Forum: slam
Page 539
Subject: Lg 4 Season 13?


  Posted by: MattG - [37722615] Tue, Feb 19, 2002, 02:17

How'd everyone do to start the season, I played Carnegie who was AXP113's old team and won. Hopefully this is the start of good things to come.
 
1VIDevilRays
      Leader
      ID: 22046168
      Tue, Feb 19, 2002, 08:26
Got blown out by a team ranked in the 100's last year-wtf? Back to the drawing board!!
 
2Raz
      ID: 35949280
      Tue, Feb 19, 2002, 08:42
Just see above. It could just as easily apply to my team. We looked nothing like we did in the preseason.
 
3J
      Leader
      ID: 34451212
      Tue, Feb 19, 2002, 10:29
My San Jose Losers are riding a 10 game winning streak now!!!! Of course, 6 of those wins were against DTT teams. Then, Twarpy, Polack and MattG in exhibition. Who knows how good the team I just beat is, but they're probably the best of the 10. Looking forward to this season and the next batch of recruits!!!
 
4MattG
      ID: 37722615
      Tue, Feb 19, 2002, 13:29
Hey my team is Solid, as long as my starters log 38 minutes a game :-P Good luck J maybe I'll see you in the NTT.

Carnegia ended last year at 41. yeeehawww
 
5G Dogg
      ID: 539522315
      Tue, Feb 19, 2002, 16:01
I beat Dearborn by 10, which is a team that finished 17-7 and ranked in the mid-30's last season. However, it could have been much worse as they killed me on the glass. I am extremely pleased with the rapid development of my So. PG, Buford Henson, who is looking like he might be my best PG ever.
 
6The Beezer
      Leader
      ID: 191202817
      Tue, Feb 19, 2002, 17:21
Beat Dallas by 12, which isn't all that impressive since they weren't very good last year. Another very winnable game against Chattanooga before the big matchup Friday with a fellow Elite 8 team from last year, Jackson. We should have a good idea on where we stand after game 3.
 
7blue hen, almighty
      Leader
      ID: 34937217
      Tue, Feb 19, 2002, 18:30
The Terre Haute Slutools are again on pace to make the NTT after crushing G's Doggs in preseason. Of course, if we're a 2 seed again, we'll find a way to blow it.
 
8MattG
      ID: 37722615
      Tue, Feb 19, 2002, 18:31
I don't think Jackson is as good as they were last year, they got killed in their first game 67-44 by Brunswick, who was 14-10 last year and ranked around 79th. The only seemed to return 2 starters who were even decent last year. I don't know if they will be that big of a test for you beezer.
 
9G Dogg
      ID: 539522315
      Tue, Feb 19, 2002, 18:44
Crushing? You got lucky. You beat me by 5 and I had a very key component to the machine at NA.
 
10VIDevilRays
      ID: 431392011
      Wed, Feb 20, 2002, 11:39
I have got to get my better attributed guys on the floor. To do that it looks like I will have to move my 6-8 second-team all conference SF to PF, move my +3 6-7 PF to the bench and move a +5 back-up PF to starting SF.

Is that too radical or am I on the right track? Any input would be appreciated!
 
11G Dogg
      ID: 539522315
      Wed, Feb 20, 2002, 12:52
VID, I may be in the minority on this one (I usually am). But, I try to get my best starting lineup on the floor and then worry about my bench. Think about it, your starters are in for the vast majority of the game, so there is no reason to reinforce a bench that isn't in the game for more than 10-15 minutes or so. To be more precise, my philosophy is to improve my bench through recruiting, not by putting players that should be starting on it. Good luck, and for what it's worth, I think you are on the right track.
 
12VIDevilRays
      ID: 11582012
      Wed, Feb 20, 2002, 12:58
Thanks gdogg. One of these days I will figure this game out!!
 
13Raz
      ID: 35949280
      Thu, Feb 21, 2002, 02:37
Well, our guys gritted out a tough 3-point win tonight, this despite the fact that my PG (with EXC hands) committed 8 turnovers. Hopefully that was just an aberration, because I sure can't be having that happen every game.
 
