Gaming and Entertainment

View the Forum Registry

XML Get RSS Feed for this thread


Self-edit this thread


0 Subject: Survivor season 13

Posted by: katietx
- [157591212] Wed, Aug 23, 2006, 19:35

Will a split "racist" season save Survivor?

Risky business, but a very diverse group.
Only the 50 most recent replies are currently shown. Click on this text to display hidden posts as well.
47Boxman
      ID: 91021215
      Fri, Nov 24, 2006, 17:18
If there's a Survival All-Stars 2, Johnathan will be on it. He's playing this game pretty well.

Yul's tribe won't betray him. Provided that Yul is sincere about taking John to the final two, it will be Yul that betrays the other members of their group, not Johnathan. Can't fault a scorpion for being a scorpion.

Johnathan could very well win this thing depending on how upset others get when Yul starts betraying people.
48beastiemiked
      ID: 36428317
      Fri, Nov 24, 2006, 18:04
If Yul has any clue he'll know he's a shoe in to win vs anybody.
49tastethewaste
      ID: 189412715
      Fri, Nov 24, 2006, 19:26
Jonathan set himself up pretty nicely for final 3. Assuming Sundra Ozzy Becky and Yul can trust jonathan to final 5. I think Yul will see Ozzy is too big a threat to carry any further and without an immunity win ozzy will be gone as becky and yul will carry jonathan along for his swing vote. Get rid of sundra next at 4. Then at 3 yul can take jonathan and a guaranteed win or becky and probably win. But if Becky wins immunity jonathan goes to final 2 and may just win if he can bs his way through the jury that he was a game player while becky just latched on to yul and cut his throat.
50C1-NRB
      ID: 24954318
      Mon, Nov 27, 2006, 15:21
If it comes down to Becky-Yul-Jonathon and Becky gets the immunity she would go heart-over-head and keep Yul in the finals.

The best thing you can do in Survivor is align as the "nice guy" who secretly aligns with the "bad guy" and covertly protects him to the end. No one wants the "bad guy" to win it all, even if the "good guy" stuck it to you.
51tastethewaste
      ID: 189412715
      Mon, Nov 27, 2006, 18:21
well becky may do that. I do not think it would be smart at all to take Yul to the finals. Unless Yul starts playing cut throat with Ozzy and Sundra she will lose 10-0 to the jury. She would have a good chance against Jonathan seeing that Jonathan has or will have to backstab everyone voted out. Hard to say what a person will do, i.e. Colby taking Tina, Ian bowing out for respect, Rafe allowing danny out of her promise to the finals. So I should say if becky is smart and wins final immunity she will take Jonathan. If she isnt, she will finish with 100,000.
52Weykool
      Leader
      ID: 41750315
      Tue, Nov 28, 2006, 12:19
Speaking of a 10 member jury.
Will the 11th vote be a phone in ala American Idol?
53ChicagoTRS
      ID: 4110481415
      Thu, Nov 30, 2006, 13:20
I love the flip betrayal vote especially when the alliance that thinks they have the numbers is filled with a bunch of morons. The shock cracks me up...

Johnathon is playing about as well as he can...he has little to no chance if he makes the final two but if he does not flip flop like he has he would have been voted off much sooner...everyone he has entered into an alliance with has done it with the intention of taking him out when they got the opportunity. Once you get down to low numbers in the game you really gain the power from being the swing vote.

I like this show a lot better when there are players like Johnathon who are playing the game and not letting morals enter into the game...play cutthroat...it is just a game...it is not life.
54Weykool
      Leader
      ID: 41750315
      Thu, Nov 30, 2006, 16:25
I agree TRS.
I call the final vote episode the:
"No fair you lied to me and voted my azz off before I could lie to you and vote your azz off" episode.
It's SURVIVOR people.
You cant take your 5 "alliance" teammates to the final 2.
You will need to lie to at least 1 and probably all 3 of them.
You have to lie and expect to be lied to.
Quit trying to bring your "real life" morals into a game.
You can still be the most moral person and be a liar on survivor.
55ChicagoTRS
      ID: 4110481415
      Thu, Nov 30, 2006, 17:28
For the final two that would be my exact strategy going into it if I was Johnathon...now is the time to be honest..."yep I lied to you...yep I backstabbed you...I was playing the game...I was outwitting...outplaying...outlasting" You hope people can understand that it is all part of the game...but in the end people carry too much of a grudge and had their feelings hurt...boohoo...I would much more respect someone who was honest and still not trying to BS me all the way to the end...both final players certainly had to do their share of lying...it amazes me that people are willing to vote for the person that is still blowing smoke up their ass...
56 NJ
      ID: 16114110
      Fri, Dec 01, 2006, 01:41
Did Nate let the cat out of the bag?

