get curry for that spot but most likely going to keep evans.
I was just wondering what 4 guards people are holding since I can't put 4 guards I would even want right now (including Durant as a guard) I am guessing everyone is holding atleast one guard that isn't sitting happy on their teams.
|
|
| | | 14 | dpr
ID: 552411820
Tue, Feb 23, 2010, 09:13
|
Rondo has as many games as anyone over the next month, with the production he has had all year I think you definitely want him. You may be able to pass for a week but after that get him. As for westbrook, curry has just as many games. I feel due to is last few awesome games people are getting way to caught up in needing him.
|
|
| | | 15 | matic
ID: 471382316
Tue, Feb 23, 2010, 17:38
|
yes westbrook is not a must i agree, he is due for under production and his main con is that hsi schedule does not fit in with anyone worthwhile in 2 weeks without taking a one day gap.
My only reason for getting him was so next week I could go Rondo > Howard and Bogut > D Lee to give me the 2 best scheduled big men for the next 3 weeks. I decided to go an alternate route instead of picking him up from Kidd today. I am just going to wait til next week then get Kidd > Billups which will free up the same amount of money and also allow a better transition from Billups > Rondo which will allow me to go J Smith for an extra 3 games as well. Just hope westbrook goes back to normal though another TD would kill me.
|
|
| | | 16 | Senator Urine
ID: 348262116
Tue, Feb 23, 2010, 20:10
|
I'm going to follow Phatsow's lead from the other GMD thread and attempt to take a fantasy basketaball hiatus. Tyreke over Westbrook followed by Deron invalidating the Rondo sell just sucked all the enjoyment out of it. Maybe stepping away for a bit will help remind that we choose to play this for fun. Good luck with your moves guys. Sorry in advance for inevitably ruining Westbrook.
|
|
| | | 17 | matic
ID: 361502322
Tue, Feb 23, 2010, 23:50
|
SU
while on hiatus you still up to give some advice?
Its decision time for my squad again.
Rondo > Howard is locked move.
I'm contemplating 2 options through the week.
A. trade Kidd > Chauncey to free up $$ Bogut > D Lee
B. do nothing and just do Bogut > Gerald Wallace end of week
one thing to note is that option A uses 2 trades while B uses 1
and also option A would force me to trade zach randolph or J smith to get back Rondo whereas option B allows me to get Rondo straight from Kidd (whom I'd most rather trade out of the three)
Option B sounds so much smoother and saves a trade but David Lee looks too much like a must own to pass on.
Basically its
D Lee (3 week hold) + Billups (and forced to trade Jsmoove/ Zach early) and an extra trade
vs.
Gerald Wallace (3 week hold) + Kidd ( Kidd into Rondo )
|
|
| | | 19 | matic
ID: 481282517
Thu, Feb 25, 2010, 18:37
|
Qwert ..to answer your question from the action thread
My roster does not allow me to get both howard and lee this week. At this point in season I am only planning on trading if the schedules link.
This would not be possible on my roster unless I traded bogut for lee but since I bought howard I don't have the cash for that. It would be a waste of a trade to make lateral moves from j smith and randolph to lee.
The exception is next week where z randolph can be traded into lee for b2b into b2b so that's what I'm considering if at anytime to get lee.
Duncan on another hand comes at a time when many popular playerd schedules perfectly link into so he is more convenient.
|
|
| | | 20 | matic
ID: 481282517
Thu, Feb 25, 2010, 18:48
|
To add to that
Ya it is true it sounds crazy to consider duncan later while overlooking lee now.
But Its more of a question of supply demand. There are more good schedules right now in general that are taking up a forward centern slot
When I simulated two weeks from now I couldn't find six centers and forwards that didn't include either choosing duncan or iggy
But of course nothing in this game goes to plan =p.
|
|
| | | 21 | dpr
ID: 552411820
Thu, Feb 25, 2010, 19:00
|
When are you picking up duncan? From 3/5 (th first day you get duncan) to 3/13 they have exactly the same schedule.
|
|
| | | 22 | matic
ID: 491132518
Thu, Feb 25, 2010, 19:13
|
dpr
ya 3/5 -3/13 duncan isn't worth it because there is a 2 game gap after, D Lee actually has MORE games then him if you pick duncan up then.
