|
| Posted by: biliruben
- [21841115] Sat, Jun 14, 2014, 10:16
I hypothesize that Obama's policy's, on average, are at least, or more conservative that many previous republican presidents.
To start us off, Nixon on Health Care:
BROAD AND BALANCED PROTECTION FOR ALL AMERICANS
Upon adoption of appropriate Federal and State legislation, the Comprehensive Health Insurance Plan would offer to every American the same broad and balanced health protection through one of three major programs:
--Employee Health Insurance, covering most Americans and offered at their place of employment, with the cost to be shared by the employer and employee on a basis which would prevent excessive burdens on either;
--Assisted Health Insurance, covering low-income persons, and persons who would be ineligible for the other two programs, with Federal and State government paying those costs beyond the means of the individual who is insured; and,
--An improved Medicare Plan, covering those 65 and over and offered through a Medicare system that is modified to include additional, needed benefits. One of these three plans would be available to every American, but for everyone, participation in the program would be voluntary.
The benefits offered by the three plans would be identical for all Americans, regardless of age or income. Benefits would be provided for: --hospital care; --physicians' care in and out of the hospital; --prescription and life-saving drugs; --laboratory tests and X-rays; --medical devices; --ambulance services; and, --other ancillary health care.
There would be no exclusions of coverage based on the nature of the illness. For example, a person with heart disease would qualify for benefits as would a person with kidney disease.
Sound Familiar? Nixon Speech |
| | | 1 | Perm Dude
ID: 294531914 Sat, Jun 14, 2014, 10:23
|
His use of the military is virtually identical to his predecessor's.
|
|
| | | 2 | biliruben
ID: 21841115 Sat, Jun 14, 2014, 11:55
|
The environmental record vs. Reagan. Though Reagan's record was mixed at best, compared to Obama, he's a friggin' tree hugger.
REP America joins every citizen in bidding a sad farewell to President Ronald Reagan. His wilderness protection achievements are an enduring legacy for the American people. President Reagan signed into law 38 bills that added more than 10.6 million acres of spectacular forests, mountains, deserts, and wetlands to the National Wilderness Preservation System.”
Obama?
President Obama’s record remains largely unwritten. He has declared two historic sites, totaling less than 15,000 acres, as national monuments. The one wilderness bill he signed — establishing 2.1 million acres of wilderness in nine states, including Virginia, Michigan and Oregon — came from a bipartisan deal struck by the Bush administration. Wapo Grist
|
|
| | | 11 | Seattle Zen Leader
ID: 055343019 Sat, Jun 14, 2014, 17:11
|
President Obama removes (don't call it deportation!) non US citizens at alarming rates, 2 million so far.
Obama, the remover and returner in Chief
|
|
| | |
| | | 14 | Boldwin
ID: 3524145 Sat, Jun 14, 2014, 22:52
|
How Obama cooks the books regarding deportation stats. According to the uber-liberal L.A.Timesthe portrait of a steadily increasing number of deportations rests on statistics that conceal almost as much as they disclose. A closer examination shows that immigrants living illegally in most of the continental U.S. are less likely to be deported today than before Obama came to office, according to immigration data.
Expulsions of people who are settled and working in the United States have fallen steadily since his first year in office, and are down more than 40% since 2009.
On the other side of the ledger, the number of people deported at or near the border has gone up — primarily as a result of changing who gets counted in the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency's deportation statistics.
The vast majority of those border crossers would not have been treated as formal deportations under most previous administrations.
|
|
| | | 15 | biliruben
ID: 81382416 Sun, Jun 15, 2014, 12:27
|
Ronald Reagan on Immigration:
"I believe in the idea of amnesty for those who have put down roots and lived here, even though sometime back they may have entered illegally."
He granted citizenship to nearly 3 million "illegals".
|
|
| | | 20 | Pancho Villa
ID: 2131916 Sun, Jun 15, 2014, 16:25
|
Besides, when Reagan was arming both the Iranians and the Iraqis during their war, you were virtually giddy at the thought of Muslims killing Muslims.
|
|
| | | 24 | Frick
ID: 29235107 Wed, Jun 18, 2014, 07:57
|
So, are you saing that Reagan didn't actually sign the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 or that it didn't provide a method for illegals to gain citizenship?
What I don't think you can wrap your head around is that the bill was a compromise where both sides got some of what they wanted.
|
|
| | | 25 | biliruben
ID: 81382416 Wed, Jun 18, 2014, 11:02
|
Are you saying he was misquoted? That's right from the horses mouth, and fairly unambiguous.
|
|
| | | 26 | Boldwin
ID: 395291810 Wed, Jun 18, 2014, 11:55
|
*sigh*...cause this will just get deleted...
There are a pair of famous compromises that have solidified Tea Party AKA Reagan Revolution intransigence with Democrats.
You wonder why we'd rather just shut government down than compromise with you?
[First remember: Reagan's fundamental principle: Government isn't the solution, government is the problem.]
Compromise #1)We'll give the Dems amnesty if they will promise to secure the borders and enforce the immigration laws from that point forward. Yes Reagan made the deal [that not coincidentally we keep getting offered]
Dems have FOREVER lost any credibility to offer that deal. We know you won't let us secure the border more than we know the sun will come up tomorrow.
Don't even ask. Amnesty is out. It's off the table.
You miiiiiight restore your position as honorable partners in government if you ACTUALLY put up the border with sensors and continuous effective fences and following the letter of the immigration law and supporting the border agents instead of putting them in jail whenever they actually do their job...
...but we all know...all of us...you and I and everyone knows you aren't ever gonna give us this.
Compromise #2) Read my lips, no new taxes.
Bush was offered the deal that the ratio of defense spending to domestic spending would be fixed for the longterm if Bush would agree to a tax increase.
Bush gave up the Republican Party's lead hallmark issue, plank #1...
...and the Dems gave us a kick in the pants.
I don't know why a republican would ever vote for a Dem spending bill ever again after that fiasco. Screw them. That way lies madness. No more spending increases.
Don't tell me we gave in on our fundamental principles before, might as well spread them for you again.
|
|
| | | 28 | bibA
ID: 204511510 Sun, Jun 22, 2014, 10:21
|
Let's address our individual bottom lines and examine our lives now compared with the first eight years of this century under Bush II.
A/ Is your personal life negatively affected by Obama's presidency?
B/ Positively affected?
C/ Or are things continuing with very little or even no noticeable change.
Personally I live exactly the same. And I know of no one who has experienced a difference either positively or negatively. Taxed about the same. No one around here being enslaved or allowed to die by death panels. About the same percentage of young people joining the armed services.
The only differences are non-related to whomever currently occupies the White House.
I assume there will always be those who predict doom no matter who leads the government. Or those who tell us how horrible things are now. But are any of us actually being affected?
|
|
| | | 31 | Perm Dude
ID: 431013412 Sun, Jun 22, 2014, 16:01
|
Reminds me of people who read just scary things, then complain because they feel scared all the time. And, of course, the blame for that feeling is placed on Obama.
|
|
|
|