0 |
Subject: Frye and Thompson- Holds or Folds?
Posted by: Dave R
- SuperDude [3010361110] Wed, Dec 09, 2009, 07:33
There are several attractive, mid priced or lower options emerging today. What are Frye and Thompson owners doing as they enter a slight schedule blip? |
1 | deejay Sustainer
ID: 501182710 Wed, Dec 09, 2009, 07:58
|
holding Frye dont have Thompson
|
2 | Headless T Gunners
ID: 181117294 Wed, Dec 09, 2009, 08:14
|
Kept Frye in 2... needed to move him on 3rd team Anthony/Frye -> Gasol/Ariza
|
3 | Jeddi
ID: 561026116 Wed, Dec 09, 2009, 09:03
|
I think you've answered your own question Dave. Don't punish yourself by hoping for JThomp to do well, ditch the geek!
|
4 | Senator Urine
ID: 348262116 Wed, Dec 09, 2009, 15:18
|
Holding Frye.
|
5 | Farn @ work
ID: 251136911 Wed, Dec 09, 2009, 15:29
|
holding Frye
|
6 | twolves
ID: 161542014 Wed, Dec 09, 2009, 15:57
|
Holding Thompson on teams that have him for now. May need to evaluate game to game but like schedule starting next week and use trade later in the holiday season.
|
7 | reebbertxx Dude
ID: 561124720 Wed, Dec 09, 2009, 16:18
|
Holding Frye. Moving Thompson to Gasol tonight.
|
8 | Senator Urine
ID: 348262116 Wed, Dec 09, 2009, 16:33
|
The thing with Frye is that people always need a cheapie. In two days his schedule is excellent again, and all throughout the week there are some great options on the more expensive side so people will need to have a cheapie in another slot to facilitate them.
12/9 Decent hit, but a bit muted due to the many players being sold and high volume of trading 12/10 Probably a follow up hit 50%-75% of tonight's hit 12/11 Hold steady (or even gain) 12/12 Hold steady (unless he really sucks) 12/13 Small hit (no cheapies to buy, many expensive players to take) 12/14 Hold steady, maybe even a small gain 12/15 A top gainer, and sustained gains for the next couple weeks
|
9 | G
ID: 20291015 Wed, Dec 09, 2009, 16:58
|
While both will get sold by some both seem like holds options. Of course arguements and $ situations exist to support sells but those that hold have decent players and save a trade as x-mas approaches.
|
10 | Senator Urine
ID: 348262116 Wed, Dec 09, 2009, 17:02
|
The "gap" in Frye's schedule doesn't seem long enough to allow a true sell-off to occur. If his schedule on the other side of it were rocky it would be a different story, but you know in at most six days people are going to be buying into him (and at a high volume).
|
11 | G
ID: 20291015 Wed, Dec 09, 2009, 17:43
|
No plans for Frye at this time. For both players I wouldnt expect a mass return as lock any time soon. F an C spots are loaded for most people and there are plenty of mid range F and C's coming into play this week that will make things even tighter at those spots. A cheap guard later this week would be quite valuable.
|
12 | G
ID: 441412322 Wed, Dec 09, 2009, 18:34
|
Since it is cheapies we are looking at and I think most would like to hold until Jan 1 to conserve trades, I ran the sartibles from 12/11 (the best day to buy Frye if one was going to) thru 12/29.
Top cheapies under $4 mil (since both Thompson and Frye) 1. Ariza 2. Landry 3. Brooks 4. Thompson 5. Varejao 6. Jennings 7. L Williams (out) 8. Hibbert 9. Hughes 10. Curry 11. Frye
|
13 | illmatic
ID: 53118918 Wed, Dec 09, 2009, 19:08
|
well a couple things ...
1. All of those players except jennings and frye plays on the 29th, if you take the dates from 12/11 - 12/28 it would look a lil different.
2. Frye is also cheaper then all of those people except for Hibbert.
I would agree at this point I don't know if I would buy into Frye anymore > but I dont see a need to spend a trade to move him to any of those options above.
|
14 | G
ID: 441412322 Wed, Dec 09, 2009, 19:40
|
illmatic,
In post 9 I mentioned that holding both had merit. I was just looking at buy back potential and posted that info above in 11/12. Also, Frye is owned by 42% (5th highest) so unless there was a mass sell-off he probably wont be bought back in large volumes. That doesn't mean he would be a sell but I agree with you that he may not be a big buy anymore.
|
| Rate this thread: | If you wish, you may rate this thread on scale of 1-5. Ratings should indicate how valuable or interesting you believe this thread would be to other users of this forum. A '5' means that this thread is a 'must read'. A '1' means that this is a complete waste of time. If you have previously rated this thread, rating it again will delete your previous rating. If you do not want to rate this thread, but want to see how others have rated it, then click the button without entering a rating, or else click here. |
|
|
Post a reply to this message: (But first, how about checking out this sponsor?)
|