Bay9 News is saying there's a meeting with Greer and DCF going on now, and he will come up with a decision by noon tomorrow. DCF says they may take custody of Terri before then.

how is it that Judge Greer’s ruling has been sustained? The answer is that in our legal system, once a judge has ruled on a matter of fact, it is very difficult to revisit such a ruling. The lawyers’ rule of thumb is that trial courts hear and rule on questions of fact, and appellate courts rule on questions of law; it’s unusual for an appellate court to overturn a lower court’s ruling because of an issue of fact.

That’s why, at every turn in this case, the Schindlers have had to try to undo the faulty rulings of fact previously issued by Judge Greer. They’ve had to go back before Judge Greer himself and try to convince him that he was wrong, and should undo his own rulings. Judge Greer has proven unwilling to do so. The higher courts, unwilling to overturn a trial judge’s rulings of fact, have no interest in granting new hearings. Michael Schiavo and George Felos have no interest in revisiting Terri’s diagnosis, as that ruling provides the whole legal basis of their ability to end her life. Dr. Cranford has no interest in seeing his own diagnosis called into question. Dr. Bell lamented that at this point, "medical realities are no longer governing this case." He added that it seemed to him that medical issues concerning the care of the patient had been subsumed by legal issues. In our courts, he added, "once a decision is made they don't want additional information."

The whole history of Terri’s case over the past few years can be summed up as the efforts of the Schindlers, and those who value Terri’s life, to try to introduce additional information before the courts and other authorities. Some of this information consists of facts and arguments that were ignored or dismissed without adequate consideration; some has been the result of advances in the diagnosis and treatment of brain injuries over the last five years. On the side of Michael Schiavo, George Felos, and Judge Greer, their efforts have consisted almost entirely in trying to prevent any new information from being presented or considered.

The legal system’s willful blindness to facts cannot succeed forever. The truth has a way of coming out. But will it do so in time to save Terri Schiavo? Dr. Morin said to me, towards the end of our conversation, that “the law can find a way to do the right thing if it wants to.” The problem so far is that those who have the power to do the right thing seem to have no desire or inclination to do so. - NR

Our investigation into this defense revealed: Credible evidence through the analysis of our board certified Neurologist on our APT [adult protection team - DH] that seriously challenges the diagnosis that Ms Schiavo is in a PVS. These findings are detailed in the doctor’s affidavit…

"where there's life there's hope" - Terri Schiavo

Dr. William P. Cheshire, a Mayo Clinic neurologist and bioethicist, stepped into Terri Schiavo's hospice room three weeks ago and was overcome by "the distinct sense of the presence of a living human being who seems at some level to be aware of some things around her."

That was not the reaction he expected before his 90-minute examination of a patient who has spent the last 15 years in a persistent vegetative state, Cheshire wrote in an affidavit filed Wednesday in Florida state court.

Schiavo, he wrote, may have been misdiagnosed. She may not be in a persistent vegetative state, but a recently recognized condition known as a "minimally conscious state," which encompasses intermittent signs of awareness.

Although the affidavit failed to persuade a state court to intervene in Schiavo's medical treatment, the seven-page document added fuel to the contentious debate over the 41-year-old woman's care by providing some scientific validation to those who seek to have her feeding tube reinstated.

"As I looked at Terri and she looked back at me, I asked myself whether I could in good conscience withdraw her feeding and hydration," Cheshire wrote. "No, I could not."

A minimally conscious state was defined by the American Academy of Neurology in 2002, a dozen years after Schiavo was first hospitalized.

Though patients in a persistent vegetative state are characterized by a complete absence of awareness, those in a minimally conscious state can respond to pain or the sight of visitors, among other signs of awareness.

Cheshire wrote that Schiavo has not had a complete neurological examination in the last three years and could fall into the minimally conscious category.

Cheshire is director of the Autonomic Reflex Laboratory at the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Fla., which specializes in brain and nervous system disorders.

He is also listed as the director of biotech ethics at the Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity in Bannockburn, Ill., a nonprofit group that, according to its mission statement, addresses issues of managed care, end-of-life treatment, genetic intervention and euthanasia from a Christian perspective.

The wife is not threatened by her husband's being the ultimate and natural authority in the family, because she trusts him and his judgment.

She is [a] submissive wife. If she can't convince me she allows me to make the final decision even if it is counter to her judgement.

I've been rock steady in saying the state should keep their hands off...[of marriage.]

