|
| Posted by: Tree
- [36638135] Fri, Jul 13, 2007, 06:43
Proposal One:
Whether to increase the number of offensive keepers in our league for 2008 to FIVE, from its current four.
i vote yes, obviously. |
| | | 1 | Punk42AE
Donor
ID: 036635522
Fri, Jul 13, 2007, 09:02
|
Yes
|
|
| | | 2 | Mattinglyinthehall
Leader
ID: 01629107
Fri, Jul 13, 2007, 09:09
|
No.
|
|
| | | 3 | Tree
ID: 3533298
Mon, Aug 11, 2008, 15:32
|
since this thread died last year for some unknown reason..let's try it for next year?
|
|
| | | 4 | Taxman
SuperDude
ID: 029463114
Mon, Aug 11, 2008, 17:57
|
No!! for 2008, 2009 and thereafter
|
|
| | | 5 | biliruben
ID: 38751812
Mon, Aug 11, 2008, 20:13
|
No.
|
|
| | | 6 | Pancho Villa
ID: 51546319
Mon, Aug 11, 2008, 21:16
|
No.
|
|
| | | 7 | Myboyjack
Dude
ID: 014826271
Tue, Aug 12, 2008, 01:28
|
nein
|
|
| | | 8 | boikin
ID: 532592112
Tue, Aug 12, 2008, 10:22
|
yes
|
|
| | | 9 | Perm Dude
ID: 19751117
Tue, Aug 12, 2008, 10:31
|
Yes
|
|
| | | 10 | Tree
ID: 30738129
Tue, Aug 12, 2008, 10:39
|
with 8 votes cast (MITH's no longer counts), we've got 4 for, and 4 against.
|
|
| | | 11 | wiggs
Sustainer
ID: 04991311
Tue, Aug 12, 2008, 10:41
|
NO
|
|
| | | 12 | Tree
ID: 30738129
Tue, Aug 12, 2008, 11:38
|
i'm curious why those who vote against it, do so.
having only 4 keepers makes it very difficult, for example, to really draft a hyped rookie and hold onto him. to me, that's part of what makes football fun.
|
|
| | | 13 | wiggs
Sustainer
ID: 04991311
Tue, Aug 12, 2008, 11:41
|
My team wasnt set up for 5 keepers thats why i vote no- if you want to do it next season i would probably vote yes
|
|
| | | 14 | Building 7
ID: 471052128
Tue, Aug 12, 2008, 12:51
|
Do I get a vote?
|
|
| | | 15 | biliruben
ID: 38751812
Tue, Aug 12, 2008, 12:59
|
Let's vote on it.
Nah! Of course you do, B7. In fact, if you don't vote, you're fired.
|
|
| | | 16 | Tree
ID: 67581211
Tue, Aug 12, 2008, 13:06
|
Wiggs - i am proposing for next season. while i'd personally love 5 keepers this season, i can understand the side of people who believe it to be unfair for the immediate season.
|
|
| | | 17 | wiggs
Sustainer
ID: 04991311
Tue, Aug 12, 2008, 13:13
|
oh, then i will change my vote to yes, I thought it was for now. Sorry about that.
|
|
| | | 18 | Pancho Villa
ID: 51546319
Tue, Aug 12, 2008, 15:16
|
The answer for me would be to have a larger draft pool and in turn, a better free agent pool during the year. This allows for more parity and the opportunity for teams like B7, just coming into the league, to field a team more in his image than MITH's.
Last year we had two(?) new teams. The fewer high end players available during the draft, the more the draft becomes less of an impact in determining league strength.
|
|
| | | 19 | Boldwin
ID: 176322815
Tue, Aug 12, 2008, 15:43
|
no
That's a very small uncertain no. I would have voted for 5 off keepers to start the league. I am usually the guy for more keepers and bench slots. It just seems that 4 off keepers makes a really dramatic first pick in this particular sport. If we had 5 keepers many would be set at either RB, WR or QB. This way most people will be torn three ways on the first pick. Ask me again tomorrow and you might get a different answer.
|
|
| | | 20 | Building 7
ID: 471052128
Tue, Aug 12, 2008, 15:56
|
No.
|
|
| | | 21 | biliruben
ID: 38751812
Mon, Aug 18, 2008, 19:04
|
No for Clyde.
|
|
|
|