I'm talking about the week after ... the 9 in 14 is when he becomes a good pickup.
|
|
| | | 23 | dpr
ID: 552411820
Thu, Feb 25, 2010, 19:31
|
6/11 is still a pretty good schedule even with the gap though. With duncan's iffyness he probably isnt worth holding longer than necessary though. Very preliminarily I did notice a lee to duncan move. One thing potentially working for duncan this year is the spurs just arent as good an maybe can't afford to sit him. They are currently 7th and I imagine want to avoid a first round lakers match up.
|
|
| | | 24 | matic
ID: 471362518
Thu, Feb 25, 2010, 19:36
|
ya 6/11 is still fine but i meant for the comparison of d lee and duncan it is not good.
i also had the plan of randolph>dlee and then after that one game advantage > dlee into duncan for the 9 in 14 (given everything else on my roster goes somewhat as planned)
yea i agree too and was actually going to post this before, about how Duncan traditionally plays better towards the end of the year in the pre playoff crunchtime. In other years where they secured top slots they might have rested him more but in this year they are in the doghouse of last seeds so I also see the potential of duncan playing those few extra minutes.
|
|
| | | 25 | dpr
ID: 552411820
Thu, Feb 25, 2010, 19:44
|
I like the idea of randolph to lee as that gains games and lee is just producing so well. That gives the options of moving to iggy or duncan later if you want.
|
|
| | | 26 | matic
ID: 9142519
Thu, Feb 25, 2010, 20:04
|
yea don't get me wrong ...Lee was HIGH on my priority list to get tommorrow and I spent alot of time trying to figure out how to get him for this week.
I think I made a post about this asking for advice earlier in the week but it came down to just getting Lee from Randolph next week like what i said in my last post.
Or if I were to get Lee this week I would have to do another trade with Kidd > Billups to get me money to get Lee from Bogut tommorrow. I was initially going to do this but I figured I don't think a a trade is worth a Billups game this week and on top of that Kidd is performing so much better then Billups that I might not even gain any points that way. Bogut/Randolph is also producing so well that the points gained from getting Lee wouldn't be that much to warrant another trade that gains no games. So I figure instead of spending two trades for no little to no projected point gain. Just wait the week hold the trades and just get Lee late if need be.
If I had M Gasol on my team that may be a different story as he has been stinkin.
|
|
| | | 27 | matic
ID: 581392523
Fri, Feb 26, 2010, 00:39
|
Billups with almost 50 in the 3rd
looks like my plan to save a trade by not downgrading to Billups to afford D Lee is going down the tube already.
For future notice always buy a player that is vs. GSW as his first game!!!!
|
|
| | | 29 | Senator Urine
ID: 348262116
Sat, Feb 27, 2010, 11:49
|
Hey sorry about that matic, I've been avoiding the boards altogether. I think you've already decided that you need to get Lee back at all costs next week, and I agree.
Just checking in to reiterate that Kidd sucks. It amazes me the free pass he gets - can you imagine if Artest or Stephen Jackson had pulled that move of running into the coach? They'd be suspended for two months and called thugs, rather than being praised for making a "cagey, veteran move".
|
|
| | | 30 | Senator Urine
ID: 348262116
Mon, Mar 01, 2010, 19:30
|
Got an interesting dilemma and 20 minutes to decide. If anyone has any thoughts it would be much appreciated.
Let's say you have the option of two Blatche games and a ton of money, or three various estimated 40 tsnp games that will also lose you a ton of money. Which route do you go with?