It is not death I fear, but ‘personhood theory’, the ethical theory that people have to prove they are human enuff to deserve to live. We thot we had that beaten back when Jefferson announced all men had inalienable rights. We thot we had that beaten back when the concentration camps were emptied.

I can’t believe some in america are suggesting we start a list of persons whose lives are not worth living. The truth is that for the past ten years if we have even made passing remarks about heroic measures, the courts have started to starve and dehydrate you even if you are able to beg for food and water.

I am not about to make the Niemoeller mistake: First they came for the minimally conscious, but I was not minimally conscious. Then they came for the alzheimer’s victims, but I was not an alzheimer’s victim. Then they came for those in cronic pain, but I was not in chronic pain. Then they came for the retarded but I was not retarded…

And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me.

We are almost all going to become disabled to some extent some day. Unless you want to be living in a society where the courts and your relatives insist you have a duty to die, you had better dig your heals in now, because it is already ten years past time you did.

The Euthanasia Lobby is Already Planning Your Murder

- Terri has not had a neurological exam in the last three years.

- There is a very high rate of false diagnosis of PVS

- There is an alternative diagnosis "minimally conscious state" that has arisen in the last few years. This diagnosis was not around when Terri was initially diagnosed.

- her cerebral cortex is not destroyed, some remains. The brain can often rebuild and rewire itself.

- New studies have shown that when people in a minimally conscious state hear loved ones read to them, large sections of their brains lit up. This was completely unexpected to neurologists.

- there is much we do not know about PVS. Doctors really don't know a lot about people who are impaired.

- The affadavit then goes into specific actions that show that Terri is probably minimally conscious, rather than in PVS.

OSCAR Schindler endangered his own life to save the lives of Jewish people. A true hero, a man to be admired and emulated, he placed the lives of others before his own.

I wonder if somewhere in the perverted mind of Florida attorney, George Felos, Terri Schiavo nee Schindler has to die, because of the role of her namesake in saving more than a thousand Jews from their role as "sacrificial lambs?" Felos is the attorney representing Michael Schiavo, the man who wants to starve to death his estranged and brain damaged wife.

On the face of it the question may seem frivolous but when one is confronted with the writings of Felos all thoughts of frivolity quickly evaporate.

Consider the following passages from his book, Litigation As Spiritual Practice.

"The Jewish people, long ago in their collective consciousness, agreed to play the role of the lamb whose slaughter was necessary to shock humanity into a new moral consciousness. Their sacrifice saved humanity at the brink of extinction and propelled us into a new age."

[been trying to make that sacrifice complete, you freaking nazi? - B]

Did it really? I wonder what The Holocaust Museum would have to say about that. Or perhaps Nazi hunter, Simon Wiesenthal?

As an Australian it seems unbelievable to me that George Felos has not been cut down to size. In my country the man wouldn't fly. He wouldn't qualify as a tall poppy and we tend to put pipsqeaks back in their boxes down here.

But, Florida is not Australia and in Florida George is a big man with big boasts, proud of his "power."

"I can truly say my wife was enamored with me," he boasted. "I suppose power and success really are potent aphrodisiacs as my spouse had made particularly evident our previous night at the Governor's Inn."

One good night at the Governor's Inn, ay? What a shame he wasn't referring to nights in a cell at the Governor's pleasure!

Still, as enamored as his wife may have been with his power and success on that celebrated night, George's massive ego took a beating when she decided that life with him was not for her. Perhaps his power couldn't sustain his prowess.

He was possessed by murderous thoughts.

"That weekend I experienced rage. Savage, unadulterated, and murderous rage.....I was on fire, fueled by thoughts of bludgeoning and tearing her apart," he wrote.

These alarming passages make me wonder just how much George Felos has in common with his client, Michael Schiavo. I feel prompted to ask if the multiple trauma suffered by Terri Schindler Schiavo around the time of her collapse in February 1990 had anything to do with a "murderous rage" on the part of Michael after he was told his company as a spouse was no longer desired. Perhaps this is just another reason Felos feels such an affinity with Mr Schiavo.

It's no secret that the Schiavo marriage was in trouble. According to Terri's brother, Bobby, and an ex girlfriend and workmate, Terri had confided in them her thoughts of separation and divorce. Her marriage had broken down and she was trapped in an unhappy marriage where her husband exercised undue power and control over her life, even the miles she drove in her car.