14MattG
      ID: 37722615
      Thu, Feb 21, 2002, 13:27
Durham Maniacs off to a 2-0 start, after beating the Orlando Godfathers 51-32. My defense has clamped down on my last two opponents, holding them to a total of 76 points... MY point guard had 10 Assists... Next up Vicksburg.
 
15VIDevilRays
      ID: 59162114
      Thu, Feb 21, 2002, 14:06
Yep. Defense leads the way. Beat last year's 25 (or so) ranked Bowling Green 56-46. Held them to 17/53 shooting. Turnovers are a problem but hopefully my freshman pg will calm down.

Providence looks dominant! Grats bmd!
 
16beastiemiked
      ID: 14821921
      Thu, Feb 21, 2002, 23:04
I haven't recruited yet and will prolly recruit at least 2 other guys out of conference 2. Any players I should stay away from?
 
17Twarpy
      Leader
      ID: 3144915
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 00:27
Anyone from Conf 11 is tough to get, hell for the past 3 years I haven't even won a tie in my own conf.
 
18G Dogg
      ID: 539522315
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 12:07
Yes, but then again Twarp, when exactly have you won a tie...ever?
 
19Toral
      Sustainer
      ID: 2111201313
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 12:10
Rats. I need a 4th max. Who are the dumbo conferences?

Toral
 
20beastiemiked
      ID: 17414316
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 12:19
The conferences I'll prolly be poaching from are 23, 28, 13, and 27. So if you have maxes in these conferences warn me asap.
 
21Toral
      Sustainer
      ID: 2111201313
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 12:22
I am looking at 10. Any gurupies there?

Toral
 
22G Dogg
      ID: 539522315
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 12:55
I'll be looking at 25, 4, 11, 2 and all of those in the 30's.
 
23beastiemiked
      ID: 17414316
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 12:56
Stay away from 2.
 
24beastiemiked
      ID: 17414316
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 12:58
I'm looking at conf 8, I think I'm going to max 4 guys from that conference.
 
25VIDevilRays
      ID: 52112213
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 13:01
My maxes are most likely out of 17, 10 and 11.
 
26Toral
      Sustainer
      ID: 2111201313
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 13:02
GDogg except 31, right? Or at least anybody whose second letter of their last name is "o" there?

Toral
 
27G Dogg
      ID: 539522315
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 13:03
I'll probably max this nice looking SG out of Providence.
 
28RecycledSpinalFluid
      ID: 42121814
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 13:04
Heading into my first season playing this game, how successful are you guys at recruiting out of conference?
 
29beastiemiked
      ID: 17414316
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 13:04
Gdogg, I know you're aren't that stupid. Went for my hometown EEPEF 6-2 guard(hate the hands but love the D), and another in conf 6-6 guy, and 2 big men from conf 27 both should be contested. If I get any 1 of these guys I'll be happy.
 
30Toral
      Sustainer
      ID: 2111201313
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 13:08
RSF Not at all with max-out types, though your needs and what you haive in conf may force your hand.. Odds very much against you. But lots of success with the lesser types. "Better than walk-on" types,especially, people you can put 28 on and be better and more position-specific than a walk-on. Also have picked some some 9-a-week types out-of-conf who have turned out to be very good.

Toral
 
31G Dogg
      ID: 539522315
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 13:09
Hey, those are the same ratings as the SG I'm after...Seriously, though, Billy-boy looks great. I have never even looked in Conf 2 since I started this game, why start now? I think I am going to max Henson (my hometown) and Mort Priddy out of Tampa. What do you think of Priddy as a PG?
 
32beastiemiked
      ID: 17414316
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 13:09
I personally recruit 90% in conf 10 % out of conference. IMO, it's tough to win OOC ties. Only times I go for OOC guys is when my in conf talent isn't what I want. This year in lg 4 I needed height and my conf had little to offer so I recruited 2 in conf guards and 2 OOC big men with all my safety players being big men as well.
 