Would it affect your answer if going with the two Blatche's means you don't have to worry about a swing closing? Odds are I'll make it, but the concept of early Rondo buys scares the hell out of me on a light trading day.
|
|
| | | 31 | reebbertxx
Dude
ID: 561124720
Mon, Mar 01, 2010, 20:27
|
So Bogut>Blatche and then Collison>Rondo? :)
|
|
| | | 32 | Senator Urine
ID: 348262116
Mon, Mar 01, 2010, 20:57
|
Haha, sort of...though now that you mention it that's definitely an option. I'm giving myself an hour to decide. You just cost me at least thirty minutes of sleep.
I wonder who gains more tonight, Rondo or Blatche.
Ultimately I convinced myself that window wouldn't hold. Though maybe I was being paranoid.
|
|
| | | 33 | Dave R
SuperDude
ID: 3010361110
Mon, Mar 01, 2010, 20:59
|
Hey reeb, you should hope he goes Bogut to Blatche.
|
|
| | | 34 | reebbertxx
Dude
ID: 561124720
Mon, Mar 01, 2010, 21:04
|
Dave, I don't know what to hope for. All I know is I can't block a guy with 6 more trades than me. Sorry for thread hijack.
|
|
| | | 35 | Senator Urine
ID: 348262116
Mon, Mar 01, 2010, 21:14
|
It doesn't matter how many trades I have if I keep having brain farts. Last year I remember one team had a huge trade advantage on qwert, and he ended up passing that team on the last night because I used each one in a spectacularly terrible fashion.
I made my decision for tonight though, it's funny, I forgot what day it was when you posted that and went into panic mode.
But I think you're going to stay ahead of me the rest of the way honestly, I think I'm playing for second, especially after this past week. Tyreke over Westbrook killed me, and then your picking up of Kidd and Boozer just sealed it. It's funny, when you got Kidd I was happy - I had completely blocked him out as an option due to my extreme bias against him and completely ignored the fact that his averages were all in the 40s or higher. You've been making much better moves than I have all year.
|
|
| | | 36 | Senator Urine
ID: 348262116
Tue, Mar 02, 2010, 07:06
|
Would have made the swing by 0.02, wow. If Collison had bled at all as I was expecting it would have closed. Oh well. 340k as a consolation prize so far.
|
|
| | | 37 | Maineacs
ID: 18901915
Tue, Mar 02, 2010, 08:28
|
That's like Warren Buffett finding twenty bucks.
|
|
| | | 38 | money4later
ID: 2111213116
Tue, Mar 02, 2010, 09:10
|
37 - LMAO!
|
|
| | | 39 | Senator Urine
ID: 348262116
Tue, Mar 02, 2010, 13:01
|
Haha, I think I may actually need it very soon too strangely.
I'm assuming a lot of people today are going to be debating between Blatche and Curry. Hate the fact that everything's on the road for GSW, but then again Ellis and Maggette are both out.
|
|
| | | 41 | damoose7474
Leader
ID: 181042723
Wed, Mar 03, 2010, 16:58
|
wow i had a good trading period
|
|
| | | 42 | Maineacs
ID: 18901915
Wed, Mar 03, 2010, 17:34
|
You sure did. How you do that? Congrats.
Glenn
|
|
| | | 43 | Florian
ID: 549221910
Thu, Mar 04, 2010, 09:51
|
I'm going to be away on vacation in the Dominican Republic with my wife and four little children from March 8-22nd inclusive. I not sure I'll be able to get internet access while I'm away. If anyone could teamsit for me it would be greatly appreciated. I have three identical teams and would leave a plan for a few trades. And if injuries occured I'd leave it up to whoever is teamsitting.
|
|
| | | 45 | Florian
ID: 549221910
Fri, Mar 05, 2010, 15:30
|
I haven't had any offers to teamsit, so I'm just going to leave my team for two weeks and hope nobody gets hurt.
|
|
| | | 46 | Florian
ID: 549221910
Fri, Mar 05, 2010, 16:06
|
Probably go Randolph to Boozer today, Gasol to Iguodala on Sunday, Curry to Louis Williams on Sunday and keep the rest of my team the same.
|
|
| | | 47 | weykool
ID: 351422416
Fri, Mar 05, 2010, 16:39
|
Florian:
I will offer to team sit for you if you dont mind a last place manager mucking up your team.
|
|
| | | 48 | Florian
ID: 549221910
Fri, Mar 05, 2010, 17:16
|
Weykool,
Thank you very much for offering to teamsit. I've sent you an email. Let me know if you didn't get it.
|
|
| | | 49 | weykool
ID: 351422416
Fri, Mar 05, 2010, 17:32
|
E-mail received.