The Rev. Robert Johansen has been trying to marshall the medical arguments against allowing Terri Schiavo to starve to death, and today he makes a remarkably persuasive case in the National Review Online. He notes that they have lined up almost 50 heavily qualified doctors, most of them board certified and/or professors of medicine, who are doubtful of the adequacy of the diagnosis of Persistent Vegitative state (PVS) that has been given to Terri. Yet the Judge in the case, George W. Greer, seems not to want to hear what they have to say: (emphasis supplied)

So how can Judge Greer ignore the opinions of so many qualified neurologists, some of whom are leaders in the field? The answer is that Michael Schiavo, his attorney George Felos, and Judge Greer already have the diagnosis they want.
Terri’s diagnosis was arrived at without the benefit of testing that most neurologists would consider standard for diagnosing PVS. One such test is MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging). MRI is widely used today, even for ailments as simple as knee injuries — but Terri has never had one. Michael has repeatedly refused to consent to one. The neurologists I have spoken to have reacted with shock upon learning this fact. One such neurologist is Dr. Peter Morin. He is a researcher specializing in degenerative brain diseases, and has both an M.D. and a Ph.D. in biochemistry from Boston University.

In the course of my conversation with Dr. Morin, he made reference to the standard use of MRI and PET (Positron Emission Tomography) scans to diagnose the extent of brain injuries. He seemed to assume that these had been done for Terri. I stopped him and told him that these tests have never been done for her; that Michael had refused them.

There was a moment of dead silence.

“That’s criminal,” he said, and then asked, in a tone of utter incredulity: “How can he continue as guardian? People are deliberating over this woman’s life and death and there’s been no MRI or PET?” He drew a reasonable conclusion: “These people [Michael Schiavo, George Felos, and Judge Greer] don’t want the information.”

Dr. Morin explained that he would feel obligated to obtain the information in these tests before making a diagnosis with life and death consequences. I told him that CT (Computer-Aided Tomography) scans had been done, and were partly the basis for the finding of PVS. The doctor retorted, “Spare no expense, eh?” I asked him to explain the comment; he said that a CT scan is a much less expensive test than an MRI, but it “only gives you a tenth of the information an MRI does.” He added, “A CT scan is useful only in pretty severe cases, such as trauma, and also during the few days after an anoxic (lack of oxygen) brain injury. It’s useful in an emergency-room setting. But if the question is ischemic injury [brain damage caused by lack of blood/oxygen to part of the brain] you want an MRI and PET. For subsequent evaluation of brain injury, the CT is pretty useless unless there has been a massive stroke.”

Other neurologists have concurred with Dr. Morin’s opinion. Dr. Thomas Zabiega, who trained at the University of Chicago, said, “Any neurologist who is objective would say ‘Yes’” to the question, “Should Terri be given an MRI?”

But in spite of the lack of advanced testing, such as an MRI, attorney George Felos has claimed that Terri’s cerebral cortex has “liquefied,” and doctors for Michael Schiavo have claimed, on the basis of the CT scans, that parts of Terri’s cerebral cortex “have been replaced by fluid.” The problem with such contentions is that the available evidence can’t support them. Dr. Zabiega explained that “a CT scan can’t resolve the kind of detail needed” to make such a pronouncement: “A CT scan is like a blurry photograph.” Dr. William Bell, a professor of neurology at Wake Forest University Medical School, agrees: “A CT scan doesn’t give much detail. In order to see it on a CT, you have to have massive damage.” Is it possible that Terri has that sort of “massive” brain damage? According to Dr. Bell, that isn’t likely. Sometimes, he said, even patients who are PVS have a “normal or near normal” MRI.

So why hasn’t an MRI been done for Terri? That question has never been satisfactorily answered. George Felos has argued that an MRI can’t be done because of thalamic implants that were placed in Terri’s skull during the last attempt at therapy, dating back to 1992. But Felos’s contention ignores the fact that these implants could be removed. Indeed, the doctor who put them in instructed Michael to have them removed. Michael has never done so.

The most obvious possible explanation for what would otherwise be inexplicable behavior is that Michael Schiavo, George Felos, and Judge Greer don’t want to admit any information that would upset the diagnosis they already have. Dr. Morin, when told that Michael had refused an MRI, and that Judge Greer had confirmed the decision, said: “He refused a non-invasive test? People trying to do the right thing want the best and most complete information available. We don't have that in Terri’s case.” Dr. Bell agreed with this assessment, saying, “It seems as though they’re fearful of any additional information.”