I saw Nate on a program were his older brother is the host. Nate was pluggin the final episode and talking how he made peace with Johnathan, but really gave it to him when he got the chance so people should watch the final episode.

Leads me to beleive Johnathan is one of the final two.
57ChicagoTRS
      ID: 4110481415
      Wed, Dec 06, 2006, 11:32
It would seem a smart move for any of the other players to carry Johnathan along with them to the final two. Everyone hates him because he is playing the game...yet they all had intentions of back stabbing him eventually...just got mad when he beat them to the punch.
58Bond, James Bond
      ID: 2510593017
      Thu, Dec 07, 2006, 21:49
West Coast Viewers....please note: SPOILER AHEAD!!!!!!!!!!!









OH MY GAWD!!!!!!!!!!!!! What are these wannabees thinking????? Voting off Johnathan now??? I understand the whole get-rid-of-the-most-irritating-player-on-the-island scheme and whatnot but certainly if you want to be a position where you could tip the scales in your favor in order to garner 1 million dollars, wouldn't you keep the most hated man IN the game so that it would guarantee your victory???

Unbelievable! Naturally, the Wizard and Yul will both think that Adam can be tossed pretty easily next week but I think they blew a great opportunity to do it now. It wouldn't surprise me a bit to see tables turn once again and this time for the dominant Wizard to bite the dust now. What would it have hurt to keep Jonathan around??? I'm just amazed and how "uncerebral" some of these people are.

By the way, FWIW, any respect I had for Yul and the Wizard totally disappeared the moment they came up with the scheme to hide food from Adam and Parvatti. That's just wrong!
59Boxman
      ID: 211139621
      Fri, Dec 08, 2006, 08:35
OH MY GAWD!!!!!!!!!!!!! What are these wannabees thinking????? Voting off Johnathan now??? I understand the whole get-rid-of-the-most-irritating-player-on-the-island scheme and whatnot but certainly if you want to be a position where you could tip the scales in your favor in order to garner 1 million dollars, wouldn't you keep the most hated man IN the game so that it would guarantee your victory???

The show just got a whole lot less interesting. With Johnathan, Yul had someone who would be loyal going forward. It seems that in every season of Survivor the dominant tribe makes a mistake and it turns the tables of the game. It just happened for this season.
60Weykool
      Leader
      ID: 41750315
      Fri, Dec 08, 2006, 09:29
I agree.
Jonathan was the 1,000,000 lotto ticket and you vote his azz off?
Not very smart.
Even if the plan was to vote him off....you could have done it next week.
Vote Adam off now...then see about Jonathan.
Yul not thinking.
He will be voted off the second the compass becomes worthless.

How is it wrong to hide the food that you collected?
While you are out working to get the food Adam is resting up for challenges and then helping to eat it to keep himself strong.
61ChicagoTRS
      ID: 4110481415
      Fri, Dec 08, 2006, 11:12
It is just another example of how terribly people play this game. The one thing I really hate about this show is people do not play the game...so many people want to be lovey dovey...be nice...don't hurt others feelings...it is a flippin game...go out and win it. Every year it seems that they have maybe 2-3 people who play the game cutthroat and then a buch of people out for an experience and to make friends. Bleh...give me a cast full of players.
62JeffG
      ID: 146591911
      Fri, Dec 08, 2006, 11:24
I would love just one season of Survivor where you have all people who understand it is a game, and no one can be trusted. Then you would not have to worry about these artificial 'twists and turns' that they are always hyping. Too many final tribal councils become the jury pontificating to the finalists about integrity, and I am always amazed how they do not get the fact it is a game.

If someone bluffs in poker, isn't it similar.
63Balrog
      Dude
      ID: 02856618
      Fri, Dec 08, 2006, 12:04
See the December 11 issue of TV Guide for a major spoiler on the final 2. Supposedly the players don't know about it at this point, but it makes some sense to get rid of Johnathan now. Regardless it makes great sense for Yul. He pleases Adam, Candice, and Parvati by getting rid of Johnny boy, which will help him when they are on the jury. If things go Yul's way, Adam and Parvati will be gone soon anyway, so why not throw them a bone and possibly earn their votes?
64Boxman
      ID: 211139621
      Fri, Dec 08, 2006, 12:18
Too many final tribal councils become the jury pontificating to the finalists about integrity, and I am always amazed how they do not get the fact it is a game.