Hurry back.
|
|
| | | 50 | matic
ID: 825568
Sat, Mar 06, 2010, 09:55
|
hmm 2 bad games in a row for tyreke and he is at close to max capacity (whopping 45%) owned
I'm really thinking of moving him into devin harris today. But that will cut me out of being able to go LBJ>wade in 3 days and instead rely on LBJ> Bosh hopefully back.
Someone talk me out of it!
Also is anyone else planning a tyreke move this week before the thursday popular sell off.
|
|
| | | 51 | Dave R
SuperDude
ID: 3010361110
Sat, Mar 06, 2010, 10:07
|
INTRUDER
"before the popular Thursday sell off", to who?
|
|
| | | 52 | matic
ID: 1025469
Sat, Mar 06, 2010, 10:54
|
51
its not that his schedule fits nicely into anyones, its just that its a definite trend that mass owned players get sold on their last b2b before a blip, and if he continues a subpar performance i can definetly see him bleeding bits (not that it matters for those not RV minded anymore since its end of season)
I see evans > curry on thursday as a popular move for one and given that day will be a low trading day I think that will amount to atleast a triple digit loss even if its just 15-20 so people.
I may be more inclined to move him then others because I need to get rid of him this week anyway if I were planning on LBJ>wade (i have no flex and kicking myself now for choosing gerald over sjax.) Wade is looking like a must own for next week with the way he is playing and i'm stuck at the G position with Rondo and Deron definite holds and its not like I will trade collison out after I already kept him through his bleeds.
Problem is I don't have any clear transitions from tyreke. Basically to get wade i would need a forward for tyreke on tuesday or get a G/F from him before then. My last ditch effort would be to just trade him to SJAX on tuesday for a lateral move just to make the positioning work. Other then g/f's im looking at tyrus thomas/AK47 on tuesday but those are riskier moves. If I don't go for the wade/sjax duo it would force me to trade LBJ for iguodala (i really hate iguodala) as the only option out (J smith> Boozer is already locked that day as well.)
If you have any other suggestions please tell because I don't see anything else =(.
|
|
| | | 53 | matic
ID: 4825669
Sat, Mar 06, 2010, 10:56
|
oh yea and the above scenario is also assuming that Bosh is either still out or comes back and sucks of course or that will definitely be another option I would take
|
|
| | | 54 | Dave R
SuperDude
ID: 3010361110
Sat, Mar 06, 2010, 11:29
|
I was actually thinking of Tyreke=> Westbrook at the end of that week
|
|
| | | 55 | Florian
ID: 549221910
Sat, Mar 06, 2010, 13:10
|
Weykool,
I've sent you my trading schedule. Hopefully you've received it.
|
|
| | | 56 | Senator Urine
ID: 348262116
Mon, Mar 08, 2010, 18:37
|
I wonder how accurate any of this Paul information is. Getting very tempted to take Collison, have a feeling it's one of those make or break moves. Would you guys feel comfortable buying him? It wouldn't make sense if Paul comes back any sooner than 3/20. I know 3/12 and 3/14 have been kicked around as dates, but then there was that report today that he hasn't even run yet. Collison has sort of proven that he's for real by now, it's just an issue of Paul staying out.
|
|
| | | 57 | reebbertxx
Dude
ID: 561124720
Mon, Mar 08, 2010, 18:43
|
I hope this decision is killing you as much as me. I assume we are both looking at the same move. Even with my trade deficit I am tempted to get him.
|
|
| | | 58 | Senator Urine
ID: 348262116
Mon, Mar 08, 2010, 18:54
|
Haha, at this point no need to hope, it should just be assumed. This will likely go to the last minute.
|
|
| | | 59 | reebbertxx
Dude
ID: 561124720
Mon, Mar 08, 2010, 20:00
|
So go Collison I guess. Think I need Curry and Kidd to score more tonight than Tyreke does in his b2b to keep the lead. Should be interesting, and fun.
|
|
| | | 60 | Senator Urine
ID: 348262116
Mon, Mar 08, 2010, 20:03
|
I went with him also, figured I had to take the risk and that you probably would too.