Michael also said on "Larry King Live" that Terri was bulimic prior to that night, and that her bulimia was possibly the cause of the potassium imbalance which was discovered when she was in the hospital. Bob & Mary also find this assertion incredible. Bob's reaction was "Poppycock!" Terri, they said, was quite healthy and had a healthy appetite prior to her injury. None of her friends or family ever saw any signs of any eating disorder, and there was no medical evidence of it found in her examinations.

This "potassium imbalance" is frequently touted as the explanation of what caused Terri's collapse. But it is an explanation that explains nothing. Indeed, doctors for the Schindlers testified in court, and reiterated at their news conference last Friday (October 24, 2003) that the potassium imbalance was only detected after she was brought to the hospital. This is after the paramedics had been working on her to revive her. Part of such treatment is the injection of various drugs and electrolytes to try to stimulate the heart. These injections were very likely the cause of the potassium imbalance. The potassium imbalance was an effect of her collapse and subsequent treatment, and not the cause of anything.

Terri's heart stopped for several minutes that night, and that stoppage caused the brain damage that led to her current condition. It is frequently asserted in press accounts that Terri had a "heart attack." This too is false. There was no heart attack, and again, doctors have testified to that effect. A heart attack causes the release of certain enzymes into the bloodstream. These enzymes are readily discovered in tests and are used as the "markers" of a heart attack. No such enzymes were found in Terri's bloodstream, nor any other evidence of a heart attack. Terri's heart was and is quite healthy: there was no heart attack.

So what happened to cause Terri to lose consciousness? No one is sure, because there was never a proper investigation. The Schindlers do not accept Michael's version of what happened to Terri. Also, Bob related, "it's in the medical record that when Terri was brought into the hospital she had bruises around her neck." Doctors for the Schindlers have testified that those bruises were consistent with manual strangulation. Furthermore, skull x-rays and head CT scans done about a year after her injury indicated fractures to the occipital region which have never been explained. These fractures are consistent with trauma to the head.

The theory that Terri was strangled gains plausibility when one considers that friends and siblings of Terri's testified that they were aware that Michael had abused Terri prior to the night of her injury. Bob & Mary were not aware of this themselves before Terri's injury. "I found out afterwards," Bob said, "that they [Terri's friends and brother] had been keeping that from me." But, Bob, explained, Terri's best friend, Jackie Rhoades, testified at the 1996 guardianship hearing that she knew Terri was being abused, that she frequently saw her with bruises on her arms and legs, and that Terri was afraid of Michael. Jackie further stated that Terri intended to divorce Michael, and that she and Terri were making plans to do that. Terri's brother Bobby also testified to his knowledge of Terri's abuse, and corroborated much of Jackie's testimony.

These allegations and the evidence behind them have been brought to court in the Schindlers' suits to have Michael removed as guardian, but have never been properly investigated. Judge Greer dismissed these allegations with a wave of his judicial wand, saying that "it would be interesting to know what happened," but that it was "irrelevant to this case." Judge Greer disregarded Jackie's and Bobby's testimony, saying that it was hearsay. That ruling will prove to be interesting in light of the judge's ruling regarding other secondhand testimony in this case.

ALAN KEYES, FORMER PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: Well, I think what we actually have here—I have always thought it kind of strange that they would say,get the government involved.

The minute the judiciary is involved in something, the government is involved. It‘s a branch of government. And, in this particular case, it‘s a branch of government that, in the form of Judge Greer and now all the other courts, are—is disregarding a basic right of Terri Schiavo, the right to life, that is actually explicitly guaranteed in the Florida Constitution. Article 1, Section 2 says that every natural person shall inalienable rights, among them, the right to enjoy and defend life.

And, right now, Jeb Bush is in the spotlight. He is the one who actually has the obligation by his oath to support, protect and defend the Constitution of Florida. And he has to move to protect the integrity of Terri Schiavo‘s constitutional rights.

(CROSSTALK)

SCARBOROUGH: Do you not think he has done enough?

KEYES: Of course not. He hasn‘t done anything. She is being starved to death.

And the notion that the judge‘s order keeps him from acting is absurd. Just as the judges have to look at the Constitution, and if a law passed by the legislature is in their view not compatible with the Constitution, they don‘t regard that law and don‘t apply it. So, if a judge in the whole judiciary makes a decision that is contrary to the Constitution in the view of Governor Bush, he has to abide by the Constitution‘s higher law, not by the dictate of the judge.