33beastiemiked
      ID: 17414316
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 13:14
If Priddy stats stay that way he looks good. I'd be very interested to see how he turns out as well as the PG that is playing out that high school team turns out(from the ratings the PG look like he would be a better SG). Both those guys you mentioned would probably only have 1 or 2 other coaches on them so they are good gambles.
 
34VIDevilRays
      ID: 391142213
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 13:14
I can tell you guys that there's a couple of pretty good PGs in conf 17-not from Branson-that don't fit my "needs". I'm sure someone in conference will max them though.
 
35G Dogg
      ID: 539522315
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 13:21
Yeah, I was hoping to get Priddy and possibly Henson uncontested by week 3 and then spend my max(es) on safeties...
 
36Raz
      ID: 35949280
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 13:35
I'll be staying in my own conference (#6) and possibly going after a guy in conf 25.
 
37MattG
      ID: 37722615
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 15:18
Im in conf 10 and I got 3 maxs in there, my other max is out of Conf 17. So I don't think you'll want to go after anyone in Conf 10. Just a forwarning... I'll tell you who I'm going after.
Conf 10 Funk
Conf 10 Goff
Conf 10 Lyvers
Conf 17 Dodson

Those are my maxed guys right now. Everyone else just get a spread of points to avoid Walk-ons.
 
38Toral
      Sustainer
      ID: 2111201313
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 15:21
No Goff, eh? I'll have to look for someone else...

Toral
 
39Flying Polack
      ID: 191482721
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 15:37
BMD-

Which 2 guys from Conf. 27 are you maxing? I'm in 27 and I've maxed 4 guys in-conference. I suspect one of the guys you maxed might even be from my hometown. Just thought I'd let you know.
 
40MattG
      ID: 37722615
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 15:38
If you really want to go after someone in Conf 10, you only have me, Jackson and Clearwater to compete with, it seems everyone else has no idea whats going on. but here are some guys i've notice putting up good stats and haveing OK attributes

The best I saw besides the guys I was going after were:
Quaacks FGFGF 6-9 23 pts and 6.8 Boards 2 Asst.
Overton GFGFF 6-7 19 pts and 3 Boards
Caldwell GGGFF 6-6 16 pts 2 boards
Moleman FFFGF 6-5 17pts 5 boards
Larkin FFFPG 6-5 19 pts 4 boards

Thats all I really saw that looked decent, I'm not going after Quaacks, I haven't seen if anyone else was either. but that 23 pts and 6.8 looks nice. Otherwise, goodluck.
 
41G Dogg
      ID: 539522315
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 15:43
Anyone know if EH is still playing?
 
42G Dogg
      ID: 539522315
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 16:16
Well, once again, I've aimed pretty low. 2 maxes in 8, one in 4, and one in some other conference (last name Nichols, but I can't remember the conference nor do I want to go look for him). If the ratings of my maxes all stay the same, I'll bring in a whopping +5 class.
 
43Twarpy
      Leader
      ID: 3144915
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 16:28
Vid conf 11:)? GRrr!
 
44blue hen, almighty
      Leader
      ID: 34937217
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 16:44
My maxes are in 10, 19, 22, 30.

The guy in 10 is not one of Matt's three.

I went after a point guard, two shooting guards and a big man.

Only one guy is over 6'5.

I also have points on about 8 other guys from conf 19 and a couple other guys.



 
45J
      Leader
      ID: 34451212
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 18:12
All 4 of my maxes are within my conference (29). Starting out I've got at least 1 RPE (or a scholarship) on 23 guys, 14 of which are in-conference guys.

Now, lets see if I can bring our Losers' winning streak to 12 tonight!!!!!!
 
46G Dogg
      ID: 539522315
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 18:17
I have a guy out with an injury. I could be looking at loss #1 this evening.
 
