|
| Posted by: Tree
- [17039238] Thu, Mar 01, 2012, 10:26
of Natural Causes |
| | | 1 | DWetzel
ID: 49962710
Thu, Mar 01, 2012, 13:03
|
Will show him infinitely more respect than he showed the dead in the past and just say that it's a shame that four kids lost a father.
|
|
| | | 2 | Perm Dude
ID: 3210201915
Thu, Mar 01, 2012, 14:12
|
I certainly feel bad for the family. Losing a father is a hard thing.
|
|
| | | 3 | Tree
ID: 13216113
Thu, Mar 01, 2012, 14:17
|
someone my age dying of natural causes always brings the mortality home.
|
|
| | |
| | | 5 | Tree
ID: 59225116
Thu, Mar 01, 2012, 17:33
|
although i only briefly scanned the list from post #4, there was at least one moderately famous person among the loons, Mancow Muller. DJ, friend of Hulk Hogan, and, apparently, moron.
|
|
| | | 6 | Boldwin
ID: 49030519
Thu, Mar 01, 2012, 22:57
|
He was 43.
|
|
| | | 7 | Boldwin
ID: 49030519
Thu, Mar 01, 2012, 23:06
|
Joe Arpaio needs to deputize an army of personal bodyguards.
|
|
| | | 8 | Tree
ID: 17039238
Thu, Mar 01, 2012, 23:14
|
he'd be better off with a good lawyer, considering the Grand Jury investigations into his abuse of power, his racial profiling, and his failure to give a crap about sex crimes.
|
|
| | | 9 | Boldwin
ID: 49030519
Thu, Mar 01, 2012, 23:23
|
You forgot to add your usual bogus pedophilia charge.
|
|
| | | 10 | Boldwin
ID: 49030519
Thu, Mar 01, 2012, 23:30
|
"We have the videos. This election he is going to be vetted."
100% for sure assassinated.
|
|
| | | 11 | Perm Dude
ID: 3210201915
Thu, Mar 01, 2012, 23:49
|
heh. Right on queue.
|
|
| | | 12 | Mith
ID: 23217270
Fri, Mar 02, 2012, 00:35
|
100% for sure assassinated.
If true, surely his colleagues are clued in. And in that case, what pathetically spineless excuses for journalists he must have chosen to be his colleagues, huh?
|
|
| | | 13 | Boldwin
ID: 49030519
Fri, Mar 02, 2012, 00:38
|
Worry about your own spineless media. Mine has me clued in.
|
|
| | | 14 | Mith
ID: 23217270
Fri, Mar 02, 2012, 00:46
|
I'm just saying that I don't see any of his journalistic associates or anyone in his employ challenging the report of natural causes to even suggest at what you say is 100% for sure.
|
|
| | | 15 | Tree
ID: 17039238
Fri, Mar 02, 2012, 00:50
|
You forgot to add your usual bogus pedophilia charge.
nope. that wasn't one of them.
the rest, however, are.
America's self-proclaimed toughest sheriff finds himself entangled these days in his own thorny legal troubles: a federal grand jury probe over alleged abuse of power, Justice Department accusations of racial profiling and revelations that his department didn't adequately investigate hundreds of Arizona sex-crime cases.
|
|
| | | 16 | Boldwin
ID: 49030519
Fri, Mar 02, 2012, 01:51
|
WND
|
|
| | | 17 | Pancho Villa
ID: 597172916
Fri, Mar 02, 2012, 07:54
|
The question one has to ask is,
If Breibart had such damaging videos of Obama, why wait to release them? What's the point of making a big announcement about them at CPAC and sitting on them? You either have damaging videos or you don't. Plus, are we to believe that only Breibart has access to these videos in case of his death, a not unlikely occurrence given his history of heart problems?
To announce that Breitbart was 100% for sure assassinated is assinine, but not suprising given the source. Even Michael Savage, prone to some of the most outrageous public statements ever uttered, wouldn't make a fool of himself by making such an absolutist statement.
|
|
| | | 18 | Pancho Villa
ID: 597172916
Fri, Mar 02, 2012, 09:11
|
The more I think about it, if Breibart was assassinated, it's much more likely it was carried out by a right wing hit squad than an Obama hit squad.
Think about it. The videos will be released whether Breitbart is alive or not. Who stands to gain from the publicity of Breitbart's death and the resulting questions surrounding the mysterious circumstances? Certainly not Obama. The conspiracy spotlight is immediately shined on Obama; the wild allegations that the President is responsible only makes the ultimate release of these videos a much bigger media event. Who gains? The story is already all over the (I won't say conservative and insult the actual meaning of the word, made a mockery by those who claim to subscribe to conservative principals)rabid right media.