SCARBOROUGH: Do you think we should have an Elian Gonzalez-type raid, where the governor sends in the National Guard or troops to go in and remove her and put in the feeding tube?

KEYES: I think the governor has to do what‘s necessary.

He has the supreme executive power in the state of Florida. There‘s no higher executive authority, no executive authority in the state that can challenge him. And he also is charged by oath with supporting, protecting and defending the Constitution, which is being egregiously violated in this case, because she is being done to death, when there is clearly a reasonable doubt as to whether or not this is her will. And that means it‘s just murder.

And murder, whether it‘s done by the judiciary or somebody else, is still a fundamental contravention of constitutional integrity. And he has sworn to enforce laws and uphold and defend the Constitution of Florida. So, he is duty-bound to do it. And, if he does not, then the responsibility for the outcome rests squarely on his shoulders, because the executive is charged with the power to act.

The judiciary can opine. The legislature can legislate. Only Jeb Bush can act to save her life.

I've got a deposition from two different occasions, maybe you can explain it to me. The first one I will pull up, its from November 19, 1993, in which Michael said: "He was talking about removing the feeding tube," meaning the doctor, "and I said I couldn't do that to Terri." Now that means his intention was NOT to remove the... at least in 1993. [but you didn't have any problem letting her die from an untreated bladder infection...do you know how much that hurts? - B]

Greta: That same day, in the same deposition, he said this: "I put a - after speaking with my doctor, I gave an order not to treat a bladder infection Terri had." The attorney then asked a question, "So when you made that decision not to treat Terri's bladder infection, you in effect, were making a decision to allow her to pass on?" Michael Schiavo: "I was making a decision on what Terri would want" [what, you aren't telling us Terri's decision? Why that's what you slipped up and told Larry King too - B]

Greta: So in that same day, we have two conflicting things he was saying in 1993. How do I know what to believe?

Anderson: Its HARD to know what to believe with him, because he says what the occasion demands, or whats in his financial interest. He told a medical malpractice jury just exactly one year before that deposition fragment that you put up, that he would ALWAYS take care of Terri, for the REST of his life. And yet there he was within a matter of months, directing that antibiotics be withheld. Its HARD to know.

Greta: Alright, lets go back... give me a quick rundown... the day she ah, tell me what happened her last day before she ended up in the hospital.

Anderson: Terri ahh, got her hair done that day, and spent more money than he thought she should have... They had a GREAT BIG fight before he went off to work. Ahh, she was so upset about the fight, that she called her best friend from work, a girl that she had discussed, perhaps both of them getting a divorce, and taking an apartment together... She called this girl, Jackie Rhodes, told her about the big fight... She was sufficiently upset that Jackie Rhodes asked her: "Should I come over? Should I come over and spend the night with you so you'll be safe?"

Anderson: And Terri said, "No, I'll either be asleep, or pretend to be asleep when he gets home from work."... and the next thing Jackie heard, was she was in the emergency room.

Well especially after having gone thru this myself, and the doctors assuming I was in a vegetative state, ahh when in fact I was TOTALLY aware of what was going on around me.

O'Reilly: Could you hear? Could you hear people, and see...

Adamson: I could hear, and see everything going on around me, and I had NO way to commmunicate with anyone.

O'Reilly: So you were like, paralized in every way, but you could HEAR the words, you KNEW when your husband was in the room when he was there, and all of that?

Adamson: Exactly. I KNEW what I wanted to say, ahh, I was completely PARALIZED. I had NO way of communicating at all.

O'Reilly: This is amazing. Its like an Edgar Allen Poe story...
So when they took the feeding tube out, what went thru your mind?

Adamson: When the feeding tube was turned off for eight days, ahh I was... thought I was going insane. I was screaming out, "Don't you know, I NEED to EAT!".

Adamson: And even though, until that point, I had been having a bagful of Ensure as my nourishment that was going thru the feeding tube, at that point, it sounded pretty good. Ahh, I just wanted something, ahh the fact that I had nothing, the hunger pains overrode EVERY thought I had.

O'Reilly: So you were feeling PAIN? when they removed your tube?

