| 0 |
Subject: Tonight's 11/17 "The Sky Is Falling" Action
Posted by: Blooki
- [119492312] Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 19:34
Not too much of TSN fantasy significance in the actual games scheduled for tonight.
The more interesting storyline will be what will happen TSND-wise with Nate Robinson, Wilson Chandler, Spencer Hawes and Dwyane Wade. I anticipate a lot of Chicken Little's dominating the price movement tonight much to the consternation of the remaining managers. |
| 1 | deejay
Sustainer
ID: 501182710
Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 19:39
|
keeping them all...
|
| 2 | RecycledSpinalFluid
Dude
ID: 204401122
Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 19:50
|
Selling them all...then buying them back. Three times. Wait...I don't play TSN...nm.
|
| 3 | allhair allstars
Sustainer
ID: 50902421
Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 19:58
|
Blooki,
You anticipate Hawes being sold right before his 5 in 7 because of one off night? Did something happen that I missed out on? Last I heard Moore was going to miss his last two, suggesting the possibility for more minutes for Hawes...
|
| 4 | qwert
Donor
ID: 2910242819
Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 19:58
|
holding too
|
| 5 | dpr
ID: 13443116
Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 20:00
|
who is going to make money tonight? I want to move robinson on my money team but I dont see any places to go. Already ahve mason brew and cj miles and need a guard. Rose looks to have most potential to make money but that is a pretty short hold. maybe ill jsut go invalid...
|
| 6 | allhair allstars
Sustainer
ID: 50902421
Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 20:00
|
Ah... I get what you're saying... I had to think back and remember the whole Chicken Little thing... LOL
|
| 7 | G
Donor
ID: 5810561615
Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 20:40
|
dpr,
I agree. While there may be a little RV to be gained all the options are...well...there aren't any. I beleive the winners will be the holders to use those trades later. Invalid is prob the safest bet.
|
| 8 | dpr
ID: 13443116
Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 20:49
|
i decided on rose. i think he can make good money in the short term and I am not that trade strapped so I hope it doesnt hurt me. Didnt want to go invalid because would still like to win the division if possible. I have the top FV guy my league tho so he likely knows what he is doing and will be hard to beat without an allout points effort
|
| 9 | I Support Bill Ayers
ID: 291043125
Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 21:48
|
Where's McGrady tonight?
|
| 10 | Guru
ID: 330592710
Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 22:18
|
McGrady left Monday's game in the third quarter with a right knee injury, according
to the Associated Press.
|
| 11 | reebbertxx
ID: 010581721
Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 23:11
|
Price movers seem weird this year. Daniels gets 22 sells and loses 70k while Chandler gets 18 sells and loses 80k. Assuming that their ownership info is right I don't see how those changes make sense.
|
| 12 | CJ
Leader
ID: 499271021
Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 23:12
|
I agree and to add I do not understand all of the daniels sells...short fuse because if you can ride the schedule for another few days you have as many games as any team for 2 weeks. I am holding
|
| 13 | reebbertxx
ID: 010581721
Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 23:18
|
CJ, the Daniels losses were expected for his 1in5. I fully expect him to start gaining again soon, maybe as soon as tomorrow.
|
| 14 | dpr
ID: 13443116
Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 23:22
|
11
on the boards wen the same issue was brought up a few weeks ago it was explained as there was a delay before the ownership data was collected slightly after the official price movers data so wasnt 100% accurate. you can read tsn reasoning in the issues thread at the top
|
| 15 | CJ
Leader
ID: 499271021
Mon, Nov 17, 2008, 23:42
|
13 Thanks You have confirmed I have a messed up schedule. I think I got it from Kafenatid.net and noticed these "x2" in some of the cells. I am not a top player so I will survive....Any word on T-Mac missing time?
|
| 16 | Blooki
ID: 119492312
Tue, Nov 18, 2008, 00:21
|
re: 11
Also, the price formula might not be directly proportional to the net change in ownership. I can imagine a situation where Marquis gets sold by x managers and bought by x-22 managers possibly leading to a price loss of greater than 70K mitigated by a less muted price gain for the buys.
I could be entirely wrong about this thinking, but just offering an alternative explanation.
|
| 17 | CJ
Leader
ID: 499271021
Tue, Nov 18, 2008, 00:28
|
Or even though sells are more by one player over another one....but each player has a different amount of holders out there????
Spurs--------Who need Parker and Gino they got Timmy "D"!
|
| Rate this thread: | If you wish, you may rate this thread on scale of 1-5. Ratings should indicate how valuable or interesting you believe this thread would be to other users of this forum. A '5' means that this thread is a 'must read'. A '1' means that this is a complete waste of time. If you have previously rated this thread, rating it again will delete your previous rating. If you do not want to rate this thread, but want to see how others have rated it, then click the button without entering a rating, or else click here. |
|
|
|
Post a reply to this message: (But first, how about checking out this sponsor?)
|