Zach's out for the night! Wasn't announced on rotoworld. Realizing that a bit earlier could have made things a bit more interesting, but part of me is glad he's frozen and we've all got him. We can just deal with it tomorrow instead.
|
|
| | | 61 | reebbertxx
Dude
ID: 561124720
Mon, Mar 08, 2010, 20:16
|
Ugh. That changes just about everything I have stared at for the last 3 hours.
|
|
| | | 62 | Senator Urine
ID: 348262116
Mon, Mar 08, 2010, 20:30
|
It's the worst feeling. It's funny because we probably would have noticed it too if we hadn't been so focused on Collison. I'm honestly relieved I missed it, situations like that are when I make really, really dumb moves.
|
|
| | | 63 | matic
ID: 4923394
Tue, Mar 09, 2010, 05:33
|
SU and team weykool: another stuck decision time for my squads,
Only definite person on my trading block for tomorrow is Josh Smith. Problem is, only person that is worth getting for my team tomorrow that I don't already have is Wade and I have no flex. (Already have Dwight/Deron/Boozer/Gerald W/rondo etc.)
So if I want Wade, I will need to rid a guard slot and the only slot worthy of opening is cutting tyreke early.
This leaves me with 2 options.
1. To just use 1 trade > Josh Smith into Iguodala
Gives me the flex til I get Durant back, and a good schedule for a couple weeks with nice transitions into targets over those 2 weeks. However I think i can speak for all of us when I say I would rather not get iguodala unless absolutely forced to. I also will go into the next week with 6 million banked.
2. The trade im leaning towards is to trade Tyreke + Josh Smith into Wade + a F/C that is under 7 million. (Need to save some $$ to get back into LBJ from DHOW) While it is lateral to trade evans on a b2b to another player for those 2 days ... I think Wade's games vs Iggy's games will amount to alot more points gained and warrants the extra trade IMO, also since Wade goes directly into the OKC trade in day.
The F/C under 7 million im looking into is Kaman or KG, but leaning towards Kaman. I don't like either buy very much but its the drawback to getting wade. I will only be holding those 2 guys for a few days til I move them back into J smith or someone else so the risk taking them will only be 5 games.
I think I already made up my mind but just seeing if you guys can give suggestions or think it is stupid to trade out of evans tomorrow given my team situation.
|
|
| | | 65 | Senator Urine
ID: 348262116
Tue, Mar 09, 2010, 15:18
|
In situations like that I think you have to break it down game by game and try to just let the math tell you where to go. Yesterday I came up with a plan that looked amazing on paper (much better than my current one) and let me get everyone I want at almost the ideal time - working out the math, it somehow came down to 8 points for two trades. Option 2 looks a lot better just on gut, but I'd be careful with throwing away the back to back - it's very difficult to show that good mathematically. But again that's real tough too because as you said, Iguodala is generally not fun to own and is one of the hardest players to predict.
|
|
| | | 66 | matic
ID: 481282517
Tue, Mar 09, 2010, 17:03
|
Yea well I completly did out the numbers of all projected spots for the next two weeks based on the two situations
In the end it came to roughly five wades vs five iggys and the difference in rv of wade gains vs. Tyreke losses for next week ..for the price of one trade.
Taking season averages it isn't really worth it but taking the 15 day avgs it is more then worth it.