Especially when given the opportunity and numbers, those jury members would have done the same exact thing had they thought of it first.

The jury blatherings to me just stink of hypocrisy; as if these people have never lied to anyone before.
65C1-NRB
      ID: 17348117
      Sun, Dec 10, 2006, 00:44
Taped it and just watched it tonight.
I see Balrog's point about Yul pleasing Parvati, Candice, and Adam. I couldn't read Yul's vote, so I assume it was Jonathon. I'm surprised he got cut. Maybe he was just too cocky.

What I don't understand is why no one ever plays a "throw-away" vote. When the vote will be unanimous, why not write down "Parvati" since she's next to go anyway or "Yul" since he won't be going, either? Then you could tell Jonathon that you didn't vote him off.

Yul is slick. He always knows the right thing to say to anyone in any situation.
66Bond, James Bond
      ID: 41133140
      Fri, Dec 15, 2006, 01:30
Not surprised by Parvati's dismissal but just to see how much Ozzy is dominating the games is insane. Obviously, Sundra and Becky have no business winning this year....which may be exactly why one of them will! :)

Certainly, for them to have even a sniff of a million dollars, it would have been best for them to have teamed up with Parvati and wiped out the men but you can't blame them for sticking with what got them this far in the game.

Meanwhile, Adam's toast and he knows it. I suspect he goes in the next tribal council. If I'm not mistaken, then with Yul in the Final Four, his immunity idol will no longer be valid. Is that correct? I think the girls will then team up and vote out whichever man doesn't win that challenge. That'd probably be Yul.

Having said all this it looks to me that Ozzy will be in the final three with Becky and Sundra. If so, I can't see anybody NOT given Ozzy his due----the Survivor championship! Thoughts?
67beastiemiked
      ID: 1110451019
      Fri, Dec 15, 2006, 02:05
Becky and Sundra only chance to win is if one of them gets lucky in the final immunity and picks the other to go with them or if they get smart and team up with Adam next vote.
68Balrog
      Dude
      ID: 02856618
      Fri, Dec 15, 2006, 09:45
I'm guessing Sundra's gone next. The final immunity challenge is always a balance/endurance thing. As we saw last night, Adam can't stand on a stationary board for 10 seconds so why not take him that far. Ozzy will in all likelihood win immunity again. If so, Sundra's gone. If not, Ozzy.
69Weykool
      Leader
      ID: 41750315
      Fri, Dec 15, 2006, 09:57
I think the Immunity that Yul has is good through the final 4.
When they are down to 3 then it becomes invalid.
I gotta think that that Ozzy is the favorite.
I just dont see him losing a challenge.
70ChicagoTRS
      ID: 4110481415
      Fri, Dec 15, 2006, 10:11
The one problem Ozzy could face is if they have an immunity challenge where you are shooting the other persons target or making a choice to cut another persons rope trivia challenge type thing...one of the challenges where they can team up against someone. I think if they get an opportunity to vote him out they will take the opportunity.

That being said I think he probably is the most dominant of any player I have seen in challenges.
71Skidazl
      ID: 189142212
      Fri, Dec 15, 2006, 21:40
I agree, I don't see ozzy losing any challenges except the type chicago mentions, but as soon as he does, he is toast....

72beastiemiked
      ID: 1110451019
      Fri, Dec 15, 2006, 22:48

That being said I think he probably is the most dominant of any player I have seen in challenges.


I'd love to see an all stars season with him, Tom, and the air force guy from last season.
73Species
      Leader
      ID: 07724916
      Fri, Dec 15, 2006, 22:55
Terry.

Tom and Terry had superior 'mental' game than Ozzy....although perhaps Ozzy's "loner" and flying under the radar in a strategical (vs. physical) sense is masking his true game.

I'd have to imagine Yul/Becky/Sundra getting rid of Ozzy the first chance they get.....IF they get the chance!
74Balrog
      Dude
      ID: 02856618
      Sun, Dec 17, 2006, 10:26
OK folks, last day. Let's pick our winners.

I say Ozzy takes it all.
75J
      Leader
      ID: 049346417
      Sun, Dec 17, 2006, 11:16
I would really like to see Ozzy win it all, but I don't think it'll happen. I think godfather Yul wins.
76GoatLocker
      Sustainer
      ID: 060151121
      Sun, Dec 17, 2006, 11:23
Yul, but don't be surprised if one of the Girls doesn't sneak off with it as we've seen before.