47Flying Polack
      ID: 191482721
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 18:32
I maxed 4 within my conference (27). I also gave 15 guys 1's and offered 8 other scholarships. I'm recruiting a total of 27 guys. During the next 2 weeks I'll probably just max my 4 guys, which will give me an extra 30 RPE to use once the W-3 and W-12 are announced. 20 of the 27 guys are from conference 27.

Is anyone using a similiar strategy?
 
48VIDevilRays
      Leader
      ID: 29439176
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 19:59
Lol Twarpy. There seemed to be quite a few of what I needed there so I'm hoping people went shopping elsewhere.

Funny bluehen-my conference 10 guy was not one of MattG's either. Also seems to fit into your other criteria. Uh-oh!!:)
 
49Raz
      ID: 35949280
      Fri, Feb 22, 2002, 23:34
My team is frustrating me to no end. After being up 44-38 at halftime, we score a grand total of 17 points in the second half and end up losing by 23. It was like a whole different team stepped out onto the court after the break. And my current PG may have EXC hands, but I am quickly realizing that something in him is not cut out to be a PG (another 5 TO's tonight). What is it - his fair intelligence?
 
50Twarpy
      Leader
      ID: 3144915
      Sat, Feb 23, 2002, 01:43
Raz are you playing your players too much, sounds like maybe they are getting fatigued.
 
51Raz
      ID: 35949280
      Sat, Feb 23, 2002, 02:46
Twarpy - Nah, I think this was just an abnormality (at least I hope so!). All of my players except one are on sub normal, and the starters get about 30 minutes/game (and for this particular game, no starter even logged 30 minutes). And the breakdown of my first 3 games of the season is:

Game 1: Down by 17 at half; lost by 10.
Game 2: Tied at half; won by 3.
Game 3: Up by 6 at half; lost by 23.

So I don't see a pattern of poor second half performances (and as a matter of fact, I got the general feeling last season that we were better in the second half). So I think this game was just a pathetic performance.

I have decided one thing for sure, though - my next game we will have a different starting PG.
 
52Raz
      ID: 35949280
      Sat, Feb 23, 2002, 02:51
P.S. Why couldn't my PG have sucked it up in the preseason, too, instead of letting me think that he might actually be capable of handling the job? This game sometimes confuses me, but it sure still is addicting.
 
53VIDevilRays
      Leader
      ID: 29439176
      Sat, Feb 23, 2002, 07:04
Woohoo! 3 of my 4 recruits are on the top 75 list! Billings (17), Messer (11), Walser (10).

:)
 
54Raz
      ID: 35949280
      Sat, Feb 23, 2002, 13:05
I was pleasantly surprised to see that only 1 of my recruits was on the top list (in fact, he was the only conf 6 recruit on the list at all) - Ty Goben at spot 18.
 
55G Dogg
      ID: 13631420
      Sat, Feb 23, 2002, 13:36
None of my recruits are on the list. I hope I am just smart or I might be getting some crappy players...
 
56MattG
      ID: 37722615
      Sat, Feb 23, 2002, 17:04
Durham moves on to 3-0 squeaks by Vicksburg 59-57. Up next is Jackson who is 2-1 and beat Beezer's Squad 71-65... This should be my first True test, Orlando is now 2-1 and I face 3-0 Ocala after Jackson but we'll see what happens. As for highest Recruited, I am going after Funk who is #16 and Lyvers who is #72 MY Conf 17 guy isnt in there although like 6 other guys from that conf are and the only other conf 10 guy is Walser who is a 6-5 +6 but i was looking more for height...
 
57beastiemiked
      ID: 14821921
      Sat, Feb 23, 2002, 17:59
Ugh, wish I would've known that sooner FP. Maxed Waters and Lester from 27, I suspect you maxed both as well judging by there positions on the top 75 list. There's a good chance I'll drop one of these 2 once W-3's come out, probably Lester as he is not 34th best high schooler. My 2 in conf maxes are not on the list and hoping one of them is free so I don't have to drop Waters or Lester.