Adamson: Oh, ABSOLUTELY. Absolutely... To say that, ahh, especially when Michael on national TV had mentioned last week, that its a pretty painless thing to have a feeding tube removed... Its the EXACT OPPOSITE. It was SHEER torture, Bill. Sheer torture

Florida Circuit Judge George Greer, who ordered the removal of Schiavo's feeding tube, signed an order Wednesday afternoon prohibiting the department from "taking possession of Theresa Marie Schiavo or removing her" from the hospice. He also directed "each and every and singular sheriff of the state of Florida" to enforce his order.

DCF lawyers appealed early Thursday, thus triggering an automatic freeze on Greer's order. But when the judge learned of the situation, he canceled the automatic stay within three hours of its filing.

George Felos, the attorney for Terri's husband, Michael, told the paper he doesn't think DCF officials knew of the window of opportunity they had created until well after they filed their appeal.

"Frankly, I don't believe when they filed their notice of appeal they realized that that gave them an automatic stay," Felos said. "When we filed our motion to vacate the automatic stay ... they realized they had a short window of opportunity and they wanted to extend that as long as they could.

"I believe that as soon as DCF knew they had an opportunity they were mobilizing to take advantage of it, without a doubt."

So...The Top Ten Reasons Why Terri Schiavo Should Be Starved To Death:

1. The devil will be delighted.

2. Michael Schiavo wants to marry the mother of his two children.

3. The mother of Michael Schiavo's children wants to marry him.

4. Judge Greer's aura of infallibility would disappear if he admitted a huge mistake and reversed himself.

5. The United States Supreme Court refused to take the Schiavo case.

6. George Felos is an agent of "God" demanding the starving of Terri.

7. Others would make better use of the food and water Terri would consume and the bed in which she lies.

8. If Terri receives physical therapy and eventually communicates about her medically confirmed history of physical trauma, Florida's crime and spousal abuse statistics might go up.

9. President Bush won re-election, and the pro-death forces need a human sacrifice to feel better.

10. That stuff in America's Declaration of Independence about an unalienable right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness as an endowment from the Creator was a political promise to be broken after the American Revolution succeeded, not a restriction on the almighty judiciary in an increasingly secular society.

For Wide Distribution,
With this cover note, please distribute to the world. Understand,
there is little here, and THAT is the crime. It's NOT about Michael
Schiavo. This is about the DIRECT INVOLVEMENT of Pinellas Pasco State
Attorney Bernie McCabe in making certain NO INVESTIGATIONS would
occur; this is about his using his official office and influence to
block the Schindler Family and ultimately their daughter Terri from
accessing the police services of the Pinellas County Sheriff's office,
St. Petersburg City Police, Pinellas Park Police, the Florida
Department of Law Enforcement, Florida Attorney General Charlie Crist
(whose home county and political associations are in Pinellas County
Florida) -- AND -- that is important to understand given the COMMON
KNOWLEDGE that McCabe has a long political association with George W.
Greer who, some allege, is an office he is not legally qualified to
hold; I don't know if that is true. This is a very complex web of
personal, professional, political associations -- Greer, McCabe, Rice,
Michael Schiavo shown favor of a job (nothing wrong with that) in the
Sheriffs jail by Rice, hospice officials and board members and George
Felos with influence over that organization being chairman of the
board up to the moment Terri was warehoused in a darkened room with
not even the joy of a toothbrush -- among others. A person directly
involved in this just said to me, "McCabe has a HAMMER on this." And,
a lawyer in California with lawyers on the ground in Florida said this
morning, "...ANY LAWYER WHO APPROACHES ANY COURT WITH ANY ISSUE IS
GOING TO BE HIT WITH HEAVY SANCTIONS." The judiciary wants this
murder really bad. BUT -- AT THIS PRECISE MOMENT, focus attention on
Greer-McCabe. There are serious people interested in developing a
case for capital murder if Terri dies. This family, THIS WOMAN has
been denied due process, PERIOD. It is a BLOT on America's CRIMINAL
and CIVIL injustice system, a system not of law, but men who so
despise law that they would murder this helpless aware of self
disabled woman.
Oh. It should be noted, there is just a bit more to go with this
FDLE report, but is not ready yet for distribution. It is one
critical evidence element links McCabe to the FDLE shutting down the
case file attached.
John Sipos
St. Petersburg Florida
727 563-9245

----------
From: "David C. Gibbs III"
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:32:21 -0500
To:
Subject: Fw: FDLE Report Attachment