Of course, none of us will see the start of it, since we'll still be watching my Chargers beat KC.

Cliff
77J
      Leader
      ID: 049346417
      Sun, Dec 17, 2006, 11:35
it does seem a little odd that Survivor is going up against a big NFL game. It seems like they usually avoid that for their Sunday finale's.

Gotta love tivo :)
78Weykool
      Leader
      ID: 41750315
      Sun, Dec 17, 2006, 11:47
has anyone heard anything about the jury having 10 votes?
Seems like there needs to be some sort of a tiebreaker.
Unless the plan is to have 3 in the final 3 with 9 voting.
79J
      Leader
      ID: 049346417
      Sun, Dec 17, 2006, 11:58
something is definitely different, right now there's 5 people still alive. Usually in the final episode, there's 4 I think. I have a feeling the final vote is gonna be amongst 3 people.
80katietx
      ID: 3810431417
      Sun, Dec 17, 2006, 12:30
Promo's state that there will be 3 voted off tonight.
81Weykool
      Leader
      ID: 41750315
      Sun, Dec 17, 2006, 13:54
But there needs to be a twist with 10 on the jury.
82GoatLocker
      Sustainer
      ID: 060151121
      Sun, Dec 17, 2006, 13:59
Two with the most votes will go to get it to three and then they'll take it to two.

Just a thought, but works.

Ya never know with them trying to change it up.

Cliff
83GoatLocker
      Sustainer
      ID: 060151121
      Sun, Dec 17, 2006, 18:05
Only 9 on the Jury.

Because the big twist is three finalists.
Not the 2 we've always seen.

Wow.

"Big money! It's the season finale, and you know what that means: someone's going home $1 million richer (OK, maybe $500,000 richer after taxes). Tonight, the three (yes, that's new) finalists are grilled by the jury members and then host Jeff Probst will announce the winner. With nine jury members, there's a possibility of a three-way tie
Who'll it be? The online betting site, bodog.com, shows Ozzy and Becky leading the pack. But Yul's been puppetmastering the game from the beginning. However it ends up, check back here the day after the finale for an interview with the winner! -- Geoff Bennett"

Cliff

84threespleens
      Leader
      ID: 00795541
      Sun, Dec 17, 2006, 18:56
go ozzie
hopefully he can win every challenge and be the most dominating survivor in history
85Boxman
      ID: 211139621
      Sun, Dec 17, 2006, 20:40
Did I miss the car giveaway episode or did they not have it yet?
86ChicagoTRS
      ID: 249542719
      Sun, Dec 17, 2006, 21:41
ugggh that fire making challenge was pathetic...

becky should not get a vote in the jury...should have just eliminated both when they could not make it with the flint...we only want to see Yul vs Ozzy anyway...
87C1-NRB
      ID: 17348117
      Sun, Dec 17, 2006, 23:19
When will contestants learn that physical dominance doesn't win Survivor?

It's "Outwit Outplay Outlast" not "Outmuscle"

threespleens- The most dominating Survivor in history was Colby from season 2: Australia. He never lost an individual reward or an individual immunity. His mistake was staying loyal to Tina rather than taking Keith (a lesser heel from that season) to the finals.

Boxman- As i'm sure you've seen by now, the car was via internet vote. And the "Car Curse" lives on.
88Bond, James Bond
      ID: 41133140
      Mon, Dec 18, 2006, 00:09
Congrats to Yul on his Survivor victory. I suppose the one thing that didn't come out in the reunion show which I thought that should have was the way Yul used the hidden Idol to keep him from getting any votes along the way thereby creating the false impression that his "smarts" got him as far as it did.

Let's face it: If Yul didn't have the Idol, there's no way he wouldn't have been voted out in say 6th or 7th place. His smarts didn't win the game---his deception of using the Idol to prevent anybody from actually making him use it by writing his name down and putting him in the majority of votes---that was the ballgame folks. Those people were idiots for NOT making him use it when was first apparent to all that he had it. Why let him keep it in order to protect himself later? That was just foolish IMHO.

Other than that, I still can't believe that Ozzy didn't win. Was his overpowering physical dominance such a detriment? Who did he backstab? Who did he deceive? Who did he flat out lie to? Yes, Yul was somewhat honest in his portrayal that he did deceive and did try to sway the jury with his comments. But Ozzy did none of the sort with any of the jury members. Yet Yul was still rewarded with the victory. Unbelievable!

