|
| Posted by: Jag
- [14828255] Tue, Oct 09, 2007, 11:22
Talk about double standards, Scooter Libby simply says he can't remember about what turned out to be a non-crime and the Dems want him castrated then hung, Berger steals highly classified documents and destroys them and he not only gets a just little slap on the wrist, but a pat on the bum by the Clintons. Why doesn't Congress just pass a law making it a criminal offense to be a Republican and give Democrats a 007 type license to do whatever the hell they want with little consequence and save the cost of Congressional hearings. |
| | | 1 | Perm Dude
ID: 2693498
Tue, Oct 09, 2007, 11:23
|
Are you having flashbacks, Jag? Listening to old Rush Limbaugh shows?
|
|
| | | 2 | Jag
ID: 14828255
Tue, Oct 09, 2007, 11:32
|
It is currently in the news PD, about Berger becoming an advisor to Hilary. What's wrong? Is Air America not reporting it yet? I am sure Keith Olbermann will have a comment for you tonight on MSNBC.
|
|
| | | 3 | Tree
ID: 3533298
Tue, Oct 09, 2007, 12:27
|
Jag -
would that be the news that Berger has no official capacity in Hilary Clinton's campaign?
i mean, i realize Fox News and the very desperate, soon-to-go-the-way-of-the-Whig Party Republicans are trying to smear things in such a disgusting manner, but that doesn't make it news.
|
|
| | | 4 | Perm Dude
ID: 2693498
Tue, Oct 09, 2007, 12:36
|
Still old news, no matter what Berger is doing (or not doing, in this case) these days.
Still trying to fight the Clinton Wars, Jag? Pathetic, really. It reminds me of those crazy Vietnam War vets staking out huge swaths of peace rallies in the 80s, still fighting the war.
|
|
| | | 5 | biliruben
ID: 17502215
Tue, Oct 09, 2007, 12:41
|
The Republicans have no choice. Either dig up ghosts of century past, or eat their own.
I'd respect them more if they showed some vision, honesty and morality and started some serious purges of the most despicable self-serving bigots in their party, but I'm not sure there would be much left.
|
|
| | | 6 | Jag
ID: 14828255
Tue, Oct 09, 2007, 13:10
|
LOL... Ya the Republicans need some honest and moral people in their party like the Clintons, the most corrupt couple since Bonnie and Clyde.
|
|
| | | 7 | Perm Dude
ID: 2693498
Tue, Oct 09, 2007, 13:18
|
Woosh! The sound of the idea going right by Jag.
|
|
| | | 8 | sarge33rd
ID: 99331714
Tue, Oct 09, 2007, 14:04
|
LOL... Ya the Republicans need some honest and moral people in their party like the Clintons, the most corrupt couple since Bonnie and Clyde.
vs.....Newt, who blasted Clinton all the while conducting his own outside-his-marriage-affair...at the very time he was blasting Clinton for his???????
Really Jag....you guys on the "right". need to let go of decade+ aged whining, and find something new to fabricate...I mean raise hell, about.
|
|
| | | 9 | Perm Dude
ID: 5896912
Tue, Oct 09, 2007, 14:08
|
The Clinton's are like crack cocaine for Republicans.
Until they admit, as a party, they need help, there is nothing the rest of us can do but watch them go down.
|
|
| | | 10 | Tree
ID: 3533298
Tue, Oct 09, 2007, 14:27
|
i'm still not convinced that Jag is anything more than a gimmick poster, the Colbert of rotoguru.
|
|
| | | 11 | Perm Dude
ID: 5896912
Tue, Oct 09, 2007, 14:30
|
Looks real to me:
|
|
| | | 12 | J-Bar
ID: 39928616
Wed, Oct 10, 2007, 08:43
|
they have been friends for 30 years. no biggie that they talk. but to say that this friendship was not directly involved with what was taken is ludicrous.
|
|
| | | 13 | sarge33rd
ID: 99331714
Wed, Oct 10, 2007, 10:07
|
As in Shrub-Rummy having been "friends" and that friendship leading to an ineptly initiated/conducted war is ludicrous and your defense of the admin responsible fo rit is even more so? Or that shrub-cheney have been friends for.....
c'mon j-bar....form at least ONE opinion on facts vs ideologic hatred, would you please?
|
|
| | | 14 | Jag
ID: 14828255
Wed, Oct 10, 2007, 14:26
|
Sarge, that incoherent babble, you just tyoe was based on pure hate. What other reason would Berger steal classified documents other than to protect his buddies.
|
|
| | | 15 | sarge33rd
ID: 99331714
Wed, Oct 10, 2007, 14:53
|
IDK Jag. I dont pretend to know, unlike some, what other people are thinking.
Which part of 13, has you confused?
|
|
| | | 16 | Perm Dude
ID: 69301013
Wed, Oct 10, 2007, 15:30
|
Berger as enforcer?
The more I see, the more I'm convinced that Clinton will be exactly like Bush in politicizing everything and spending huge amounts of time fighting political enemies, actual and perceived.
|
|
| | | 17 | walk
Dude
ID: 32928238
Wed, Oct 10, 2007, 15:47
|
Yeah, I don't prefer Clinton as president, but I'd still rather have her than Rudy, Mitt or McCain. While I don't think Hillary and her entourage will be as bad for the country in terms of making disastrous decisions or continue the notion of a unitary leader or defy things like science (stem cell, global warming) and diplomacy (ya gotta hvae some of it), I also think that there's a lot of hatred stacked up against the Clintons, and it's baggage that will interfere with her governing. The hatred will result in more of the "we/they" politics as PD says, which is what a lot of us want to see ironed out (to whatever reasonable expectation). I'd rather have Barack, but not only because he does not bring that anti-Clinton sentiment.
|
|
|
|