Just have to decide on a midpriced f/c ...kaman or kg or someone elde I forgot
|
|
| | | 67 | weykool
ID: 351422416
Tue, Mar 09, 2010, 17:43
|
I dont know that I would burn the trade to force Wade.
Towards the end of the season there will be DNP's galore as players sit to gear up for the playoffs.
Im sure banking the trade would net you more points than giving up a b2b to get another b2b.
|
|
| | | 68 | Senator Urine
ID: 348262116
Tue, Mar 09, 2010, 18:04
|
Just have to say, I really hate not having five guard slots right now.
|
|
| | | 69 | matic
ID: 227917
Tue, Mar 09, 2010, 18:07
|
the b2b for a b2b only looks ugly for the short term
the real game difference is 5 wade/ 5 kaman vs. 5 iggy / 5 evans for the price of a trade. On season averages i'm only gaining 20. But the 15 day averages show alot more, I know its skewed because Wade had 3 big games in a row but I really hate iggy! But it seems a lot of people are getting him though, since I can't decide I think I'm going to do option a on 1 team and B on the other.
|
|
| | | 70 | matic
ID: 481282517
Tue, Mar 09, 2010, 19:45
|
Decided to just bank the trade and rolled with the iggy monster on both tms
I figure if I hated him enough could always just use him to pawn back into lbj
|
|
| | | 72 | matic
ID: 481282517
Thu, Mar 11, 2010, 13:40
|
So how is everyone getting back to lebron? Is he a definite go for tommorow?
I went in this week with the plan to move into him from my weakest player. And after only two games that appears to be iggy.
I'm trading tonight so hopefully lebron is definitely playing tommorrow?
|
|
| | | 73 | Maineacs
ID: 18901915
Thu, Mar 11, 2010, 15:36
|
Oh my gosh, Bosh. I can't stand him another minute even if Lebron is done for the year.
|
|
| | | 74 | Senator Urine
ID: 348262116
Sat, Mar 13, 2010, 15:00
|
I can't tell if Wallace is a sell or not now. I liked it better when the news was expected to miss.
|
|
| | | 75 | matic
ID: 481282517
Sat, Mar 13, 2010, 15:44
|
He is travelin wit team I can see him miss a game and maybe play tues...I hate to sell him since he has a 4in5 Soon but since I hav extra trades I noved back into howard. Su u have many trades I'd make the trade if I were you why chance your lead!
|
|
| | | 76 | MATIC
ID: 552311513
Mon, Mar 15, 2010, 14:31
|
what would you guys rather have Melo vs. Hou/Was
vs.
Gasol (reduced minutes) vs. GSW/Sac
can't make a decision
might just take the Howard losses and durant it up 2 days late but rather do one of the first 2 options for a trade
|
|
| | | 77 | money4later
ID: 2111213116
Mon, Mar 15, 2010, 15:21
|
MATIC - I'd go with Gasol simply because Melo's games are more likely to be blowouts, thus limiting his play.
|
|
| | | 78 | MATIC
ID: 552311513
Mon, Mar 15, 2010, 15:26
|
heh true but ...LAL vs GSW and SAC are both going to be blowouts too lol
i mean they are good fantasy teams to face but Gasol is also supposedly under reduced minutes for rest of season by phil jackson as well (i think i read that in rotoworld some weeks ago).
I think they will both produce around the same, i would expect a little under 40 from either of them on average
|
|
| | | 79 | matic
ID: 72301518
Mon, Mar 15, 2010, 19:30
|
was going to just save the trade (because i realized i needed 7 for next week to do what i wanted to do) and keep howard for his next b2b.
But then i realized my window for Evans > Westy and Blatche > Bogut on wednesday only has a window of like 300k. It would really suck to miss that so I think im going to make the 2 day trade for Gasol or Melo tonight to gaurantee the window ... I see odom on the starting lineup in the ESPN box scores instead of gasol is there a reason for that or is it just wrong.
only problem i have now is I would only be able to trade 2 of the 3 at end of next week out of LBJ, collison, Rondo.
|
|
| | | 80 | money4later
ID: 2111213116
Mon, Mar 15, 2010, 20:14
|
You need 7 trades for next week? Holy crap! LOL
|
|
| | | 81 | MATIC
ID: 3226169
Tue, Mar 16, 2010, 10:15
|
so for those with extra trades for the week
Anyone thinking to move today rondo > someone else besides smoove?