As far as Becky was concerned----Thank God she didn't even garner one vote. What a useless ploy it was to have a three person finale instead of two. In hindsight, we can now see that if, like previous years, there was an immunity challenge for the final two, Ozzy probably would have won and then selected Becky to face him in the final. Wonder who would've won then?

In summary, in spite of my obvious slant toward who I thought deserved to win, I sincerely enjoyed this edition of Survivor! I hope one day it'll come out on DVD. I can only hope that Survivor: Fiji is close to this entertaining.
89JeffG
      Leader
      ID: 01584348
      Mon, Dec 18, 2006, 00:13
Survivor 14 will take place in Fiji. Teasers from tonights final episode include: 2 immunity idols hidden on exile island; 19 contestants; tribal split has one living in 'luxury' and one in very stark conditions; also promised another diverse group of contestants. They also had a tease that one contestants controversial sacrifice in season 14 is guaranteed to have America talking.

There was a military coup in Fiji while the show was in production.
90Weykool
      Leader
      ID: 41750315
      Mon, Dec 18, 2006, 02:45
I think that this was by far one of the best survivors ever.
The best part was that there want all the crying and bitching about getting backstabed that have ruined the other final jury pontifications.
I was pulling for Ozzy but also happy that Yul won.
I dont think that if Becky won it would have been all that bad either.
Lets face it she did what she had to do with what she had to work with.
She wasnt capable of dominating in the physical challeneges. (None of the so-called men were either.....other than Ozzy)
She was as much a part of the strategies that Yul employed as Yul was.
She outplayed and outsmarted 17 other survivors.
91Balrog
      Dude
      ID: 02856618
      Mon, Dec 18, 2006, 11:10
Yul deserved the win, but I can't believe Ozzy didn't even mention the idol during the final tribal council. I figured he would have pointed out, as James Bond said, that Yul only won because he had the idol and that would have swayed the vote to Ozzy. But Yul did use that idol optimally to get votes, so...
92Species
      Leader
      ID: 07724916
      Mon, Dec 18, 2006, 11:43
I think the best player won. Yul's skill of 'playing' the idol to his advantage was masterstroke.

The best part of the final tribal was the way Candice tried to pigeonhole Yul into a "Yes or no" answer.....and he still couldn't help himself trying to spin his answer! Just say Yes because A - it was honest; and B - it's what she wanted to hear!
93Skidazl
      ID: 189142212
      Wed, Dec 20, 2006, 12:15
First of all, was it just me or did Ozzy look like he gained quite a bit of weight bet/ the final tribal council and the reunion show?

Secondly, I agree 100% with Bond, Ozzy should have won. There is no way that Yul and Becky would have even been there had it not been for Ozzy. Remember that when they were 4 against 8, Ozzy's dominance in those immunity challenges made it possible for them to stay 4.

Also, if Yul did not have the idol, he would have been gone a while ago as Bond stated...

Becky was definitely a waste and I was very happy with her not getting a single vote. The 1.5 hours + to make a fire even with matches was a joke and proved that she didn't do much more than ride Yul's coattails...
94ChicagoTRS
      ID: 4110481415
      Wed, Dec 20, 2006, 17:36
You kind of wonder whether they had always planned the three person final or if once they saw either guy was going to take Becky to the final vote and it would likely be unanimous for either Yul or Ozzy vs Becky...that they decided lets bring all 3 of them. I guess I can't fault them because that is definitely the final I wanted to see Yul vs Ozzy.

I have to give Yul credit...he did very well answering the jury questions...I guess I expected that since he is a lawyer. I would put him near the top as far as historical jury performance.
95Skidazl
      ID: 189142212
      Wed, Dec 20, 2006, 23:08
Interesting thought, Chicago, but they mentioned it was the FINAL immunity challenge before it was decided on becky or sundra...
96Weykool
      Leader
      ID: 41750315
      Thu, Dec 21, 2006, 08:44
I think that was the plan when they announced Brad as the first jury member.
Since there were still 11 players left in the game, a final 2 would have made a 10 member jury.
Gaming and Entertainment

View the Forum Registry

XML Get RSS Feed for this thread


Self-edit this thread




Post a reply to this message: (But first, how about checking out this sponsor?)

Name:
Email:
Message:
Click here to create and insert a link
Ignore line feeds? no (typical)   yes (for HTML table input)


Viewing statistics for this thread
Period# Views# Users
Last hour22
Last 24 hours22
Last 7 days66
Last 30 days77
Since Mar 1, 20071367673