If I get my hometown recruit(6-2) I'm not sure where to play him, check out his stats, 24.5 PPG 2.8 RPG 1.0 APG 2.2 SPG 4.3 TPG(scouted EEPEF). That has to be the lowest APG for a high school PG.
 
58Raider_Guy
      ID: 57158230
      Sun, Feb 24, 2002, 04:19
Aaaaw man, another Jeff Walters recruiter...
 
59Flying Polack
      ID: 191482721
      Sun, Feb 24, 2002, 11:56
BMD you are right I'm maxing both Waters (2nd)and Lester (30th), along with Casey Berman (62nd). I was disappointed to see 3 of my 4 maxes on the top 75 list, but all of them are in-conference so I hopefully have a decent chance on each. My other max is Francois Ochsner. Hopefully I'll be the only person maxing him.

BMD, I also don't think that Lester is the 30th best high-schooler. I'm only maxing him because he's a home-town guy and he fits a need on my team.

For anyone whose played for more than one season. When you max a recruit who isn't on the Top 75 list, with how many teams have you been tied on that recruit? Is there a good chance I'm alone on Ochsner?
 
60beastiemiked
      ID: 14821921
      Sun, Feb 24, 2002, 13:31
It depends FP. I'd say there's anywhere between 0-3 other coaches maxing him, probably 1 or 2. Personally the key to recruiting for me is to find that max that no one else is maxing so when W-3's come out you can max a safety, you'd be surprised at some of the guys that are not maxed.
 
61VIDevilRays
      ID: 22113258
      Mon, Feb 25, 2002, 08:13
Billings is more highly recruited than Ransdale. Yea right! I would drop him in a heartbeat if he wasn't in-conference.
 
62KM
      ID: 321302517
      Mon, Feb 25, 2002, 17:37
I'm after 2 In conference guys. One hometowner, Roehrig, that J
is trying to steal. And an obvious guy who is on the list at #30
something F+ E+ E+ E+ F+ and tall. The other two are ooc, not
because my conf lacked talent this year, but because the guys I
wanted were hometowners of some very active coaches. Other
two maxed are Luke Olsen of conf 23, who is really high on the
list to my dismay. The other isn't on the list, Hakim Garren, from
the wasteland that is conf 4.
 
63The Beezer
      Leader
      ID: 191202817
      Mon, Feb 25, 2002, 19:41
Only recruit for Paducah in the top 75 is Chad Garnett of Waterloo. Stayed in-conference since last year I was able to get clear on 3 good IC guys, and hoping for a repeat. Started out 1-2, UGH! Hopefully we're still good enough to win the conference and get back to the NTT.
 
64Raz
      ID: 35949280
      Tue, Feb 26, 2002, 00:05
Well, I got over .500 for the first time tonight. Little did I expect this would be done with my League 5 team who went 1-23 last year and who won their first game of the season tonight by a convincing 16 points. My League 4 team continues it's struggles, losing its conference opener by 11 points to a previously winless team. However, I think I am finally finding a combination of players that can work well together. It's too bad it's taken me this long into the season to make any headway.
 
65J
      Leader
      ID: 34451212
      Tue, Feb 26, 2002, 00:59
Wednesday will be a big day in conference 29. The San Jose Losers (3-1; 1-0 in conference) host the Portland Schlomoes (2-2; 1-0) as Burger King All-American Quintin Roehrig (PG, Portland High) will be making his official visit to San Jose. Quintin has accepted an invitation to participate with the team during warmups and will have a court side seat to the game at the best venue in the nation. "I'm excited to get out of this sh!thole of a city, I hate Portland. I wish they never recruited me, but I've gotta do whats best for me. Even if that means staying here in this hell hole for college. This game, this experience will go a long way in my decision on where to take the next step towards a career in the SimBA."
 
