| 0 |
Subject: DeJuan Blair
Posted by: Dave R
- SuperDude [3010361110] Wed, Dec 30, 2009, 07:31
I've emailed TSN, according to Yahoo (and ESPN ), Blair has 6 starts @ C, and should be F/C now.
link
Or am I missing something? |
| 1 | deejay
Sustainer
ID: 501182710
Wed, Dec 30, 2009, 08:52
|
I also emailed TSN, yesterday, no reply yet.
|
| 2 | deejay
Sustainer
ID: 501182710
Wed, Dec 30, 2009, 16:46
|
Blair is now FC
|
| 3 | RecycledSpinalFluid
Dude
ID: 204401122
Sun, Jan 03, 2010, 16:10
|
This got me thinking the other day...yes, it does happen...how hard is it really to keep track of players that meet the "games started" criteria?
So, I made a routine to read all player pages and record the number of games they have started at each position. This is then recorded in a simple database.
Thanks to Dr. Doom's guidance, I figured out my query to show me any player that has newly met the "5 Start" threshold.
This stuff might already be out there somewhere, but I don't know where it is. So, hopefully over the next week, I'll get a webpage setup so the DB can be queried and to get some basic data out.
Currently, the database doesn't take into account positions already eligible for. So, like last night, Ty Lawson made his 5th start at GUARD, which makes no impact since he is already Guard eliglble. But, it also shows that Juwan Howard made his 5th start at CENTER for PDX, thus now being eliglble at that position.
|
| 4 | RecycledSpinalFluid
Dude
ID: 204401122
Tue, Jan 05, 2010, 19:07
|
Nothing spectacular...shows "newly eligible" then a table of all players and start counts.
http://rsf.hopto.org/starts.asp
|
| 5 | G
ID: 441412322
Wed, Jan 06, 2010, 16:14
|
sweet
|
| 6 | RecycledSpinalFluid
Dude
ID: 204401122
Wed, Jan 06, 2010, 16:52
|
Just thumbing through the numbers...most interesting "on the cusp" guy is Monta Ellis with 4 Forward starts.
|
| 7 | deejay
Sustainer
ID: 501182710
Wed, Jan 06, 2010, 17:03
|
Nice thingy.
Thanks rsf.
|
| Rate this thread: | If you wish, you may rate this thread on scale of 1-5. Ratings should indicate how valuable or interesting you believe this thread would be to other users of this forum. A '5' means that this thread is a 'must read'. A '1' means that this is a complete waste of time. If you have previously rated this thread, rating it again will delete your previous rating. If you do not want to rate this thread, but want to see how others have rated it, then click the button without entering a rating, or else click here. |
|
|
|
Post a reply to this message:
|
|