I have been itching to lose rondo, and last night put a seal on it but no one great to get into today. Manu would have been definite but his last 2 games say otherwise (although they were blowouts and he had reduced minutes).
Thoughts?
|
|
| | | 83 | damoose
Leader
ID: 181042723
Tue, Mar 16, 2010, 15:12
|
so how did devin harris lose -.04 on one sell and rudy gay only lose -.01 on one sell....harris has 18 owners and gay 34
|
|
| | | 84 | MATIC
ID: 332471614
Tue, Mar 16, 2010, 15:47
|
u answered your own question ...its because the harris trades took out more % of his ownership.
Now to rondo dilemmna what is everyone doing?
|
|
| | | 85 | Comic Book Guy
ID: 20817160
Wed, Mar 17, 2010, 00:55
|
83
Gay's ownership is above the gravity line (which is somewhere in the 20's) and Harris' is below so Harris lost an extra 30K because of gravity.
|
|
| | | 86 | matic
ID: 572251713
Wed, Mar 17, 2010, 14:25
|
so i planned this weeks final moves and while I have the trades to do the perfect rotation (imo) I think i'm going to save one for emergency.
This means I have to make a decision between holding Evans or holding Blatche. Holding Evans would cause me to get westy 2 days late and holding blatche causes me to get Bogut 2 days late.
FV consideration and points lead to me thinking holding evans and booting blatche wins.
|
|
| | | 88 | damoose
Leader
ID: 181042723
Wed, Mar 24, 2010, 13:55
|
If you are unsure what the column header means, hover over it with your mouse.
A pop up will display a longer definition of the header.
GURUPATRON BONUS MATERIAL
The following columns are sartible and reverse sartible.
Click on the column header once for the default sort order.
Click a second time for the reverse sort order.
| Rank | GurupieName | LSWP0 | LSWP | LSWP5 | WWR | FV | Cash | RV | FVC | Trades | | 1 | w-Senator Urine-10353684 | 24813 | 79 | 8448 | 2 | 86.69 | 1.27 | 85.42 | -0.32 | 9 | | 2 | w-qwert-10055562 | 23663 | 46.5 | 8238.5 | 41 | 79.84 | 3.02 | 76.82 | -0.34 | 4 | | 3 | w-dpr-10043614 | 23287 | 86.5 | 8152.5 | 113 | 80.03 | 3.97 | 76.06 | -0.02 | 5 | | 4 | w-illmatic-11076448 | 23285.5 | 0 | 8398 | 102 | 78.50 | 1.58 | 76.92 | -0.17 | 5 | | 5 | w-Florian-10599711 | 22932 | 82 | 8112 | 124 | 76.45 | 0.09 | 76.36 | 0.22 | 5 | | 6 | w-damoose-10468631 | 22525 | 7.5 | 8096 | 163 | 74.72 | 4.66 | 70.06 | -0.19 | 6 | | 7 | w-Maineacs-10024830 | 22045.5 | 83 | 7736 | 236 | 73.08 | 0.55 | 72.53 | -0.11 | 3 | | 8 | w-Coldwater Coyotes-10482471 | 21752 | 88 | 7598.5 | 247 | 57.40 | 1.45 | 55.95 | -0.11 | 4 | | 9 | w-weykool-10178617 | 21394 | 7.5 | 7488 | 293 | 67.40 | 1.07 | 66.33 | -0.21 | 3 | | 10 | w-qwerty123-10086047 | 21375 | 0 | 6718.5 | 284 | 66.86 | 0.87 | 65.99 | -0.30 | 28 |
Head To Head | UNIQUE TO | UNIQUE TO | | | | COMMON TO BOTH TEAMS | |
|
|
|
|