66KM
      ID: 51110264
      Tue, Feb 26, 2002, 04:18
The Portland Schlomoes are excited to play the San Jose Losers. Roehrig may not like it here, but we're offering him a package he can't pass up (can you say alumni "donations"). Portland has only lost one hometown recruit it was maxing before, and we don't expect to have any repeat traitors. Stud Freshman Kareem Wilkinson will be giving Roehrig a tour of campus before the game.
 
67VIDevilRays
      ID: 17138268
      Tue, Feb 26, 2002, 08:38
Has anyone noticed the effect playing a lot of minutes has on your starters over the course of a season-vis a vis over the course of a game?

Should you rest or sub out your starters more to keep them fresh during a season or does playing them a lot have no effect over the course of a season?
 
68MattG
      ID: 37722615
      Tue, Feb 26, 2002, 13:19
Dropped a game to Jefferson City, not to happy about that, puts me at 3-1. Stewart Funk is now at like #8 on the top 75, good thing he's in conference. other than that i hope i can pick it up next game against Ocala...

 
69G Dogg
      ID: 539522315
      Tue, Feb 26, 2002, 16:38
There are many differing opinions on the subject, vid. But, after seeing the effects that logging big minutes has had on my players (many condition 9's), I have determined that it does indeed have a profound effect on players. As a result, I took a page out of JKaye and Chris' book of SSB coaching, as well as numerous other SSB coaches, a few seasons back and have all my starters on sub more. I usually keep my backups on sub normal, but in a few cases have had to put them on sub more as well. My starters now usually play very well in the second half of both games and of the season.
 
70VIDevilRays
      Leader
      ID: 29439176
      Tue, Feb 26, 2002, 18:12
Thanks again G Dogg. Last year I started 8-1 and promptly lost four in a row, due in part to injury. Trying to nip that one in the bud this year. Makes sense.
 
71beastiemiked
      ID: 14821921
      Thu, Feb 28, 2002, 02:21
I love this game but if I win a NTT championship I think I'm going to retire because it's next to impossible.
 
72G Dogg
      ID: 539522315
      Thu, Feb 28, 2002, 13:59
I'm going to retire in July, regardless of an NTT championship or not.
 
73beastiemiked
      ID: 17414316
      Thu, Feb 28, 2002, 14:02
Yeah because you're going to be living on Bourbon street. I don't blame you.
 
74G Dogg
      ID: 539522315
      Thu, Feb 28, 2002, 15:18
Yeah, I think it will be a little too difficult to try to recruit in that type of environment.
 
75J
      Leader
      ID: 34451212
      Thu, Feb 28, 2002, 16:27
thats not fair, I wanna live on Bourbon Street.
 
76VIDevilRays
      Leader
      ID: 211392615
      Mon, Mar 04, 2002, 09:52
Where is everybody? I've gotten off to my usual good start, just waiting for the roof to cave in:).

Stopped maxing Messer. Can't wait to see the W/3 and W/12 later this week.
 
77Raz
      ID: 35949280
      Mon, Mar 04, 2002, 15:37
I've gotten off to what could be termed now (in my second season) as my usual bad start. 1-5 is definitely not what I was hoping for, especially not the clean sweep by division foes. Although I suppose I should have realized that I would need more than one season to get this team off the ground. There's a lot I'm still learning.
 
78blue hen, almighty
      Leader
      ID: 34937217
      Mon, Mar 04, 2002, 16:32
The Roosters are 2-4 but not worried. We start a VERY young team and will surely be great in years to come.
 
79Matt G
      ID: 49238416
      Mon, Mar 04, 2002, 16:44
Started off 4-2 much better than last years 0-5 start I'm currently 69th in the power rankings and my two loses were to great teams. Jackson who is like 12 PR and Ocala who is 58th, my pg had a bad game that one which is why I lost. My next test comes in week nine against clemson who is also 4-2. Currenlty Conf 10 has 5 teams with 4+ wins. So going through my conf schedule will be tough, so far im 1-2... Good luck all. Hopefully I get an NTT bid this year. If not I'll look to run the PTT again.
 