Tactics like these don't need facts in order for them to get legs. All a Michael Savage has to do is plant the seed, and suddenly the story has gone viral. There's absolutely no benefit for Obama to bring attention to these videos by having Breitbart killed, but there's massive benefit for Obama's enemies.
|
|
| | | 19 | Tree
ID: 1922229
Fri, Mar 02, 2012, 10:25
|
hey, i saw that on some TV show last week. Hawaii 5-0? SVU? hmmm..
whatever. those were fiction too.
|
|
| | | 20 | DWetzel
ID: 49962710
Fri, Mar 02, 2012, 12:18
|
It's far more likely that his fellow conservatives murdered him to bring credibility or attention to whatever theatrical production he'd thrown together this time. They have far more to gain.
(/pretending to be a wacky conspiritard)
|
|
| | | 21 | Mith
ID: 23217270
Fri, Mar 02, 2012, 13:25
|
Yeah I just presumed that B linking Michael Savage and WND (which was apparently the closest thing he could find to colleagues or people in the employ of Andrew Breitbart) saying:It’s entirely plausible... that Breitbart simply collapsed of a heart attack because of overwork and a reported history of health problems. - and calling the question of an assassination "crazy" - is a full and unambiguous concession of the points made in my previous posts.
|
|
| | | 22 | bibA
ID: 4057177
Fri, Mar 02, 2012, 15:15
|
If he says 100% assassinated, I'm sure he can back it up with compelling evidence. Give him some credit.
|
|
| | |
| | | 24 | Tree
ID: 58236811
Thu, Mar 08, 2012, 12:42
|
"We have the videos. This election he is going to be vetted."
100% for sure assassinated.
for sure.
Breitbart's "bombshell" video falls flat
and the video was actually aired by PBS - PBS! - four years ago!
But PBS, which aired the footage as part of a 2008 election special, noted "there's nothing new about the clip or Obama's role in the controversy at Harvard Law School."
Fox News contributor Juan Williams said on the show that he was disappointed by Breitbart's promised bombshell.
"I must say, I thought this was going to be so much more," said Williams. "I thought this was going to be a smoking gun... But it really didn't come to much."
|
|
| | | 25 | Seattle Zen
ID: 10732616
Thu, Mar 08, 2012, 12:52
|
Re: 24
Well, he had not edited it yet...
|
|
| | | 26 | Tree
ID: 1025812
Thu, Mar 08, 2012, 13:16
|
:oD
|
|
| | | 27 | Perm Dude
ID: 3210201915
Thu, Mar 08, 2012, 13:28
|
Heh. This is the Al Capone's vault for Bretbart.
|
|
| | | 28 | Razor
ID: 551031157
Thu, Mar 08, 2012, 13:45
|
Juan Williams' quote is embarrassing. Why does a journalist hope for any political outcome?
|
|
| | | 29 | Action Figure
ID: 1250812
Thu, Mar 08, 2012, 13:51
|
Geraldo found more than this.
|
|
| | | 30 | sarge33rd
ID: 4717718
Thu, Mar 08, 2012, 13:57
|
Juan Williams, journalist? I thought he was a FOX contributor? Doesnt that factoid, lay rest to his ability to claim being a journalist?
|
|
| | | 31 | Boldwin
ID: 49030519
Thu, Mar 08, 2012, 22:58
|
Razor
You missed that entire Journo-O-List affair?
|
|
| | | 32 | Tree
ID: 17039238
Fri, Mar 09, 2012, 02:36
|
wonder why the above poster didn't comment on the Breitbart video, instead choosing to focus on something totally unrelated.
"We have the videos. This election he is going to be vetted."
100% for sure assassinated.
|
|
| | | 33 | nerveclinic
ID: 4711362616
Fri, Mar 09, 2012, 10:37
|
Ha Ha I saw the video, I heard his webmaster speak on CNN about ohhhhh not really the kind of stuff someone gets whacked for.
|
|
| | | 34 | Tree
ID: 1123999
Fri, Mar 09, 2012, 10:42
|
then again, Conservatives have been trying to whack PBS for years, maybe in part to them airing this "bombshell" video a few years ago. :oD
|
|
| | | 35 | bibA
ID: 4057177
Fri, Mar 09, 2012, 10:51
|
Come on now you guys. He wouldn't say that he was 100% sure unless he absolutely believed it to be true. And, to be that sure, he obviously has some evidence to back it up. He will give us that info shortly.....I'm 100% sure.
|
|
|
|