0 |
Subject: Is your Primary Today? If so, who's your vote for
Posted by: walk
- Dude [32928238] Tue, Feb 05, 2008, 10:18
I did the NYC hurry-up thing and voted on my way back from the gym. Polls open at 6am here (cool), and I exercised and voted before the freakin sun came up. The place was great. Election workers, 90% of ethnic diverse backgrounds (i.e. not white) were really smiling and psyched to be there. So friendly, so courteous and made you feel sorta totally geeky-proud to be American and to be voting. When I was there, about 6:15am, there must've been 50 workers in the high school and only about 5 voters.
Then, I dropped my two kids off at elementary school, PS290. As they go to a public school, the school is doing double-duty, like where I voted (a different school) for voting and schooling. Supporters out by the school, election workers, and kids, kids, kids.
Couple that with really loud chanting now for the Giants from the Wall street area as the parade is about to commence. I will head on out soon.
Vote: Obama
Your experiences and vote? |
1 | Mattinglyinthehall
ID: 454491514 Tue, Feb 05, 2008, 10:20
|
Not a member of either major party so I don't get a vote today.
|
2 | walk Dude
ID: 32928238 Tue, Feb 05, 2008, 10:24
|
Aaaaaah, same with my wife, MITH. She sweated this out, and while she's totally a liberal, never registered with the Dem party, finally, finally, finally, after so much deliberating decided recently on Obama over Hillary, and ... forgot she is an indie and as you said, cannot vote. She tried to get it changed, but missed the deadline. Bummer for her. Sounds like you are what/where you wanna be though.
Go Giants & Obama.
|
3 | Pancho Villa
ID: 47161721 Tue, Feb 05, 2008, 10:47
|
As a registered independent, I can't vote in the Utah primary.
Romney should easily win all Utah's GOP delegates(winner take all state).
Hillary and Obama is looking tight. Obama was to make an appearance Saturday, but cancelled so as not to compete with the funeral for LDS president Gordon Hinckley. His wife Michelle made an appearance yesterday. Chelsea Clinton stumped for her mom here last week, so neither Dem candidate made an appearance.
|
4 | Boxman
ID: 337352111 Tue, Feb 05, 2008, 11:03
|
I voted for McCain early about two weeks ago. The early voting station had a line which I thought was very encouraging for turnout considering it was in the middle of a work day.
|
5 | Richard Dude
ID: 204252420 Tue, Feb 05, 2008, 11:06
|
Obama for me out in California. Even though I lean strongly towards Libertarian views, I've been a registered Democrat since 1969 (the Republican administration back then was trying hard to send me to Vietnam.)
|
6 | Seattle Zen
ID: 49112418 Tue, Feb 05, 2008, 12:49
|
I've got a caucus on Saturday and I'm going for Obama. I will throw my hat into the ring hoping to be a delegate.
|
7 | walk Dude
ID: 32928238 Tue, Feb 05, 2008, 13:35
|
Good luck there, SZ, on the delegate thing.
|
8 | biliruben
ID: 5610442715 Tue, Feb 05, 2008, 13:58
|
Yeah GL, Zen.
But only if you make it to the convention, strip off all your clothes and paint "KUCINICH FOR PREZ!" on your ass, and streak onto the stage in the middle of a Hillary speech. ;)
|
9 | Seattle Zen
ID: 49112418 Tue, Mar 18, 2008, 12:21
|
Great news for Washington voters, big snub to the Democratic and Republican parties.
The Supreme Court has upheld the state of Washington's open primary election system. By a 7-2 vote, the court says the state may use a primary system that allows the top two vote-getters to advance to the general election, even if they are from the same party. Washington never held a primary under the new system because of legal challenges. Writing for the majority, Justice Clarence Thomas said that overturning Washington's plan would have been an "extraordinary and precipitous nullification of the will of the people."
The top-two plan was created after state voters approved a law in 2004 allowing them to pick their favorite candidate for each office. The top two vote-getters would advance to the November general election, even if they are from the same party. The major parties challenged the law in federal court, asserting a First Amendment right to select their own nominees without outside interference. Interestingly, this is one of the few cases where Thomas & Scalia do not agree.
|
10 | Perm Dude
ID: 33239189 Tue, Mar 18, 2008, 12:27
|
That *is* interesting. My understanding was that primaries are elections within parties, allowing party members to choose their candidates. But this ruling makes it more of a pre-general election. I'm not sure I agree with it, but I'd want to read more.
|
If you believe a recent post violates the policy on Civility and Respect, you may report the abuse via email to moderators@rotoguru1.com |
|
|
Post a reply to this message: (But first, how about checking out this sponsor?)
|
|