80Matt G
      ID: 49238416
      Mon, Mar 04, 2002, 16:49
Forgot one thing, Jose Demling my 6-9 Sr Center is having a great year. 9 pts 8 Boards 2 Ast 2 Stls and 3 blks a game.
 
81G Dogg
      ID: 539522315
      Mon, Mar 04, 2002, 18:55
My team sucks. I am extremely disappointed at the moment.
 
82MattG
      ID: 37722615
      Mon, Mar 04, 2002, 23:34
5-2 after beating KM Schnmoloes. I wasn't impressed with the win, we are going to have to play better than that if we want to beat Jackson and Clearwater, Both 6-1 and in the top 30 or so... Im now 51 PR and my conf is the top conf in the league. And who said we dont pay attention and you were recruiting from my conf... not a good idea considering. How'd everyone else do?
 
83J
      Leader
      ID: 34451212
      Mon, Mar 04, 2002, 23:37
My team is just on an absolute tear. I'm sure they're playing above their heads, everyone, even my bench, is shooting 44% or better. Freshman Clifford Seaman is averaging 25pts a night as my PG. So, he's more of an Allen Iverson than a Jason Kidd, but its working. Due to this success, San Jose is considering backing off of Roehrig and going after another big man, since we're losing both our centers, and my 6'6" SF.

Off to a 6-1 start, won 15 of the last 16 games now. Scored 85 points or more in our last 4 games. Big matchup with the #11 team, Scottsdale next Monday!!!
 
84VIDevilRays
      Leader
      ID: 211392615
      Tue, Mar 05, 2002, 08:25
Again, my psychotic team won by 30. Beat a team ranked in the 200s by 6, beat a team ranked around 100 by 30. RPI now 30-something. Still, I remember last year where I got to a rank of 9 before the bottom fell out so I'm not sure what to think of these guys yet. Holding my breath.

Play Minneapolis and Columbus in the next week so I will get some read I hope.
 
85KM
      ID: 1239516
      Tue, Mar 05, 2002, 16:42
Not doing so well, oh and Matt, you should be sort of impressed with your win. You kept a 57% shooter in HS to 8-20, and my center shot 60% in HS, and he went 5-14, if you hadn't keep those two under 50% it would have been my victory.
 
86MattG
      ID: 37722615
      Wed, Mar 06, 2002, 23:44
Ok I have to gloat. I just spanked St Petersburg 79-42. I shot 30/60 from the field and 17/24 FT but thats not as impressive as my 9 steals and only 3 TO's all game. Not to mention 5 blocks.... I move to 6-2 PR 44 I face Clemson next they are 5-3 84 PR. MY team is moving right along... Here I come NTT, just have to get by Jackson(7-1 6PR) and Clearwater(7-1 24PR)
 
87beastiemiked
      ID: 14821921
      Thu, Mar 07, 2002, 00:41
Well I was up 2 with 5 seconds left and we fouled a guy and he made the shot and FT so we lost by 1. It was a tough loss.
 
88VIDevilRays
      Leader
      ID: 211392615
      Thu, Mar 07, 2002, 08:35
Lost to an in-conference team 72-65. Seems that they shot really well so we'll see what happens against the cream of the conference in the next week.
 
89Buchster
      ID: 313732
      Thu, Mar 07, 2002, 11:34
I hate my team. We play the good teams tough(and lose)and get blown out by the horrible teams. Lost 52-51 to Ft. Myers last night to bring our overall record to 2-6. Hopefully I can pull in some decent recruits and be somewhat competetive next season.
 
90G Dogg
      ID: 539522315
      Thu, Mar 07, 2002, 12:58
I was down by 20 early to a crappy Charleston team and came back to win by 3 in OT. What the hell is wrong with my squad? Geez, and to think I get to get spanked by Tampa and Macon next week. I love my conference, I really do...
 
91Raz
      ID: 35949280
      Thu, Mar 07, 2002, 13:12
Won my first conference game of the season last night. My team roared out to a 16 point lead in the first half, and barely hung on in the second to win the game by a single point.